Statewide Epidemiological Outcomes Workgroup (SEOW) Prioritization of Priority Substances December, 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Community Epidemiology Workgroup CEW 101. CEW, Why Am I Here? You have been identified as an important stakeholder –In our community –In our state –In.
Advertisements

Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience.
Jane Ungemack, DrPH University of Connecticut Health Center Governor’s Prevention Initiative for Youth Evaluation Team Needs Assessment Training Session.
Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) Center for the Application of Prevention Technologies West Regional Expert Team Mail Stop 279 University of.
Hillsborough County Alcohol and Drug Indicator Profile Kathleen Moore, Ph.D. M. Scott Young, Ph.D. Department of Mental Health Law and Policy Louis de.
WHO GLOBAL ALCOHOL STRATEGY
Steve Delaronde, MSW, MPH University of Connecticut Health Center The Governor’s Prevention Initiative for Youth July 16, 1999 Identifying Community Resources.
Unintentional Poisoning. Injury Facts  Unintentional Poisoning.
Making The Most of Assessment. Collect data to define problems, resources and readiness within the county to address needs Assessment.
South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)
Overview June,  Sub-recipients grant applications will go to ADAMHS/ADAS Boards only.  ADAMHS/ADAS Boards will be expected to identify a primary.
1 Alcohol and Substance Abuse Council of Jefferson County, Inc. 167 Polk Street, Suite 320 Watertown, New York Voice: ; Fax: ;
Copyright Alcohol Medical Scholars Program1 Medical Consequences of Alcohol and Drug Use Disorders Eric B. Raimo, M.D.
1 An Introduction to the Minnesota Epidemiological Profile Minnesota State Epidemiological Workgroup and Minnesota Institute of Public Health Fall Forums.
USE AND ABUSE PRESCRIPTION, NON- PRESCRIPTION, AND ILLEGAL DRUGS.
Healthiest Wisconsin 2010: A Partnership Plan to Improve the Health of the Public A Report of the State Health Plan Committee October 12, 2007.
Washington State Department of Social & Health Services – Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery - PRI One Department Vision Mission Core set of Values.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration OFFICE OF APPLIED STUDIES Treatment Episode Data Set.
Barnstable County Regional Substance Abuse Council Updated October 2015 Barnstable County Department of Human Services |
1 READY BY 21 TASKFORCE Harford County Department of Community Services Local Management Board Health Benchmark December 7, 2010.
South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)
State Targeted Response to Opioid Crisis
Colorado’s Opioid Epidemic
screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment
2017 Epidemiological Report
Youth at Disproportionate Risk for Substance Use: A look at Delaware Data Presented by The SEOW Funding for this project has been provided by the Department.
Jessica E. Bates, Pharm.D. PGY-1 Pharmacy Resident
5th Annual Empowering Local Leadership Conference
Partnership with Providers: Addressing the Opioid Crisis
THE OPIOID CRISIS Mississippi Board of Nursing
10th Annual Susan Li Conference
Building Consensus and Promoting Data-Driven Policy in Substance Abuse Prevention: An Examination of the SPF SIG in Arkansas Brenda M. Booth, Ph.D. Sarah.
Venn Diagram Mapping Kicked out of college Kicked out of the house
Chapter 22 Illegal drugs.
Community Perception Survey Results
Prevention Strategies for Young Adults and Higher Education
Statewide Epidemiological Outcomes Workgroup
The Myths and Realities of the Opioid Epidemic AMERSA November 3, 2017
6th Annual Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Conference
Mental Health and Substance Use among Students with Disabilities
Wireless Access SSID: cwag2017
National Prevention Week is an annual health observance dedicated to increasing public awareness of, and action around, substance abuse and mental health.
Opioid-related harms and responses
Marijuana Use in Delaware: 2018 State Epidemiological Profile
Other Illicit Drug Use in Delaware: 2018 State Epidemiological Profile
2018 State Epidemiological Profile
Protective factor in Delaware: 2018 State Epidemiological Profile
Mental Health in Delaware: 2018 State Epidemiological Profile
Opioid Use in Delaware: 2018 State Epidemiological Profile
Transgender youth in Delaware: 2018 State Epidemiological Profile
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Questioning (LGBQ) Youth in Delaware:
2018 State Epidemiological Profile
2018 Delaware State Epidemiological Profile
Using Data to Combat the Opioid Overdose Crisis
2018 Delaware State Epidemiological Profile
2018 Delaware State Epidemiological Profile
Impact of Policy and Regulatory Responses to the Opioid Epidemic on the Care of People with Serious Illness Hemi Tewarson, Director, Health Division National.
collaboration giving community 2018 HOUSTON OPIOID SUMMIT
Figure 1. National Drug Overdose Deaths Number Among All Ages, by Gender, Figure 1. National Drug Overdose Deaths—Number Among All Ages, by Gender,
Using Publicly Available Data for Needs Assessment and Strategic Planning: A Public Health Approach to Addressing Substance Abuse and Health Disparities.
Drugs Health 7 Name: Grade: 70__.
Bob Flewelling Amy Livingston
Bob Flewelling Amy Livingston
Youth substance use data 2018
Community Needs Assessment 2019
Substance Use Prevention for Young Adults and Higher Education
National Employer Survey 2019 Opioid Usage In The Workplace A Research Report For The National Safety Council By B2B International February 2019.
Strategic Initiatives to Address Opioid Overdose & Addiction
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
Robert J. Illback, PsyD REACH of Louisville, Louisville, KY
Presentation transcript:

Statewide Epidemiological Outcomes Workgroup (SEOW) Prioritization of Priority Substances December, 2017

SEOW Prioritization of Substances Prioritization was undertaken to support DMHAS prevention planning Members participated in an online survey, based on substance data presented by UCHC CPES, and epidemiological profiles distributed to respondents Prioritization based on magnitude, impact, and changeability 12-17, 18-25, 26-65, and 66+ age groups 12 members completed the survey

Respondents considered: Consumption, use data Risks and consequences of use Accessibility of substances Gateway potential Treatment admission data Overdose and death data Cost of treatment Relaxed laws around marijuana and potential legalization Long term effects Target population (the work we do) State demographics and subpopulations affected Personal experience Potential for policy decisions to address substance State’s capacity to address the problem

Rank of Priority Substances, 12-17 Age Group Also of concern: Electronic nicotine devices PCP Hallucinogens and “party drugs” Fentanyl Inhalants

SEOW Substance Prioritization based on Magnitude, 12-17 Age Group How many people are affected and how serious are the consequences?

SEOW Substance Prioritization based on Impact, 12-17 Age Group How does this affect the population and systems such as the economy, healthcare, and judicial?

SEOW Substance Prioritization based on Changeability, 12-17 Age Group What is the State’s capacity and readiness to address this problem?

Rank of Priority Substances, 18-25 Age Group Also of concern: Illicit Fentanyl (cut into other drugs) Prescription stimulants Hallucinogens

SEOW Substance Prioritization based on Magnitude, 18-25 Age Group How many people are affected and how serious are the consequences?

SEOW Substance Prioritization based on Impact, 18-25 Age Group How does this affect the population and systems such as the economy, healthcare, and judicial?

SEOW Substance Prioritization based on Changeability, 12-17 Age Group What is the State’s capacity and readiness to address this problem?

Rank of Priority Substances, 26-65 Age Group Also of concern: Illicit Fentanyl (cut into other drugs) Benzodiazepines, in combination with other drugs (Alcohol, Opioids) 1

SEOW Substance Prioritization based on Magnitude,26-65 Age Group How many people are affected and how serious are the consequences?

SEOW Substance Prioritization based on Impact, 26-65 Age Group How does this affect the population and systems such as the economy, healthcare, and judicial?

SEOW Substance Prioritization based on Changeability, 26-65 Age Group What is the State’s capacity and readiness to address this problem?

Rank of Priority Substances, 66+ Age Group Also of concern: Benzodiazepines Prescription management Mental health issues 1

SEOW Substance Prioritization based on Magnitude,66+ Age Group How many people are affected and how serious are the consequences?

SEOW Substance Prioritization based on Impact, 66+ Age Group How does this affect the population and systems such as the economy, healthcare, and judicial?

SEOW Substance Prioritization based on Changeability, 12-17 Age Group What is the State’s capacity and readiness to address this problem?

State Epidemiological Outcomes Workgroup (SEOW) 2018 Meetings • Wednesday, March 21 (postponed) • Wednesday, June 20 • Wednesday, September 19 • Wednesday, December 19