Evaluating truth tables

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright 2008, Scott Gray1 Propositional Logic 3) Truth Tables.
Advertisements

TRUTH TABLES Section 1.3.
TRUTH TABLES The general truth tables for each of the connectives tell you the value of any possible statement for each of the connectives. Negation.
Truth Functional Logic
Chapter 21: Truth Tables.
Logic & Critical Reasoning
3.5 – Analyzing Arguments with Euler Diagrams
Valid arguments A valid argument has the following property:
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
Formal Semantics of S. Semantics and Interpretations There are two kinds of interpretation we can give to wffs: –Assigning natural language sentences.
Use a truth table to determine the validity or invalidity of this argument. First, translate into standard form “Martin is not buying a new car, since.
For Wednesday, read Chapter 3, section 4. Nongraded Homework: Problems at the end of section 4, set I only; Power of Logic web tutor, 7.4, A, B, and C.
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.3 Valid & Invalid Arguments.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
For Monday, read Chapter 4, Sections 1 and 2. Nongraded homework: Problems on pages Graded HW #4 is due on Friday, Feb. 11, at the beginning of.
The semantics of SL   Defining logical notions (validity, logical equivalence, and so forth) in terms of truth-value assignments   A truth-value assignment:
For Friday, read Chapter 3, section 4. Nongraded Homework: Problems at the end of section 4, set I only; Power of Logic web tutor, 7.4, A, B, and C. Graded.
Validity: Long and short truth tables Sign In! Week 10! Homework Due Review: MP,MT,CA Validity: Long truth tables Short truth table method Evaluations!
1.5 Rules of Inference.
2.5 Verifying Arguments Write arguments symbolically. Determine when arguments are valid or invalid. Recognize form of standard arguments. Recognize common.
MATERI II PROPOSISI. 2 Tautology and Contradiction Definition A tautology is a statement form that is always true. A statement whose form is a tautology.
Validity All UH students are communists. All communists like broccoli. All UH students like broccoli.
GLE Explore the concept of premises, including false premises. Intro to Logic.
Truth-Table Definition of Validity An argument is truth-table valid if it is impossible for the premises to all be True and the conclusion False. I.e.,
Chapter Six Sentential Logic Truth Trees. 1. The Sentential Logic Truth Tree Method People who developed the truth tree method: J. Hintikka— “model sets”
FALSE PREMISE.
The Inverse Error Jeffrey Martinez Math 170 Dr. Lipika Deka 10/15/13.
Chapter Three Truth Tables 1. Computing Truth-Values We can use truth tables to determine the truth-value of any compound sentence containing one of.
Unit 1D Analyzing Arguments. TWO TYPES OF ARGUMENTS Inductive Deductive Arguments come in two basic types:
Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
Study Questions for Quiz 1 1. The Concept of Validity (20 points) a. You will be asked to give the two different definitions of validity given in the lecture.
Thinking Mathematically Arguments and Truth Tables.
TRUTH TABLES. Introduction The truth value of a statement is the classification as true or false which denoted by T or F. A truth table is a listing of.
Sentence (syntactically Independent grammatical unit) QuestionCommandStatement “This is a class in logic.” “I enjoy logic.” “Today is Friday.”
Copyright © 2014, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 3.4, Slide 1 3 Logic The Study of What’s True or False or Somewhere in Between 3.
Analyzing Arguments Section 1.5. Valid arguments An argument consists of two parts: the hypotheses (premises) and the conclusion. An argument is valid.
If then Therefore It is rainingthe ground is wet It is raining the ground is wet.
L = # of lines n = # of different simple propositions L = 2 n EXAMPLE: consider the statement, (A ⋅ B) ⊃ C A, B, C are three simple statements 2 3 L =
Truth Tables, Continued 6.3 and 6.4 March 14th. 6.3 Truth tables for propositions Remember: a truth table gives the truth value of a compound proposition.
Analyzing Arguments : Introduction to Philosophy June 1, 2009 Instructor: Karin Howe Carnegie Mellon University.
UOP CRT 205 Week 7 Assignment Argument Evaluation Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
a valid argument with true premises.
WEEK 3 VALIDITY OF ARGUMENTS Valid argument: A deductive argument is valid if its conclusion is necessarily and logically drawn from the premises. The.
FALSE PREMISE.
Lecture Notes 8 CS1502.
Jeffrey Martinez Math 170 Dr. Lipika Deka 10/15/13
Truth Tables How to build them
3 Logic The Study of What’s True or False or Somewhere in Between.
Validity and Soundness
Argument Lecture 5.
Testing for Validity and Invalidity
Section 3.5 Symbolic Arguments
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
TRUTH TABLE TO DETERMINE
Hurley … Chapter 6.5 Indirect Truth Tables
TRUTH TABLES.
TRUTH TABLES continued.
Discrete Mathematics Lecture # 8.
The most important idea in logic: Validity of an argument.
Deductive Arguments: Checking for Validity
Validity & Invalidity Valid arguments guarantee true conclusions but only when all of their premises are true Invalid arguments do not guarantee true conclusions.
Introductory Logic PHI 120
6.4 Truth Tables for Arguments
Phil2303 intro to logic.
SUMMARY Logic and Reasoning.
Philosophical Methods
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating truth tables Unit 1 Methods/Logic

Is this valid or invalid? P  Q P Q P Q P Q P  Q T F Both Premises are True on the Bottom Row and the Conclusion is True, as well. This argument is……. VALID

IS THIS VALID OR INVALID? P Q Q P  Q T F P  Q Q P Both Premises are True In the Second Row and the Conclusion is True, as well. This argument is…….

Is this valid or invalid? P Q R P  Q Q  R T F P  Q Q  R P R All three premises are true in rows one, three and four. However, the conclusion in row four is false. What do you think this means? Since there is at least one case which all the premises are true but the conclusion is false, this argument is… INVALID

IS THIS VALID OR INVALID? P  Q P  R P Q R P  Q P  R T F The premise is true in rows one and two where the conclusion is true as well. This argument is… VALID

Sorry…This PowerPoint was brutal! (The next one is going to worse ) https://www.yout ube.com/watch?v=J r7bRw0NxQ4