Real-time orbit the LHC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tevatron BPM System Upgrade Technical Update Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Advertisements

Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
Xiao-Yan Zhao Beam Instrumentation Group Accelerator Center, IHEP BEPCII Background Issues: Beam Loss Measurement.
LER Workshop, CERN, October 11-12, 2006Detector Safety with LER - Henryk Piekarz1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Accelerator & Detector.
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
Craig Drennan Linac and 400 MeV BPMs January 7, 2011.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Injection and protection W.Bartmann, C.Bracco, B.Goddard, V.Kain, M.Meddahi, V.Mertens, A.Nord, J.Uythoven, J.Wenninger, OP, BI, CO, ABP, collimation,
AB-CO TC / J. Wenninger1 Real-time orbit the LHC Summary of the mini-workshop held Oct 6 th 2003 J. Wenninger AB-OP-SPS With emphasis.
4. Operations and Performance M. Lonza, D. Bulfone, V. Forchi’, G. Gaio, L. Pivetta, Sincrotrone Trieste, Trieste, Italy A Fast Orbit Feedback for the.
Collimation Aspects for Crab Cavities? R. Assmann, CERN Thanks to Daniel Wollmann for presenting this talk on my behalf (criticism and complaints please.
LHC Beam Commissioning Meeting V. Kain & R. Alemany
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
J. Wenninger AB-OP-SPS for the non-dormant AB feedback team,
Powering the LHC Magnets
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
CNGS Proton Beam: Introduction
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
Initial Experience with the Machine Protection System for LHC
Beam collimation for SPPC
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
Thursday morning – optics correction
Orbit feedback for collimation
CNGS Primary Beam Results 2010
Interlocking of CNGS (and other high intensity beams) at the SPS
Summary of Week 16 G. Arduini, J. Wenninger
J. Uythoven, W. Venturini Delsolaro, CERN, Geneva
LHC Momentum in 2008 J. Wenninger December 2008.
6 months of beam operation in 2010
Week 35 – Technical Stop and Restart
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
LHC Collimation Requirements
Friday morning 10:30 Optics measurements and corrections.
Protection against accidental beam loss at the LHC
Energy Calibration of the SPS with Proton and Lead Ion Beams
Sunday
LHC Beam Operations Past, Present and Future
BI cont. *** Summary Matching Monitor test *** We only had ~15minutes of inject and dump, but managed to see a profile with ~9e9 p (!)
Global aperture measurements at 450 GeV with 170 mrad crossing angle
Saturday 7th May Sat – Sun night
Orbit Feedback / Chamonix 03 / J. Wenninger
Summary Thursday h21: Stable beams fill #1303.
Machine Tolerances in Cleaning Insertions
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
Aims for the week Recover from technical stop and precycle at 10A/s
Wednesday 10:00 test of the un-squeeze to 90 m at 4 TeV.
LHC BLM Software audit June 2008.
Machine protection and closed orbit
CNGS Primary Beam Results 2011
Monday morning 09:40 Dump fill 2838, integrated ~130 pb-1.
Beam Interlocks for Detectors and Movable Devices
The LHC Beam Interlock System
From commissioning to full performance…
LHC collimation review follow-up Impedance with IR3MBC option & comparison with phase 1 tight settings N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral Acknowledgements:
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
Summary Tuesday h23: Machine closed. Precycle started.
Wednesday h18: 228b fill lost just before start of ramp.
Another Immortal Fill….
Monday 27th August & night
Wednesday morning / afternoon
Saturday 15th May One bunch 1 e11 per beam 09:57: start ramp
Feedbacks & Stabilization Getting them going
Operational Results of LHC Collimator Alignment using Machine Learning
LHC An LHC OP guide… under construction J. Wenninger
Beam Stability of the LHC Beam Transfer Line TI 8
What systems request a beam dump? And when do we need them?
Operational Results of LHC Collimator Alignment using Machine Learning
Presentation transcript:

Real-time orbit control @ the LHC An introduction J. Wenninger AB-OP-SPS 11.12.2003 AB-CO TC / J. Wenninger

LHC layout 2 inter-leaved proton rings. For each ring : Pt.5 CMS Pt.4 Pt.6 RF Beam Dump BEAM 1 clockwise BEAM 2 counter- clockwise Pt.3 Momentum Betatron Pt.7 cleaning cleaning 2 inter-leaved proton rings. For each ring : Horizontal & vertical beam position (orbit) sampled at 500 points by Beam Position Monitors (BPMs). For each plane there are ~ 250 steering magnets with individual Power Conveters (PCs) to adjust the beam position. ALICE LHC-B Pt.2 Pt.8 ATLAS Pt.1 Injection Injection BEAM I BEAM II from SPS from SPS 11.12.2003 AB-CO TC / J. Wenninger

Stored beam energy Energy stored in each LHC beam exceeds existing machine by 2 orders of magnitude x 200 Energy stored in the beam [MJ] Sufficient to melt 500 kg of Cu Momentum [GeV/c] 11.12.2003 AB-CO TC / J. Wenninger

Vacuum Chamber Beam must remain centered inside the vacuum chamber that is surrounded by the super-conducting magnets : Margin  4 mm Stabilitity  0.5-1 mm 50.0 mm Beam screen Expected perturbations may exceed 20 mm…. 36 mm Beam 3 s envel. ~ 1.3 mm @ 7 TeV 11.12.2003 AB-CO TC / J. Wenninger

Collimators Large amplitude particles are ‘cleaned’ by collimators – very tight requirements on beam stability : ~ 50 mm r.m.s. stability at top energy (and full intensity). 11.12.2003 AB-CO TC / J. Wenninger

Real-time orbit control The aim of real-time orbit control system is to stabilize the orbit of the LHC beams during ALL operational phases within the required tolerances. It is a real-time system in the sense that the system must be deterministic – this important during critical phases. The LHC system is ‘unique’ among accelerators because it is distributed over a large geographical area and because of the large number of components. Very schematically - we have 5 players : BPM system Network ‘Controller’ Network PC system Beams 11.12.2003 AB-CO TC / J. Wenninger

Preferred architecture Concentration of all data in a central point entire information available. all options possible. can be easily configured and adapted. … network more critical : delays and large number of connections. IR FB IR IR IR IR IR IR IR 11.12.2003 AB-CO TC / J. Wenninger

Beam Position Monitor Control Hardware : 500 position readings / ring / plane ~ 1000 BPMs for the 2 rings Front-end crates (standard AB-CO VME) are installed in 8 surface buildings around the ring : 68 crates in total  8-10 crates / point Data streams : Nominal sampling frequency is 10 Hz – but I hope to run at 25 Hz… Average data rates per IR : 18 BPMs x 20 bytes ~ 400 bytes / sample / crate 140 BPMs x 20 bytes ~ 3 kbytes / sample / IR @ 25 Hz – from each IR : Average rate ~ 0.6 Mbit/s Instantaneous rate ~ 25 Mbit/s (1 msec burst) 40 ms 11.12.2003 AB-CO TC / J. Wenninger

Magnet & PC Control Architecture : WorldFip Gateway FGC PC Each PC is controlled by one Function Generator Controller (FGC). Up to 30 FGCs (PCs) per Worlfip bus segment. 1 gateway controls a given Worldfip segment. Orbit correctors are accessed over ~ 40 gateways. FGC PC Gateway 1 2 3 30 WorldFip Timing & access : The WorldFip will run @ 50 Hz – 20 ms cycle  the sampling frequency must be fs = 50 Hz / n n=1,2,3…. The delay (WorldFip + PC set) is ~ 30-40 ms. Present idea is to send all settings to some ‘central’ PO gateways that will dispatch the data to the lower level gateways & Worldfip. 11.12.2003 AB-CO TC / J. Wenninger

Schematically… Present architecture, as seen BPM FE BPM FE Present architecture, as seen by the parties that are involved FB ‘servers’ PO gateways to hide HW details from the clients PC Gw PC Gw PC Gw Remove this layer ? WF PC FE WF PC FE WF PC FE WF PC FE 11.12.2003 AB-CO TC / J. Wenninger

Network delay and packet losses The orbit system only uses a small fraction of the LHC technical network bandwidth, but the exact load is not really known today. If IT agrees we may use a special network profile to get a higher priority – present fallback in case of difficulties. We can accept some packets losses, as long as we only lose a sample ‘now and then’ (< 1 in 100/1000 ?) – criticality depends on the machine phase and beam intensity. 11.12.2003 AB-CO TC / J. Wenninger