MERIT beam intensities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Beam stability (direction/flux) 2.Absolute  beam flux.
Advertisements

Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
MERIT Pump/Probe Data Analysis Outline  The pump/probe program  Particle detector response correction  Pump/probe analysis results NFMCC Collaboration.
Ulrich RaichLinac-4 instrumentation day May 2007 Longitudinal Bunch Shape Monitor U. Raich.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group 10th ICATPP Conference on Astroparticle,
Using Tune Shifts to Evaluate Electron Cloud Effects on Beam Dynamics at CesrTA Jennifer Chu Mentors: Dr. David Kreinick and Dr. Gerry Dugan 8/11/2011REU.
Comparisons of Scintillating Fiber, Diamond Particle Detector and Beam Current Transformer T. Tsang BNL (Nov 24, 2009)
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory The MERIT High-Power Target Experiment Muon Collider Design Workshop BNL December 3-7, 2007.
MERIT review, Dec. 2005CERN AB-ATB1 CERN Installation I. Efthymiopoulos, A. Fabich, J. Lettry CERN AB-ATB MERIT review, Dec.
MERIT Experiment Status MERcury Intense Target K. McDonald for the MERIT Collaboration August 30, 2007 TT2/TT2A: MERIT Build.272: Offices & Control Room.
TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. Introduction SCT Week – March 03 Jose E. Garcia TB & Simulation results Simulation results Inner detector.
Timing Issue for Mercury Target Hee Jin Park (SUNY Stonybrook, BNL) Ilias Efthymiopoulos (CERN) Adrian Fabich (CERN)
Measures of Central Tendency 3.1. ● Analyzing populations versus analyzing samples ● For populations  We know all of the data  Descriptive measures.
LHC’s Second Run Hyunseok Lee 1. 2 ■ Discovery of the Higgs particle.
Computing and LHCb Raja Nandakumar. The LHCb experiment  Universe is made of matter  Still not clear why  Andrei Sakharov’s theory of cp-violation.
Diana Parno – July 22, 2008 January PREx Test Run: Compton Photon Analysis Diana Parno Carnegie Mellon University HAPPEX Collaboration Meeting.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Observation of W decay in 500GeV p+p collisions at RHIC Kensuke Okada for the PHENIX collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute February 20, /20/20101.
#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser.
16th March 2005, ENG target A.Fabich, CERN AB/ATB 1 Status of the TT2A target experiment Status of the TT2A target experiment A.Fabich CERN AB/ATB ENG/BENE.
Monitoring of background events in 2010 run Giuseppe Zito 06/11/2015 PFG/MIG Topical meeting on beam background.
11 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 TPAC test beam analysis tasks Paul Dauncey.
Chapter 2: Describing Location In a Distribution Section 2.1 Measures of Relative Standing And Density Curves.
1 Calorimeter in G4MICE Berkeley 10 Feb 2005 Rikard Sandström Geneva University.
A. Fabich, CERN MERIT collaboration meeting, CERN, 7-8 February 2008 MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08A. Fabich, CERN1.
A simple formula for calculating the momentum spread from the longitudinal density distribution and RF form Recycler Meeting March 11, 2009 A. Shemyakin.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
12 October 2001, M. LefebvreHEC-Athena Tutorial: HEC beam test primer1 HEC Beam Test Primer Production modules of the HEC have been tested in particle.
Jyly 8, 2009, 3rd open meeting of Belle II collaboration, KEK1 Charles University Prague Zdeněk Doležal for the DEPFET beam test group 3rd Open Meeting.
Peterson xBSM Optics, Beam Size Calibration1 xBSM Beam Size Calibration Dan Peterson CesrTA general meeting introduction to the optics.
Some feedbacks from DRS data analysis (very preliminary) F. Scuri - I.N.F.N Sezione di Pisa RD52 – Collaboration Meeting – Pavia, March 12, 2013 F. Scuri.
1 Fast kicker study Machine Time 2011/10/18~10/29(2 weeks) TB meeting 2011/01/14 T.Naito.
MERIT review, Dec. 2005CERN AB-ATB1 CERN installation I. Efthymiopoulos, A. Fabich, J. Lettry CERN AB-ATB MERIT review, Dec.
3 MeV instrumentation commissioning U. Raich, Federico Roncarolo, F. Zocca Linac-4 Beam Coordination Committee CERN, 18.December 2013 Uli Raich.
Online Consumers produce histograms (from a limited sample of events) which provide information about the status of the different sub-detectors. The DQM.
F. Caspers, S. Federmann, E. Mahner, B. Salvant, D. Seebacher 1.
#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser.
H. Matis, S. Hedges, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+several students] (LBNL) R. Miyamoto (now at ESSS) H. Matis - LARP CM18 - May 8, Fluka Modeling.
Kevin Lynch MuLan Collaboration Boston University CIPANP 2006 A new precision determination of the muon lifetime Berkeley, Boston, Illinois, ITU, James.
First collisions in LHC
Seeding in the presence of microbunching
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
BeamCal Simulation for CLIC
Software for Spectrometer T0 jumps correction
Descriptive measures Capture the main 4 basic Ch.Ch. of the sample distribution: Central tendency Variability (variance) Skewness kurtosis.
Spectral methods for measurement of longitudinal beam profile
Longitudinal impedance of the SPS
An Automated calibration method from shower data
Monitoring glitches in the frequency divider
Shift instructions August 16, 2017 Antoni Aduszkiewicz
The Standard Deviation as a Ruler and the Normal Model
MINOS and Me D. Jason Koskinen
On-Line Analysis What the program does
X5 quasi offline Analysis
Upcoming longitudinal MDs
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Damping Ring Kicker Tests at AØ
The facts or numbers that describe the results of an experiment.
Proton Beam Diagnostics
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
MioctPresenter and CtpmonPresenter
Hee Jin Park (SUNY Stonybrook, BNL) Ilias Efthymiopoulos (CERN)
Soft X-Ray pulse length measurement
The Fill Pattern Monitor For the Australian Synchrotron
MERIT beam request A.Fabich CERN AB-ATB
Performance test of ACEM-detector (Aluminum Cathode Electron Multiplier) Marcus Palm AB-ATB-EA M. Palm, CERN.
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
The facts or numbers that describe the results of an experiment.
AV 13 Avantis Capabilities for Effective Asset Management
Daniel, Gianluca and Belen (for the Collimator team)
Presentation transcript:

MERIT beam intensities A. Fabich, CERN MERIT collaboration meeting, CERN, 7-8 February 2008 MERIT beam intensities MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08 A. Fabich, CERN

Contents Aim: Single bunch intensities Relative precision of a few percent Must be better than the aimed precision for detecting production deficiencies due to cavitation. Beam intensity monitors Data synchronization MERIT BCT data and analysis PS transformer data Self-contained analysis and comparison of different systems MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08 A. Fabich, CERN

Beam intensity monitors BSM Bunch shape measurements in the PS ring On last turn before extraction Single bunch intensities available Not always recorded, data stored graphically BeamCurrentTransformers (PSCT) on TT2 Pulse intensities measured, no single bunch intensities “wrongly” measured intensities for pulses in pump-probe method beyond a certain delay Automatic logging (data electronically available) MERIT BCT on TT2A (MCT) About 10 meter upstream of z=0 500 MHz (2 ns) sampling rate Attenuation factor was increased once on 26.Oct 2008 at 16:03 (BCT time) MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08 A. Fabich, CERN

The crux of the matter is in the details .... which takes a long time to analyse ... MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08 A. Fabich, CERN

Step 1 – Synchronize data Sources with different data management and timing systems Ilias prepared a file with all major parameters combined with beam run numbers. MERIT logbook and beam run numbers PS logging system (PSCTs, B-fields ...) UTC time (2 hour off, 1 hour off after 28th Oct. 2007) compared to CERN time GMT+1) MERIT BCT, stand-alone server (with different day-light adjustments than usual) Mercury system Particle detector systems For the case of beam intensities: Satisfactory! Minor discrepancy, where the discrepancy has other origins than timing synchronization. MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08 A. Fabich, CERN

A typical MCT recording Bunch (h16) drift - offset Ringing MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08 A. Fabich, CERN

PS in different harmonic modes MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08 A. Fabich, CERN

Single pulse response All single h16-bunches normalized to unity. Time shifted Left: start of MCT response Center: ringing up to “next” bunch Right: Numerical integral MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08 A. Fabich, CERN

“Single” pulses – h8 MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08 A. Fabich, CERN

Analysis – step by step Any beam taken (in fact 2007-10-31,10:00:52 transformer time) harmonic 16 16 bunches NO pump-probe; extraction within one turn Raw integral MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08 A. Fabich, CERN

Reconstruct with single pulse response (single pulse from 2007-10-29 16:20:51) MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08 A. Fabich, CERN

The intensity integral MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08 A. Fabich, CERN

Comparison PSCT - MCT Right: Left: Histogram of black data from right red and green = PSCT (scaled) Black: ratio MCT/OSCT Left: Histogram of black data from right Peak at 1 is reasonable Some strange peaks and flat distributions Peak at 0.25 and 0.5 from “wrong” measurements by PSCT in pump-probe MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08 A. Fabich, CERN

BSM data Right: BSM Below: superposition of BSM and MCT MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08 A. Fabich, CERN

BSM summary Pulse total from single bunch recordings of BSM and MCT are compared. Poor statistics from BSM (to be verified). MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08 A. Fabich, CERN

Summary Analyzed about 500 beam measurements Revisit intensity from PSCT for “strange” cases Codes (mathematica) available for automated analysis available Summary sheet of all single bunch intensities available Need to add flag of good/bad beams If “bad” beam run is needed, has to be evaluated case-by-case. Re-evaluate BSM data MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08 A. Fabich, CERN