Guide 5: Postgraduate regulations at Liverpool Hope

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Academic Services Division. Progression and Award Regulations for Taught Courses Registry Academic Services Division Chris Bexton, PG Registry Manager.
Advertisements

Regulation and Credit Framework for the Conferment of Awards Quality and Standards Office.
External Examiners’ Workshop The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Registry
GT ARTS April Session Outline What is End of Session? Assessment Periods What is an ART? GT ARTs (when to apply, what each ART does, BIRMS auto-calculation)
The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Academic Standards and Partnership
Friday, April 17, 20151MA Academic Practice Assessment Regulations 2011 / 2012 Peggy Cooke Head of Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement.
© University of South Wales Regulations Briefings Overview of University of Wales, Newport regulations – still in place for ex-Newport students completing.
External Examiner Workshop. The Assessment Process Colin Davis Academic Registry 20 November 2013.
Academic Affairs Presentation Examination Liaison Officers 16 February 2015 Catherine McCorry / Angela Douglas Academic Affairs.
Our Academic Framework Modular Regulations. Two semesters –September to January –February to June –(The summer period) BUT Three terms –September to Christmas.
Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS Faculty / Quality Assurance Services.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services.
Paul H Bridges UK Credit Forum. Credit is a formal quantified recognition of learning achievement awarded to learners The formal recognition of learning.
Assessment Boards External Examiner Training 13 May 2015.
Programme Leader’s event The framework and progression.
The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Academic Standards and Partnership
The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Academic Standards and Partnership
External Examiners Induction
© University of South Wales University of South Wales ‘Regulations for Taught Courses’ Hayley Burns Head of Quality Unit.
Our Academic and Quality Frameworks Phil Brimson Quality Manager (Validation and Review)
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS FOR ACADEMIC STAFF Quality Assurance Services.
Summary of the Undergraduate and Postgraduate Standard Assessment Regulations Academic Year 2012/13.
Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2014/15 Stewart Smith-Langridge Annette Cooke Governance Services 5 November
Operation of Subject Examination Boards Sarah Lane Senior School Manager, School of Law March 2015.
Institutional Overview of Quality Frameworks, Quality Assurance and Enhancement Dr Anne Craven, Head of Quality and Academic Partnerships 25/04/2014.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF Quality Assurance Services.
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners Spring 2013 Derek Milligan Director of Academic Programme Development.
Changes to the Standard Assessment Regulations for 2013/14 August 2013.
Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation Web Site Our core activities are the resolution and determination.
How To Pass M.Sc. Computing
Summary of Standard Assessment Regulations Academic Year 2013/14.
External Examiner Induction Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2015/16 Annette Cooke/Alison Jones Quality and Enhancement Office 4 November 2015.
International Partnerships Conference 21 November 2013 CREATE THE DIFFERENCE1 Dr Noel Morrison Academic Registrar and Director of the Student Experience.
External Examiners’ Seminar 2011/12 Academic Regulations Lynn Jones Regulations, Assessment and Awards Manager Academic Registry.
External Examiner Workshop. The Assessment Process Michael Wing Academic Registry June 14, 2016.
BOARDS OF EXAMINERS’ REVIEW Prof Chris LANGLEY Chair – RSC Dominic STONE Secretary – RSC 16 th November 2015 Slide 1.
Guidance for Module / Exam Boards 2015/16 session David Ealey Head of Registry Services.
External Examiners’ Workshop The University’s key examination and assessment regulations Mr Paul Cecil Quality and Standards Manager (Academic Standards.
1 ARC Assessment Practitioners Group 19/11/10 Reassessment Methods Neil McLaughlin Cook Liverpool Hope University
Prof Richard Barnes Student Director
An Introduction to External Examining Procedures at Bangor University
IDTA level 4 Diploma in Dance Teaching
ACADEMIC REGULATIONS INCLUDING UPDATES
External Examiner Workshop Subject / School Boards
Postgraduate Examination Board Briefing
ISS Board of Examiners: Info meeting for MA students
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
MMU Regulations.
The New Academic Framework and progression
External Examiners Induction
Taught Award Regulations
Marks/Exams Information – All Years
An Introduction to External Examining Procedures at Bangor University
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
Guide 4: Undergraduate regulations at Liverpool Hope
Guide 3: Examining Procedures at Liverpool Hope
External examining at Solent university
External Examiners Induction Academic Regulations
Welcome and Induction Event for new External Examiners 2016
How will my Degree be Classified
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners Spring 2014
Guide 5: Postgraduate regulations at Liverpool Hope
Guide 4: Undergraduate regulations at Liverpool Hope
Guide 5: Postgraduate regulations at Liverpool Hope
External Examiners Induction Academic Regulations
IDTA level 4 Diploma in Dance Teaching
How will my Degree be Classified?
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners March 2014
What happens if I don’t pass first time
Presentation transcript:

Guide 5: Postgraduate regulations at Liverpool Hope Liverpool Hope University External Examiner Guidance: 2018 Guide 5: Postgraduate regulations at Liverpool Hope University Registrar

Contents 1. Curriculum Structure slides 3-4 2. Duration of Programmes slides 5-9 3. Pass Marks, Reassessments and Retakes slides 10-13 4. Marking Scales & Assessment Descriptors slides 14-16 5. Award Classification Rules slides 17-23 6. Mitigating Circumstances slides 24 7. Academic Misconduct slide 25 8. What will Board Transcripts Look Like? slides 26-27 9. Implications for Externals slides 28-30 10. And finally…. slide 31

1. Curriculum Structure (a) Masters Degrees: Modules to the value of 180 credits. All modules must be at Level M[7]. Three main types: single subject Masters 120 taught credits [normally at least 60 credits “core and exclusive”] 60 credits Dissertation [may begin before 120 credits taken or passed]; two-subject Masters 120 taught credits [60 from subject 1 & 60 from subject 2] 60 credits Dissertation integrating the 2 subjects; MEd Professional Practice 180 credits taught modules.

1. Curriculum Structure (b) PGCEs: Academic module[s] to the value of 60 credits, at Level M[7]. Professional work and professional practice [not credit-rated]. Postgraduate Diplomas: Modules to the value of 120 credits, at Level M[7]. Postgraduate Certificates: Modules to the value of 60 credits, at Level M[7].

2. Duration of Programmes (a) Masters Degrees [except MA Social Work and MEd Professional Practice]: have the following normal expectations students starting from Sept 2015 - 1 year ft or 2 years 1 term p/t; students starting before Sept 2015 - 1 year ft or 3 years p/t; “End Dates” can be extended by Boards of Examiners on the basis of retakes, resubmissions , deferrals or interruptions, up to 3 years ft or 5 years p/t; the Vice Chancellor needs to approve any further extension, via Registrar; students starting from September 2015 pay an extension fee for any End Date Extension not due to valid mitigating circumstances.

2. Duration of Programmes (b) MEd Professional Practice: As for standard Masters degrees EXCEPT that the normal duration is 9 academic terms - the degree is only available part-time students do 180 credits of taught modules instead of 120 credits plus a 60-credit Dissertation.

2. Duration of Programmes (c) MA Social Work: has the following normal expectations 2 years full-time; “End Dates” can be extended by Boards of Examiners on the basis of retakes, resubmissions , deferrals or interruptions, up to 5 years full-time; the Vice Chancellor needs to approve any further extension, via Registrar; students starting from September 2015 pay an extension fee for any End Date Extension not due to valid mitigating circumstances.

2. Duration of Programmes (d) PGCEs: have the following normal expectations 1 year full-time; “End Dates” can be extended by Boards of Examiners on the basis of retakes, resubmissions , deferrals or interruptions, up to 3 years [but more than 2 is exceptional]; the Vice Chancellor needs to approve any further extension, via Registrar.

2. Duration of Programmes (e) Postgraduate Diplomas: have the following normal expectations 2 semesters [or equivalent] full-time; 4 semesters [or equivalent] part-time; “End Dates” can be extended by Boards of Examiners on the basis of retakes, resubmissions , deferrals or interruptions, up to 4 years; the Vice Chancellor needs to approve any further extension, via Registrar. Postgraduate Certificates: 1 semester [or equivalent] full-time; 2 semesters [or equivalent] part-time; “End Dates” can be extended by Boards of Examiners on the basis of retakes, resubmissions , deferrals or interruptions, up to 3 years;

3. Pass Marks, Reassessments and Retakes (a) Module Pass Marks: students who started from September 2015 - Grade C [no compensation of marks below F+]; students who started before September 2015 - modules taken before 2015/6 - 40 [unlimited compensation of fail marks], modules taken from 2015/6 - 40 [no compensation of marks below 35]. Note students remain on the ‘old’ mark schemes.

3. Pass Marks, Reassessments and Retakes (b) Reassessment Entitlements: normally can only resubmit if module aggregate is 25+; BUT if module failed due to academic misconduct, normally cannot resubmit irrespective of the module aggregate. Capping following Reassessment: assessment mark uncapped, but module aggregate is either capped at 50/40 or frozen at its value from initial assessment [whichever is the higher] - students resubmitting a dissertation might see 84 for the resubmission but an overall capped 50 for the dissertation module.

3. Pass Marks, Reassessments and Retakes (c) Retake Entitlements: retake normally required if module aggregate was <25 OR module was failed due to academic misconduct; a failed retaken module can ONLY be redeemed by resubmission [but entitlements in previous slide apply]; What Students Retake: normally, EITHER the module they failed OR, if the module was optional, an alternative, to the same credit value a failed alternative is treated in the same way as a failed retake; retaking a Dissertation means starting a new Dissertation, with supervision.

3. Pass Marks, Reassessments and Retakes (d) Capping of Retakes [and Alternative Takes]: if the original fail was due to nonsubmission or academic misconduct, the aggregate for the retaken/alternative module is capped at 40/50; otherwise no capping. Retake Fees: students who started before September 2015 - no retake fee; students who started from September 2015 - retake fee charged per module.

4. Marking Scales and Assessment Descriptors (a) Marking Scale for Post- Sept 2015 Starters Work that has Passed A++ 92 Pass with Distinction (High) Module aggregate will appear as PD A+ 84 Pass with Distinction (Middle) Module aggregate will appear as PD A 76 Pass with Distinction (Low) Module aggregate will appear as PD B+ 68 Pass with Merit (High) Module aggregate will appear as PM B 64 Pass with Merit (Low) Module aggregate will appear as PM C+ 58 Pass (High) Module aggregate will appear as P C 54 Pass (Low) Module aggregate will appear as P Work that has NOT Passed F+ 47 Marginal Fail F 37 Clear Fail F- 27 Comprehensive WF 12 Weak Fail U 2 Unclassified

4. Marking Scales and Assessment Descriptors (b) Marking Scale for Pre- Sept 2015 Starters Work that has Passed A+ 86-100 Distinction standard; module grade PD A 70-85 Distinction standard; module grade PD B+ 65-69 Merit standard; module grade PM B 60-64 Merit standard; module grade PM C+ 55-59 Pass standard; module grade P C 50-54 Pass standard; module grade P D 45-49 Pass standard; module grade P E 40-44 Pass standard; module grade P Work that has NOT Passed F+ 35-39 Marginal Fail [condoned if module aggregate is 40+] F 25-34 Clear Fail [cannot be condoned] F- 15-24 Comprehensive Fail [no resit if mod. agg. in this band] U 1-14 Unclassified Fail [no resit if mod. agg. in this band] 0 NS/FL/PL etc [no resit if mod. agg. in this band] 0 M [assessment deferred due to mit. circumstances]

4. Marking Scales and Assessment Descriptors (c) University-wide descriptors available for each grade: Faculties/Departments may adapt. Descriptors ensure that New Pass Mark Rules do NOT disadvantage students, for example: University-wide descriptors for a Bare Pass of 50 for post Sept. 2015 students match those for a Bare Pass of 40 for earlier students; University-wide descriptors for Compensation Threshold of 40 for post Sept. 2015 students match those for Compensation Threshold of 35 for earlier students.

5. Award Classification Rules (a) Overview students are entitled to an award per se if they have enough credits including Accreditation of Prior Learning/Recognition of Prior Learning 180 credits including APL/RPL entitles them to a Master degree 120 credits including APL/RPL entitles them to a PG Diploma 60 credits including APL/RPL entitles them to a PG Certificate; all PGT awards can be made with Merit or Distinction; eligibility for Merit or Distinction is based solely on modules completed at this University.

5. Award Classification Rules (b) Masters Degrees [students who began before Sept 2015]: overall aggregate mark is NOT used; Distinction is mandatory if student has PD [70+] for 180 credits; Distinction is discretionary if student has PD for 120-179 credits convention is only to award if PD for the Dissertation if P/PM for 60 credits, PD needed for everything else to get a Distinction; if P/PM for >60 credits, student CANNOT get a Distinction getting 40 instead of 55 for a module will have no impact; Merit is mandatory if student has PM [60+] for 180 credits; Merit is discretionary if student has PM for 120-179 credits convention is only to award if PM for the Dissertation OR Dissertation is near PM & student has PDs on taught modules.

5. Award Classification Rules (c) Masters Degrees, not MEd (students who began from Sept 2015) [i]: Merits & Distinctions only if 120+credits are from Hope; Distinction mandatory if PD[70+] for the Dissertation & overall aggregate; If overall aggregate is 65-69 Distinction if aggregate is 67.5+ & student gets 70+ for 50% of marks including Dissertation OR aggregate is 65-67.4 & student gets 84+ for 50% of marks including Dissertation if aggregate from 1st 60 credits is 63, Distinction is still possible getting 50 instead of 75 for a module makes Distinction less likely; If overall aggregate is 70+ and Dissertation is below 70 Distinction if Dissertation is 68.

5. Award Classification Rules (d) Masters Degrees (students who began from Sept 2015) [ii]: Merit is mandatory if PM[60+] for the Dissertation & overall aggregate. If overall aggregate is 55+ Merit if aggregate is 57.5+ & student gets 60+ for 50% of marks including Dissertation OR aggregate is 55-57.4 & student gets 65+ for 50% of marks including Dissertation If overall aggregate is 60+ and Dissertation is below 60 Merit if Dissertation is 58.

5. Award Classification Rules (e) PGCEs [i]: Academic award based on 60-credit academic module; QTS recommendation based on 0-credit professional module; postgraduate award [possibly with Merit/Distinction] if academic assessments satisfy level M[7] criteria; graduate award if academic assessments reach Level H[6] criteria; possible outcomes: Postgraduate Certificate with Distinction (with QTS recommendation) Postgraduate Certificate with Distinction (without QTS recommendation) Postgraduate Certificate with Merit (with QTS recommendation) Postgraduate Certificate with Merit (without QTS recommendation) Postgraduate Certificate (with QTS recommendation) Postgraduate Certificate (without QTS recommendation) Professional Graduate Certificate (with QTS recommendation).

5. Award Classification Rules (f) PGCEs [ii]: Distinction is mandatory if: the aggregate academic mark is 70+ [with at least one mark of 70+ and no mark below 60]; Distinction is discretionary [and normally awarded] if: the aggregate academic mark is 69 [with at least one mark of 70+ and no mark below 60]; Merit is mandatory if: the aggregate academic mark is 60+ [with at least one mark of 60+ and no mark below 50]; Merit is discretionary [and normally awarded] if: the aggregate academic mark is 59 [with at least one mark of 60+ and no mark below 50].

5. Award Classification Rules (g) MEd, PGDips and PG Certs: Merits & Distinctions only if 120[MEd]/90[PGD]/45[PGC] credits are from Hope. Distinction mandatory if 70+ for the overall aggregate. If overall aggregate is 65-69 Distinction if aggregate is 67.5+ & student gets 70+ for 50% of marks OR aggregate is 65-67.4 & student gets 84+ for 50% of marks. Merit mandatory if 60+ for the overall aggregate. If overall aggregate is 55-59 Distinction if aggregate is 57.5+ & student gets 60+ for 50% of marks OR aggregate is 55-57.4 & student gets 65+ for 50% of marks.

6. Mitigating Circumstances: students who think they are not fit to sit Outline They should apply for a concession: extension [mark available at the Board]; deferral of assessment [no mark until the next Board – M grade shown]; deferred take with attendance [no mark until a later Board – MT grade]; interruption of study; special assessment arrangements / alternative assessments. Once a concession has been granted, the work is assessed as normal. Detailed policies on the University’s website cover valid grounds, type of evidence required, procedures, and responsibility for granting requests. Cases should have been dealt with before the Board. Implications for Externals You are not directly involved, but make sure that the Board seeks an assurance that any M or MT grade has been arrived at via due process.

7. Academic Misconduct Outline Implications for Externals Detailed policies on the University’s website cover penalties and procedures. Cases should have been dealt with before the Board. Cases identified on Board transcripts by “PL” or “PR” grades. “PR” means “offer a resubmission despite the normal penalty”. Mark is 0, unless misconduct was in one part of a multi-part Portfolio. 48PL means “student passes the Portfolio despite 0 for one part, but further misconduct would be treated as a repeated offence,”. Boards accept recommendations as long as due process has been followed. Implications for Externals Make sure that the Board seeks an assurance that any PL or PR grade has been arrived at via due process. If you suspect misconduct, notify the Assessment Co-ordinator asap, and ask for the matter to be investigated by due process.

8. What will Board Transcripts look like? Issued electronically no later than the day before the Board; best displayed via laptop or iPad. You may get a paper copy on the day. Example on the next slide.

. General information about student Grades and marks for assessments; grades, marks and results for modules. Qualitative assessments carry standard grades and marks. . Progression recommendation Award classification recommendation, with rationale

9. Some Implications for Externals (a) General: make sure that threshold standards have remained the same despite the pass mark changing from 40 on the pre 2015 regulations to Grade C on post 2015 regulations. Masters Degrees [students who started from September 2015]: pay particular attention to Dissertations and Research Projects; for fails, make sure that - work below F+ is too poor to be compensated, module aggregates below 25 reflect performance too poor to warrant a resit; for passes, make sure you are confident that work is suitably placed into the “high” or “low” part of each band; remember that the highest category starts at 84 if you think markers use a notional maximum of 76, say so!

9. Some Implications for Externals (b) Masters Degrees [students who started before September 2015]: pay particular attention to Dissertations and Research Projects; for fails, make sure that - work below F+ is too poor to be compensated, module aggregates below 25 reflect performance too poor to warrant a resit; for passes, make sure you are confident about the Pass/Merit/Distinction category awarded for each module - awarding a module 69 instead of 70 might have a significant effect on the student’s eligibility for a Distinction.

9. Some Implications for Externals (c) PGCEs [academic credits]: make sure you are confident about the broad level of a student’s achievement: pass at level M[7], pass at level H[6], below pass standard at Level H[6]; for fails, make sure that - work below F+ is too poor to be compensated, module aggregates below 25 reflect performance too poor to warrant a resit; for passes, make sure you are confident about the Pass/Merit/Distinction category given to each assessment.

9. And finally… We hope you have found this presentation useful. If you have any queries please email Dr Cathy Walsh [University Registrar] at walshc@hope.ac.uk