The post-workshop community

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
Advertisements

How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
Economic Education and How People Learn Scott Simkins, Interim Director Academy for Teaching and Learning (ATL) North Carolina A&T State University Acknowledgements:
The Teacher Work Sample
.  How you refined your question. Include things like: o Research proposal o Any s/communication with others you have had that helped you decide.
What is a Professional Literature Review? Not to be confused with a book review, a literature review surveys scholarly articles, books and other sources.
Reference Publishing at Oxford University Press Damon Zucca, Reference Publisher.
NSF Research Proposal Review Guidelines. Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity.
The Rosabeth Moss Kanter Award Module 2, Class 2 A Teaching Module Developed by the Curriculum Task Force of the Sloan Work and Family Research Network.
January 2009RMC Research Corp. 1 Effective Science Instruction: What Does Research Tell Us? Dave Weaver RMC Research Corporation.
Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities Peer Review Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities.
Seminar on Engineering Education Research (EER): Status of Global Efforts and Opportunities sponsored by the National Science Council National Ping Tung.
Service is Sovereign Strategic Change and the Future of Library Services.
ALL TEACHERS OF ELLS NEED TO USE THESE TEN KEY STRATEGIES FOR TEACHING ELLS.
Building Engineering Education Research Capabilities Karl A. Smith Purdue University/University of Minnesota National.
What We Talk about When We Talk about Teaching Writing Margaux Sanchez Supported by The Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning.
Creating Schools of Engineering Education Karl A. Smith, University of Minnesota American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference – Workshop.
Professional Development Presentation REED 526 ORGANIZING, IMPLEMENTING, AND EVALUATING SCHOOL READING PROGRAMS.
#cyberlearning Explaining “Cyberlearning” to unfamiliar audiences Sample slides for use by CIRCL and Cyberlearning Investigators.
NSF GRFP Workshop Sept 16, 2016 Dr. Julia Fulghum
Teamwork and Project Management Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University STEM Education Center/ Civil Eng - University of Minnesota
Jan Shorey Associate Dean for CME & Faculty Affairs.
Chapter One Applying Psychology to Teaching. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 1-2 Overview What is educational psychology? How.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Teacher Learning Communities. A model for teacher learning 20  Content, then process  Content (what we want teachers to change):  Evidence  Ideas.
Building Engineering Education Research Capabilities Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota Electrical and Computer.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999) Three core principles 1: If their (students) initial understanding.
Chapter 1 Applying Psychology to Teaching Viewing recommendations for Windows: Use the Arial TrueType font and set your screen area to at least 800 by.
SCIENCE FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT 75 Practical Strategies for Linking Assessment, Instruction, and Learning by Page Keeley.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Connecting the Characteristics Margaret Heritage UCLA/ CRESST Attributes of Other Characteristics of Effective Instruction and Assessment for Learning.
Project Based Learning: Kentucky River Watershed Institute.
The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota
Conducting Rigorous Research in Engineering Education: Creating a Community of Practice (RREE) NSF-CCLI-ND American Society for Engineering Education Karl.
Research Paper Day 5. Where you should be at this point… Your note cards should be completed with 50 facts total. You should be part way done with your.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH PAPER WORKSHOP: FROM AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY TO A LITERATURE REVIEW.
Standards-based Grading and Reporting Information for Parents.
National 4 Course Torry Academy. Analysis and Evaluation UNIT To pass this unit, you will be able to: Understand, analyse and evaluate straightforward.
Copyright © Springer Publishing Company, LLC. All Rights Reserved. BECOMING A SCHOLAR IN NURSING EDUCATION – Chapter 16 –
Critical Information Literacy
Writing and Revising SLOs with Best Practices in Mind
Using Video-Annotated Peer Review to Support the Diffusion of
Instructional Design Groundwork:
D. E. Koditschek 358 GRW ESE 290/291 Introduction to Electrical & Systems Engineering Research Methodology & Design
Emporia State University
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Overview Kerry Flaherty Gifted Specialist
SLOs: What Are They? Information in this presentation comes from the Fundamentals of Assessment conference led by Dr. Amy Driscoll and sponsored by.
Undergraduate Public Health Education- Consensus Conference Report
AS Unit 1 Middle Level 5.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY
The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) And Variations
A Focus on Team Meetings
Investigating science
Tool 2: Using Performance Expectations to Plan Classroom Assessments
Building Engineering Education Research Capabilities
The Rosabeth Moss Kanter Award Module 2, Class 2 A Teaching Module Developed by the Curriculum Task Force of the Sloan Work and Family Research Network.
Building Engineering Education Research Capabilities
Computer Science Section
Faculty Senate January 2013
Extending “Scholarship” to Including Teaching in a Digital World
A Challenge: The Cultural Landscape
Faculty Senate January 2013
How to Document Great Teaching for P&T Review
PRINCIPLES OF GOOD PRACTICE IN SoTL
Presentation transcript:

The post-workshop community Other Initiatives – AREE, etc. Journal of Engineering Education Expertise NSF

Building Engineering Education Research Capabilities: NSF Initiated Science and Engineering Education Scholars Program (SEESP) NSF – Centers for Learning and Teaching (CLT) Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE) Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL) National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) NAE: Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE) AREE: Annals of Research on Engineering Education NSF-CCLI-ND: Rigorous Research in Engineering Education (RREE) ASEE Idealog – http://rree.asee.org/

Annals of Research on Engineering Education (AREE) Link journals related to engineering education Increase progress toward shared consensus on quality research Increase awareness and use of engineering education research Increase discussion of research and its implications Resources – community recommended Annotated bibliography Acronyms explained Conferences, Professional Societies, etc. Articles – education research Structured summaries Reflective essays Reader comments www.areeonline.org

www.areeonline.org

JEE Research Emphasis The State of the Art and Practice of Engineering Education Research January 2005 New form and format Guest Editors Richard M. Felder, NCSU Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford Karl A. Smith, U of Minnesota Source: Jack Lohmann

Journals vary considerably All Fields (Current Volume) Peer Reviewed? Society Sponsored? Research Focus? JEE (93) YES YES* EJEE (29) No IJEE (20) WTE&TE (2) JSMETE (3) Focused (Discipline) JPIEEP (CE) CEE (ChE) IEEE TE (EE) INFORMS TE (OR) IJCELLL (Cont. Ed.) IJMEE (ME) n/a IJEEE (EE) Source: Jack Lohmann * JEE initiated a research focus January, 2003

What JEE expects Mission refined January, 2003 Ten review criteria …to serve as an archival record of scholarly research in engineering education Ten review criteria Five focused on content and contribution Five focused on composition and presentation Source: Jack Lohmann

Content and contribution Appeal to a broad readership interested in engineering education Address important questions or propositions of lasting value Build upon relevant references and bodies of knowledge Employ appropriate educational or scientific principles and methodologies Present original ideas or results supported by compelling evidence Source: Jack Lohmann

Expertise Implies: a set of cognitive and metacognitive skills an organized body of knowledge that is deep and contextualized an ability to notice patterns of information in a new situation flexibility in retrieving and applying that knowledge to a new problem Bransford, Brown & Cocking. 1999. How people learn. National Academy Press.

Acquisition of Expertise Fitts P, & Posner MI. Human Performance Acquisition of Expertise Fitts P, & Posner MI. Human Performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1967. Cognition: Learn from instruction or observation what knowledge and actions are appropriate Associative: Practice (with feedback) allowing smooth and accurate performance Automaticity: “Compilation” or performance and associative sequences so that they can be done without large amounts of cognitive resources “The secret of expertise is that there is no secret. It takes at least 10 years of concentrated effort to develop expertise.” Herbert Simon

John Seely Brown. Growing up digital: The web and a new learning ecology. Change, March/April 2000.

Paradox of Expertise The very knowledge we wish to teach others (as well as the knowledge we wish to represent in computer programs) often turns out to be the knowledge we are least able to talk about.