Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Héctor Herranz, Ruifen Weng, Stephen M. Cohen  Current Biology 
Advertisements

Germline Stem Cells: Origin and Destiny
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages e5 (April 2017)
Filopodia-like Actin Cables Position Nuclei in Association with Perinuclear Actin in Drosophila Nurse Cells  Sven Huelsmann, Jari Ylänne, Nicholas H.
Germline Stem Cells: Origin and Destiny
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Eva Decotto, Allan C. Spradling  Developmental Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 13, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 23, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Lacy J. Barton, Belinda S. Pinto, Lori L. Wallrath, Pamela K. Geyer 
Drosophila piwi Mutants Exhibit Germline Stem Cell Tumors that Are Sustained by Elevated Dpp Signaling  Zhigang Jin, Alex S. Flynt, Eric C. Lai  Current.
Dcr-1 Maintains Drosophila Ovarian Stem Cells
Cynthia Vied, Amy Reilein, Natania S. Field, Daniel Kalderon 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Utf1: Goldilocks for ESC Bivalency
Vicki P. Losick, Lucy X. Morris, Donald T. Fox, Allan Spradling 
Monica Boyle, Chihunt Wong, Michael Rocha, D. Leanne Jones 
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
The Drosophila ovary and germarium, bab1-GAL4 expression in larval ovaries, and the screening strategy. The Drosophila ovary and germarium, bab1-GAL4 expression.
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Nikhila S. Tanneti, Kathryn Landy, Eric F. Joyce, Kim S. McKim 
Location, Location, Location: The Cancer Stem Cell Niche
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 23, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Dedifferentiating Spermatogonia Outcompete Somatic Stem Cells for Niche Occupancy in the Drosophila Testis  X. Rebecca Sheng, Crista M. Brawley, Erika.
Phf7 Controls Male Sex Determination in the Drosophila Germline
Planar Polarized Protrusions Break the Symmetry of EGFR Signaling during Drosophila Bract Cell Fate Induction  Ying Peng, Chun Han, Jeffery D. Axelrod 
Germline Stem Cell Heterogeneity Supports Homeostasis in Drosophila
Decapentaplegic Is Essential for the Maintenance and Division of Germline Stem Cells in the Drosophila Ovary  Ting Xie, Allan C Spradling  Cell  Volume.
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
From Stem Cell to Embryo without Centrioles
Michael J. Fairchild, Lulu Yang, Katharine Goodwin, Guy Tanentzapf 
Jacob Gonzalez, Hongying Qi, Na Liu, Haifan Lin  Cell Reports 
Todd Nystul, Allan Spradling  Cell Stem Cell 
Stem Cells: Keeping BMP Signaling Local
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
The Drosophila Hindgut Lacks Constitutively Active Adult Stem Cells but Proliferates in Response to Tissue Damage  Donald T. Fox, Allan C. Spradling 
Germline Stem Cells: Origin and Destiny
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages e5 (April 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Zfh-1 Controls Somatic Stem Cell Self-Renewal in the Drosophila Testis and Nonautonomously Influences Germline Stem Cell Self-Renewal  Judith L. Leatherman,
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
miR-184 Has Multiple Roles in Drosophila Female Germline Development
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Intrinsic role of Aub in GSC self‐renewal and differentiation
Volume 17, Issue 14, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Nicola Iovino, Filippo Ciabrelli, Giacomo Cavalli  Developmental Cell 
Epigenetic Regulation of Stem Cell Maintenance in the Drosophila Testis via the Nucleosome-Remodeling Factor NURF  Christopher M. Cherry, Erika L. Matunis 
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
Candidates function in the soma to control GSC and niche cap cell number during larval-pupal transition. Candidates function in the soma to control GSC.
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
Ismail Osman, Jun Wei Pek  Stem Cell Reports 
Héctor Herranz, Ruifen Weng, Stephen M. Cohen  Current Biology 
Shree Ram Singh, Wei Liu, Steven X. Hou  Cell Stem Cell 
GSC tumor phenotype in ago3 mutant germaria
Conversion of Quiescent Niche Cells to Somatic Stem Cells Causes Ectopic Niche Formation in the Drosophila Testis  Phylis Hétié, Margaret de Cuevas, Erika.
Anterior escort cells are required for germline stem cell maintenance.
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
GeneSwitch GAL4 lines carry drivers for GSC maintenance and differentiation niches. GeneSwitch GAL4 lines carry drivers for GSC maintenance and differentiation.
Candidates function in the soma during development to control GSC and niche cap cell numbers. Candidates function in the soma during development to control.
Selfish Stem Cells Compete with Each Other
Epigenetic Regulation of Stem Cell Maintenance in the Drosophila Testis via the Nucleosome-Remodeling Factor NURF  Christopher M. Cherry, Erika L. Matunis 
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (March 2012)
Yb Modulates the Divisions of Both Germline and Somatic Stem Cells through piwi- and hh-Mediated Mechanisms in the Drosophila Ovary  F.James King, Akos.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages 458-469 (October 2007) Stem Cell Aging Is Controlled Both Intrinsically and Extrinsically in the Drosophila Ovary  Lei Pan, Shuyi Chen, Changjiang Weng, Gerald Call, Dongxiao Zhu, Hong Tang, Nian Zhang, Ting Xie  Cell Stem Cell  Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages 458-469 (October 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.09.010 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Partial Interference of BMP Signaling Does Not Affect GSC Formation but Has Severe Consequences on GSC Aging (A) A schematic diagram of a germarial tip showing different cell types in the proximity of GSCs. Abbreviations: TF, terminal filament (dark yellow); CPC, cap cells (light green); ESC, escort stem cells (purple); GSC, germline stem cells (highlighted by broken red lines); EC, escort cells (light purple); SS, spectrosome (green, round or elongated); and FS, fusomes (green, branched). All the germaria in (B)–(E) and (I)–(L) are labeled for lamin C (TFs and cap cells, green), Hts (spectrosome and fusome, green), and DNA (blue). All the genotypes described in this figure, including the wild-type control, are in the hh-lacZ heterozygous background. (B and C) Seven-day-old control germarial tips showing three (B) and two (C) GSCs (solid circles) attached to the cap cells (highlighted by broken lines). (D and E) Sixty-three-day-old wild-type germarial tips showing two (D) and one (E) GSCs (solid circles) attached to the cap cells (highlighted by broken lines). (F and G) Graphs showing that the GSC (F) or cap cell (G) maintenance rates for the control and heterozygous mutants for the BMP pathway (percentages, the y axis) change with age (days, shown in the x axis). The GSC (F) or cap cell (G) numbers for the 7-day-old control and heterozygous mutant for dpp and gbb are normalized to 100% for comparison. The GSC (F) or cap cell (G) maintenance rate for a given genotype at a given time point is determined by the average GSC or cap cell number for the genotype at the time point divided by that for the 7-day-old germaria of the same genotype. All the subsequent graphs are generated using the same method. (H) The bar graph showing the changes in the numbers of cysts per germarium (y axis) in the two-GSC-containing germaria of different genotypes (+/+ control, gbbD4/+, dpphr56/+, and dpphr4/+) with age (7 days, blue; 35 days, purple; and 63 days, yellow). Because there were not enough dpp and gbb mutant heterozygous germaria containing two GSCs at the age of 63 days, we compared the cyst numbers in the 63-day-old germaria containing one GSC between the control and mutants. p values that are less than 0.05 between two comparisons (solid lines, among the same genotypes; broken lines, between different genotypes) are indicated, while 15 germaria are examined for each genotype at a given time point. (I and J) Seven-day-old gbbD4/+ germarial tips showing three (I) and two (J) GSCs (solid circles) attached to the cap cells (highlighted by broken lines). (K and L) Sixy-three-day-old dpphr4/+ germarial tips showing one (K) (solid circle) or no (L) GSC attached to the cap cells (highlighted by broken lines). (M and N) Seven-day-old (M) and 63-day-old (N) Dad-lacZ/+ germarial tips showing that Dad-lacZ expression is lower in the older GSCs (circles) than in the younger GSCs (circles). (O) A bar graph showing that the 63-day-old GSCs (red) have significantly lower Dad-lacZ expression than the 7-day-old GSCs. The error bars represent standard derivation calculated using EXCEL. All the micrographs represent overlayed multiple confocal sections and are shown in the same scale, and the scale bar at (B) represents 10 μm. Cell Stem Cell 2007 1, 458-469DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2007.09.010) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Strengthening BMP Signaling in Aged Ovaries Can Slow Down GSC Aging (A and B) Graphs showing that the GSC (A) or cap cell (B) maintenance rates for the controls (hh-gal4 UAS-gal80ts/+ and nos-gal4/+) and gbb-, dpp-, and SAX∗-overexpressing ovaries (percentages, the y axis) change with age (days, shown in the x axis). All the germaria in (C), (D), (F), and (G) are labeled for lamin C (TFs and cap cells, green), Hts (spectrosome and fusome, green), and DNA (blue). (C) A 63-day-old hh-gal4 UAS-gal80ts/+ control germarial tip showing two GSCs (solid circles) in the niche (broken lines). (D) A 63-day-old hh-gal4 UAS-gal80ts/+; UAS-dpp/+ germarial tip showing one GSC (solid circle) in the niche (broken lines). (E) The bar graph showing the changes in the numbers of cysts per germarium in the two-GSC-containing germaria of different genotypes and ages (7 days, blue; 35 days, yellow; and 63 days, purple). p values that are less than 0.05 between two comparisons (solid lines, among the same genotypes; broken lines, between different genotypes) are indicated, while 15 germaria are examined for each genotype at a given time point. (F) A 63-day-old hh-gal4 UAS-gal80ts/+; UAS-gbb/+ germarial tip showing three GSCs (solid circles) in the niche (broken lines). (G) A 63-day-old nos-gal4/+; UASp-SAX∗/+ germarial tip showing three GSCs (solid circles) in the niche (broken lines). All the micrographs represent overlayed multiple confocal sections and are shown in the same scale, and the scale bar at (C) represents 10 μm. Cell Stem Cell 2007 1, 458-469DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2007.09.010) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 E-Cadherin Participates in GSC Aging (A and B) Graphs showing that the GSC (A) or cap cell (B) maintenance rates for the controls (hh-lacZ/+ and nos-gal4/+), shg heterozygous mutant, and E-cadherin-overexpressing ovaries (percentages, the y axis) change with age (days, shown in the x axis). All the germaria are labeled for lamin C (TFs and cap cells, green), Hts (spectrosome and fusome, green), and DNA (blue). (C and D) Sixty-three-day-old shgR69/+ germarial tips showing two GSCs (solid circles) (C) and one GSC (solid circle) (D) in the niche (broken lines). (E) The bar graph showing the changes in the numbers of cysts per germarium in the two-GSC-containing germaria of different genotypes and ages (7 days, blue; 35 days, yellow; and 63 days, purple). p values that are less than 0.05 between two comparisons (solid lines, among the same genotypes; broken lines, between different genotypes) are indicated, while 15 germaria are examined for each genotype at a given time point. (F and G) Seven-day-old (F) and 63-day-old (G) germarial tips showing that E-cadherin accumulation in the junctions (arrowheads) between GSCs (their fusomes indicated by arrows) and their niche is less in the older germarium than in the younger one. (H) A bar graph showing that E-cadherin accumulation in the stem cell-niche junction of the 63-day-old wild-type germaria (red) is significantly lower than that in the 7-day-old germaria (blue). The error bars represent standard derivation calculated using EXCEL. (I) A 63-day-old nos-gal4/+ control germarial tip showing two GSCs (solid circles) in the niche (broken lines). (J) A 63-day-old nos-gal4/+; UAS-E-cad/+ germarial tip showing three GSCs (solid circles) in the niche (broken lines). All the micrographs represent overlayed multiple confocal sections and are shown in the same scale, and the scale bar at (C) represents 10 μm. Cell Stem Cell 2007 1, 458-469DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2007.09.010) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 SOD Overexpression in GSCs or Their Niche Can Extend GSC Life Span and Stimulate Proliferation of Aged GSCs (A and B) Graphs showing that the GSC (A) or cap cell (B) maintenance rates for the controls (hh-gal4/+ and nos-gal4/+) and for niche-specific and germline-specific SOD-overexpressing ovaries (percentages, the y axis) change with age (days, shown in the x axis). All the germaria in (C)–(F) are labeled for lamin C (TFs and cap cells, green), Hts (spectrosome and fusome, green), and DNA (blue). (C) A 77-day-old hh-gal4/+ germarial tip showing two GSCs (solid circles) in the niche (broken lines). (D) A 77-day-old hh-gal4/+; UASp-SOD-1/+ germarial tip showing three GSCs (solid circles) in the niche (broken lines). (E) A 77-day-old hh-gal4/+; UASp-SOD-2/+ germarial tip showing three GSCs (solid circles) in the niche (broken lines). (F) The bar graph showing the changes in the numbers of cysts per germarium in the two-GSC-containing germaria of different genotypes and ages (7 days, blue; 35 days, yellow; and 63 or 77 days, purple). p values that are less than 0.05 between two comparisons (solid lines, among the same genotypes; broken lines, between different genotypes) are indicated, while 15 germaria are examined for each genotype at a given time point. (G) A 63-day-old nos-gal4/+; UASp-SOD-2/+ germarial tip showing three GSCs (solid circles) in the niche (broken lines). All the micrographs represent overlayed multiple confocal sections and are shown in the same scale, and the scale bar at (C) represents 10 μm. Cell Stem Cell 2007 1, 458-469DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2007.09.010) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 A Model Depicting the Control Mechanism of GSC Aging The young niche (green) has high levels of niche signals and E-cadherin (purple) and possibly low ROS damage, while the young GSC (red) also has high levels of niche signal reception and E-cadherin expression and possibly low ROS damage. In contrast, the old niche cell (green) has decreased levels of niche signals and E-cadherin (purple) and has accumulated more ROS damage, while the old GSC (red) also has decreased niche signal reception and E-cadherin expression and also has accumulated more ROS damage. Self-renewal and proliferation capacities of the GSC are greatly reduced in aged individuals. Cell Stem Cell 2007 1, 458-469DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2007.09.010) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions