Circular Reasoning/Begging the Question

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(Faulty Casualty/Non-Sequitur) Evan Payne
Advertisements

Q3,J4 A) “Hitler was a vegetarian, therefore, I don’t trust vegetarians.” B) “You can’t prove that there aren’t Martians living in caves under the surface.
The Crucible $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 Characters?
Understanding Logical Fallacies
Kenzie Garrett Amber Jewell
Fallacy Appeal to Ridicule (Appeal to Mockery/ The Horse Laugh) Anna Houchens Tiffany Tolsma.
Circular Reasoning/Begging the Question
Argument from authority
Straw Man Logical Fallacy
 Red Herring- an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue Have you Done your homework? Do you know what time.
Focus Questions The Crucible: Act I.
Begging the Question/Circular Reasoning
Circular Reasoning By: Logan Witty and Kacie Martin.
By: Haley Ford Appeal To Ignorance.
The Crucible Discussion Questions.
Circulus in Demonstrando (circular argument) and Petitio Principii (begging the question).. By: Ashley Lewis.
Begging The Question Kelsey Turner and Chelsey White.
Post Hoc First period. Definition A fallacy in which one event is said to be the cause of a later event simply because it occurred earlier. A fallacy.
Logic Fallacies Debate Class Production Spain Park High School
Ad Populum/ Appeal to Popularity/ Bandwagon Krystal Sims & Makayla Glass.
The Crucible Bo and Maggie Straw Man Fallacy. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than It actually is and claims that the real.
The Straw Man Whitney Phillips 7 th Period. Definition: Straw Man Fallacy- when a character misrepresents another character’s position and then proceeds.
Circular reasoning (also known as paradoxical thinking or circular logic), is a logical fallacy in which "the reasoner begins with what he or she is trying.
LOGICAL FALLACIES By: Ella Settle. DOGMATISM The tendency to lay down principles as incontrovertibly true, without consideration of evidence or the opinions.
The Crucible logical fallacy project
Students will understand what causes the flaws in the justice system in Act III.
Circular Reasoning Joshua Meador, Rilee Mathews, and Rebekah Thompson.
Straw Man GRAYSON HYATT. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than it actually is and claims that the real position has been.
Logical Fallacies EXIT Continue… A logical fallacy is a statement that contains faulty reasoning. Don’t give your reader a reason to doubt your information.
Circular Reasoning. What is Circular Reasoning? A fallacious form of argument in which someone assumes that parts (or all) of what a person claims to.
Poisoning the Well By Tessa Britt and Tracey Resner.
BEGGING THE QUESTION/ CIRCULAR REASONING BY: Jessica Greenwood And McKenzie Pedigo.
By: Tanner Gray 2nd period
Ad Hominem LUCAS ENGLAND & ZACH ZACCARI A.P. LANGUAGE ROSEMARIE GRICE 7 TH PERIOD.
Ad Hominem By: Ashley Crenshaw.
What Is Dogmatism? Dogmatism is the tendency to lay down principles as incontrovertibly true, without consideration of evidence or the opinions of others.
WEEK 3: Metaphysics Natural Theology – Anselm’s Ontological Argument.
Puritans. Puritans Characters ACT I ACT II ACT III.
Act III Comprehension Questions
“The Crucible” Fallacies: Ad Hominem/Poisoning the Well
The Crucible Act IV.
Reasoning and Proof Unit 2.
The Crucible Jeopardy Who’s Who? Who Says? What’s What? Q $100 Q $200
CST 24 – Logic.
Appeal to Ignorance Paige Davis.
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible
THE CRUCIBLE ACT II.
Makayle Botts and Kaitlin Graves
Argument From False Authority Fallacy
Post Hoc Kassi Hall.
Red Herring.
The Crucible Fallacies: Post Hoc
The Crucible Arthur Miller
The meaning, association, or emotion that has come to be attached to a word is its connotation.
Begging The question/circular reasoning
Developing Arguments for Persuasive Speeches
Dogmatism BY: Kennedy ludwig.
The Crucible Act II.
Appeal to Ignorance A fallacy based on the assumption that a statement must be true if it cannot be proved false.
Irony and logical fallacy
Katie Trulock and Courtney Sexton
Dogmatism By: Taylor Montgomery.
Appeal to Ignorance By: Amber Cline.
The Crucible---Study Guide, Act III
The crucible – Act Two What do you know so far?.
The Crucible Act II.
Syllogisms.
Chapter 2: Geometric Reasoning
What’s your nationality? Where are you from?
The Crucible Test Review
Presentation transcript:

Circular Reasoning/Begging the Question John McGhee Wyatt Price

Definition Begging the question, is a logical fallacy in which the writer or speaker assumes the statement under examination to be true. In other words, begging the question involves using a idea to support itself. If the idea is uncertain, then the argument is bad. The most basic instances of begging the question involve rephrasing. (grammarist.com)

Examples from The Crucible Act II –“ If you say I am one, then I say there are none.” -Elizabeth Pg.200 Elizabeth Proctor is being questioned by Hale on if she believes in witches, with her being a Christian woman, she says that if she is being accused of being a witch, then she does not believe witches exist. It is not possible for her to be a witch, therefore they do not exist.

Act III- Hawthorne: “How do you know, then, that you are not a witch?” Martha Corey: “If I were, I would know it.” Pg.207 Martha Corey answers his question by circling back to his original question on if she knew what a witch is. She previously stated that she did not know what a witch is, yet now she says that if she was a witch, she would know it. Thus, using circular reasoning.

Real life Example Religion is the most common of circular reasoning. One who believes in some sort of religion does not need logic to show or prove their religion, but faith. But when their beliefs are put into questions people circle through using faulty logic then simply enplaning them selves. Unaticfaith. N.p., n.d. Web. Mar.-Apr. 2013.