Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 14, 2004 TJR - - UPDATED 1/25/04 1 MICE Beamline Analysis Using g4beamline Including Jan 25 Updates for Kevin’s JAN04 Beamline Design Tom Roberts.
Advertisements

Beam Test of a High-Pressure GH 2 -Filled RF Cavity (for efficient muon beam cooling for a MC or NF, since the low-Z ionization energy-loss absorber and.
Ion instability at SuperKEKB H. Fukuma (KEK) and L. F. Wang (SLAC) ECLOUD07, 12th Apr. 2007, Daegu, Korea 1. Introduction 2. Ion trapping 3. Fast ion instability.
M. Sullivan Mini-workshop on the MEIC design Nov 2, 2012.
March 30, 2004 TJR1 MICE Target Source Calculations Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology March 30, 2004.
Frictional Cooling MC Collaboration Meeting June 11-12/2003 Raphael Galea.
Basic Measurements: What do we want to measure? Prof. Robin D. Erbacher University of California, Davis References: R. Fernow, Introduction to Experimental.
2/7/2002 RolMUCOOL/MICE1 20b. Gaseous Energy Absorber, 21a. High Pressure RF Cavities New Money for New Approaches DOE Small Business Innovation Research.
Chris Rogers, MICE CM16 Wednesday Plenary Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
July 28, 2004K. Yonehara, NuFact'04 Osaka1 High pressure RF cavities for muon beam cooling Katsuya Yonehara Illinois Institute of Technology NuFact04 in.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Optimized Parameters for a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los.
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Optimization David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
1 Front End Capture/Phase Rotation & Cooling Studies David Neuffer Cary Yoshikawa December 2008.
Fast TOF for Muon Cooling Experiments Robert Abrams Muons, inc.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
NuFact04 July26-August 1, 2004 Osaka University, Osaka, Japan Columbia University & the Max-Planck-Institute Review & Status of Frictional Cooling A. Caldwell,
Tools for Nuclear & Particle Physics Experimental Background.
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
TJR 01/21/2003Slide 1 Simulations of the Study 2 Cooling Channel with Realistic Absorber Windows Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology.
1 Higgs : keV precision and CP violation W. J. Murray RAL.
Synchrotron radiation at eRHIC Yichao Jing, Oleg Chubar, Vladimir N. Litvinenko.
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
Dott. Antonio Botrugno Ph.D. course UNIVERSITY OF LECCE (ITALY) DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS.
High gradient acceleration Kyrre N. Sjøbæk * FYS 4550 / FYS 9550 – Experimental high energy physics University of Oslo, 26/9/2013 *k.n.sjobak(at)fys.uio.no.
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Gas-filled rf David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
MICE at STFC-RAL The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment -- Design, engineer and build a section of cooling channel capable of giving the.
March 2, 2011 TJRPhysics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools 1 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. This is the current list − Please help us to complete.
Recent progress of RF cavity study at Mucool Test Area Katsuya Yonehara APC, Fermilab 1.
-Plasma can be produced when a laser ionizes gas molecules in a medium -Normally, ordinary gases are transparent to electromagnetic radiation. Why then.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
A. Bross MICE CM17 February MuCool RF Program 805 and 201 MHz Studies.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
 A model of beam line built with G4Beamline (scripting tool for GEANT4)  Simulated performance downstream of the AC Dipole for core of beam using  x.
Frictional Cooling A.Caldwell MPI f. Physik, Munich FNAL
Radiation Shielding Assessment for MuCool Experimental Enclosure C. Johnstone 1), I. Rakhno 2) 1) Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois.
Numerical Model of an Internal Pellet Target O. Bezshyyko *, K. Bezshyyko *, A. Dolinskii †,I. Kadenko *, R. Yermolenko *, V. Ziemann ¶ * Nuclear Physics.
M  on Cooling RINGBERG July, 2003 Studies at Columbia University/Nevis Labs & MPI Raphael Galea, Allen Caldwell How to reduce beam Emmittance by.
ICHEP Conference Amsterdam 31st International Conference on High Energy Physics 24  31 July 2002 Gail G. Hanson University of California, Riverside For.
“MuCyc” Update Kevin Paul Tech-X Corporation Don Summers University of Mississippi 1 NFMCC Meeting - 27 Jan 2009.
Mitchell Yu Carol Guimaraes Arturo Fiorentini York University 2013/11/22 NuStorm Near Detector Flux Study.
Basic of muon ionization cooling K. Yonehara 8/29/11HPRF cavity physics seminar - I, K. Yonehara1.
Katsuya Yonehara Accelerator Physics Center, Fermilab On behalf of the Muon Accelerator Program 5/22/121International Particle Accelerator Conference,
Muons, Inc. Feb Yonehara-AAC AAC Meeting Design of the MANX experiment Katsuya Yonehara Fermilab APC February 4, 2009.
EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Summary of WP3 J. Pozimski.
Research and development toward a future Muon Collider Katsuya Yonehara Accelerator Physics Center, Fermilab On behalf of Muon Accelerator Program Draft.
G4beamline Spin Tracking Tom Roberts, Muons, Inc. In G4beamline 2.12, the tracking of muon and electron spins is introduced: – decay of pions into polarized.
Uncertainties in Cooling Simulations R.C. Fernow BNL Synergy Workshop FNAL 13 June 2008.
Chapter 2 Radiation Interactions with Matter East China Institute of Technology School of Nuclear Engineering and Technology LIU Yi-Bao Wang Ling.
Radiopharmaceutical Production Cyclotron radionuclide production STOP.
David Neuffer Cary Yoshikawa March 2009
Parametric Resonance Ionization Cooling of Muons
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
Using MICE to verify simulation codes?
(Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment)
Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. Illinois Institute of Technology
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Design of the MANX experiment
Why Study Electron Clouds? Methods and Tools to Study Electron Clouds
K.B. Beard1#, S.A. Bogacz2, V.S. Morozov2, Y.R. Roblin2
Beam Dump Experiments with Photon and Electron Beams
ACCELERATORS AND DETECTORS
The Detector System of the MICE Experiment
Background Simulations at Fermilab
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Presentation transcript:

Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools This is the current list − Please help us to complete it. Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. March 2, 2011 TJR Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools

Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools Classes of Processes Single-particle processes Collective effects in vacuum Collective effects in matter Polarized muon processes Normalization and Computation of Emittance RF breakdown Neutrino processes Details Some of these are implemented in other tools; we need to consider adding to our toolbox and/or enhancing the tools we use. March 2, 2011 TJR Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools

Single-Particle Processes Accurate multiple-scattering model Several are available in ICOOL G4beamline has all Geant4 processes available Geant4 9.4 changes this (again) Energy-loss straggling model (incl. length dependence) Vavilov model vs. Striganov model Material dependence of energy loss and straggling ICOOL and G4beamline disagree for LiH Correlation of energy loss with multiple scattering angle Effect of magnetic field on multiple scattering Energy loss in matter for high-energy muons (> ~200GeV) March 2, 2011 TJR Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools

Collective Effects in Vacuum Space charge Basic computation in ICOOL Two computations in G4beamline Wake fields Beam loading Beam-beam interactions G4beamline space charge implementations apply Electron cloud effects Decay of macro-particles Interactions of macro-particles March 2, 2011 TJR Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools

Collective Effects in Matter (1) Space charge screening by material Bunch effect on the density term of the single-particle formula for energy loss (plasma density) Bunch-induced polarization of material causing intensity-dependent increase in energy loss Can induce an instability Plasma effects from ionized electrons and ions Dense beam boring a “hole” in the absorber, with the front of the bunch ionizing ~100%, so the back end of the bunch has reduced ionization loss Absorber bubble formation, melting, or other thermal damage Beam particles “ganging up” on atomic nuclei – a hydrogen nucleus is NOT heavy compared to 1,000 muons. Energy loss and multiple scattering from ionized and excited atoms (prepared by earlier beam particles). March 2, 2011 TJR Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools

Collective Effects in Matter (2) Beam particles screening each other, for both multiple scattering and energy loss. Effect of plasma on atomic response, for both multiple scattering and energy loss. Effect of matter on wake fields and beam loss, including EM radiation from bunches transiting windows (resonates in RF cavity…). For all of the above: Consider dependency on material properties Consider time dependence Head vs. tail of a single bunch Effects involving successive bunches in a train Are LH2 and RF-cavity windows important? March 2, 2011 TJR Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools

Polarized Muon Processes Geant4 has no muon-polarized processes, we need ot implement them Effect of ionization cooling on polarization. For applications other than a muon collider or neutrino factory Might it be interesting in a collider to trade a factor of ~100 reduction in luminosity for partially polarized beams? – Would it be possible? March 2, 2011 TJR Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools

Normalization and Computation of Emittance Uncertainties remain about the accuracy of the pion production models used. MARS, Fluka, MCNPX, Geant4, all differ in various ways Direct experiments are scarce, but there are relevant ones Cavitation and other distortions of the mercury jet production target Proper calculation of the EM vector potential in the emittance computation. March 2, 2011 TJR Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools

Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools RF Breakdown While not directly part of the particle simulations, modeling RF breakdown is an important aspect of the overall simulation of a muon collider. Vacuum High-pressure H2 Surface effects and processing This is so important that experiments are required. Will affect technology used, so must be done early March 2, 2011 TJR Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools

Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools Neutrino Processes Surface radiation assessment will require accurate simulations of neutrino interactions Need to significantly increase neutrino interaction cross-sections to make simulations feasible Also needed for studying backgrounds in the MC detector. March 2, 2011 TJR Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools

Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools Details Our current simulations are at best approximations to what would actually be built Many details must be assessed and included if necessary, such as: 3-D effects in RF cavity field models Realistic, non-pillbox cavities Couplers HOM absorbers Engineering assessments Thermal loads from the beam Thermal loads from muon decay Radiation levels Surely others… Ability to model a large and complex detector for background studies Surely more… March 2, 2011 TJR Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools

Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools Summary There are a number of complicated and subtle physics processes not included in our current simulation tools. We must expand the list to be as complete as possible. Ultimately we will need a set of publications or MuCool notes, estimating the importance of each one. We need to implement those that can significantly affect our modeling of facilities. There are many other simulation tools available, and we need to assess whether to acquire and use additional tools, or to enhance the ones we already use. There are of course myriads of engineering details, required for accurate simulations of a specific design. March 2, 2011 TJR Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools