Global Energy Market Trends and Learnings from German Energiewende Dr

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hal T. Interactions between Carbon Regulation & Renewable Energy Policies  Thoughtpiece: The CATF is in a position to consider program.
Advertisements

1 AEP Perspectives on Development and Commercialization of CCS Technology for Natural Gas Power Generation Matt Usher, P.E. Director – New Technology Development.
World Energy Outlook Dr. Fatih Birol IEA Chief Economist Brussels, 29 April 2014.
MultiMOD – An equilibrium model for energy market & infrastructure analysis Ruud Egging 24 th Oct 2013 CREE meets CenSES.
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY World Energy Outlook 2004: Key Trends and Challenges Marco Baroni Energy Analyst Economic Analysis Division INTERNATIONAL HYDROGEN.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
Arnoud Kamerbeek CEO DELTA NV Dutch Energy Day 2015 Amsterdam, June 25th 2015 The decarbonisation of the power sector could and should be faster and cheaper.
© OECD/IEA 2013 Global Energy Dynamics: Outlook for the Future Dr Fatih Birol Chief Economist, IEA 10 April 2014.
Copenhagen 29 June Energy and climate outlook: Renewables in a world and European perspective Peter Russ.
Why should renewable energy not be subsidised?. Sustainable Energy Usage By the end of the lesson you will; 1) Be able to describe the key features of.
EMPIRE- modelling the future European power system under different climate policies Asgeir Tomasgard, Christian Skar, Gerard Doorman, Bjørn H. Bakken,
Instrumentation, Controls & ElectricalUnrestricted © Siemens AG 2013 All rights reserved. Performance Monitoring and Control Systems for Hybrid Power Plants.
Options for climate friendly technologies for power generation and their related costs and potential environmental impacts Sustainable Energy Development.
Electric Generation Reliability Remarks Before the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission 2011 Summer Reliability Assessment Meeting June.
WIND ENERGY Is there a Latvian Master Plan? CHRISTIAN KJÆR Chief Executive Officer European Wind Energy Association SSE Riga, 4 December 2008 © EWEA/L.
RENEWABLE ENERGY POTENTIALS Projections to 2050 BASED ON THE PRESENTATION of Mohamed El-Ashry Chairman REN 21 3rd Ministerial Meeting in Gleneagles Dialogue,
THE CHALLENGES OF EUROPEAN ENERGY SECURITY Jiří Feist, CEZ Group.
Owen WILSON Environment and Sustainable Development Committee, EURELECTRIC POWER CHOICES EURELECTRIC Study on low-CO2 Europe by 2050 POWER CHOICES EURELECTRIC.
© Prof. Dr. Georg Erdmann 1 Electricity Systems with High Renewable Energy Shares Prof. Dr. Georg Erdmann TU Berlin; Chair Energy Systems Member of the.
Electricity Market Design Presentation at the 31st USAEE/IAEE North American Conference November 5-7 Austin, Texas Lars Bergman IAEE and Stockholm School.
World Energy Outlook 2006 Scenarios for the World and the European Union Presentation to European Wind Energy Conference Milan, Italy, 7-10 May 2007.
1 Economics of The European 2020 Climate Goals Torben K. Mideksa Center for International Climate and Environmental Research - Oslo April 18, 2009 The.
Delivering commercial insight to the global energy industry Wood MackenzieEnergy Natural Gas Markets Enter an Era of Unprecedented Uncertainty.
Keeping the door open for a two-degree world (Climate, Renewables and Coal) Philippe Benoit Head of Environment and Energy Efficiency Division International.
IFIEC ENERGY FORUM Renewable Energy Support Schemes 19 June 2012 BRUSSELS Dr Mukund Bhagwat Corporate Energy Affairs, Aurubis Member of Electricity & Climate.
IFIEC Europe International Federation of Industrial Energy Consumers 1 Promotion of Renewable Energies in the EU Member States Consequences on the Price.
© OECD/IEA 2015 Budapest, 19 October © OECD/IEA 2015 Energy & climate change today A major milestone in efforts to combat climate change is fast.
1 Economics of The European 2020 Climate Goals Torben K. Mideksa Center for International Climate and Environmental Research - Oslo [CICERO] April 18,
Energy Transition – Energiewende - in Germany
© OECD/IEA 2016 The global energy outlook and what it means for Portugal Dr. Fatih Birol Executive Director, International Energy Agency Portugal IDR launch.
Evolving Business Models in the Electricity Sector Marc Oliver Bettzüge | 07 July 2016 | CEEPR EPRG EDF Energy Forum.
The Risks around Renewables? March 2012 Campbell Dunford.
© 2016 Global Market Insights, Inc. USA. All Rights Reserved Solar PV Mounting Systems Market share to reach $9bn by 2024: Global Market.
© 2016 Global Market Insights, Inc. USA. All Rights Reserved Gas Turbine Market Price, Packaging Trends, Industry Outlook & Forecast.
Socio-Economic Benefits of Renewable Energy
The role of oil and gas companies in global climate policies
World Energy and Environmental Outlook to 2030
Technological options for introducing flexibility in the existing coal fired power generation Etienne Bourguignon, Commercial Sales PG S Morocco.
Energy Economics Group, TU Wien
The Urgency to Re-Invent Nuclear Power in the U.S.
Global Energy Problems and Counter Policies and Measures of Korea
NS4960 Spring Term 2017 Korea: Energy Policy
Electricity, Carbon and Competition
XI KAZENERGY Eurasian Forum
Towards a 100% Renewable Energy Supply “Renewables Working Together”
Integrated Resource Plan 2016
International Renewable Energy Agency
Prospects for renewable energy developments and role of natural gas
The Economics of Energy, The Environment, and Global Climate Change
Energy and Climate Outlook
Romania’s intervention (5 min)
The Opportunity Cost of Climate Mitigation Policy
NS4960 Spring Term 2017 Japan: Energy Outlook
Australian Energy Scenarios Predicting Uncertainty
© 2016 Global Market Insights, Inc. USA. All Rights Reserved Geothermal Energy Market share research by applications and regions for.
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
NS4960 Spring Term 2018 Renewables Competitive by 2020
Innovation in the Energy Sector: Technologies after 2030 and Necessary Policies Today Prof. Dr. Georg Erdmann, TU Berlin President, GEE e.V., Former.
Additional clarifications on economic and adequacy running hours
Kuwait – Germany Prospects for Cooperation
NS4960 Spring Term 2018 Korea: Energy Policy
NS4960 Spring Term, 2018 China: Expanded Renewables
Coal – security of coal supply considerations of EURACOAL
APEC Energy Demand and Supply Outlook 6th Edition 2-1 Introduction and Business as Usual Cecilia Tam, Special Adviser May 2016, EWG 51 Canberra.
RE Grid Integration Study with India
Spencer Dale Group chief economist.
Discussions about the Role of Nuclear Power for Achieving the Paris Agreement in Japan Yutaka Nagata and Sumio Hamagata Socio-economic Research Center.
Wholesale Electricity Costs
NS4960 Spring Term 2018 Japan: Energy Outlook
FUNDAMENTALS OF 100%RES POWER SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Global Energy Market Trends and Learnings from German Energiewende Dr Global Energy Market Trends and Learnings from German Energiewende Dr. Peter Kluesener, Senior Strategist Siemens Power Generation, Erlangen, Germany Restricted © Siemens AG 2016 siemens.com

Energy Policy: Balance affordability, sustainability and security of power supply 117_84 9_84 The challenges of power generation … … solved by renewables/gas power plants LCoE 1 Affordable power – low LCoE, low Capex -x% Time 2 Low emissions and high efficiency η > 62% <330 gCO2/kWh Renewables Affordability Sustainability 3 Generation flexibility to complement renewables Plant Load Time 4 Switch from Coal/Oil to Gas η<40% >0.9 kg/kWh η >60% <0.35 kg/kWh Installed Capacity 5 Reserve Margin Reliable power supply Peak Load Efficiency Energy Security Firm Capacity

COP21 put new pressure on nations to reduce their GHG emissions, still gap between INDC vs. 2°C target Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission projections until 2050 The emission gap Current policy trajectory INDC case As major CO2 emitting countries are going to sign the COP21 agreement (e.g. US, China, India, EU, Australia) the threshold value of 55% of global emissions is reached and the commitment is going to come into force. But nevertheless there will still remain a huge gap in emission reduction to reach the 2° or even 1.5° C targets. Source: UNEP; INDC: Intended Nationally Determined Contributions

Current trajectory: power generation is shifting towards Renewables and Gas, but not enough Power Generation 2015 and 2030 (TWh) Power Plant Capacity Balance 2015 and 2030 (GW) Share of RE: 24% 31% CO2 from Power Gener. 3,984 9,434 11.5 Gt 13.6 Gt 38 39 Battery Storage 117 Renew.: 2200 GW Conv.: 1800 GW 241 Other RE 34,361 1,097 Solar +2.5% 920 (3%) Other renewables 1,575 (5%) Solar 1,161 Wind 2,996 (9%) Wind 69 194 6,325 874 4,935 (14%) Hydro 215 133 145 1,569 Hydro 23,896 222 829 236 3,551 (10%) Nuclear 1,202 Nuclear 3,900 Oil 2,552 8,360 (24%) Natural gas 2,204 Gas 5,488 (23%) 853 (2%) Oil 1,605 1,044 10,983 (32%) 9,162 (38%) Coal still 32% 2,269 Coal 1,936 2015 2030 Cap2015 Retirements 16-30 Additions 16-30 Cap2030 Source: IHS Energy, Global Energy Scenarios, Rivalry scenario July 2016

Investment in Renewables on record level globally due to lower cost, with regional investment cycles Global average investment cost for wind and solar PV Wind Solar PV -55% Significant cost reduction for Solar PV of about 55% over the last 5 years, but cost decrease becoming more moderate in the recent past Cost reduction for Wind Onshore less steep as technology is already in a mature development phase, but still a decrease of about 25% over the last 5 years Wind Offshore still challenged by requirement of cost reduction to get competitive to other renewables in a more market based environment Nevertheless Renewables still dependent on financial support schemes Investment in Renewables is cycling regionally with Europe currently with a moderate investment level, while China is booming so far -25% Investment in RE-based power by technologies and regions Source: IEA, World Energy Investment Outlook 2016

Coal-to-Gas switch would reduce CO2 emissions by half, but requires carbon price of more than 25 €/t Marginal power generation cost Specific CO2 emissions by power plant type (variable costs only) gCO2/kWh -63% €ct/kWh Generation cost position in Europe (Jan 2016) CCPP: 61.5% efficiency, gas price 5.8 €/GJ SPP: 38.0% efficiency, coal price 1.9 €/GJ Gas Price high 9.0 €/GJ Coal Price high 3.0 €/GJ (38% eff.) (45% eff.) (61% eff.) Coal Price low 1.8 €/GJ Gas Price low 5.0 €/GJ Energy mix and impact on CO2 emissions In 1,000 TWh and Gt CO2 -42% 16.1 TWh 16.1 TWh Assumptions Net Efficiency Existing Coal SPP: 38.0% CCPP new build: 61.5% Gas 12.3 Gt 5.7 Oil 0.9 7.1 Gt 7 €/t 25 €/t Coal 9.5 CO2 €/t CO2 Status quo Only Gas 2015

Global LNG supply improves competitiveness of power generation by gas and supply security Global LNG liquefaction capacity Global LNG liquefaction capacity grows faster than demand US just entered global LNG trade and will significantly expand exports in the future Gas markets are getting more global through LNG supply options Gas price is under pressure through LNG import options Enhanced global gas trade improved competitiveness and supply security LNG-to-Power project Delimara in Malta 200 MW combined cycle power plant (3 Siemens SGT-800) Gas turbines feature an inlet air cooling system to absorb the required chilling power from the regasification of the LNG Inlet air cooling improves power output and power plant efficiency Commissioning in August 2016 Symbiosis of LNG regasification and combined cycle power plant offers substantial options for improved power output and efficiency Sources: IGU, IHS

Increasing implementation pressure after COP21 Power generation from Renewables already >30%, but reduction of CO2 emissions stagnating Targets of German ‚Energiewende’ … … and Status of Implementation Share of Renewables in gross power generation growing Ongoing strong generation from Coal in % of total generation in TWh Renew- ables 607 624 628 646 610 527 20% 23% 24% Renewables 3% 26% 30% 29% 18% 16% Nuclear 15% 16% 14%  7% Fossil 14% 12% 11% 10% 9% Gas Oil/Other 59% 43% 44% 46% 44% 42% Coal Nuclear 5% 2015 2020 2030 2050 1990 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Reduction of GHG Emissions GHG Emissions and Reduction Targets Increasing implementation pressure after COP21 in Mt CO2e 1.247 in Mt CO2e -27% -40% 1,247 -55% Other GHG -1% Other (non-CO2 + CO2 from non-power) 750 -80% 922 927 946 902 908 565  Other 250 -1% Power Sector Power 73 1990 2020 2030 2050 1990 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Renewables generation varying between 10 and 50 GW 1H2016: Renewables power generation reached new record levels challenging conventional plants Energy Mix in Power Generation in Germany (1H2016) Renewables generation varying between 10 and 50 GW 40 GW difference between maximum and minimum power generation for intermittent renewables 50 GW 10 GW Conv. Power Plants Solar Wind Onshore Wind Offshore Hydro Power Biomass Power Demand Power Generation by Conventional Power Plants (1H2016) Up to 45 GW cycling, requirements for conventional power even impacting baseload power plants such as Nuclear and Lignite, Gas acting in mid- and peak load operation Maximum ramp-rate: 8-10 GW/h Residual load for conventional power plants vary from 15 to 60 GW (∆= 45GW!) 60 GW 15 GW Hard Coal Lignite Nuclear Hydro Pump Nat. Gas Other Source: Agora Energiewende

Wholesale baseload electricity price varying between -15 and 52 €/MWh 1H2016: Limited flexibility of coal/ nuclear power caused high price fluctuations and need for exports Power Generation, Demand and Electricity Price (1H2016) Wholesale baseload electricity price (€/MWh) Wholesale baseload electricity price varying between -15 and 52 €/MWh Ø 45-50 €/MWh in 2009-13 +52 €/MWh <30 €/MWh Ø27 €/MWh Q1 2008Q1 2008 Q1 2009Q1 2009 Q1 2010Q1 2010 Q1 2011Q1 2011 Q1 2012Q1 2012 Q1 2013Q1 2013 Q1 2014Q1 2014 Q1 2015Q1 2015 Q1 2016Q1 2016 -15 €/MWh Conv. Generation Renewables Generation Price Demand Wholesale price (EPEX Spot) at a very low level: 2015: 31.2 €/MWh, H1-2016: <30 €/MWh Power Exchange of Germany with other Countries (1H2016) Max. 13 GW export Ø7 GW export Power export to neighboring countries is used to balance the German power system with a high share of fluctuating renewables Export at low, even negative power prices Subsidized by German consumers as they pay the EEG allocation Export >40 TWh in 1H2016 (~15% of consumption) Source: Agora Energiewende; FhG-ISE

Moderate fuel and carbon prices ahead Despite greatly low gas prices, clean spark spread still negative – no investment stimulus Wholesale prices in Germany(real 2014€/MWh) Clean Spark/Clean Dark Spreads in Germany (real 2014€/MWh) Statistic Projection Clean Spark Spread Gas CCPP 54.5 % efficiency, incl. CO2-tax Continuing low power prices Disappearing spread between Base and Peak load Slightly positive clean spark spread not sufficient to stimulate CCPP new build Peakload Baseload 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2021 Fuel/ Carbon Prices for Continental Europe) (2014 €/MWh/€/t) Clean Dark Spread From 2017 Gas more competitive than Coal due to extraordinary low gas price, shifting back by 2021 in case CO2 price remains at low level Coal SPP 37.8 % efficiency, incl. CO2-tax -60% Moderate fuel and carbon prices ahead Gas (EU) CO2 ETS Coal (ARA) 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 Source: IHS Energy, August 2016

>25 bn € EEG budget per year Retail electricity prices in Germany at the upper end in comparison to other countries, driven by levies Retail Electricity Price Development and Price Structure in Germany (€/kWh) 2016 Electricity Price Structure +21% 28.7 >25 bn € EEG budget per year Tax 2.1 0.9 Other Levies +28% 6.4 EEG Levy concession levy 6.2 15.0 0.5 1.5 Households Grid 7.1 6.4 Industry 0.1 Households 3,500 kWh/a, Industry: 160,000..20 million kWh/a & Grid Generation 6.1 6.5 Households Industry Comparison of 2015 Retail Electricity Prices by Countries (€ct/kWh) 28.7 30.7 21.5 20.8 21.3 24.5 x3 16.2 14.4 Households 8.5 9.2 10.8 x1.5 x3 14.4 15.0 15.2 16.0 11.1 6.5 8.5 9.5 8.6 9.1 Industry 5.6 x1.3 Japan China India USA Germany EU28 France Poland UK Italy Den- mark

Dispatchable capacity balance 2015 to 2022 Dispatchable capacity 2015 Gap in dispatchable capacity after 2020 endangering supply security as not sufficient new plants are built 272_84 281_84 Power generation capacity (GW, net), status Sep 2015 – Germany in total 191 Dispatchable capacity balance 2015 to 2022 Hydro PS Geothermal Grid peak load (85 GW) plus 15% reserve margin Gap of ~10 GW! Biomass Solar PV 106 -17% Wind Offshore 3 5 13 Wind Onshore 8 2 98 3 6 5 10 1 3 7 88 Hydro 7 2 2 1 6 2 5 8 1 Nuclear 3 8 3 10 e.g. CCPP Lichterfelde (Berlin) Nuclaer Phase-out Lignite plants retirement Plants older than 45 years in 2022 e.g. CCPP Marzahn 8 Other Fossil 3 3 1 Gas 22 28 3 Oil 3 4 Hard Coal 24 23 Lignite 19 14 Installed capacity Sep 2015 Dispatchable capacity 2015 Special operations (seasonal closures) Additions firm (under construction) Retirements firm (regulated) Retirements planned (as anounced to BNetzA) Retirements likely (plant lifetime) Additions planned 2022 Source: BNetzA Kraftwerksliste, Sep 2015; own analysis

Lessons learned from German 'Energiewende' + High renewable installations supported by effective subsidy schemes However, CO2 emissions in Power Sector stagnating since years High amount of levies pushing electricity retail prices (households: ~30 €ct/kWh) Low wholesale price (~30 €/MWh) not providing sufficient revenue inflow for power plant operators – no incentives for investment in required new thermal power plant capacity Security of Supply at risk, at least at a national level for Germany with need to rely on power plant capacity from neighboring countries after 2020 - - - -

Disclaimer This document contains forward-looking statements and information – that is, statements related to future, not past, events. These statements may be identified either orally or in writing by words as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, “will” or words of similar meaning. Such statements are based on our current expectations and certain assumptions, and are, therefore, subject to certain risks and uncertainties. A variety of factors, many of which are beyond Siemens’ control, affect its operations, performance, business strategy and results and could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Siemens worldwide to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. For us, particular uncertainties arise, among others, from changes in general economic and business conditions, changes in currency exchange rates and interest rates, introduction of competing products or technologies by other companies, lack of acceptance of new products or services by customers targeted by Siemens worldwide, changes in business strategy and various other factors. More detailed information about certain of these factors is contained in Siemens’ filings with the SEC, which are available on the Siemens website, www.siemens.com and on the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in the relevant forward-looking statement as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended, planned or projected. Siemens does not intend or assume any obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements in light of developments which differ from those anticipated. Trademarks mentioned in this document are the property of Siemens AG, it's affiliates or their respective owners.