Design of a New Coded Aperture

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
xBSM meeting, Dan Peterson, Coded Aperture 1 1 A new Coded Aperture design In this talk, I will discuss a means to evaluated different coded.
Advertisements

Diffraction See Chapter 10 of Hecht.
LHC Collimation Working Group – 19 December 2011 Modeling and Simulation of Beam Losses during Collimator Alignment (Preliminary Work) G. Valentino With.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
Handling Data and Figures of Merit Data comes in different formats time Histograms Lists But…. Can contain the same information about quality What is meant.
Blue: Histogram of normalised deviation from “true” value; Red: Gaussian fit to histogram Presented at ESA Hyperspectral Workshop 2010, March 16-19, Frascati,
Extension of the Excel-based Numerical Integration Calculation of the Coded Aperture Image to include mask partial-transmission and phase shift.
Principal maxima become sharper Increases the contrast between the principal maxima and the subsidiary maxima GRATINGS: Why Add More Slits?
XBSM Analysis - Dan Peterson Review of the optics elements: Pinhole (“GAP”), FZP, Coded Aperture Extracting information from the GAP what is the GAP width?
Figure 8.Color map of the geometric correction along the dispersion axis for segment A. Figure 4. Measured distortions for all PSA positions for segment.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Optics 2----by Dr.H.Huang, Department of Applied Physics1 Diffraction Introduction: Diffraction is often distinguished.
Module 1: Measurements & Error Analysis Measurement usually takes one of the following forms especially in industries: Physical dimension of an object.
Notes Unit 1 Chapters 2-5 Univariate Data. Statistics is the science of data. A set of data includes information about individuals. This information is.
Modulation Transfer Function (MTF)
Peterson xBSM Optics, Beam Size Calibration1 xBSM Beam Size Calibration Dan Peterson CesrTA general meeting introduction to the optics.
From the population to the sample The sampling distribution FETP India.
Design of a New Coded Aperture Dan Peterson, Design study by DPP, John Flanagan and Brian Heltsley.
, Dan Peterson Apparent inconsistencies and other issues in the xBSM measurements of IBS Scans We have studied the pinhole and CodedAperture.
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
Calculation of the Coded Aperture zero-beam-size image (the “image”). The CA fitting procedure: The image is parameterized as a Sum-Of-Gaussians.
XBSM Analysis - Dan Peterson Review of the optics elements: Pinhole (“GAP”), FZP, Coded Aperture Extracting information from the GAP what is the GAP width?
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
1 Chapter No. 17 Radiation Detection and Measurements, Glenn T. Knoll, Third edition (2000), John Willey. Measurement of Timing Properties.
Diagnostic Radiology II X-ray Tubes. Anode angle Anode angle defined as the angle of the target surface with respect to the central ray in the x-ray field.
Progress on Excel-based Numerical Integration Calculation
Q1.1 Find the wavelength of light used in this 2- slits interference.
Chapter 35-Diffraction Chapter 35 opener. Parallel coherent light from a laser, which acts as nearly a point source, illuminates these shears. Instead.
DIFFRACTION.
8.2 Estimating Population Means
C-Line Windowless Operation:
8.2 Estimating Population Means
NAC flat fielding and intensity calibration
Advanced Wireless Networks
C.Baltay and S. Perlmutter December 15, 2014
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis.
Interference of EM Waves
Chapter 13 Integral transforms
Topic : Resolution.
Chapter 35-Diffraction Chapter 35 opener. Parallel coherent light from a laser, which acts as nearly a point source, illuminates these shears. Instead.
Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution
Progress on Excel-based Numerical Integration Calculation
BASIC HYPER SPECTRAL IMAGING
2.1 Normal Distributions AP Statistics.
xBSM Analysis - Dan Peterson
Chapter 10 Diffraction March 20 Fraunhofer diffraction: the single slit 10.1 Preliminary considerations Diffraction: The deviation of light from propagation.
Chapter 5 Sampling Distributions
PRISMS – one of the e.g. of optical instrumentation
T. J. Okamoto (NAOJ/Kyoto Univ.)
Beam Instrumentation Meeting – Dan Peterson
Descriptive Statistics: Describing Data
Fits for Pinhole and FresnelZonePlate
Diffraction vs. Interference
Displaying Distributions with Graphs
Displaying and Summarizing Quantitative Data
Fraunhofer Diffraction
At the Instrumentation Meeting,
, Dan Peterson some comments on December 2012 xBSM data
Extract the x-ray energy spectrum based response to applied filters
Progress on fitting the model to the December xBSM filter data
Apparent Subdiffusion Inherent to Single Particle Tracking
Design of a New Coded Aperture
Design of a new xBSM Coded Aperture for 1.8 Gev
Chapter 10 Diffraction February 25 Fraunhofer diffraction: the single slit 10.1 Preliminary considerations Diffraction: The deviation of light from propagation.
Dan Peterson Comments on changing the C-line low-energy optics
Unit 2 Particles and Waves Interference
Slope measurements from test-beam irradiations
Advanced Algebra Unit 1 Vocabulary
Measurements & Error Analysis
Objectives 6.1 Estimating with confidence Statistical confidence
Objectives 6.1 Estimating with confidence Statistical confidence
Presentation transcript:

Design of a New Coded Aperture Dan Peterson, 2013-01-16

We are doing this because: we decided we may need more optics chips for the remainder of the CesrTA program, the FZP has not been developed and will not be used, the standard Coded Aperture provides insufficient beam size resolution at “normal” beam current. Careful design is necessary; the chip costs 15 k$, and has 60 - 90 day delivery. Design of a Coded Aperture requires an understanding of the x-ray energy spectrum; the image is diffractive. I will describe the calculation of the energy spectrum, describe a figure-of-merit for evaluating Coded Aperture designs describe several attempts at improved designs.

This design study uses the data-driven calculation of the energy spectrum. Data was taken with the PINHOLE optic, with 3 beam energies: 1.8, 2.085, 2.3 GeV 4 filter conditions: none, 4 μm Diamond, 7. 2μm Aluminum, 2.0 μm Molybdenum The energy spectrum is determined by the relative intensities in these conditions. We find that day-to-day PH calibrations are not repeatable at the precision required for this study. Thus we look at ratios only within an energy. C-line and D-line, at 2.085 GeV, are averaged. Thus, there are 9 data points. December 2012 data

The model uses the Jackson formula for the energy distribution in the synchrotron plane: δI(ω)/δΩ|θ=0 = 3/(2π) e2/c γ2 ω/ωc exp( -2ω/ωc ) (Jackson 14.88) In “fitting” this model to the (limited) April 2012 data, the detector absorption and response could be approximated by a power function , E1.15 . * Model, detector response = E1.15 Relative intensities for the December 2012 data force a reevaluation of the approximation of the detector absorption and response. The RMS of the deviations, (locking the relative intensity for 2.085:Diamond to the model) is 26%. This quantity was 15% for the April 2012 data.) ({model}-[data})/{data} * A term of E1 has been absorbed into the normalization of the numerical integration , fixing it to be independent of energy.

The new fitted detector absorption and response if derived from a fit to the data. A vector in the space of the 10 energy bin amplitudes is determined by the errors and the present energy distribution for each data point. There is only one iteration, with the E1.15 response used for the input energy spectra. A second iteration could improve the result. However, the RMS is 8% ; the maximum deviation is 14% , which is as good as the consistency of the data. The function described by the red line, modulating the Jackson formula, is my approximation of the energy spectrum. ({model}-[data})/{data}

The current Coded Aperture (CA) works well at 2.085 GeV beam energy. I would like a way to quantify the quality of optics elements for different conditions I use a figure of merit (FoM) for the xBSM measurements based on the modeled image. ∑pixel [ h(σ+Δσ) – h(σ) ]2 / h(σ) ( simplified for transparency; the actual formula is symmetric ) where h(σ) is the signal height of a pixel for the given beam size, σ . So, this is a χ2 , measuring the change in the spectrum with an error due to statistics only. The FoM has units of signal height; an increase in FoM is equivalent to increased beam current. It is plotted for constant Δσ /σ , and measures the ability to resolve the beam size for constant current.

threshold for resolving the beam size = ~ 0.6 , Some observations: PINHOLE: The NO Filter is better than Diamond, above 20 μm beam size. This is expected; NO filter has 2x the intensity. Above the subtractor the FoM for NO filter should approach 2x that for Diamond. It is surprising that the diamond is not better at low beam size. Coded Aperture: The current Coded Aperture (CA) performs better than the PH below ~13μm beam size, as expected. Our experience is, with typical beam current ~ 0.5ma: below a beam size of ~10μm, the PH is no longer useful, the CA performance is useful up to a beam size of ~ 30-35 μm. I estimate that the threshold for resolving the beam size = ~ 0.6 , for a “typical current”, based on the experience described above .

At 1.8 GeV, we do not have a usable optic. The point of the study is to design the best optic for beam energy 1.8 GeV for the range of beam size, 10 - 30 μm.

First attempts to design a new CA had mixed results. Images made at 7 μm beam size. “White lines” at 15 and 20 μm beam size. Brian suggested 2 widely spaced pairs of slits. Total opening 120 μm. John used a “pseudo random” pattern with 20μm minimum feature size. Total opening 180 μm. dpp tried a design with 2 symmetric sets of slits. Total opening 170 μm. dpp tried a “grating, with 62 μm features. (To operate as a real grating would require smaller features.) Total opening 186 μm.

All show improvement over the standard CA with 0 All show improvement over the standard CA with 0.7 μm gold, above 12μm beam size. The grating with 62μm features is the first to show real improvement at 20μm beam size. But, none of these designs are above threshold at 10μm beam size. Also, at the time of the 2012-11-07 meeting, I showed that less gold is better. But we require at least 0.7 μm gold

Jim A. had the idea to start with a pseudo Fresnel Zone Plate (with 3 transmitting zones). The “FZP” has only one significant feature and total opening of 120 μm. I kept the feature of a large central opening, but departed from the FZP characteristic of smoothly decreasing feature size moving away from the center. Total opening is increased to 190 μm. The performance is significantly improved and for the first time, there is visible improvement at 10 μm.

The tuning as of 2012-11-19 was somewhat random. I have developed my program to directly plot the FoM in real time in response to input changes to the design. When feature sizes are changed in the spread sheet, the graph responds in ~5 seconds. This allows rapid tuning of the pattern at the 1 μm level. I have done further tuning, and now have 2 variations to consider: a 5 slit design, with wide center slit, 192 μm total opening ; a 6 slit design, with the center slit split, 188 μm total opening .

For reference, not one of the 2 designs, this is the 20121119 “alt3” design

“alt3” 20130111 “alt4” design 5 slits

the center slit is split and all slits are re optimized 20130111 “alt6” design 6 slits, the center slit is split and all slits are re optimized “alt4” “alt7” is a minor change, moving the outer pairs out by 1 μm.

I would choose “alt 6”, with the 10 μm center slit. There is a significant improvement at 10 μm beam size at the cost of a minor loss at 30 μm beam size. In use in IBS, the beam current will be less at the smaller beam size, which justifies the tradeoff. At 1.8 GeV , the new Coded Aperture will provide resolution similar to that of the standard CA at 2.085 GeV. At 2.085 GeV, the new Coded Aperture will provide resolution better than the PINHOLE, for beam size up to 30 μm .