Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interaction of Era with the 30S Ribosomal Subunit
Advertisements

Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Engineering a Protein Scaffold from a PHD Finger
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Myosin VI Undergoes Cargo-Mediated Dimerization
Joseph D. Mancias, Jonathan Goldberg  Molecular Cell 
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
James J Chou, Honglin Li, Guy S Salvesen, Junying Yuan, Gerhard Wagner 
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (September 2001)
Structure and Site-Specific Recognition of Histone H3 by the PHD Finger of Human Autoimmune Regulator  Suvobrata Chakravarty, Lei Zeng, Ming-Ming Zhou 
Binding Dynamics of Isolated Nucleoporin Repeat Regions to Importin-β
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Solution Structure of the RAIDD CARD and Model for CARD/CARD Interaction in Caspase-2 and Caspase-9 Recruitment  James J Chou, Hiroshi Matsuo, Hanjun.
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 143, Issue 2, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Methylated Histone H3K36 by the Eaf3 Subunit of Histone Deacetylase Complex Rpd3S  Chao Xu, Gaofeng Cui, Maria.
Structure and Regulation of the CDK5-p25nck5a Complex
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Crystal Structure of SRP19 in Complex with the S Domain of SRP RNA and Its Implication for the Assembly of the Signal Recognition Particle  Chris Oubridge,
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Protein–Protein Communication: Structural Model of the Repression Complex Formed by CytR and the Global Regulator CRP  Birgitte H Kallipolitis, Mads Nørregaard-Madsen,
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
The Structure of the GGA1-GAT Domain Reveals the Molecular Basis for ARF Binding and Membrane Association of GGAs  Brett M. Collins, Peter J. Watson,
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 731-740 (June 2006) Structure of the Tfb1/p53 Complex: Insights into the Interaction between the p62/Tfb1 Subunit of TFIIH and the Activation Domain of p53  Paola Di Lello, Lisa M. Miller Jenkins, Tamara N. Jones, Bao D. Nguyen, Toshiaki Hara, Hiroshi Yamaguchi, Jimmy D. Dikeakos, Ettore Appella, Pascale Legault, James G. Omichinski  Molecular Cell  Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 731-740 (June 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.007 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 In Vitro Binding Studies of Tfb1 and p62 with the TAD of p53 (A) Tfb1 and p62 bind the TAD of p53, but not to the TAD1 subdomain. (Upper panel) GST-Tfb11–115 (1 μM) was coupled to GSH-Sepharose and incubated with 1.0 μM, 0.5 μM, and 0.1 μM of p531–73 (lanes 5–7) or with 1.0 μM, 0.5 μM, and 0.1 μM of p531–40 (lanes 8–10). (Lower panel) GST-p621–127 (1 μM) was coupled to GSH-Sepharose and incubated with 1.0 μM, 0.5 μM, and 0.1 μM p531–73 (lanes 5–7) or 1.0 μM, 0.5 μM, and 0.1 μM of p531–40 (lanes 8–10). In both experiments, neither 1 μM p531–73 (lane 3) nor 1 μM p531–40 (lane 4) was retained by GST (1 μM) coupled to GSH-Sepharose. Purified p531–73 (lane 1) and p531–40 (lane 2) were loaded as controls. The p53 peptides were detected with anti-p53 antibody. Coomassie staining verified equivalent inputs of GST and GST fusion proteins. (B) Tfb1 and p62 bind to the TAD2 subdomain of p53. (Upper panel) GST-Tfb11–115 (1 μM) was coupled to GSH-Sepharose and incubated with 1.0 μM, 0.5 μM, and 0.1 μM of p531–73 (lanes 5–7) and 1.0 μM, 0.5 μM, and 0.1 μM of p5320–73 (lanes 8–10). In this assay, neither 1 μM of p531–73 (lane 3) nor 1 μM p5320–73 was retained by 1 μM GST coupled to GSH-Sepharose. 0.5% of 1 μM p531–73 (lane 1) and 1 μM p5320–73 (lane 2) were loaded as controls, and the p53 peptides were detected with anti-p53 antibody. (Lower panel) p5320–73 at 1.0 μM, 0.5 μM, and 0.1 μM was incubated with 1 μM GST-p621–127 (lanes 3–5) or 1 μM GST-Tfb11–115 (lanes 6–8) coupled to GSH-Sepharose. In this assay, 0.5% of p5320–73 input was loaded (lane 1) as a control, and 1 μM of p5320–73 was not retained by 1 μM GST (lane 2) bound to GSH-Sepharose. Coomassie staining verified equivalent inputs of GST and GST fusion proteins. Molecular Cell 2006 22, 731-740DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The p53 TAD2 Binds to Similar Regions of the Tfb1 and p62 PH Domains (A) Ribbon model of the free p621–108 structure (Gervais et al., 2004). The residues showing chemical shift changes in the 1H-15N HSQC spectra of p621–127 upon binding to p5320–73 are shown in yellow. (B) The residues that undergo chemical shift changes in the 1H-15N HSQC spectra of Tfb11–115 upon formation of the Tfb1/p53 complex are mapped (in yellow) onto the ribbon model of the NMR structure of free Tfb1 (Di Lello et al., 2005). Molecular Cell 2006 22, 731-740DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structure of the Tfb1/p53 Complex (A) Overlay of the 20 lowest-energy structures of the complex between Tfb1 (in green) and p53 (in orange). The structures were superimposed using the backbone atoms C′, Cα, and N of residues 4–65 and 85–112 of Tfb1 and residues 47–56 of p53. (B) Ribbon model for the lowest-energy conformer of the complex Tfb1 (in green)/p53 (in orange). Molecular Cell 2006 22, 731-740DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Structural Details of the Tfb1/p53 Interface (A) The 3D structure of Tfb1 is shown as a ribbon within the transparent molecular surface (in green), whereas the backbone trace of p53 is represented as a tube (in orange). The side chains of the three hydrophobic residues (Phe54, Trp53, and Ile50) on the amphipathic side of the p53 helix are also shown. The aromatic ring of Phe54 from p53 is positioned in a shallow pocket on the surface of Tfb1. (B) Ribbon representation of Tfb1 (in green) and backbone trace of p53 (in orange). Gln49 and Arg61 from Tfb1 form one side of the hydrophobic pocket in which the side chain of Phe54 from p53 is inserted; also, their side chains are involved in amino-aromatic and cation-π interactions with the aromatic ring of Phe54. (C) Ribbon representation of Tfb1 (in green) and backbone trace of p53 (in orange). The indole ring of Trp53 from p53 is positioned into a narrow cleft formed by the side chains of Lys57 and Met59 of Tfb1. The side chain of Trp53 (p53) contributes to the stability of the complex through a cation-π interaction with Lys57 (Tfb1) on one side of the indole ring and a sulfur-π interaction with Met59 (Tfb1) on the other side. Additional contacts between p53 and Tfb1 involve the side chain of Ile50 of p53 and both Met59 and Met88 of Tfb1. Molecular Cell 2006 22, 731-740DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Effect of p53 Phosphorylation on the Complex Formation (A) Comparison of the Kd values (nM) for the binding of p62 and Tfb1 to the unphosphorylated and phosphorylated p53 peptides. (B) Selected regions of the overlay between the 2D 1H -15N HSQC spectra of 15N-labeled p621–127 in the free form (in black) and in the presence of unlabeled p5320–73 (in red). The signals undergoing significant changes in 1H and 15N chemical shifts upon formation of a 1:1 complex with p53 are highlighted by arrows. (C) Selected regions of the overlay between the 2D 1H -15N HSQC spectra of 15N-labeled p621–127 in the free form (in black) and in the presence of unlabeled p53(pS46pT55) (in red). The signals that undergo significant changes in 1H and 15N chemical shifts upon formation of a 1:1 complex with p53(pS46pT55) are highlighted by arrows. (D) Ribbon model for the lowest-energy structure of the Tfb1 (in green)/p53(pS46pT55) (in orange) complex, showing the potential ion pairs Lys11/pSer46 and Arg61/pThr55. (E) Ribbon model for the lowest-energy structure of free p621–108 (Gervais et al., 2004). The side chains of Lys18 and Lys54, which correspond to Lys11 and Gln49 in Tfb1, are also highlighted. The Tfb1/p53(pS46pT55) model and the NMR structure of free p621–108 were superimposed using the backbone atoms C′, Cα, and N of residues in secondary structure elements and were then separated for clarity. Molecular Cell 2006 22, 731-740DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions