Proton Electromagnetic Form Factors at Low Q2 & the Proton Size Puzzle

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Eta production Resonances, meson couplings Humberto Garcilazo, IPN Mexico Dan-Olof Riska, Helsinki … exotic hadronic matter?
Advertisements

1 The and -Z Exchange Corrections to Parity Violating Elastic Scattering 周海清 / 东南大学物理系 based on PRL99,262001(2007) in collaboration with C.W.Kao, S.N.Yang.
A precise extraction of the induced polarization in 4 He(e,e’p) 3 H from E Simona Malace University of South Carolina Outline.
The Electromagnetic Structure of Hadrons Elastic scattering of spinless electrons by (pointlike) nuclei (Rutherford scattering) A A ZZ  1/q 2.
DESY PRC May 10, Beyond the One Photon Approximation in Lepton Scattering: A Definitive Experiment at DESY for J. Arrington (Argonne) D. Hasell,
Howard Budd, Univ. of Rochester1 Vector and Axial Form Factors Applied to Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Scattering Howard Budd University of Rochester (in collaboration.
The Size and Shape of the Deuteron The deuteron is not a spherical nucleus. In the standard proton-neutron picture of this simplest nucleus, its shape.
BONUS (Barely Off-Shell Nucleon Structure) Experiment Update Thia Keppel CTEQ Meeting November 2007.
Richard MilnerDESY April 6, OLYMPUS Overview Motivation for the experiment Progress to date on the experiment The path forward.
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.
The Structure of the Nucleon Introduction Meson cloud effects: two-component model Strange form factors Results Summary and conclusions Roelof Bijker ICN-UNAM.
LEPTON PAIR PRODUCTION AS A PROBE OF TWO PHOTON EFFECTS IN EXCLUSIVE PHOTON-HADRON SCATTERING Pervez Hoodbhoy Quaid-e-Azam University Islamabad.
The angular dependence of the 16 O(e,e’K + ) 16  N and H(e,e’K + )  F. Garibaldi – Jlab December WATERFALL The WATERFALL target: reactions on.
Does a nucleon appears different when inside a nucleus ? Patricia Solvignon Argonne National Laboratory Postdoctoral Research Symposium September 11-12,
T.C. Jude D.I. Glazier, D.P. Watts The University of Edinburgh Strangeness Photoproduction At Threshold Energies.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
Dynamical study of N-  transition with N(e,e'  ) Shin Nan Yang Department of Physics National Taiwan University Collaborators: G.Y. Chen, J.C. Chen (NTU)
Measuring the charged pion polarizability in the  →    −  reaction David Lawrence, JLab Rory Miskimen, UMass, Amherst Elton Smith, JLab.
A Measurement of Two-Photon Exchange in Unpolarized Elastic Electron-Proton Scattering John Arrington and James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
Chung-Wen Kao Chung-Yuan Christian University, Taiwan
Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.
Measuring the Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 Timothy Holmstrom College of William and Mary For the Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration.
GEp-III in Hall C Andrew Puckett, MIT On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III Collaboration April 15, 2008.
Daniel S. Carman Page 1 Hadron Sep , 2015 Daniel S. Carman Jefferson Laboratory N* Spectrum & Structure Analysis of CLAS Data  CLAS12 N*
Chung-Wen Kao Chung-Yuan Christian University, Taiwan National Taiwan University, Lattice QCD Journal Club Two is too many: A personal review.
Amand Faessler, Tuebingen1 Chiral Quark Dynamics of Baryons Gutsche, Holstein, Lyubovitskij, + PhD students (Nicmorus, Kuckei, Cheedket, Pumsa-ard, Khosonthongkee,
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility PAC-25, January 17, 2004, 1 Baldin Sum Rule Hall C: E Q 2 -evolution of GDH integral Hall A: E94-010,

Nucleon Elastic Form Factors: An Experimentalist’s Perspective Outline: The Fib and the Questions EM FF Strangeness Glen Warren Battelle & Jefferson Lab.
Study of e+e- annihilation at low energies Vladimir Druzhinin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) SND - BaBar Lepton-Photon, August,
Tensor and Flavor-singlet Axial Charges and Their Scale Dependencies Hanxin He China Institute of Atomic Energy.
A Precision Measurement of G E p /G M p with BLAST Chris Crawford Thesis Defense April 29, 2005.
Nucleon Form Factors Understood by Vector Meson Exchange Earle Lomon(MIT)Jlab12/12/08 Summary: Description of model, history & early success Details of.
Lecture 8: Understanding the form factor 30/9/ Why is this a function of q 2 and not just q ? Famous and important result: the “Form Factor.
PV Electron Scattering
5/18/2018 Extracting the proton charge radius from low-Q2 electron/muon scattering Graphic by Joshua Rubin, ANL (Guy Ron – HUJI - giving the talk for)
Quantum Chromo-Dynamics (QCD)
Possible Ambiguities of Neutrino-Nucleus
A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST
Structure and dynamics from the time-dependent Hartree-Fock model
The Size and Shape of the Deuteron
James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne National Lab
The College of William and Mary Charlottesville, October 9, 2008
Precision Measurement of the Electroproduction of p0 Near Threshold:
Elastic Scattering in Electromagnetism
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Handout 5 : Electron-Proton Elastic Scattering
Handout 5 : Electron-Proton Elastic Scattering
Mainz: Drechsel, Tiator Taipei: Guan Yeu Chen, SNY
Hadron Form Factors Rolf Ent Jefferson Lab
Precision Measurement of η Radiative Decay Width via Primakoff Effect
Excited State Spectroscopy from Lattice QCD
Study of Strange Quark in the Nucleon with Neutrino Scattering
A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST
Nuclear excitations in relativistic nuclear models
Polarized Structure Function of Nucleon and Orbital Angular Momentum
Excited State Spectroscopy from Lattice QCD
Wei Luo Lanzhou University 2011 Hall C User Meeting January 14, 2011
New Results on 0 Production at HERMES
Duality in 12 GeV Era: Projected Results from E
Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON
Scaling Study of the L-T Separated p(e,e’π+)n Cross Section at Large Q2 Tanja Horn Jefferson Lab APS/DNP meeting 2007 DNP07 October 2007.
Pion transition form factor in the light front quark model
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #23 Standard Model Wednesday, Apr 25, 2012
Proposal for an Experiment: Photoproduction of Neutral Kaons on Deuterium Spokespersons: D. M. Manley (Kent State University) W. J. Briscoe (The George.
for the A1 collaboration
Parity – Violating Neutron Density Measurements : PREX, C-REX
GEp-2γ experiment (E04-019) UPDATE
Measurement of Parity-Violation in the N→△ Transition During Qweak
Presentation transcript:

Proton Electromagnetic Form Factors at Low Q2 & the Proton Size Puzzle Xiaohui Zhan Argonne National Lab Jlab Pizza Seminar Apr. 20th 2011

Outline Introduction New measurements at low Q2 Electron scattering & nucleon Sachs form factors World measurements Form factor theory review New measurements at low Q2 Low momentum region & pion cloud Mainz cross section results Polarization Jefferson Lab E08-007 Puzzle on the proton charge radius Muonic hydrogen Lamb shift measurement ep scattering global analysis Summary

Introduction Proton and neutron are basic building blocks of visible matter. Most fundamental bound state of quarks and gluons---strong force (QCD). Structure of the nucleon is a defining problem of hadronic physics, being a primary interest for decades. NP 1943: proton anomalous magnetic moment. NP 1961: First proton form factor measurement. NP 1990: Quark-level structure of the proton. NP 2004: Strong force theory– QCD. Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Electron Elastic Scattering Formalism Very powerful tool in probing the structure of nucleon and nuclei. Dirac & Pauli form factors describes the difference between scattering from a structureless particle and an extended spin-1/2 object: F1: helicity conserving F2: helicity flipping single photon exchange (Born approximation) Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Sachs Form Factors Linear combination of F1 and F2, Fourier transform of the charge (magnetization) densities in the Breit frame at non relativistic limit. Electric: Magnetic: Early experiments found ~ dipole form GD (Q2 < 2 GeV2), naively corresponds to an exponential shape in space. Normalized to static properties at Q2=0 Limit Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Form Factor Measurements – Unpolarized Rosenbluth separation: Difficulties: σ is not sensitive to GE at large Q2 and to GM at small Q2, Limited by accuracy of cross section measurement at different settings. Radiative correction 10-30%, 2γ exchange (ε-dependent). Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Form Factor Measurements – Recoil Polarimetry Direct measurement of form factor ratios by measuring the ratio of the transferred polarization Pt and Pl . Advantages: Only one measurement is needed for each Q2. Much better precision than a cross section measurement. Complementary to XS measurements. Famous discrepancy between Rosenbluth and polarized measurement, mostly explained by 2-γ exchange. J. Arrington, W. Melnitchouk, J. A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. C 76, 035205, 2007 Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Form Factor Measurement – Beam Target Asymmetry Polarized cross section: Beam helicity h=±1: Super ratio of the asymmetries: Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Theory Review - I pQCD: Theory of strong interaction, well tested in high-energy region Hadron helicity conservation for Q2 > Ϛ2pQCD >> Λ2QCD Dimensional counting rules gives (Brodsky and Farrar): Data seems to be in better agreement with QF2/F1, asymptotic region not reached yet? (GEp III up to Q2 ~ 8.5 GeV2) Vector coupling between quark gluon, quark helicity conservation, neglect quark orbital angular momentum Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Theory Review - II VMD (Vector Meson Dominance): Early VMD fits predicted a linear decrease of the proton FF ratio (Iachello et. al), amplitude in terms of parameters and fit to the data. Dispersion analyses: performed separately for nucleon isoscalar and isovector FFs Recent analysis: constraints from meson nucleon scattering, unitarity and pQCD, including 2π, ρπ, continua. Extended GK model: basic VMD + quark dynamics via pQCD + ρ width + ρ’, ω, ω’ Fits to nucleon EMFFs for space-like momentum transfer with the explicit pQCD continuum. M. A. Belushkin et. al, Phys. Rev. C 75 035202 (2007) Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Theory Review - III CQM/LFCQM: Ground state of a quantum-mechanical 3-quark system, SU(6) spin-flavor WFs & antisymmetric color WF. Relativistic treatment needed for FFs calculation. Three forms of dynamics: Instant form Point form Light-front form Shortcomings: break all symmetry properties of the QCD Lagrangian. Included the pionic degrees of freedom for improvement. Thomas, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 13, 1 (1984) Miller, Phys. Rev. C 66, 032201(R) (2002) Comparison between data (Punjabi et al. & Gayou et al.) and various CQM calculations: dotted: front form calculation of Chung and Coester. thick solid: front form of Frank et al. dot-dashed: front form of Cardarelli et al. dashed: point form of Boffi et al. thin solid: covariant spectator model of Gross and Agbakpe. Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Theory review - IV Dressed-quark: Defined by the solution of a Poincare covariant Faddeev equation in which dressed-quark provide the elementary degree of freedom. Nucleon-photon vertex only has one free parameter: diquark charge radius. For both the proton and neutron, the form factor ratio possesses a zero. Below data for Q2<3 GeV2, likely attributed to the omission of the pion cloud contributions. I. C. Cloёt, G. Eichmann, B. El-Bennich, T. Klӓhn, C. D. Roberts, Few-Body Syst 46:1, (2009)

Theory review - V Lattice QCD Starts from first principles with quark masses and coupling constants as independent inputs. Extrapolation down to the physical quark masses are required. Results from Nicosia-MIT group for isovector (p-n) form factor. Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Interpretation of the Sachs Form Factors In NR limit, FFs are Fourier transforms of the nucleon charge (magnetization) densities in the Breit frame, but ruined as Q increases. Model dependent corrections need to be applied to extract the rest frame densities. Kelly, Phys. Rev. C 66, 065203 (2002) Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Scale of the photon probe—why low Q2? High Q2 sensitive to the fine details of the structure, and the importance of relativity and quark orbital angular momentum. Low Q2 probes the long-scale properties—pion cloud picture. Low Q2 investigation motivated by previous world data which shows hints of narrow structures in all four nucleon form factors. Many implications in nuclear physics: proton size, strangeness form factors, hydrogen hyperfine splitting, DVCS… Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

World high precision polarization data before 2008. J. Friedrich and Th. Walcher, Eur. Phys. J. A 17, 607 (2003) World high precision polarization data before 2008.

Mainz Cross Section Measurement (A1) Bernauer et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 242001, 2010 High precision xs survey at Q2 = 0.004 – 1 GeV2 (~1400 points). Direct fits by various parameterizations to extract the form factors. Normalization factors determined by fits, no TPE applied. Hint of structures at Q2~m2π~0.2GeV2, indication of pion cloud?

High precision proton form factor ratio measurement at Jlab (E08-007) Electron injected into the accelerator from polarized gun. Two Linac contains 20 cryomodules : 5MeV/m. Beam energy up to 6 GeV Deliver to 3 experimental halls independently, up to 180mA in a single hall. Beam polarization up to 85%, with helicity flipping at 30 Hz. A C B Completed in 2008 in Hall A High precision survey at Q2 = 0.3-0.7 GeV2 Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Experimental Setup LHRS Ee: 1.192GeV Pb: ~83% BigBite Non-focusing Dipole Big acceptance. Δp: 200-900MeV ΔΩ: 96msr PS + Scint. + SH

Analysis Spin-orbit coupling between proton and the carbon nuclei induced azimuthal asymmetries in the second scattering Focal Plane Polarimeter (FPP) Carbon doors S Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Analysis Detector frame --------------> target frame

Results & Discussions Strongly deviates from unity, systematically lower than previous polarization measurements. Slowly decrease as Q2, no sign of “narrow structure”. Led to LEDEX reanalysis, agree with new data. (G. Ron, X. Zhan, J. Arrington, et al. to be submitted) Most models don’t match, however, indicates the importance of the pion-cloud contribution. Lowest point still significantly below 1, slope change at lower Q2, change of knowledge of the long-range scale structure. X. Zhan et al. eprint: nucl-ex, arXiv:1102.0318, 2011, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Global fit & Extraction of Form Factors Combined fit to non-Mainz world xs (TPE corrected) and polarization data. 16 parameters for GE & GM, 32 floating normalization factors for xs data sets. Updated global fit with new ratio results indicate ~2% (1%) decrease(increase) in GE(GM) , precision greatly improved. Ratio results consistent with Mainz extractions, but systematically lower GM… (J. Arrington, W. Melnitchouk, J. A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. C 76, 035205, 2007)

Proton Size Puzzle Leading QED corrections Proton RMS radius can be obtained from the form factor slopes at Q2=0 Atomic measurements through hydrogen lamb shift: energy split between 2S1/2-2P1/2, effect from the interaction between electron and the vacuum on 2S1/2 state. Recent muonic-hydrogen lamb shift measurement revealed a much more precise and smaller proton charge radius 0.84184(67) fm. (P. Pohl et al, Nature, 466, 213,2010) Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Extraction from ep scattering Fit issues & strategy Sensitive to low Q2 data Different Q2 cutoff (0.3,0.5,1.0) Difficulties: functional behavior unknown, model independent? Different parameterizations Choice of number of parameters Tests with MC Treatment of xs normalization uncertainties, estimate of exp. error. Cross reference between data sets Search for Δχ2=1 range CODATA mainly inferred from hydrogen lamb shift measurements. Results from ep interaction system suggests the discrepancy relates to the difference between the electron and muon probes. Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Magnetic radius Real discrepancy between data sets? Mainz: 0.777±0.017 fm Non-Mainz (this work): 0.850±0.025 fm Real discrepancy between data sets? Inconsistent treatment of TPE? Coulomb distortion ~ 0.5% Full TPE ~ 2% Different normalization? Potential change if combine data sets?

Recent speculations - I Consistency check of definitions Role of Darwin-Foldy term in atomic physics: The atomic physics convention: proportional to the slope of a subtracted Sachs form factor GE, same as what we measure! U. D. Jentschura, Eur. Phys. J. D (2010) Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Recent speculations - I Role of Darwin-Foldy correction in nuclear charge radius: Result in a nonvanishing nuclear size correction for the atomic binding energy even for a point-like nucleus. On the same page! J. L. Friar, J. Martorell, D. W. L. Sprung, Phys. Rev. A 56, 4579 (1997) Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Recent speculations - II Role of the 3rd Zemach moment I. C. Cloёt and G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. C 83, 012201 (R), 2011 Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Recent speculations - III Off-mass-shell effects at the photon-nucleon vertex (increase the 1st term by 0.15meV): Could be resolved with an effect: Strength constrained by nuclear physics phenomena: EMC, quasi-elastic scattering, deviations from Coulomb sum rule. Lepton-nucleus scattering via binding effects of the nucleon, two photon effects, muonic deuterium. G. A. Miller, A. W. Thomas, J. D. Carroll, J. Rafelski, arXiv:1101.4073, 2011 Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Outlook E08-007 phase II scheduled in 2012: Beam target asymmetry, systematic check… Ratio down to Q2 ~ 0.015 GeV2, overlapped with Mainz. Direct comparison with Bates. Better constraints on GM.

Summary Nucleon FFs are fundamental quantities describing the nucleon internal structure, and has been a longstanding subject of interest in nuclear and particle physics. pQCD not applicable at low momentum transfer region, precision FF measurements are needed for all the experimental accessible region to test various models. Present the new high precision measurements on the proton elastic form factors at low Q2, found the structure is not as simple as previously believed. New global fit were performed to extract individual form factors, low Q2 data are essential to extract the proton RMS radius. The proton charge radius given by recent muonic-hydrogen lamb shift measurement shows a severe discrepancy from the one from the ep interaction system, no solid explanation so far… Further analysis on the ep scattering data underway, and new measurement at JLab in 2012, stay tuned… Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Thank you!

Back up Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Lattice Calculation

Analysis diagram

BigBite Spectrometer Scintillator Detect scattered electrons. Only elastic-peak blocks were in the trigger. Background minimized with tight elastic cut. e’ Pre-shower Shower

Elastic Events Selection proton dpkin HRS acceptance cut: out of plane: +/- 60 mr in plane: +/-30 mr momentum: +/- 0.04 (dp/p0) reaction vertex cut FPP cuts: scattering angle θfpp 5o ~ 30o reaction vertex (carbon door) conetest cut Other cuts: Coin. Timing cut Coin. event type (trigger) single track event dpkin (proton angle vs. momentum)

Spin Transport in HRS

Systematic Budget Spin transport: OPTICS and COSY---major uncertainty (0.7 ~ 1.2 %) Others negligible: FPP alignment, Al end cap contamination, VDC reconstruction, spectrometer settings, beam energy, charge asymmetry, pion contamination, etc.

Analysis summary World cross section database – two-photon exchange corrected (John) Updated polarization database. New Mainz data NOT included. Normalization factors allow to float in the combined fit. Focus at the low Q2 for the radius analysis. Choice of fitting functions for systematic study: MC used to test the functional forms: Dipole (MC) --- CF & Poly. (Fit) CF (MC) -- Poly. (Fit) Poly.(MC)– CF (Fit) Give almost identical results on the dipole form Consistent within error in extracting the other.

Cross-validation CF Determine the optimal fit Randomly separate data sample, fit one, and calculate the χ2 validation set. Poly. Black: fit sample Red: validation sample

Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"