Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Michigan Department of Environmental Quality January 11, 2018.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Advisory Team for Environment, Food, and Health.
Advertisements

Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
1 Midland Community Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Steven Chester, Director Jim Sygo, Deputy Director.
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT IN AN ICS STRUCTURE. EU Mission Statement The Environmental Unit is established to provide technical and scientific expertise and capabilities.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Lovers Lane Lead Site Jeffrey A. Lippert, OSC.
Basic Economic Development Course in Pennsylvania Environmental and Commercial Real Estate Legal Issues Surrounding Economic Development Act 2 Issues Scott.
1 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY
Christa-Marie Singleton, MD, MPH Associate Director for Science
Transformation in Arizona Presentation by Kent Ennis, Deputy Director, Dennis Doby, Sr. Director Research Administration, Arizona Department of Commerce.
ESPA Comprehensive Aquifer Management Plan Presentation to the Governor’s Water Summit April 17, 2007 Idaho Water Resource Board Jonathan Bartsch and Diane.
Terezia Sinkova EFSA The new EU Food Safety Agency.
Environmental Protection in the United States Christopher Green U.S. Embassy July 13, 2006.
Deemed Exports Overview and the Inspector General’s Report Presentation for : Alex Lopes Director, Deemed Exports and Electronics Division Office of National.
Gerry Pratt State AOC Coordinator, Division of Water New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, Albany, NY P: 518.
Policy and Legal Framework on Soil Contamination Management in Thailand Workshop on Strengthening Contaminated Soil Monitoring in Vietnam, November.
Former DuPont Barksdale Works Project Update December 14, 2004 DuPont Corporate Remediation Group Great Lakes Visitors Center.
Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental.
Refining the Organizational Structure of State Coastal Entities December 9, 2009 Kyle Graham Governor’s Office Coastal Activities.
Developing Proposals for a System of Indicators on the Nation’s Environment (the SINE) H. Theodore Heintz, Jr. Indicator Coordinator White House Council.
September Board Meeting FY08 and FY09 Spending Plan.
REMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED LAND IN SOUTH AFRICA Part 8 of the Waste Act Ms Mishelle Govender Chemicals and Waste Management.
WATER RESOURCES ORSANCO Technical Committee October 9-10, 2012.
Washington State Alzheimer’s Plan Senior Lobby October 28, 2015.
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
THE ROLE OF THE AUDITOR- GENERAL RP MOSAKA Business Executive: Parliamentary Services OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR-GENERAL.
Estimating the Costs of Implementing Institutional Controls Brownfields 2009 New Orleans November 17, 2009 John Pendergrass.
Unity Ground Water Investigation Steve Faryan, USEPA.
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Waste Management Stony Hill Road Contamination Wake County.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
BruinTech Vendor Meet & Greet December 3, 2015
Food Additives Project
The PFC Contamination at Pease: Community Update 2016
Making Cross-campus, Inter-institutional Collaborations Work
Pending EPA Health Advisory for PFOA and PFOS
FDP Update to GUIRR Cynthia (Cindy) Hope, Chair
LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE FORUM--FALL 2014 MEETING
Overview of Part 213 Amendments Senate Bill 717 – Act 381 of 2016
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AUGUST 24, 2017 REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY CHARTER THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH.
Task Force Activities We are working together on a new approach that identifies sources of PCBs and dioxins, directly applies a plan for reduction and.
2017 ITRC Annual Meeting new Orleans, la
Trust, Accountability and Integrity: Board Responsibility for
The Path Forward for WIPP: A State and Local Perspective
Partnering Opportunities ERDC actively engages in research and development with government, academic, and industrial entities:   Potential Partners Agreement.
Student Concerns about Faculty Conduct Faculty and staff together provide support to students that help align the student experience with the mission and.
Bozeman Health Clinical Research
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
Niagara River Area of Concern
Research Program Strategic Plan
Corporate Responsibility Org Chart
Emilee Scott & Jim Ray May 10, 2018
Outline: OCS Overview: Organizational Structure USDA Coordination
Jim Flechtner, PE Executive Director April 26, 2018
Kentucky Lead Workgroup Recommendations
Fix it or Forget it? Dealing with Troubled Projects
MDHHS Response to the Opioid Crisis
Case Study: Water Based PU
Update on Water Quality
Student Centered Funding Formula
Governor Snyder’s Directive Creates the PFAS Action Response Team
Flint Water Crisis Indictments Detroit Free Press
Department of Environmental Quality
RACER Trust Buick City Project Update racertrust.org
Allen Chan U.S. Government Accountability Office October 2, 2018
Emerging Contaminants: Reactions to PFAS
Fayetteville, NC August 14, 2018
HSRA Rule Change Reflect changes in scientific understanding since 1994 Provide Consistency in Cleanup Standards Reduce risk from contaminated sites Correct.
PFAS Background and Action Plan
California Water Boards PFAS Efforts
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)
Presentation transcript:

Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Michigan Department of Environmental Quality January 11, 2018

PFAS **Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances** USEPA designation - national emerging contaminant PFAS - suite of chemicals, thousands of applications Used in industrial, food, and textile industries Characteristics Incredibly stable Break down very slowly Highly soluble Easily transferred through soil to groundwater

Statewide Concerns PFAS contamination identified in several locations in Michigan Currently – 14 locations, 29 sites Sources include: Current and former military installations Tanneries Plating operations Legal and illegal disposal sites Finding significant PFAS migration Water wells – test wells, residential, municipal, livestock

Michigan PFAS Action Response Team (MPART) Governor Snyder signed ED 2017-4 on November 13 Design: ensure comprehensive, cohesive, timely response to continued mitigation PFAS substances (PFAS) across Michigan Goal: provide cooperation and coordination among all levels of government

Michigan PFAS Action Response Team Cabinet Director Appointed Lead Exec Office Legal Travis Weber SME Dr. Savitz DEQ DHHS DMVA Program Manager DNR MDARD MSP DTMB Treasury LARA MDE Michigan PFAS Action Response Team Deputy CoS External Comms Truscott/Gov Office Potential On-Call Agencies

DEQ Action Response Team

Confirmed PFAS Locations Alpena Ann Arbor Escanaba Flint Grayling Gwinn Lansing Lapeer Mt. Clemens Mt. Pleasant Oscoda Plainfield Township Rockford Tawas

Confirmed PFAS Locations/# sites Alpena/2 Ann Arbor/1 Escanaba/1 Flint/2 Grayling/3 Gwinn/1 Lansing/2 Lapeer/2 Mt. Clemens/2 Mt. Pleasant/1 Oscoda/7 Plainfield Township/2 Rockford/2 Tawas/1 14 locations 29 sites

Challenges Test analysis time frame Unsettled science Funding Testing analysis time frame Approximately 12 private vendors do PFAS testing All out of state General turn-around 4-6 weeks, $500 Rush $1000 Unsettled science Some things we do know, Exposure pathway is ingestion only, not dermal Half-life is 2 to 9 years Activated carbon filters will work up to certain concentration levels Extremely high temperatures can break them down There is not consensus on Rate of dispersal in the environment ppt level at which filters should be used for consumptive water Human health impacts, animal impacts (livestock, pets, wild, fish) Bioaccumulation of long chain PFAS in animals and what that means to those consuming Funding Addressing these sites is staff intensive and analysis is costly. Need to take large number of samples (individual private wells and monitoring wells) to ensure public safety and characterize the plume. Also will require expensive remediation actions.

DEQ’s PFOA and PFOS 70 ppt Drinking Water Criterion PFAS criterion – 70 ppt PFOA and PFOS combined, established under Part 201 Took effect Wednesday, January 10, 2018 Allows MDEQ to: Mandate responsible parties conduct activities take legal action who doesn’t comply with MDEQ’s cleanup rules 70 ppt comes from the health advisory value set by EPA for PFOA and PFOS. 201 Rules 70ppt is also the value for PFOA/PFOS in the pending proposed 201 rule set. No concerns have been expressed to date with this value as part of the 201 rule process. Allows DEQ to Address contamination, reducing exposure to human health and the environment, and Pursue legal actions against those who don’t comply, including violation notices, lawsuits, etc.

Next Steps Stand up state laboratory capabilities MPART PFAS Multiagency Technical Workgroup Scientific Advisory Committee Local Public Health Advisory Committee Secure ongoing financial support Web site: www.michigan.gov/pfasresponse Laboratory Capabilities $1.4M in supplemental to finance lab equipment and supplies Currently in the process of working with vendors to order necessary equipment – should have a firm estimation on a date for opening within the month. MPART Direct work of individual departments to ensure coordination, alignment, and consistency 10 state departments, in coordination with local and federal officials across Michigan, are working together to ensure that the public health and safety of residents is protected while ensuring our environmental heritage is secure for generations of Michiganders to come. Receive regular updates on the status of site activities and legal actions Identify knowledge and resource gaps Ensure transparency regarding general and site specific information via Web site, community meetings, etc. Web site: www.michigan.gov/pfasresponse Provide report to the Governor and Cabinet on PFAS status and progress Scientific Advisory Committee led by Dr. David Savitz of Brown University’s School of Public Health and academic advisor to MPART convene Michigan and national PFAS experts to review available science and make recommendations for Michigan’s statewide response coordinate and review medical and environmental health PFAS science and develop evidence-based recommendations charged with completing their review and making recommendations within the next six months. Local Public Health Advisory Committee led by Dr. Eden Wells, chief medical executive with the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services coordinate and exchange information between state and local public health leadership specifically addressing the public health impact of PFAS within Michigan communities elevate and address locally identified issues, concerns, and requests for assistance; ensure ongoing two-way communication within communities regarding state and federal agency activities; coordinate data sharing; and identify and jointly develop action plans related to community engagement, testing, remediation, and more, for PFAS contamination sites PFAS technical team Research and review known technical information Help provide answers to pressing health and scientific questions Identify and recommend courses of action Funding State legislature provided $23.2 million of one-time funding (includes $14.8 million for DEQ and $8.4 million for DEQ) Funding will support response activities, including residential well testing, surface water sampling, fish collection & testing, filters, and continual investigation New lab equipment will also be purchased 15 FTEs will be supported by the funds (8 DHHS and 7 DEQ) Discussions regarding ongoing future funding strategies are underway