Elements and Artifacts

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forensic Anthropology. Generally speaking forensic anthropology is the examination of human skeletal remains to determine identity and present findings.
Advertisements

Forensic Anthropology. It’s the application of physical anthropology to the legal process. Identify skeletal, badly decomposed or unidentified human remains.
Forensic Anthropology. What Questions Can Forensic Anthropology Answer? Race Sex Approximate age Approximate stature Pathologies (diseases) Traumas (injuries)
Forensic Anthropology A forensic anthropologist can assist in the identification of deceased individuals whose remains are decomposed, burned, mutilated,
FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY
Forensics Anthropology. Generally speaking forensic anthropology is the examination of human skeletal remains for law enforcement agencies to determine.
Steven lee M.S. Pathology FTCC. Right os coxa Left os coxa Lumbar vertebrae sacrum Right femur Left femur coccyx sacrum steven lee M.S. Pathology FTCC.
Tom, Rachel, Katherine Forensic Anthropology. Introduction The main bones we’re interested in: *Cranium/Skull *Pelvis *Tibia *Femur *Humerus.
CHE FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY A Very Brief Overview CHE 113 Thanks to help from Prof. Ann Bunch, SUNY Oswego.
Forensic Anthropology
Age Determination Most accurate estimations from:
All About Bones The Skeletal System.
All About Bones The Skeletal System.
CHE FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY A Very Brief Overview CHE 113.
Forensic Anthropology and Odontology. Forensic Anthropology -study of human skeletal remains to determine sex, age, race, and time of death in an effort.
FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY WHAT IS IT? WHAT DOES A FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGIST DO? HOW DOES ONE BECOME A FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGIST?
Identification of Human Remains
Human Remains. The Postmortem Interval: Determining the Time of Death Pathologist usually determines Done most accurately within the first 24 hrs of death.
Forensic Anthropology: Studying Bones
Learn how anthropologists use bones to determine whether remains are human; to determine the age, sex, and race of an individual; to estimate height;
Human Osteology Bone Identification. Frontal Nasal Maxilla Lacrimal Ethmoid Sphenoid Zygoma Inferior Nasal Conchae.
Ch. 14 Human Remains.
Forensic Anthropology
As humans, we have three basic racial groups
Forensic anthropology
Forensic Anthropology
Forensic Anthropology: Studying Bones
Forensic Anthropology
Human Remains.
Forensic Science Anthropology.
Ch. 14 Human Remains.
Sherlock Bones® Power Point Presentation
By Jonathon Lewis and Devin Lowrey Western Oregon University
Forensic Anthropology: Studying Bones
Forensic Anthropology
Forensic Anthropology
Skeletal Remains BONES NEVER LIE.
Age, Race, and Sex Determination from Bones
Finding Identity in a Skeletal Cold Case
Forensic Anthropology
Forensic Anthropology
Forensic Anthropology
Project 1.2.3: Student Data Sheet
Forensic Anthropology:
FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY
Forensic Anthropology –
Forensic Anthropologists
Forensic Anthropology
Forensic Anthropology
Notes: Anthropology and Death
Forensic Anthropology: Studying Bones
Forensic Anthropology: Studying Bones
Project 1.2.3: Student Data Sheet
Forensic Anthropology
FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY
Forensic Anthropology: Studying Bones
Chapter 14 Human Remains.
Forensic Anthropology: Studying Bones
Forensic Anthropology
Forensic Anthropology
Forensic Anthropology: Studying Bones What types of information can we gather from studying bones as evidence?
Forensic Anthropology
Forensic Anthropology: Studying Bones What types of information can we gather from studying bones as evidence?
Forensic Anthropology: Studying Bones What types of information can we gather from studying bones as evidence?
FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY A Very Brief Overview
Forensic Anthropology: Studying Bones
Forensic Anthropology
Forensic Anthropology Part II
Forensic Anthropology: Studying Bones
Expert Witness Testimony
Presentation transcript:

Elements and Artifacts No one left behind: Forensic Anthropology in the community by, Keith Biddle and Britney Radford Accession Elements and Artifacts Results This project was initiated at the request of a citizen of Beaverhead County as a means of identifying which of his relatives were represented in three burials. The remains were curated temporarily during analysis at the University of Montana Forensic Anthropology Lab (UMFAL) and were returned for reburial after analysis was completed. The case was given the number of FSD BHC 2017 Ind #3. These are some of the skeletal elements used to help ID the individual. For example, the mandible tends to have a more square chin in males and the Os coxa, or innominate, tends to exhibit a wider greater sciatic notch in females. SEX: MALE Narrow greater sciatic notch, lack of pre- auricular sulcus, no ventral arc or dorsal pitting on the pubic bone, acute sub- pubic angle. Cranial assessments agreed with pelvic analysis, as did humeral head measurements (Phenice 1969, Bass 2005). ANCESTRY: EUROPEAN (with possible Asian admixture) Narrow nasal aperture, distinct nasal sill and prominent nasal spine. High, rounded cranial vault. Sloping eye orbits and retreating zygomatics (Bass 2005, Byers 2016, Klepinger 2006). AGE: Adult, 48 – 59 years at time of death Ectocranial suture closure, dental eruption and wear/tooth loss, presence of OA, analysis of known changes to the pubic symphysis and the auricular surface indicate an older individual (Suchey-Brooks 1990, Lovejoy et al. 1985). STATURE: 5’7” – 6’2” Measurements of the femur, tibia and humerus were taken and mathematically calculated using standard regression formulas (Trotter – Glesser, 1958). TRAUMA/PATHOLOGY: EXTENSIVE Dentition exhibited multiple gold crowns and fillings Healed fracture to left tibia 4 Healed depression fractures to left parietal Healed fracture to right hand Osteo Arthritic development evident on scapulae, lumbar vertebrae, femoral heads Research Goal The goal of this research was to create a biological profile of the individual, in the hopes of identification with a potential family member. Mandible: Note the multiple gold fillings and crowns FSD BHC 2017 Ind. #3: Mostly complete skeleton laid out anatomically. FORDISC 3.1 statistical analysis of ancestry and sex. The arrow indicates location of this individual in reference to other exemplars. Project Overview Right Os Coxa: Greater Sciatic notch (yellow arrow) and auricular surface (blue arrow) used in sex and age estimates. Using Bioarchaeological methods we separated material artifacts from human skeletal remains. Using Forensic Anthropological methods we assessed the human remains and constructed a biological profile of the individual to include: Sex Ancestry Age Living stature Pathology and trauma Working with Archaeology faculty we identified the artifacts and the era in which the individual lived and died. References Healed Tibial Fracture is evidence of medical attention Bass W. 2005. Human Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Manual. 5th ed. Missouri Archaeological Society. Brooks S, Suchey JM. 1990. Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: A comparison of the Acsádi-Nemeskéri and Suchey-Brooks methods. Hum Evol 5:227–238. Byers SN. 2016. Introduction to Forensic Anthropology. Taylor & Francis. Klepinger LL. 2006. Fundamentals of Forensic Anthropology. John Wiley & Sons. Phenice TW. 1969. A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis. Am J Phys Anthropol 30:297–301. Trotter M, Gleser GC. 1958. A re-evaluation of estimation of stature based on measurements of stature taken during life and of long bones after death. Am J Phys Anthropol 16:79–123. Cufflinks and tuxedo buttons recovered with the remains. Remnants of a bowtie