Louisiana’s Comprehensive Assessment System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State Assessment Quality Control Oklahoma
Advertisements

Interpreting Test Results For Grades K-8. What tests will my child take? Students are assessed through: DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy.
Understanding Grade Level and School Growth Reports Office of Assessment and Accountability.
Iowa Assessment Update School Administrators of Iowa November 2013 Catherine Welch Iowa Testing Programs.
STATE STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENTS. 1969The National Assessment for Educational Progress (NAEP) administered for the first time, Florida participated in the.
Raising Expectations Louisiana’s jobs market is changing: Most Louisiana jobs require education after high school (four-year college or at a two-year.
Large Scale Assessment Conference June 22, 2004 Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education Assessments Shall Provide for… Participation of all students Reasonable.
Reliability and Linking of Assessments. Figure 1 Differences Between Percentages Proficient or Above on State Assessments and on NAEP: Grade 8 Mathematics,
The State of the State TOTOM Conference September 10, 2010 Jim Leigh Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2014 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting Smarter.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Jacqueline E. King, Ph.D. Director, Higher Education Collaboration California Community Colleges Early Assessment Program.
Common Core State Standards & SBAC Field Test April, 2, 2014 Hill Regional Career High School Intended Outcomes: To gain a general understanding of the.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Assessment Update California Mathematics Council.
Ohio’s Assessment Future The Common Core & Its Impact on Student Assessment Evidence by Jim Lloyd Source doc: The Common Core and the Future of Student.
Parent Training California Assessment for Student
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Measurement of Academic Performance and Progress.
Accommodations in Oregon Oregon Department of Education Fall Conference 2009 Staff and Panel Presentation Dianna Carrizales ODE Mike Boyles Pam Prosise.
Including Quality Assurance Within The Theory of Action Presented to: CCSSO 2012 National Conference on Student Assessment June 27, 2012.
Gwinnett Comprehensive Accountability and Assessment System Georgia’s Changing Landscape April 2014.
Diagnostics Mathematics Assessments: Main Ideas  Now typically assess the knowledge and skill on the subsets of the 10 standards specified by the National.
Metairie Academy for Advanced Studies WELCOME LEAP Information February 18, 2014.
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
Michigan Educational Assessment Program MEAP. Fall Purpose The Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) is Michigan’s general assessment.
IDEA and NCLB Standards-Based Accountability Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’ Conference.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
Georgia’s Changing Assessment Landscape Melissa Fincher, Ph.D. Associate Superintendent for Assessment and Accountability Georgia Department for Education.
1 Comprehensive Accountability Systems: A Framework for Evaluation Kerry Englert, Ph.D. Paper Presented at the Canadian Evaluation Society June 2, 2003.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
1 Georgia’s Changing Assessment Landscape Melissa Fincher Associate Superintendent for Assessment and Accountability Georgia Department for Education GACIS.
Assessing Very Low-Achieving Children with Disabilities Using Large Scale Assessments Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’
Tuesday, November 27, 2015 Board of Education Meeting District MAP.
The READY Accountability Report: Growth and Performance of North Carolina Public Schools State Board of Education November 7, 2013.
How was LAA 2 developed?  Committee of Louisiana educators (general ed and special ed) Two meetings (July and August 2005) Facilitated by contractor.
Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,
Next Generation Iowa Assessments.  Overview of the Iowa Assessments ◦ Purpose of Forms E/F and Alignment Considerations ◦ Next Generation Iowa Assessments.
December 4, 2009 State Board of Education adopted:  Oregon Diploma  Modified Diploma  Extended Diploma  Alternative.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Reading Well by Third Grade
Birmingham Falls Georgia Milestones
Next Generation Iowa Assessments
2007 Article VII # ELFA 8 Education, Labor, and Family Assistance
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Comparability of Assessment Results in the Era of Flexibility
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Value-Added Evaluation & Tenure Law
Release of PARCC Student Results
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Common Core Update May 15, 2013.
Comparability of Assessment Results in the Era of Flexibility
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Reading Well by Third Grade
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Summative: Formative resources: Interim Assessments:
Brian Gong Center for Assessment
Assessments: Beyond the Claims
Formative Assessments Director, Assessment and Accountability
Hawaii TAC Meeting WIDA Assessments
New Prospect Elementary School
Georgia’s Changing Assessment Landscape
State Assessment Update
Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary
Developing Quality Assessments
Presentation transcript:

Louisiana’s Comprehensive Assessment System

Ensuring Comparability with Other States Louisiana students are just as smart and capable as any in the country. However, academic results have not always afforded Louisiana’s students the opportunities of their peers in other states. Year Assessment Plan, including Comparability Late 1990’s Standards for Louisiana’s state assessments (LEAP) were informed by NAEP achievement levels. However, Louisiana considered Basic to be proficient for the purposes of accountability. 2013 State Board commits to Mastery (Level 4) as the new bar for proficiency. 2015 Louisiana administered intact PARCC forms through an alternate vendor. 2016 Louisiana administered LEAP; could not be more than 49.9% PARCC questions; no cap on percentage of points. Louisiana sought comparability with PARCC states, but also with previous state assessment. 2017 Louisiana administered LEAP. Items from a variety of banks; vast majority PARCC items. Continued commitment to national comparability

Goals of Louisiana's System Purpose Approach High quality, fully aligned content in the shortest form possible Set an instructional vision Hold our system accountable for rigorous reading, writing, and math learning Fully assess the complete scope of standards Reduce assessment times where possible Find and use the best items to build forms Modified, shortened form Comparability Equity that ensures Louisiana students are held to the same expectations as students anywhere Credibility so that parents know results mean the same in Louisiana as in other states Maintain stable scale and cut scores Use admin, scoring, and processing rules Run an external audit Cohesion grade to grade and within a grade Grade to grade students experience the same quality of items and results to monitor growth Within a grade, provide information on progress to mastery in order to adjust instruction Provide K-high school summative assessment Provide aligned diagnostics and interims for each grade

Ensuring Comparability with Other States: Areas Studied To ensure Louisiana’s claims of comparability were defensible, the Department conducted a third party validation by the Center for Assessment. The Center studied four core areas: Areas of Study Finding Test Content: Content of tests was comparable Sufficient match in content and test design Test Administration Administrative policies, procedures and practices consistent with PARCC and 2015 LEAP Scoring and Reporting: Scale and achievement standards were comparable Louisiana and DRC maintained rigorous procedures to ensure accurate and reliable scoring, including aggregation and reporting Psychometric Analyses Analyses were sufficient to create a link between LEAP and PARCC

Ensuring Comparability with Other States: Claims Studied The Center also studied three claims: Claims Studied Finding Results from the LEAP assessments can be compared to results from states taking the PARCC tests. Sufficient evidence to conclude Results from the LEAP assessments could be compared to previous years in Louisiana. Link was sufficient to support claim Results from the computer tests can be compared to the pencil-and-paper form. Only minimal difference; no adjustments needed for reporting

Assistant Superintendent, Louisiana Department of Education Contact Information Jessica Baghian Assistant Superintendent, Louisiana Department of Education jessica.baghian@la.gov