PREPARATION OF THE GiRO executable

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Weekly Report on GOES-14 PLT Science Test NOAA / NESDIS / STAR X. Wu, G. Rancic, F. Yu, M. Grotenhuis December 14, 2009.
Advertisements

2015 GSCIS annual meeting, March, 2015, New Delhi, India Application of GIRO to Himawari-8/AHI Hidehiko Murata and Masaya Takahashi Meteorological.
2015 GSCIS annual meeting, March, 2015, New Delhi, India 1 GDWG Agenda Item New GSICS Products Masaya Takahashi, JMA CMA, CNES, EUMETSAT, ISRO, IMD,
2015 GSCIS annual meeting, March, 2015, New Delhi, India 1 GRWG Requirements Summary on Data, Products, and Tools - for GDWG Understanding Masaya.
Lunar Calibration Workshop General discussion Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with Tom Stone (USGS) Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie (CNES)
Lunar Calibration Workshop Preparation Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with Tom Stone (USGS) Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie (CNES) Jack.
Beyond the workshop: Developing inter-calibration products based on Lunar Observations Tim Hewison (EUMETSAT) [GSICS Research Working Group Chair] Special.
Beyond the workshop: Developing inter-calibration products based on Lunar Observations Tim Hewison (EUMETSAT) [GSICS Research Working Group Chair] Special.
Thomas C. Stone U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ USA GSICS Research Working Group Meeting EUMETSAT 24−28 March 2014 Using the Moon as a Radiometric.
A.K. Mitra, Shailesh Parihar, S.K. Peshin Ministry of Earth Sciences
PLEIADES Lunar Observations Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie
GSICS Baseline Review: Tools – e.g. GSICS Bias Plotting Tool
Description of the giro ON THE DETAILS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION
Proposal for input/output data of GIRO application
PREPARATION OF THE GiRO executable
GDWG Agenda Item: Tools for GRWG activities
GIRO Input/Output data convention
Calibrating the METEOSAT SEVIRI solar channels using lunar observations Sébastien Wagner (1) Bartolomeo Viticchie (1), Tom Stone (2), Tim Hewison(1), Gary.
EUMETSAT’s Lunar Calibration Capabilities
JMA lunar calibration report [MTSAT-2 and GMS-5]
Lunar Calibration Workshop Activities
GDWG Agenda Item Existing netCDF Format Updates
Lunar Calibration Workshop
Second Joint GSICS-IVOS Lunar Calibration Workshop
Technical Expectations from Organizers & Participants B. Fougnie, S
Spectral Response Function netCDF towards “GSICS Standard netCDF”
GDWG Agenda Item Repository for GSICS Work - Clarification on Archiving Masaya Takahashi, JMA CMA, CNES, EUMETSAT, ISRO, IMD, JAXA, JMA, KMA, NASA, NIST,
Doelling, Wagner 2015 GSICS annual meeting, New Delhi March 20, 2015
The ROLO Lunar Calibration System Description and Current Status
GIRO usage and GSICS Lunar Observation Dataset Policy S. Wagner
Sébastien Wagner (1) Tom Stone (2), Gary Fowler (1), Tim Hewison (1)
Data Preparation for Using the ROLO / GIRO Model
MODIS Lunar Calibration Data Preparation and Results for GIRO Testing
Actions and Recommendations of the Joint Session
Extraction of Moon “imagettes” from MSG data
Status of the Data Preparation Bertrand Fougnie – Sophie Lachérade
Example of sensitivity analysis Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie
Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) Tom Stone (USGS)
Update on the GIRO Benchmark
GRWG VIS/NIR sub-group briefing report
Preparation of the Lunar Workshop # 2014
Sensitivity ANALYSIS Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with
S-NPP Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Lunar Calibration using GSICS Implementation of the ROLO model (GIRO) for Reflective Solar Bands.
Moving toward inter-calibration using the Moon as a transfer
GIRO APPLICATION Current status and NEXT STEPS
Sensitivity ANALYSIS Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with
Definition of a benchmark for the GIRO
Requirements on GSICS Plotting Tool to support VISNIR products
Data policy, data usage and dataset update
Presentation Overview
Summary of the Achievements to date
Technical aspects of the GIRO work: inputs from GRWG
Lunar Calibration Workshop
Status of the EUMETSAT GSICS DCC product
Lunar Calibration Workshop Wrap up, next steps and list of actions
Moving toward inter-calibration using the Moon as a transfer
Traceability of the GIRO to the ROLO: Definition of a benchmark
Lunar calibration of COMS visible channel using GIRO
Special Issue of the IEEE TGRS on “Inter-Calibration of Satellite Instruments”: 07 April 2019 Outcomes of 2016 GRWG Meeting JAXA, Tsukuba, Japan Tim Hewison.
Inter-band calibration using the Moon
S3B OLCI Lunar Observations
A timeline for the lunar calibration workshop
The GSICS Lunar Observation Dataset
Bertrand Fougnie, Sophie Lachérade (CNES)
GRWG VIS/NIR sub-group briefing report
Infrared Sub-Group Report Tim Hewison
Lunar Calibration Workshop Activities
Toward a synergy between on-orbit lunar observations
Lunar Calibration Workshop Status of the preparation
GRWG Summary Decisions, Actions, Recommendations
Presentation transcript:

PREPARATION OF THE GiRO executable Current status Bartolomeo Viticchiè, Tom Stone, Sebastien Wagner, Masaya Takahashi & Tim Hewison

GIRO second release Many users running the GIRO!

GIRO second release Functionalities: reading of the input NetCDF files (observation + spectral response function), computation of the observables, writing of the sanity check files, computation of the ROLO reference irradiance, writing of a complete lunar calibration output file. Figure 1 of https://gsics.nesdis.noaa.gov/pub/Development/20140624/GSICS_ROLO_HighLevDescript_IODefinition_wiki.pdf

GIRO second release: feedbacks from users

GIRO second release: feedbacks from users Bugs fixed: Problems in the reading of rectangular imagettes (reported by Fangfang Yu, NOAA, by analysing GOES data), Problem in the evaluation of the Moon imagette dimension (problem found by analysing MODIS and VIIRS data) BOTH POINTS 1 AND 2 HAVE BEEN SPOTTED BY CHECKING THE CONTENT OF THE SANITY CHECK FILES. IN DETAIL, BY COMPARING THE VALUES OF THE DC OFFSET AS PROVIDED BY THE USER AND AS DERIVED BY THE IMAGETTE PROCESSING WITHIN GIRO. IF THE IMAGETTES ARE NOT READ PROPERLY THE OFFSET FROM THE IMAGETTE PROCESSING IS (USUALLY) IN STRONG DISAGREEMENT WITH THE ONE PROVIDED BY THE USER. Wrong values of the Solar Irradiance in the NIR spectral range. 4. Problems in the smoothing/interpolation of the Solar Spectrum on the SRF wavelengths in the NIR spectral range (reported by Zhipeng Wang, NASA GSFC, by analysing VIIRS data). POINT 4. HAS BEEN SPOTTED BY Zhipeng Whang BY ANALYSING VIIRS AND TERRA/AQUA MODIS DATA. IN DETAIL, IN SOME OF THE CHANNELS NaN VALUES WERE FOUND FOR THE ROLO IRRADIANCE. THIS WAS DUE TO A WRONG INTERPOLATION OF THE SOLAR IRRADIANCE SPECTRUM ON THE SRF WAVELENGTHS OF THOSE CHANNELS.

GIRO second release: feedbacks from users Bugs fixed: Problems in the reading of rectangular imagettes (reported by Fangfang Yu, NOAA, by analysing GOES data), Problem in the evaluation of the Moon imagette dimension (problem found by analysing MODIS and VIIRS data) BOTH POINTS 1 AND 2 HAVE BEEN SPOTTED BY CHECKING THE CONTENT OF THE SANITY CHECK FILES. IN DETAIL, BY COMPARING THE VALUES OF THE DC OFFSET AS PROVIDED BY THE USER AND AS DERIVED BY THE IMAGETTE PROCESSING WITHIN GIRO. IF THE IMAGETTES ARE NOT READ PROPERLY THE OFFSET FROM THE IMAGETTE PROCESSING IS (USUALLY) IN STRONG DISAGREEMENT WITH THE ONE PROVIDED BY THE USER. Wrong values of the Solar Irradiance in the NIR spectral range. 4. Problems in the smoothing/interpolation of the Solar Spectrum on the SRF wavelengths in the NIR spectral range (reported by Zhipeng Wang, NASA GSFC, by analysing VIIRS data). POINT 4. HAS BEEN SPOTTED BY Zhipeng Whang BY ANALYSING VIIRS AND TERRA/AQUA MODIS DATA. IN DETAIL, IN SOME OF THE CHANNELS NaN VALUES WERE FOUND FOR THE ROLO IRRADIANCE. THIS WAS DUE TO A WRONG INTERPOLATION OF THE SOLAR IRRADIANCE SPECTRUM ON THE SRF WAVELENGTHS OF THOSE CHANNELS. THE MODIFICATIONS RELATED TO POINTS 3. AND 4. HAVE A DIRECT IMPACT ON THE COMPUTATION OF THE ROLO REFERENCE IRRADIANCE! A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GIRO AND THE USGS ROLO IRRADIANCES HAS BEEN REPEATED AND THE PREVIOUS SMALL DIFFERENCES HAVE BEEN FURTHER REDUCED

GIRO second release: feedbacks from users Issue raised by Zhipeng Whang: “...in some cases, raw DC read from MODIS (dc_raw) is converted to dc_obc to compensate the temperature effect... while dc_raw are all integer, dc_obc are float. Unless GIRO provides the ability of various adjustment on top of the background subtraction,  defining dc_obc as float can provide more flexibility for our users... ” Major changes: The GIRO application handles now the information derived from the DC imagette in floating point (before as integers). IMPORTANT! The information are still stored as integers, but are converted to floating point in the processing by employing variable’s attributes: scale_factor and add_offset (see section 7.3.1 of [HLD_GIRO_IO]).

Thank you very much for the feedbacks and support! GIRO third release: users that derived calibration results Fangfang Yu (NOAA) : results from GOES15 Sophie Lacherade and Bertrand Fougnie (CNES) : results from Pleiades1B Tae-Hyeong Oh (KMA) : results from COMS1 Zhipeng Wang (NASA GSFC) : results from VIIRS and MODIS Thank you very much for the feedbacks and support!

THE GIRO WORKING GROUP LOOK FORWARD TO SEE YOU AT THE WORKSHOP! Conclusions The GIRO third release is the executable that will used at the workshop in combination with the GIRO PERTurbation tool for the sensitivity analysis. Few bugs have been found and fixed thanks to the feedbacks of the users. If you find any malfunctioning of the GIRO third release please contact us! Do not wait the workshop to communicate with the developers! THE GIRO WORKING GROUP LOOK FORWARD TO SEE YOU AT THE WORKSHOP!