Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing the CCSS 8:30-8:40 Introductions & quick background
Advertisements

Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Mathematics Instruction: Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting
Increasing the cognitive demand in the classroom Rachel Linney Aoife Kelly.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
1 Learning to Do the Mathematical Work of Teaching Deborah Loewenberg Ball Hyman Bass, Tim Boerst, Yaa Cole, Judith Jacobs, Yeon Kim, Jennifer Lewis, Laurie.
Common Core Standards, K – 12 Kentucky Core Academic Standards Mathematics 1.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
Worthwhile Tasks. Four Fours and Operations Problem Use four 4s and some symbols +, x, -, ÷,and ( ) to give expressions for the whole numbers from 0 through.
Developing Mathematics PD Sessions: Planning Conversations and Instructional Decisions that Lead to Improved MKT in District Leaders. National Council.
Classroom Assessments Based On Standards (CABS) WMC State Mathematics Conference Green Lake, Wisconsin Leadership Pre-conference April 30, 2008 Beth Schefelker,
Teacher Quality Workshops for 2010/2011
Math Assessments Increasing Rigor February 20, 2013 & February 21, 2013.
Digging into the Instructional Design Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez MTL Session, September 20, 2011.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Problem Solving, Protocols and Practice through the Ages Wisconsin Mathematics Council Wisconsin Mathematics Council 41 st Annual Conference 41 st Annual.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
The Empty Number Line: A Model For Thinking Math Alliance DeAnn Huinker & Beth Schefelker April 27, 2010.
Welcome Academic Math Coaches! Let’s Mix It Up! Find a seat at a table. Use the dot on your nametag to make sure each color is represented. Green 1-2 years.
How Do You Know Students Learned What You Just Taught? Lee Ann PruskeRosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public.
Math AP Meeting January 20, 2015 Presenter: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, CFN204.
High Cognitive vs. Low Cognitive 1. An effective mathematical task is needed to challenge and engage students intellectually. 2.
1 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction Based on research from the Quasar Project found in Implementing Standards-Based Mathematics Instruction:
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist
Kevin McLeod Connie Laughlin Hank Kepner Beth Schefelker Mary Mooney Math Teacher Leader Meeting, April 5 th and 7 th The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership.
Engaging Students in High Level Cognitive Tasks Marjorie Graeff April 21, 2010 Division of Teaching & Learning.
1 Improving Teaching and Learning Through Questioning Lee Ann Pruske Bernard Rahming Rosann Hollinger Sharonda M. Harris March 16 & 18, 2010 MTL Meeting.
Materials Beliefs Cut-up beliefs Answer key Adjusting support tool Tasks activity Martha’s carpeting problem (on ppt) Fencing problem (labels) 3-5 tasks.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
Exploring Cognitive Demands Part 2 Rosann Hollinger Lee Ann Pruske Sharonda M. Harris Bernard Rahming January 20, 28, 2010 Math Teacher Leader Meeting.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
Algebraic Reasoning Content Academy—Grade 5 Round Rock ISD Learning by Doing® Sami Briceño.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.
Math & Science Collaborative Analyzing Mathematical Tasks and the Mathematical Task Framework.
Teaching Math for Learning: Standards-Aligned System, Secondary Mathematics, Year 2.
Classroom Assessments Based On Standards (CABS) New Wisconsin Promise Conference Madison, Wisconsin January 14, 2009 Beth Schefelker, MTSMary Mooney, MTS.
Representation: Getting at the heart of mathematical understanding Wisconsin Mathematics Council Green Lake Annual Conference Thursday, May 6, 2010 Sarah.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
SCS -TNCore Rollout 2013 Study Group # 1. Common Core State Standards Module 1: An Introduction: Making Sense of Tasks Setup and Implementation.
Capturing Growth in Teacher Mathematical Knowledge The Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators Eleventh Annual Conference 26 January 2007 Dr. DeAnn.
Bernard Rahming Lee Ann Pruske Rosann Hollinger Sharonda Harris Assessment Session PRIME Framework: Teaching and Learning Leadership Principle MTL Meeting,
Analyzing Mathematical Tasks. Developed under the auspices of the NSF-funded ESP Project (ESI ) -- Directed by Margaret Smith, University of.
A Formative Assessment System That Really Works Lee Ann Pruske, MTS Kim O’Brien, MTL Milwaukee.
Amy Jones Lewis November 2010 Green River Regional Educational Cooperative MathPLUS Content Day 1: Student-Centered Problem Solving.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Capturing Student Thinking. Purpose:  Learn about process for capturing student thinking  Hands-on experience with some of the steps in the process.
Materials l Ppt slides (5) as handout Tasks books for principals Form for data collection Form for additional input Outcomes for project by session (Eoline)
Thinking about the ways students encounter mathematics.
Classroom Discourse and Classroom Practice Pandora Bedford Rosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Hank Kepner Connie Laughlin October 12 & 14, 2010 MTL Meeting.
The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP), an initiative of the Milwaukee Partnership Academy (MPA), Using Properties to Reason through Tough Questions.
Planning for Discourse in the Classroom Pandora Bedford Rosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Hank Kepner Connie Laughlin December 9 th and 16 th, 2010 MTL.
CCSSO – Cross-State Mathematics Teacher Leaders: IA, MT, ND, SD Facilitator Name and Location Strategies for Modifying Existing Math Tasks to Increase.
Improving Mathematical Number Sense & Technology Integration Teacher Quality Grant Peyton Forest Elementary Atlanta Public Schools Atlanta, GA July 23,
Good Morning!   Please find a seat at a table that has materials.   We hope you have your Common Core Math binder with you. If you don’t, please go.
Algebraic Reasoning Inquiry Project
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
New Wisconsin Promise Conference: Closing the Achievement Gap
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
MATHEMATICAL TASKS TO SKILLS
3-5 Math Best Practices workshop 2018
HANDOUT Page for facilitators that lists all the hand outs needed for the workshop and the meanings of icons used on the slides in this workshop. SLIDE.
Mathematical Tasks, Cognitive Demand and Higher Level Mathematics
to the Work of the Mathematics Teacher Leader
Exploring Probability Through Yahtzee Extensions
Serena Alderson Manager of School Partnerships Carnegie Learning, Inc
Presentation transcript:

Are All Math Tasks Created Equally? Lee Ann Pruske Dana Thome Pruskelx @Milwaukee.k12.wi.us Thomedk@Milwaukee.k12.wi.us National Conference of Teachers of Mathematics Indianapolis, IN April 2011 Add mps logo

We Are Learning To . . . Understand and identify the cognitive demand levels of mathematical tasks.

Success Criteria We will be successful if at the end of the session, we can understand and identify the features of the four levels of cognitive demand of mathematical tasks, and begin to understand where the tasks are located in your textbook materials.

Building Academic Vocabulary Discuss with your shoulder partner what you think Cognitive Demand is.

Cognitive Demand… “The kind and level of thinking required of students in order to successfully engage with and solve the task.” Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, (2000) At about 5 min now

Reading: “Analyzing Mathematics Instructional Tasks” Individually read the article. Each person share one idea from the article at your table. 10-15 min with debrief Decide what the debrief is and which big ideas should be surfaced.

Four Levels of Cognitive Demand in Mathematical Tasks Low Level Cognitive Demands Memorization Tasks Procedures Without Connections to understanding, meaning or concepts Tasks High Level Cognitive Demands Procedures With Connections to understanding, meaning or concepts Tasks Doing Mathematics Tasks

Pink handout

Table Group Sort Activity Lay out the 4 green category cards Deal out the 8 blue Mathematical Task Cards to everyone in the group. Refer to the “Task Analysis Guide” for criteria. As you place your Mathematical Task cards into a category, explain your reasoning. Help each other justify the placements. 10 min to sort 15 min to debrief.

Explanation of Categorization Cognitive Demands and Features Sample Tasks Task Level of Cognitive Demand Explanation of Categorization Features A Doing Mathematics There is no pathway suggested by the task. The focus is on looking for the underlying mathematical structure. Requires an explanation Uses manipulatives Involves multiple steps Uses a diagram Handout key to groups

Materials Discussion Where do you find high level cognitive demand questions in your curricular materials? Turn and talk to a neighbor. 5 min discussion

“When teachers take the opportunity to analyze the tasks, they become more alert to the potential for slippage between intentions and actions in their teaching. Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, (2000)

Success Criteria We will be successful if at the end of the session, we can understand and identify the features of the four levels of cognitive demand of mathematical tasks, and begin to understand where the tasks are located in your textbook materials.

Take Aways… As you walk away, think about these three questions: Which of the four levels of cognitive demand are you most comfortable with? Which one do you understand the least? Something I want to know more about is…?

Thank you for coming! www.mmp.uwm.edu Resources can be found at Pruskelx @Milwaukee.k12.WI.US Thomedk@Milwaukee.k12.WI.US Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

Mathematical Tasks Framework Figure 1.3 TASKS As they appear in curricular/ instructional materials As set up by teachers As implemented by students Student Learning A representation of how mathematical tasks unfold during classroom instruction. (Stein & Smith, 1998, Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School)