Section 106 Consulting Parties Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office & 106 Reviews
Advertisements

ODOT’s Section 106 Training
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation 1 36 CFR Part 800 Protection of Historic Properties Section 106 Managing the Environmental & Project.
Jennifer Horn, Preservation Pennsylvania. Who is Preservation Pennsylvania? Pennsylvania’s only private, non-profit, statewide organization dedicated.
Program Alternatives under 36 CFR Part 800 Dave Berwick Army Affairs Coordinator Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Geothermal Projects and Indian Tribes: Dealing with Cultural Resources Issues Michael P. O’Connell Stoel Rives LLP O R.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Section 106 The reasons, the actions, the participants.
Historic Preservation in Indianapolis: Government Programs Presentation to Chapters of The Daughters of the American Revolution November 14, 2009 Indianapolis.
Cultural Resource Management Plans What good are they?
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Environmental Review Todd Levine Architectural historian, environmental reviewer, Connecticut Freedom Trail coordinator, Washington- Rochambeau Revolutionary.
A BEGINNERS GUIDE TO SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE: REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION.
Anacostia Streetcar Phase 2 Environmental Assessment & Section 106 Evaluation: Community Workshop January 12, 2011.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force As of:1 Jane Yagley Program Manager ANG/A7CVP (301) Cultural.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Monroe Executed Programmatic Agreement The Army’s Responsibilities Include: Identify Significant Viewsheds (initiated)-18 Months =Oct 2010 Cultural Landscape.
Cultural Resource Management An Introduction to Federal Heritage Preservation and the Law.
Welcome. DBE Outreach for the On-Call Cultural Resource Contract Caltrans D5 July 21, 2015.
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act ____________________ Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP Program Projects.
Environmental Planning CULTURAL RESOURCES CH 5 - HO # 13
Cultural Resource Management in the Department of Defense September 29, 2005 Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation Officer.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division Working Through The S106 Process FY 2015 CDBG Applicant Workshop December 4 th, 2014Meg.
Productive SB 18 Consultation Michelle LaPena, Esq. LaPena Law Corporation 2001 N Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA (916)
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CULTURAL RESOURCES LAWS AND REGULATIONS CH 5 CH 5 HO # 13, 13a, 13b
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Section 106: Historic Preservation Review and Compliance as it relates to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 “How Can State Agencies Assist.
National Historic Districts And Why Taylor Should Be Among Them.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 1 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP.
1 Historic Preservation Webinar "Reporting Through PAGE and to PMC"
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
NEPA and Section 106: An Introduction WISDOT MEETING NOVEMBER 3-4, 2015.
Raising the Bar: Improving the Roles of the State, MPO, and FHWA in Tribal Consultation Tribal Transportation Planning, Partnering and Consultation James.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
Anth January 2012.
 Revised 5/17/16. Relocation Meeting Agenda  Vision Russell Overview & Choice Implementation Grant  Relocation Timeline  Beecher Terrace Household.
National Treasures: Brownfields and the National Historic Preservation Act Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
BLM Decision Making Process
101 New London Road Newark, Delaware
Section 106 Consulting Parties Meeting
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
Sustainability "meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."
Susan Barnes Vice-Chairman Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Mayor’s Task Force on Persons with Disabilities
May 8, 2018 Marion Werkheiser, Cultural Heritage Partners
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
National Historic Preservation Act
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
National Historic Preservation Act
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
© Paul Graham Washington Department of Transportation © Paul Graham
NCHRP 25-25, TASK 106 HIGHWAY NOISE AND HISTORIC PROPERTIES:
Slide Deck: My Municipal Government
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
Programmatic Approaches to Section 106 Compliance
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
Presentation transcript:

Section 106 Consulting Parties Meeting January 30, 2018 Tim Barry, Louisville Metro Housing Authority Gretchen Milliken, Louisville Metro Government Jeana Dunlap, Louisville Metro Government Cynthia Elmore, Louisville Metro Government Cinder miller, gray & Pape, cultural resources

Project Overview People Housing Education Neighborhood

Need for the Project

Community Engagement

Phase I of Project 4 Stories 120 – Senior Units Management Offices Pool & Amenities

What is Section 106? National Historic Preservation Act (1966): Federal agencies are to take into account the effects of the undertaking on properties listed in, or eligible for listing in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) the opportunity to consult (www. achp.gov) Last meeting we reviewed the concepts of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. We noted that the NHPA was enacted with the goal of balancing the need for economic and commercial development with the strong desire expressed by the public to preserve important historic places. Section 106 of the NHPA provides a mechanism for the federal government to balance these goals. And it specifically provides communities and interested parties with the right to participate in the conversation about how to balance these needs.

Section 106: Steps Establish that there is an undertaking… Step 1: Initiate consultation Step 2: Identify historic properties Step 3: Assess effects of the undertaking on historic properties Step 4: Resolve any adverse effects The Section106 process has no predetermined outcomes. Every project is different, every outcome is distinct and specifically tailored to meet the needs to the community. The processes, is generally followed in a series of steps. Because Section 106 establishes a legal process, the steps required are legally defined. A decision tree identifying these steps is provided on the board in the corner. The Undertaking is everything that is included in the whole Beecher Terrace Development Project. The CNI grant for the project covers all of the different Phases, from the initial Phase I wellness center to the final stages of the rebuilding of the BT neighborhood. Not all of these phases are well defined yet. The Lead Federal agency for the project is HUD, HUD has delegated its authority for complying with Section 106 to Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government. Consultation is an ongoing process throughout the project. Let’s review where we are with the consultation process.

Step 1: Consultation “The process of seeking, discussing and considering the view of other participants, and where feasible, seeking agreement with them regarding matters arising in the Section 106 process”. [36 CRF 800.16(f)] As we noted, the implementing law for Section 106 defines consultation. This meeting is part of this process.

Who are the Consulting Parties? By Invitation Kentucky Organization of Professional Archaeologists Kentucky Office of State Archaeology Louisville Council Districts 4 & 5 Urban Strategies Louisville Western Library African American Archives Louisville Story Program Black Media Collaborative University of Louisville St. Peters United Church of Christ Six members of the public Commonwealth Preservation Trades Program Neighborhood Planning and Preservation, Inc., Concerned Pastors of Russell Louisville Central Community Center The Beech Olmsted Parks Conservancy Wayside Christian Mission Westside Institute of Technology By Right- Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO)-Kentucky Heritage Council Louisville Metro Housing Native American Tribes-seven tribes contacted, and three have chosen to participate in the process Who does Metro consult with? Many of your were specifically invited here as CP’s. Some Consulting Parties are designated as CP’s by right. This means they automatically are included as CPs and have certain rights and responsibilities in the process. For the current process, CPs by right are the ACHP, SHPO, Tribes that choose to Participate, and LMHA. Other consulting parties are groups and organizations with specific and definable interests in the process or the project. Metro invited 37 different organization and people to participate in the process.

[36 CFR 800.2(c), 800.3(f) and 800.4(a)(3-4)] Role of Consulting Parties Assist in identifying other consulting parties Help identify historic resources Tell Metro why these Places are Important to you Provide data Review documentation and reports (within deadlines) Voice input and propose mitigation options Participate/comment at any step in the process [36 CFR 800.2(c), 800.3(f) and 800.4(a)(3-4)] The most important job of a consulting party is to tell Metro why the historic properties here are important to you and how you would like to see these places commemorated, preserved, and celebrated as Metro moves forward with the project. You do this by providing comments on documents and by participating in the process. As CP’s, you, or your organization, has demonstrated a legal, economic, or preservation related interest in the project. At this meeting we will focus on mitigating resources that we know will be impacted by the project.

Status of Section 106 for Beecher Terrace Project Project has been determined to be an Undertaking by the Louisville Metro Government, acting as the Responsible Entity Step 1: Initiate the Project-Process initiated in December. Ongoing. Step 2: Identify and Evaluate historic properties-Archaeological and Architectural Surveys have been completed. Step 3: Assess effects of the Undertaking on historic properties- Project will have an Adverse Effect Step 4: Resolve any adverse effects-Developing a PA to resolve effects These are all the steps! Where are we in this process for the BT project? Steps 1 and 2- Have identified additional consulting parties. All identification reports submitted. Comment Period on Above Ground resource report is closed. Archaeology report is under review by KHC. Will circulate to other parties soon. Step 3-LMG has already determined and SHPO has already concurred that the project will have an adverse effect on historic properties. BT Historic District will be adversely effected. Currently working to identify any indirect effects to the project and to identify effects of later stages of the project. Step 4- Metro knows that there will be many effects that they cannot define yet. Thus, they are developing a Programmatic Agreement to help resolve the effects now and into the future.

One New Historic District-Beecher Terrace Historic District Beecher Terrace Complex Baxter Community Center Baxter Square Park Two Archaeological Sites Beecher Terrace Three Historic Buildings Fire Department Headquarters St. Peters Church Merciful Savior Church Fire Department Headquarters-JFWR-11748 at the top of the map St. Peters Church-JFWR-1749-NW corner Merciful Savior Church-JFWR-1752-At the bottom of the map

Project CONTACTS Write us at www.visionrussell.com RELOCATION BENEFITS - CATHY HEAD, (502) 569-3479 CHOICE NEIGHBORHOODS - KATHLEEN ONEIL, (502) 569-3461 EVENT CALENDAR – CHLOE QUIROGO, (502) 569-3454 RUSSELL NEIGHBORHOOD – JEANA DUNLAP, (502) 574-4140 HISTORIC PRESERVATION – CYNTHIA ELMORE, (502) 574-2868 Write us at www.visionrussell.com