Request for Approval of Cape Fear / Neuse River Basin Hydrologic Model

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interlocal Cooperation for a Sustainable and Secure Water Supply Town of Pittsboro October 27, 2014.
Advertisements

Governor’s State Water Law Review Committee Recommendations 1982: Implementation Update David G. Baize Bureau of Water.
0 James Kennedy, Ph.D., P.G. State Geologist Georgia Environmental Protection Division Georgia Comprehensive State-Wide Water Management Plan Assessment.
GAS DRILLING & HYDRAULIC FRACTURING In the Tidewater Region Photo credit: R.W. Dawson.
Water Management Regulatory Programs Interbasin Transfer, Drought Management and Capacity Use William Kreutzberger/CH2M HILL (
David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 1 / 26 David P. Lusch, Ph.D. Distinguished Senior Research Specialist Michigan State University Dept. of Geography,
Apalachicola/Chattahoochee/Flint Focus Area - USGS WaterSMART NIDIS SE Climate Forum Lake Lanier Islands, GA December 2, 2011.
Interlocal Cooperation for a Sustainable and Secure Water Supply Don Greeley Regional Managers Meeting April 8 th, 2014.
David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 1 / 19 David P. Lusch, Ph.D. Distinguished Senior Research Specialist Michigan State University Dept. of Geography,
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
WATER AVAILABILITY MODELING for the SULPHUR RIVER BASIN Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Austin, Texas Consultant: R. J. Brandes Company.
The North Carolina Drought Management Advisory Councilhttp://
Proposed Regulation for the Measurement of Agricultural Water Deliveries Department of Water Resources Water Use and Efficiency PUBLIC.
An Interregional Water Solution with Conjunctive Use of Groundwater Haskell L. Simon President, Coastal Plains Groundwater Conservation District Vice President,
Interdistrict Transfers of Water and Local Sources First Land Resources and Regulatory Committee November 3, 2005 Land Resources and Regulatory Committee.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Groundwater Study For Malad and Bear Rivers Drainages, Box Elder County Bear River Water Conservancy.
Policy for Maintaining Instream Flows in Northern California Coastal Streams Monitoring and Reporting Provisions for Water Rights Victoria Whitney Deputy.
Alabama Water Resources Association Geological Survey of Alabama
What is OASIS? Water resources simulation/optimization model
High Altitude View of ACF Regional Water Plans.
S.B Municipality Fees. S.B – Environment Budget Reconciliation Bill Enacted during the 2011 regular legislative session and becomes effective.
Ground-Water Management Plan Beryl Enterprise Area August 6, 2007 Sign up sheet.
Request approval to proceed to EMC with 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan.
Division of Water Resources COMPREHENSIVE BASIN PLANNING The Integration of Water Quality Planning and Water Quantity Planning Ian McMillan Chief, Basin.
Connie Brower NC DENR Division of Water Resources.
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT San Jacinto Groundwater Basin Numerical Flow Model Update Brian Powell Director of Planning March 17,
WATER USE PROGRAM HOW IT HAS CHANGED WHY IT IS IMPORTANT! Eric K. Klotz, P.E. Utah Water Resources Frank Quintana, P.E. Utah Water Rights Tammy North,
The Future of Sustainable Water Initiatives in North Carolina PENC Engineering Leadership Conference Tuesday, December 2, 2013 Donald L. Safrit, P.E.,
12-31 EMC Approval of Broad River Basin Hydrologic Model November 8, 2012 Division of Water Resources NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
Road map hydrology and water allocation SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning in Turkey.
Water Availability 1996 Texas drought –Governor Bush asks “how much water do we have? How much are we using? How much do we need?” -- Ooops. No good answers!
Department of Environmental Quality
Provisions under GST ASSESSMENT
Department of Environmental Quality
Presented by Jon Traum, P.E.
Department of Environmental Quality
Development and Application of a Groundwater-Flow Model of the Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifers, Aiken County, South Carolina to Support Water Resource.
Ten Reasons to Use South Carolina’s Surface Water Quantity Models
Department of Environmental Quality
Klamath ADR Hydrology Report
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
WATER POLICY And Management in AlabamA
Department of Environmental Quality
EPA’s Partial Approval of North Carolina’s (d) List
Department of Environmental Quality
Request for a Major Variance from the Neuse River Riparian Area Protection Rules    Harshavardhan Tummalpally 5201 Trinity Road Raleigh, NC January.
Local Water Supply Plan Summary
Report of Proceedings Surface Water Quality Standards Triennial Review Environmental Management Commission November 13, 2014 Steve Tedder – EMC Hearing.
Temporary Rulemaking for 15A NCAC 02L Section .0400
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality Scott Bullock
September 8, 2016 Request Approval of the Determinations to be Submitted to Rules Review Commission for Subchapter 15A NCAC 02E (Periodic Review of Existing.
Committee Update: Review of Groundwater Standards/IMACs
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
Final Determination Environmental Management Commission March 11, 2015
Department of Environmental Quality
Summary of Chesdin Reservoir Reliability
3 step process Step 1: Agency determination
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
2013 CCPCUA Assessment Central Coastal Plain Capacity Use Area
Water Allocation Committee IBT Update July 2015
Solutions to Challenges to Water Supply Permitting
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Systems and Components – A Process for Developing the Total Water Budget Handbook for Water Budget Development - With or Without Models CWEMF 2019 Annual.
Presentation transcript:

Request for Approval of Cape Fear / Neuse River Basin Hydrologic Model Tom Fransen DWR Modeling and Assessment Branch

Session Law 2010-143 AN ACT to direct the department of environment and natural resources to develop basinwide hydrologic models G.S. 143-355 is amended by adding a new subsection to read: (o) Basinwide Hydrologic Models. - The Department shall develop a basinwide hydrologic model for each of the 17 major river basins in the State as provided in this subsection.

Session Law 2010-143 (o)(3) Model. - Each basinwide hydrologic model shall: a. Include surface water resources, groundwater resources to the extent known by the Department, transfers into and out of the river basin, other withdrawals, ecological flow, instream flow requirements, projections of future withdrawals, an estimate of return flows within the river basin, inflow data, local water supply plans, and other scientific and technical information the Department deems relevant.

Cape Fear / Neuse river Basin Hydrologic Model Modeled surface water resources 49 streams 27 reservoirs

Cape Fear / Neuse river Basin Hydrologic Model 27 modeled interbasin transfers Other withdrawals 46 reservoir evaporation Agricultural and golf course irrigation, 15 industrial withdrawals 18 instream flow requirements 2020 - 2060 withdrawal and return flow projections 39 withdrawals 54 return flows

Cape Fear / Neuse river Basin Hydrologic Model Inflow data 22 USGS gages Local Water Supply Plans For 133 systems Other scientific & technical information Dept. deems relevant Drought plans for 29 systems

Session Law 2010-143 (o)(3) Model. - Each basinwide hydrologic model shall: b. Be designed to simulate the flows of each surface water resource within the basin that is identified as a source of water … in response to different variables, conditions, and scenarios. The model shall specifically be designed to predict the places, times, frequencies, and intervals at which any of the following may occur: 1. Yield may be inadequate to meet all needs. 2. Yield may be inadequate to meet all essential water uses. 3. Ecological flow may be adversely affected.

Session Law 2010-143 (o)(3) Model. - Each basinwide hydrologic model shall: b. Be designed to simulate the flows… Validation: evaluation of model performance, i.e., whether model possesses satisfactory range of accuracy consistent with its intended application Does model represent real system’s flows to sufficient level of accuracy?

Cape Fear / Neuse river Basin Hydrologic Model Validation: statistical tests Goodness-Of-Fit Statistics Summary Table - CF-Neuse River Basin Gage Flow Gages/Location GOF Results Drought Period, Days Monthly NSE > 0.5 RSR ≤ 0.70 PBIAS ≤ ± 25% Data Total % Difference ≤ ± 25% 0090 Haw River at Haw River Gage 0.9905 0.0968 1.8 USGS 557   Satisfactory Simbase 633 13.64%

Cape Fear / Neuse river Basin Hydrologic Model Validation: graphical comparisons

Session Law 2010-143 (o)(3) Model. - Each basinwide hydrologic model shall: c. Be based solely on data that is of public record and open to public review and comment. Flow records from U.S. Geological Survey Withdrawals & discharges from local water supply plans, withdrawal registrations, and NPDES Public meetings, public notice and comment

Session Law 2010-143 (o)(5) Interstate cooperation. - To the extent practicable, the Department shall work with neighboring states to develop basinwide hydrologic models for each river basin shared by North Carolina and another state. Not applicable for Cape Fear/Neuse River basin

Session Law 2010-143 (o)(6) Approval and modification of hydrologic models. - a. Upon completion of a hydrologic model, the Department shall: 1. Submit the model to the Commission for approval. 2. Publish in the North Carolina Register notice of its recommendation that the Commission approve the model and of a 60-day period for providing comment on the model. 3. Provide electronic notice to persons who have requested electronic notice of the notice published in the North Carolina Register. b. Upon receipt of a hydrologic model, the Commission shall: 1. Receive comment on the model for the 60-day period noticed in the North Carolina Register. 2. Act on the model following the 60-day comment period.

Cape Fear / Neuse river Basin Hydrologic Model NC Register publication February 17, 2014 Comments accepted through April 21, 2014 3 comments received Town of Cary, CH2MHill: support the model City of Raleigh: Questioned use of models to analyze ecological flows; reported segment of Neuse where simulated flow oscillates

Session Law 2010-143 (o)(6) d. A hydrologic model is not a rule, and Article 2A of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes does not apply to the development of a hydrologic model. Cape Fear/Neuse model is not a rule (o)(8) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to vary any existing, or impose any additional regulatory requirements, related to water quality or water resources. Cape Fear/Neuse model is for planning purposes only

Recommendation The Division recommends that the EMC approve the Cape Fear/Neuse River basin hydrologic model.

tom.fransen@ncdenr.gov Questions ?