AHECB Special Meeting July 26, 2018 Agenda Item 1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AHECB Finance Committee Meeting July 25, AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 OPERATING NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE BIENNIUM Tara Smith Senior Associate.
Advertisements

Arkansas Higher Education Coordinating Board Agenda Item 4 April 25, 2008 Annual Report on Productivity of Recently Approved Programs Presented by: Laura.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Jim Purcell ADHE.  Does the Director of DFA have authority to tell Colleges and Universities when or when not to give raises to their employees? ◦ I.
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards 77th Annual Congress Orlando, Florida Accreditation 101 & Panel Discussion Saturday May 3, :00 – 10:00.
Presenter: Date: Arizona & Higher Education 2014 and Beyond Dan Anderson Director of Institutional Research October 22, 2014.
Changing Demographics and Enrollment Trends Ken Esbenshade Associate Dean and Director of Academic Programs College of Agriculture and Life Sciences North.
Analysis of States’ Use of Student Enrollments and Performance Criteria in Higher Education Funding May 2012 R EPORT FOR THE N EVADA L EGISLATURE ’ S C.
Attracting the Best and Brightest Minds to Science Geraldine Richmond University of Oregon.
Student Affairs Committee University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Board of Governors State University System of Florida August 9,
Achieving the Dream Dr. Jan Lyddon October What is Achieving the Dream?
Before & After: What Undergraduates and Alumni Say About Their College Experience and Outcomes Angie L. Miller, NSSE & SNAAP Research Analyst Amber D.
Transitioning from High School to Career BRIDGE TO SUCCESS.
Credentials Awarded AHECB Meeting of April 25, 2013.
“Building an Inclusive Community” Presented by Dr. Mordean Taylor-Archer Vice Provost for Diversity and International Affairs 1 University of Louisville.
Ph. D. Completion and Attrition: Analysis of Baseline Data NSF AGEP Evaluation Capacity Meeting September 19, 2008 Robert Sowell Council of Graduate Schools.
AHECB Meeting April 30, Credentials Awarded AHECB Meeting of April 30, 2015.
10/17/2015 State Board of Education 1 ANNUAL REPORT ON GIFTED AND TALENTED EDUCATION Academic Year
THECB 7/2004 Closing the Gaps by 2015 Progress Report, July 2004.
Where Are All the Boys? 英二 1 5 th Dec Summary Women now make up 55 percent of the college population-and that number continues to rise. Within.
Tennessee Higher Education Commission Fall 2012 Enrollment & Completion Update Tennessee Higher Education Commission Fall Quarterly Meeting November 15,
Key Considerations in Collecting Student Follow-up Data NACTEI May 15, 2012 Portland, OR Promoting Rigorous Career and Technical Education Programs of.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Arkansas Goals for Education Challenge to Lead: Arkansas 2006 Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Data Highlight: Completion CAAP Meeting March 30,
THECB 10/2007 Closing the Gaps by 2015 Presentation for: 2007 Governing Board Conference David W. Gardner October 29, 2007.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 OPERATING NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE BIENNIUM Tara Smith Senior Associate Director, Institutional Finance.
Michigan Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Annual Report to the Public CENTERPOINT OCTOBER 10, 2016 SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Faculty Leadership Training
Community College of Baltimore County
Trends in Public US Education: Challenges & Opportunities
Graduations, Dropouts and Mobility Rates McKinney-Vento
The U.S. Higher Education Landscape: Equity Lens Applied
Research and Policy Brief May 25, 2010
MIAIR, November 3, 2016 Jessica Kijek & Bin Ning
Youth CareerConnect Programs:
North Texas Regional P-16 Gap Analysis for the School Year of
The New American Dilemma
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near Poverty Rates for Children Under Age 5, by Living Arrangement: 2015 The data for Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near.
U.S. Levels of Educational Attainment by Race
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Shoumi Mustafa October 16, 2017
Applicant Data Cycle CASPA.
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ARKANSAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD
Joint Initiative: Graduate Council and Graduate School
Matriculant Data Entering Classes
2017 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Research Doctorates Conferred,
FCS Baccalaureate Degrees
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SECTION 31(1) AND (2) OF THE NURSING ACT (ACT NO
WICHE Region 2017 Benchmarks: WICHE Region 2017 presents information on the West’s progress in improving access to, success in, and financing of higher.
An Increasing Population Fills Future Classrooms
Environmental Scan Planning Retreat
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
Every Student Succeeds Act Update
Agenda item no. 9: Annual Financial Conditions Report
Challenge to Lead: Texas
Leveraging the Power of Geographic Information System
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
Disproportionate Impact Study
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
College of Liberal Arts & Science Scorecard
College of Business Scorecard
College of Computing & Informatics Scorecard
College of Health & Human Services Scorecard
College of Education Scorecard
Presentation transcript:

AHECB Special Meeting July 26, 2018 Agenda Item 1 Annual Report on the College-Going Rate of Arkansas Public High School Graduates Sonia Hazelwood Associate Director, Research & Analytics

Methodology Each fall ADHE receives data from the Arkansas Department of Education on the most recent public high school graduating class. We link this data to our Student Information System (SIS) to calculate the Annual College-Going Rate. The methodology for this year’s report focuses on students meeting the following criteria: Graduated from an Arkansas public school district in Academic Year 2016-17 Were reported in SIS as first-time entering college students in Fall 2017 term Reported as Arkansas resident This methodology has been in place since 2010 and follows that used by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). However, there are several differences: NCES filters by the age range of 16-24. ADHE ignores age as most high school graduates meet this criteria. NCES includes GED recipients in their counts. ADHE does not have complete GED recipient data. Since the NCES report is based on a survey, it may include private high school graduates, and home school students, or students attending college out-of-state. ADHE has no data on annual graduating classes of private high school students or home school students, or students attending college at institutions in other states. **With these data limitations, the College-Going Rate calculations provided in this report are for Arkansas public high school graduates only attending an Arkansas college or university.

Please note what these rates are not telling us… NCES rates are based on a monthly household survey conducted by the Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Labor Statistics AND contain college attendance data for GED, home school, and private high school graduates, as well as students who attended college all over the nation. Our SIS cannot track those students so the comparison is not a true comparison. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cpa.asp; SIS The public high school student college-going rate for all Arkansas public and independent institutions for the Fall 2017 term was 48.2%. This represents a decrease of 1.5 percentage points from the previous fall term.

College-Going Rate – 5 Year Review Arkansas public high schools experienced a 5.4% increase in the number of high school graduates when comparing 2012-13 to 2016-17. This increase, however, did not improve the College-Going Rate of first-time entering students to an Arkansas institution of higher education. The College-Going Rate of public high school graduates declined 3.2% from 51.4% to 48.2% when comparing 2012-13 to 2016-17 public high school graduates. Source: SIS

Source: SIS Over five years, the share of CGR students at 4-Year Universities decreased from 30.7% in 2013 to 29.1%. The share of CGR students at 2-Year Colleges has decreased from 18.0 % in 2013 to 16.9% in 2017. The share of CGR students at Private Institutions has decreased from 2.7% in Fall 2013 to 2.2% in Fall 2017.

Source: SIS For the 15,094 public high school graduates the majority enrolled in public 4-Year Universities. This represents a decrease of 0.5% for 4-Year Universities compared to the Fall 2016 entering class, an increase of 3.4% for 2-Year Colleges, and a decrease of 3.2% for Private institutions from last year’s College-Going Rate cohort by Institution Type.

GENDER The College-Going Rate for Arkansas High School Graduates has declined for both male and female students the past three years. Source: SIS According to NCES, the national College-Going Rate for High School Graduates has increased slightly for male students, but decreased slightly for female students the past three years. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cpa.asp

GENDER Source: SIS https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cpa.asp

RACE/ETHNICITY The 2016-17 College-Going Rates for Arkansas High School Graduates has declined for several races compared to the 2015-16 rates. The Asian students showed a decline of 5.1% and the Black students decreased 5.3% over last year’s College-Going Rate cohort. The Native American/Alaskan Native students had the largest one year rate increase of 3.3%. Source: SIS

RACE/ETHNICITY The NCES reported 2015-16 College-Going Rates for U.S. High School Graduates has declined for Asian and Black students when compared to the 2014-15 rates. The College-Going Rates for Hispanic and White students both had modest increases. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cpa.asp

#1 #1 #1 #3 #3 #3 Program areas Program areas Program areas 4-YEAR ATTENDANCE Remember the cohort is in-state students only. Source: SIS #3 Education Program areas With most credentials Awarded Business & Management #1 Health Professions & Nursing #3 Education Program areas With most credentials Awarded Business & Management #1 Health Professions & Nursing #3 Education Program areas With most credentials Awarded Business & Management #1 Health Professions & Nursing

#1 #1 #1 #3 #3 #3 Program areas Program areas Program areas 2 YEAR ATTENDANCE Source: SIS #3 Education Program areas With most credentials Awarded Business & Management #1 Health Professions & Nursing #3 Education Program areas With most credentials Awarded Business & Management #1 Health Professions & Nursing #3 Education Program areas With most credentials Awarded Business & Management #1 Health Professions & Nursing

STEM Majors The following tables provide STEM Major information for the 2016-17 high school graduates who entered a public institution in Fall 2017. The first table uses the original STEM program list and the second table includes CIP codes added to the previous STEM list during the Productivity Funding Model implementation process last year. The tables below provide the top six 4-year and top six 2-year institutions based on number of College-Going Rate cohort STEM majors. For consistency purposes, going forward, all agenda items with STEM component will use the new STEM definition as defined by the Productivity Funding Model definition. Source: SIS Source: SIS

Academic Affairs Special Meeting July 26, 2018

Annual Review of Faculty Performance Colleges and universities are required to conduct faculty performance reviews under Arkansas Code Annotated §6-63-104 and AHECB policy 5.5. ADHE staff is required to monitor faculty evaluation processes adopted at Arkansas public institutions and report annually to the AHECB and Legislative Council. All institutions conducted faculty performance reviews during 2017-2018 using a variety of methods including assessment by students, classroom visits by administrators, peer review, and self-evaluation activities. Student Ratings External Perspective Artifacts Agenda Item No. 2

Annual Review of Faculty Performance Notable Findings Institutions have implemented a variety of training programs to strength faculty development around performance review elements: Advising Techniques (e.g. intrusive advising, coaching, and mentoring) Tools/approaches to assess student learning outcomes (capstone projects, eportfolios, rubrics) Development of quantitative/qualitative component ratings of faculty Utilization of technology in the classroom Participation in English training including: English as a Second Language courses, and accent reduction training. Agenda Item No. 2

Academic Program Review Arkansas Code §6-61-214 requires that the AHECB review existing academic programs at Arkansas public colleges and universities. The existing academic program review policies (AHECB Policy 5.12) were adopted in 1988 and revised in 1995, 1998, and 2008. Agenda Item No. 3

Academic Program Review Summary ANC (14) CCUA (9) PCCUA (3) UAPTC (11) UCA (33) ASUB (12) COTO(8) SAUM (12) UAF (36) ASUMS (0) ASUJ (30) HSU (8) SAUT (5) UAFS (19) EACC(0) ASUMH (9) NAC (13) SEARK (2) UALR (47) SACC(0) ASUN (2) NPC (19) UACCB (12) UAM (6) UARM (0) ATU (19) NWACC(17) UACCH (11) UAMS (2) BRTC (8) OZ(8) UACCM (13) UAPB (2) Total Review Completed 2017-2018: 390 Agenda Item No. 3

AHECB Program Viability Standards Degree Level Standard Graduates Over a Three-Year Period 01 Certificate of Proficiency 02 Technical Certificate 03 Associate Degree (AAS Only) 12 03 Associate Degree (AA, AS, and AAT) 18 Graduates Over a Five-Year Period 05 Bachelor Degrees 05 Bachelor Degrees (in science, mathematics, engineering, foreign languages, middle school education, and secondary education programs for licensure in science and mathematics) 07 Master’s Degree 08 Specialist 17 Doctoral: Research/Scholarship 6 18 Doctoral: Professional Practice Agenda Item No. 4

Program Viability Review 4 - Year Institutions Total Programs Viable Programs at 4 -Year Institutions Non-Viable Programs at 4 -Year Institutions Deleted Program or Proposed for Deletion Percentage of Non-Viable Programs 1415 1411 4 1 <1% 2 - Year Institutions Total Programs Viable Programs at 4 -Year Institutions Non-Viable Programs at 4 -Year Institutions Deleted Program or Proposed for Deletion Percentage of Non-Viable Programs 1353 1305 48 5 <4% Agenda Item No. 4