University of California AB 168 Implementation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Advertisements

Purchasing Updates Faculty and Staff Presentation Fall Semester, 2010.
1. Compensation Objectives In the Compensation Training, we will discuss the details on ANR’s Compensation strategies and how it relates to new hires,
Changing applicant statuses, salary and Equal Opportunity approvals, offering the position to the applicant.
Purchasing Updates Faculty and Staff Presentation Fall, 2010
International Hiring: Faculty, Researchers and Staff  Presented by Mario Rojo del Busto, LL.M. Assistant Dean of Faculties & Chief of Staff Director.
Michelle Grimes-Hillman, South Representative Cynthia Rico, South Representative FACULTY LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE JUNE 11-13, 2015 SAN JOSE Empowering Local.
FEBRUARY 26, 2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SESSION 2 OF SERIES III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON.
1 Effective Senates: The Key Ingredients of Collegial Consultation Angelica Bangle, Chris Hill, Wheeler North, Beverly Reilly, Cheryl Stewart.
ACADEMIC SENATE ORIENTATION 9/3/09 Welcome New and Returning Senators!
EMPOWERING LOCAL SENATES Kevin Bontenbal, South Representative Stephanie Dumont, Area D Representative.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Interdepartmental Placement of Employees Returning to Work Following Approved Leave County of Los Angeles Department of Human Resources July 6, 2011.
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges ­– Leadership Institute 2008 Basics for Effective Senates Shaaron Vogel Wheeler North Academic Senate.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Effects of the Passage of ABX4 2 on California-Adopted Instructional.
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
1 Ethics CLARK COUNTY M-PLAN TRAINING. 2 Sources of Ethical Standards Ethics standards for management staff are derived from the following sources. They.
Presentation Title | May 4, 2009 HR Hiring Process ▸HR Decision Process is Completed ▸Job Descriptions will be reviewed in 10 business days ▸Position Recruitment.
Hiring and Evaluation Processes Greg Granderson & Pat James Hanz.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
Hosted By: League of California Cities Personnel & Employee Relations Department Presented By: Gage Dungy, Liebert Cassidy Whitmore.
Step Advancement Based on Satisfactory Performance Departmental Human Resources Group Meeting July 28, 2006.
FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTS Workshop on Senate Bill 239 (Hertzberg) July 21, 2016 Nevada LAFCo – Presented by P. Scott Browne, Counsel.
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel Winter Quarter Department Chair Forum February 24, 2006.
Classification and Compensation
Contract Compliance Training
2016 SPaRC Retreat Afternoon Concurrent Session #2 Ask HR!
Title of Presentation A Roundtable Discussion: Pay Equity Issues
CIVIL SERVICE 101.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Labor and Employment: 2017 CIOMA Legislative Update
Training for Faculty Search Committees
House Bill 2542 Next Steps Board of Governors Training August 16, 2017
Randolph County School System
Ethics, Outreach & Lobbying
Personnel actions in People Admin PD module
Presented by: Anthony Gatto, Esq. General Counsel
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association
Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Azerbaijan
DMS Office of Efficient Government Kick Off Meeting.
Post-Doctoral Trainee Senior Professional Research Staff Staff
Fair Chance Hiring Economic Development Committee, April 17, 2017
Coastal Carolina University
Overview Background UPS Operational Policy TC 4
UAB Office of the Provost
MEET THE NEW LAW:  Massachusetts Pay Equity Law.
Contract Compliance Training
Supplier Training Overview February 2018
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Taxability of Relocation Expenses
2018 Employment Law Forum Pay Equity Panel.
Taxability of Relocation Expenses
Workflow: Faculty PT/LT/Adjunct Direct-Hire Posting Managed Positions
Temp Faculty Hiring & Processing Workshop Spring 2018
Classification and Compensation Department of Human Resources
Best Practices in Maintaining Personnel Files
Search and Screening Guidelines Faculty UCF Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action EO/AA Search and Screening Guidelines 9_14 Prepared by Suzanne Lin.
Office of Sponsored Programs & Research
Sponsored Projects & Contracting Services
University of California AB 168 Implementation
University Budget Office
Streamline, Simplify, Organize, Automate
RECRUITING Staff and Student
Roles and Responsibilities
Chancellor’s Office Update
House Bill 2542 Next Steps Board of Governors Training August 16, 2017
Roles and Responsibilities
to Guide the Conversation about
Classification and Compensation Department of Human Resources
Massachusetts Equal Pay Act (MEPA)
Presentation transcript:

University of California AB 168 Implementation Restriction on Salary Information Inquiries University of California AB 168 Implementation 11/15/2018

Salary Inquiry Ban – National Trends A number of states and cities have passed laws that prohibit employers from asking job candidates about their salary history during all stages of the employment process. Delaware, Massachusetts, and Oregon have statewide laws prohibiting salary history inquiries. North Carolina and Pennsylvania have proposed similar bills. New York City, Philadelphia, and San Francisco have passed similar laws for their jurisdictions. California Governor Jerry Brown signed AB 168, Salary Information, on October 12, 2017, adding new language to the California Labor Code.

Salary Inquiry Ban – National Trends In general, these laws are intended: To improve gender pay equity and reduce likelihood that applicants will be prejudiced by prior salary levels. To prohibit an employer from relying on the salary history of a job applicant when determining his or her salary amount at any stage of the employment process. To allow pay variations based on a merit system, seniority system, education and training, geographical differences, etc.

Assembly Bill 168 (Salary Information) New California law prohibits CA employers from inquiring about or relying upon salary history as a factor in determining salary or whether to offer employment. Employers will be required to provide applicants with the pay scale for a position upon request. Prohibits inquiries directed to both applicants and agents, such as employment agencies. Applies to all employers, private and public, effective Jan. 1, 2018.

What does this mean for the UC? Based on its legal standing and constitutional status, the University may be exempt from the law. However, it is important to reflect: Our institutional values Our commitment to progressive talent management and diversity best practices Our desire to do the right thing Therefore, the University is taking steps to align our practices with the passage of this law.

For Your Location - Next Steps The full checklist is available on the Salary Inquiry Restrictions webpage. Remove all questions about prior salary history from: Employment applications Background checks Reference checks Employment verification and other verification inquiries Locally-contracted third-party agreements and related processes (e.g., search firms, background check vendors, staffing agencies, employment verifications, or any other verification inquiries) Review and revise: Local policies and procedures Interview/screening guidelines Training materials Provide training to all employees involved in the hiring process

Frequently Asked Questions The full FAQs document is available on the Salary Inquiry Restrictions webpage. Does AB 168 apply to all staff, academic, and faculty appointments? Yes. This law does not differentiate between the groups, therefore it applies to all staff, academic, and faculty for any position. The University is in the process of reviewing and considering changes to applicable University policies as a result of AB 168. For more information and guidance, contact your location’s Central Human Resources office or Academic Personnel office.   This set of FAQs is designated for SMG, MSP, PSS, Union and Non-Union staff. For information about how AB 168 applies to academic personnel, please contact your local Academic Personnel Office for guidance. What questions can I ask applicants related to this? Examples of questions that may be asked are: What are your salary requirements? What do you expect to make in this position? Is the salary range for this position within your acceptable range? If an applicant volunteers their salary history information, what am I supposed to do? The bill states: “If an applicant voluntarily and without prompting discloses salary history information to a prospective employer, nothing in this section shall prohibit that employer from considering or relying on that voluntarily disclosed salary history information in determining the salary for that applicant.” To ensure UC continues to advance and ensure equal pay rights, it is recommended that hiring managers do not rely on volunteered salary history information when making hiring decisions or setting salaries.

Frequently Asked Questions Does this influence how we share our salary range information?   AB168 encourages employers to share pay scales (salary grades) with applicants. Upon request, locations must share position, salary, grade and range information with an applicant. However, the guidance from Systemwide Human Resources is to use a current salary range like those derived from Career Tracks to set a budgetary-driven target range of pay for each open position. This budgeted target range should fall within the broader Career Tracks/other pay grade range. Locations retain the same ability and options to determine whether to share salary range information in the job posting. Locations may want to review how they currently share salary range information to better assist applicants in determining if they want to apply for the job. PPSM 30 (Compensation) states that there is a 25 percent cap on an employee’s salary increase within a single fiscal year. How does UC’s compliance with AB 168 affect this limitation? PPSM 30 (Compensation), Section III.B.4 (Annual Limit) states that an employee’s total salary increase in a single fiscal year cannot exceed 25 percent of base salary. Salary increases for policy-covered staff that exceed this policy provision must continue to be approved as policy exceptions following local procedures. The University is in the process of reviewing and considering changes to applicable University policies as a result of AB 168.

Additional Resources Salary Inquiry Restrictions Webpage: http://ucnet.universityofcalifornia.edu/working-at-uc/your-career/talent-management/talent-acquisition-employment/ab-168.html Contains implementation toolkit Policy References: PPSM 20 PPSM 21 PPSM 30 Contact your local Human Resources or Academic Personnel Office for location-specific information.