Disposal Method Selection Criteria

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lesson 3 Responding to Emergency Events. For additional information or questions please contact Toledo-Lucas County Health Department APC:
Advertisements

Cleaning and Disinfection Vehicles. Overview ●Any vehicle used on infected premises or with infected animals – Trailers, feed trucks, milk trucks, carcass.
Cleaning and Disinfection Roles and Responsibilities Basic Protocol Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Cleaning and Disinfection (2014 )
Personal Protective Equipment Donning and Doffing Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Personal Protective Equipment (2011)
Carcass Disposal Overview. Method Selection ●Animal species ●Number of animals – Space and equipment needed ●Pathogen and its ability to persist or spread.
Massachusetts Avian Flu and Other Carcass Management Planning John Fischer MassDEP MHOA 2007 Seminars.
Carcass Disposal On-Site Burial. ●Excavated trench or pit – Decomposition – Heat ●Length of time required varies – Species and size – Total volume – Soil.
Mass Depopulation & Euthanasia
Biosecurity Biosecurity Principles Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Biosecurity (2013)
Biosecurity Overview. Biosecurity ●Series of management practices – Prevent introduction  Keep disease agents out of animal populations where they are.
Continuity of Business Overview Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Continuity of Business (2013)
Roles and Responsibilities Local Agencies and Responders.
Wildlife Management and Vector Control for an FAD Response in Domestic Livestock Developing a Wildlife Management Plan Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS.
Personal Protective Equipment Overview Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Personal Protective Equipment (2011)
Personal Protective Equipment Types and Levels Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Personal Protective Equipment (2011)
Health and Safety Overview Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Health and Safety (2011)
Health and Safety Incident Reporting Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Health and Safety (2011)
Disposal Overview Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal (2012)
Cleaning and Disinfection Overview. Cleaning & Disinfection (C&D) ●Stop the spread of pathogens – Inactivate or destroy microorganisms ●Vital for animal.
Health and Safety Responder Security and Safety Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Health and Safety (2011)
Cleaning and Disinfection Production Situations, Safety Issues Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Cleaning and Disinfection (2014 )
Business Continuity. HSEMD, IDALS, CFSPH Animal Disease Emergency Local Response Preparedness, 2008 Learning Objectives Recognize the impact an animal.
Carcass Disposal Composting. ●Carcasses layered with organic material – Thermophilic microbes – Heat generation – Accelerates biological decomposition.
Disposal Thermal Disposal and Other Methods Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal (2012)
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Tracing and Additional Operational Procedures Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance, Epidemiology,
WORKER SAFETY Radionuclides Web Cast August 4, 2004 Loren W. Setlow Office of Radiation and Indoor Air
Health and Safety Pre-Deployment Preparation Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Health and Safety (2011)
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Tracing and Additional Operational Procedures Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance, Epidemiology,
Quarantine and Movement Control Authorities Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Quarantine and Movement Control (2014)
Cleaning and Disinfection C&D Procedures, Part 1 Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Cleaning and Disinfection (2014)
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Surveillance Part 1: The Surveillance Plan Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance, Epidemiology,
Quarantine and Movement Control Overview Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Quarantine and Movement Control (2014)
Managing Disease Risk. HSEMD, IDALS, CFSPH Animal Disease Emergency Local Response Preparedness, 2008 Overview Importance of animal agriculture Biological.
Response to an Animal Disease Emergency. HSEMD, IDALS, CFSPH Animal Disease Emergency Local Response Preparedness, 2008 Steps in a Response Detection.
Vaccination for Contagious Diseases Preventing Disease Transmission During Vaccination Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Vaccination for Contagious.
Carcass Disposal Off-Site Locations (Rendering and Landfills) and Transportation Biosecurity.
Mass Depopulation & Euthanasia Responsibilities of Euthanasia Personnel Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Mass Depopulation and Euthanasia (2015)
Mass Depopulation & Euthanasia Overview Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Mass Depopulation and Euthanasia (2015)
Disposal Group Responsibilities and Activities Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal (2012)
Disposal Disposal Method Selection Criteria Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal (2012)
Mass Depopulation & Euthanasia Avian Euthanasia Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Mass Depopulation and Euthanasia (2015)
Vaccination for Contagious Diseases Preventing Disease Transmission During Vaccination Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Vaccination for Contagious.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Surveillance Part 2: Implementing Surveillance Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance, Epidemiology,
Disposal Composting, Rendering, and Burial Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal (2012)
Mass Depopulation & Euthanasia Non-Domestic and Aquatic Animal Euthanasia Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Mass Depopulation and Euthanasia.
Mass Depopulation & Euthanasia Bovine Euthanasia Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Mass Depopulation and Euthanasia (2015)
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Epidemiology Part 2: Epidemiology in an FAD Outbreak Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance,
Quarantine and Movement Control Movement Control, Permitting, and Personnel Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Quarantine and Movement Control.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Personnel and Premises Designations Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and.
Biosecurity Overview. Biosecurity ●Series of management practices ●Bioexclusion – Preventing the introduction onto non-infected premises ●Biocontainment.
Mass Depopulation & Euthanasia Equine Euthanasia Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Mass Depopulation and Euthanasia (2015)
Disposal Waste Materials Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal (2012)
Composting, Rendering, and Burial
Introduction to the Biotechnology Workplace
Introduction to the Biotechnology Workplace
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing
Mass Depopulation & Euthanasia
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing
Biosecure Areas Uninfected and Infected
Structure and Terminology
Role of Industry Self-regulation in Phytosanitary Compliance
Mass Depopulation & Euthanasia
Main Objectives of This Secession
Welcome To Our Presentation 1. Topic Name Transfer Stations and Transport, Ultimate Disposal Methods 2.
Overview of US EPA & State Manure Management Regulations
Mass Depopulation & Euthanasia
Food Safety T-1150 This work has been produced by DGL (Aust) Pty Ltd
Mass Depopulation & Euthanasia
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing
Presentation transcript:

Disposal Method Selection Criteria 2011 Disposal Disposal Method Selection Criteria Effective disposal of animal carcasses and associated materials is a critical component of a successful response during an animal health emergency, such as a major disease outbreak or a foreign animal disease (FAD). During an animal health emergency, disposal measures are implemented to prevent the introduction of or mitigate the spread of the pathogen through the elimination of infected, or potentially infected, animal carcasses and associated materials. Disposal also serves to remove potentially contaminated feed or food products from the animal feed and human food supply, protect the nation’s agricultural and national economy, and also - if the disease is zoonotic, safeguard public health. This presentation describes selection criteria for disposal methods. [This information was derived from the Foreign Animal Disease Preparedness and Response (FAD PReP)/National Animal Health Emergency Management System (NAHEMS) Guidelines: Disposal (2012)]. Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal (2012) USDA APHIS and CFSPH

Environmental and Biosecurity Considerations FAD PReP/NAHEMS Health and Safety PreDeployment Environmental and Biosecurity Considerations All disposal options present some potentially negative environmental effects and must be accounted for in planning. Biosecurity risks are also present to varying degrees in each of the presented disposal methods. Transportation of contaminated disposal materials off-site for processing (e.g., burial, composting, rendering) will present biosecurity challenges to contain the contaminated material, as well as to clean and disinfect the transportation vehicles. FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal - Disposal Method Selection Criteria USDA APHIS and CFSPH

FAD PReP/NAHEMS Health and Safety PreDeployment Composting Low risk of environmental contamination Proper site selection Well-compacted soil Appropriate cover Potential for nitrogen release Indoor composting protected Biosecurity risks Test compost before transporting When outdoor composting is conducted at a proper site on well-compacted soil with appropriate cover, the risk of environmental contamination is low. However, nitrogen (in the form of ammonia or nitrate) is produced by decaying carcasses and could be released. Compared to outdoor composting, indoor composting is protected from weather (such as wind or drying) and scavengers. On-site composting reduces the biosecurity risks associated with transportation. However, if off-site carbon sources must be obtained, biosecurity plans must be in place for transportation vehicles bringing the co-compost. Composted materials, once the process is believed to be complete, should be tested prior to transportation to assure disease causing pathogens are not present. FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal - Disposal Method Selection Criteria USDA APHIS and CFSPH

FAD PReP/NAHEMS Health and Safety PreDeployment Rendering Environmental regulation Biosecurity risks Transportation to rendering facility Handling at rendering facility End product is generally safe Some pathogens or toxins may not be completely eliminated Rendered carcasses not used as feed May be safe for landfills The rendering process is closely regulated to keep the process environmentally safe, but biosecurity during transportation to the rendering facility, and handling once at the facility can be problematic. Transportation and handling of infected carcasses and other waste material increase the risk of spreading disease. This risk may be exacerbated if the number of carcasses exceeds facility capacity and some of the carcasses must be stored. Once the carcasses have been rendered, however, the end product is generally considered biosecure. If rendering is chosen as a carcass disposal option, selection of a facility with optimal biosecurity protocols is critical. Carcasses that are contaminated with endotoxins, chemical residues, or are infected with pathogens that are not eliminated by rendering cannot be rendered into feed ingredients, but are sometimes safe for landfills. FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal - Disposal Method Selection Criteria USDA APHIS and CFSPH

FAD PReP/NAHEMS Health and Safety PreDeployment Permitted Landfill Output: leachate and landfill gas Landfills Systems in place for collection Adjustments may be necessary Biosecurity risks Transportation Carcass handling The output resulting from disposal in a permitted landfill is generally similar to that resulting from typical operations: leachate and landfill gas. Because these are normal byproducts of a landfill, systems are already in place to collect and treat these outputs. Depending on the pathogen, no additional systems may be necessary. However, the disposal of large carcass numbers may warrant adjustments to the collection and/or treatment systems. Like all off-site disposal methods, transportation of carcasses to landfills presents additional biosecurity challenges and plans must be in place to prevent pathogen spread. Workers who handle infectious carcasses should take proper precautions and should be equipped with appropriate PPE in accordance with site-specific plans. [This photo shows the disposal of waste material at a landfill. Photo source: David Meeker, National Renderers Association] FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal - Disposal Method Selection Criteria USDA APHIS and CFSPH

FAD PReP/NAHEMS Health and Safety PreDeployment Unlined Burial Potential water contamination Pathogens are not inactivated Long term monitoring, management, environmental testing Environmental remediation, if necessary Using unlined burial as a disposal method has significant environmental challenges. Contamination from leachate, runoff and ash burial can result in negative impacts to both private and public water supplies. Certain geological conditions, such as sandy soil and a high seasonal water table, can increase the risk of contaminants reaching the groundwater. The selection of a burial site must ensure that water sources are protected as well as private property and residences and public spaces such as roads, public lands, community parks, etc. On-site burial limits the movement of carcasses, but the burial process does not inactivate pathogens which poses a biosecurity issue. Plans must include long term monitoring, management and environmental testing of burial sites, and if necessary, environmental remediation. FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal - Disposal Method Selection Criteria USDA APHIS and CFSPH

Fixed-Facility Incineration FAD PReP/NAHEMS Health and Safety PreDeployment Fixed-Facility Incineration Emission control devices Ash disposal from closed container Biosecure transport and handling Temporary storage, if capacity exceeded Inactivates prions Although fixed-facility incineration can only dispose of limited amounts of waste material, this method has less negative environmental impact when compared to air-curtain or open-air burning. A fixed-facility incinerator may be equipped with emission control devices that comply with regulations and protect the environment. The resulting ash may be less problematic to manage compared to open–air burning because it is in a discrete closed container rather than distributed over open land. This disposal method would likely require biosecure off-site transportation and handling of carcasses, and potentially temporary storage if capacity is exceeded. During an animal health emergency involving a TSE the use of fixed-facility incineration is very biosecure and advantageous because this method is capable of inactivating prions. FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal - Disposal Method Selection Criteria USDA APHIS and CFSPH

FAD PReP/NAHEMS Health and Safety PreDeployment Open-Air Burning Negative impact on air quality and water sources Soil contamination from accelerant Ash disposal Pathogen may be dispersed in smoke Public nuisance, unintended fires, and violations of regulatory restrictions Uncontrolled open-air burning has the potential to generate significant pollutants in the form of smoke and odor, negatively impacting air quality. Ground water and soil contamination may also result from pollution by hydrocarbons if used as an accelerant. Each ton of carcasses yields 0.3 tons of ash, which also requires proper disposal. Depending on groundwater considerations ash-disposal options range from burial on-site to disposal at landfills. Biosecurity concerns involve pathogens that may not be inactivated and could be dispersed in smoke particles. Open-air burning holds the possibility of creating a public nuisance, causing unintended fires, and violating regulatory restrictions. FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal - Disposal Method Selection Criteria USDA APHIS and CFSPH

Air-Curtain Incineration FAD PReP/NAHEMS Health and Safety PreDeployment Air-Curtain Incineration Relatively clean-burning Can be set up on-site Fewer air pollutants than open-air burning Refractory box protects the ground at the site from ash Biosecure delivery of fuel Air-curtain incineration is one of the most practical and environmentally acceptable emergency incineration options, and is the most rapid of the thermal disposal methods. It is relatively clean-burning if operated correctly (not loaded too fast with carcasses), and can be set up on-site. This incineration method may emit pollutants into the air, but fewer than open-air burning as it traps unburned particles under a curtain of air for further combustion. The use of a refractory box rather than an earthen trench contains the ash and protects the ground at the site. Air-curtain incinerators require fuel to burn, so biosecure delivery of wood or coal should be part of the plan. FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal - Disposal Method Selection Criteria USDA APHIS and CFSPH

Site-Specific Disposal Method Selection Criteria FAD PReP/NAHEMS Health and Safety PreDeployment Site-Specific Disposal Method Selection Criteria The selection of optimal disposal sites in an animal health incident involves a variety of factors and concerns. Disposal plans must be site-specific and account for many variables including pathogen and species type, environment, and public health perception. This section summarizes some primary considerations in site selection, including decision making, on-site disposal, and additional disposal strategies such as off-site disposal and temporary storage. FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal - Disposal Method Selection Criteria USDA APHIS and CFSPH

FAD PReP/NAHEMS Health and Safety PreDeployment Regional Limitations Consult authorities to minimize negative effects Environmental Pubic health Other regulations Consider local geophysical conditions and climatic trends Consult with local, county, state, and federal environmental officials to obtain specific information for the region or community in order to minimize any negative environmental effects associated with the disposal of contaminated material. To gain information regarding geophysical considerations regarding soil type/condition and water table level, consult the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. All applicable public health or environmental protection laws, including fire codes and other regulations should be determined and followed. Regional climatic trends should also be considered (for example, the general direction of prevailing winds) and seasonal considerations (precipitation, thermal factors) when considering various on-site methods of disposal. [This photo illustrates the importance of consultation with local, county, state, and federal environmental officials to select an optimal disposal method and site. Photo source: Alex Ramirez, Iowa State University] FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal - Disposal Method Selection Criteria USDA APHIS and CFSPH

Safety Considerations FAD PReP/NAHEMS Health and Safety PreDeployment Safety Considerations Safety Officer provides guidance in disposal site selection All personnel should be trained OSHA recommendations for people working in hazardous waste operations involving pathogens CFR, Part 21, Chapter 1910 The assigned Safety Officer should be consulted to provide guidance in disposal site and method selection. Careful site selection, method selection, and proper safety protocols must be followed to avoid injury. Site-specific hazards such as slippery footing, falls into trenches, burns, injuries related to heavy machinery, and contact with electric lines need to be avoided. All personnel should be properly trained and knowledgeable of the planned strategies. A Safety Officer should be available at all times for further guidance and direction. The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has outlined requirements and recommendations for those working in hazardous waste operations involving pathogens (CFR, Part 21, Chapter 1910, http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/hazardouswaste/index.html). FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal - Disposal Method Selection Criteria USDA APHIS and CFSPH

FAD PReP/NAHEMS Health and Safety PreDeployment Animals to be Disposed Biomass Personnel needed Necessary equipment Type/species/number Potential by-products also requiring disposal E.g., dairy cows and milk The overall biomass of the animal carcasses to be disposed of must figure heavily into disposal method considerations. Personnel required to carry out disposal activities as well as necessary equipment to handle carcasses will vary by animal type, species and number of animals. In addition, potentially contaminated animal by-products, feed and manure should also be considered when planning. For example, disposal activities related to dairy cattle will also need to include plans for disposal of milk. [This is a photo of dairy cows. A plan to dispose of dairy animal carcasses also needs to consider the disposal of contaminated milk, feed and manure. Photo source: Danelle Bickett-Weddle, Iowa State University] FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal - Disposal Method Selection Criteria USDA APHIS and CFSPH

FAD PReP/NAHEMS Health and Safety PreDeployment Temporary Storage Carcass disposal ideally occurs within 24 hours of depopulation Temporary storage may be necessary in an animal health emergency EPA regulations may apply Storage options Refrigeration in closed building Grinding and preserving carcasses Trenches, silos, pits During an animal health emergency that involves depopulation, members of the Disposal Group strive to properly dispose of contaminated or potentially contaminated animal carcasses and related materials within 24 hours of depopulation. However, in a major animal health emergency temporary storage may be necessary. The EPA has published regulations regarding storage and collection of solid waste, which can be applied to animal mortalities, which are essentially food waste. One option for temporary storage involves refrigeration in a closed building. Another involves grinding and preserving carcasses. In some cases, carcasses may be stored on trucks to await transportation for disposal. Trench silos or pits may also be used to temporarily store carcasses but care must be taken to prevent environmental contamination. FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal - Disposal Method Selection Criteria USDA APHIS and CFSPH

For More Information FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines & SOP: Disposal (2012) Test Template HANDS 2011-03 For More Information FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines & SOP: Disposal (2012) http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_ health/emergency_management/ Disposal web-based training module http://naherc.sws.iastate.edu/ More details can be obtained from the sources listed on the slide, available on the USDA website (http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/emergency_management/) and the NAHERC Training Site (http://naherc.sws.iastate.edu/). FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal - Disposal Method Selection Criteria USDA APHIS and CFSPH

Guidelines Content Authors Test Template HANDS 2011-03 Guidelines Content Authors Reneé Dewell, DVM, MS (CFSPH) Tom Glanville, PhD (Iowa State University) Significant contributions to the content were provided by USDA APHIS VS: Lori P. Miller, PE Darrel K. Styles, DVM, PhD This slide acknowledges the authors and those who made a significant contribution to the content of the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal document. Please see the Guidelines document for others who also provided additional assistance with content development. FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal - Disposal Method Selection Criteria USDA APHIS and CFSPH

Acknowledgments Development of this presentation was by the Center for Food Security and Public Health at Iowa State University through funding from the USDA APHIS Veterinary Services Information provided in this presentation was developed by the Center for Food Security and Public Health at Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, through funding from the US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services. PPT Author: Kerry Leedom Larson, DVM, MPH, PhD, DACVPM Reviewers: Janice Mogan, DVM; Reneé Dewell, DVM, MS MSP, CFSPH - 2010