Jukka Rakkolainen / ECO Nordic-Baltic Electronic Communications Regulators Workshop Network Neutrality and Consumer Protection Vilnius, 29 August 2012.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Dakar, April 2005 CEPT PREPARATIONS FOR RRC-06 François RANCY, Vice-Chair CEPT WG RRC-06 Dakar, 27 April 2005.

Advertisements

Nairobi, Kenya, 26 – 27July 2010 Maintaining Equipment Standards to ensure good QoS Mwende Njiraini Engineer I/NT/LCS Communications Commission of Kenya.

ECC initiatives on spectrum for Programme Making and Special Events - PMSE Bruno Espinosa Deputy Director, ECO, Copenhagen.

Jan 2012 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: MBANS Europe Status Date Submitted: Jan 17,

Net Neutrality a regulator’s vision February 27 th, 2012 Guillaume Mellier.

Activities in CEPT ECC/WGFM/ Project Team FM54

Consumer information under the new directives Chris Rowsell Senior policy adviser - consumer issues.

Freddie McBride, European Communications Office Working Group Numbering & Networks Third CEPT workshop on “European Spectrum Management and Numbering”

Geolocation databases for spectrum sharing : ECC findings and studies EC DG CONNECT Workshop, 20 March 2015 Bruno Espinosa, Deputy Director, ECO.

SPECTRUM REGULATION IN EUROPE, ECC ACTIVITIES RELEVANT FOR UTILITIES Bruno ESPINOSA, ECO

Human Rights in the Digital Era Conference Net Neutrality Policy in the UK & the Citizen’s Interest in Neutral Networks Giles Moss Institute of Communications.

10 th International Electronic Communications Regulators Conference 8 th May 2015 Future of mobile: 4G and Beyond Eric Fournier Chairman, Electronic Communications.

Activities in CEPT ECC/WGFM in relation to the Evolution of the Radio Communication System Workshop on Evolution of the Radio Communication System - European.

19 April 2012 Impact of M2M Communications to E.212 Resources (IMSI) Jukka Rakkolainen / ECO.

Network neutrality is the idea that all internet traffic should be treated equally. It does not matter who is downloading and what is being downloaded.

European Regulatory Environment (just a part!) Mark Thomas, ECO Director CEPT Workshop on European Spectrum Management and Numbering 4 th June 2014.

The ECC in practice, its structure, its routine

Nov/Dec 2003ElectraNet BSP-2 Workshop (khb) 1 EU Telecoms Regulatory Status Governing Legislation Package 2002  Directive 2002/19/EC Access to, and interconnection.

1 COMMUNICATIONS REGULATION COMMISSION Republic of Bulgaria MOBILE BROADBAND EUROPE – BULGARIAN EXPERIENCE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MOBILE BROADBAND ACCESS.

ITU-T Workshop All Star Network Access Geneva, 2-4 June 2004 International Telecommunication Union Worldwide, Regional and National Unlicensed and Unprotected.

Implementation of EU Electronic Communication Directives.

CROATIAN REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR NETWORK INDUSTRIES (HAKOM) DO WE NEED NET NEUTRALITY REGULATION? Marina Brkljačić, CROATIAN REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR.

Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology, VII B 3 "Digital Broadcasting" Initiative 1 The Initiative „Digital Broadcasting“ of the German Government,

Liberalization of Telecommunications in Europe Pál Belényesi 27 October 2006 Verona.

FAQs about the new regulatory framework Lucy Rhodes

GSC#8 April 2003, DRAFT GSC-8, OTTAWA Slide 1 RAST 10/2-3 Generic Standards

Local Loop Unbundling PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 6 th JUNE 2007.

New EU-Framework for electronic communication Implications for Broadcasting Hans Peter Lehofer, KommAustria 16th EPRA-Meeting Ljubljana.

Richard Harris DG Information Society European Commission EICTA - PHARE Business support programme Brussels, 5 December 2001 “EU Policy for electronic.

Seniorklubben af 1991 Introduction Presentation to Seniorklubben af 1991 – 19 April 2012.

Thomas Weilacher WG FM Chairman 1 European regulation on 24 GHz automotive radars Geneva/Switzerland, 5 November 2015.

CEPT/ECC-ETSI Co-operation Process

Stakeholders Forum on QoS and Consumer Experience (Nairobi, Kenya, 23 to 25 November 2015) Role of Global & Regional Communities, Policy Makers, Regulators.

International Telecommunication Union ITU-T Workshop All Stars Access Network Geneva, 2-4 June 2004 Session 7: Regulatory issues, their status and resolution.

Jerker Torngren 1. Universal Service Obligations The EU legislation A basic introduction Presented by Jerker Torngren 1.

LATVIAN EXPERIENCE IN QOS MEASUREMENTS ON INTERNET, INCLUDING ON MOBILE INTERNET Elmars Lipenbergs Senior expert of Quality of Service Division, Electronic.

WGFM PT49 BB PPDR Dublin, 26 – 27 November 2013 Peter Buttenschön Chairman WGFM PT 49

Doc.: IEEE /12??r0 SubmissionSlide 0 IEEE 802 Plenary, Dallas, Tx RRTAG( ) meeting Consultation on Safety Related ITS 12 th November 2008.

Consumer rights when subscribing to an internet service.

M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 10 – Information society and media.

EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade 19 DK-1366 Copenhagen Denmark Telephone: Telefax:

Net Neutrality and Quality of Service. OVERVIEW Transparency and more strict regulation IAS versus specialized services NN and monitoring of overall IAS.

Introduction to CEPT, its committees and ECO Bruno Espinosa, ECO Deputy Director CEPT Workshop on European Spectrum Management and Numbering 5 th April.

Abbreviations APT - Asia-Pacific Telecommunity ASMG - Arab Spectrum Management Group ATU – African Telecommunications Union BEM – Block Edge Mask BWA –

Activities in CEPT (European Spectrum Regulation) with regard to connected cars evolving towards autonomous vehicles Connected Cars, V2X & Autonomous Vehicles.

ECC: what we do The ECC: Brings together representatives from CEPT members (48) Develops common policies and regulations A focal point for information.

Organisation map.

Activities in CEPT (European Spectrum Regulation) for Applications in Transport and Traffic Telematics including Sensors Automotive Radar Sensors for Semi-Automatic.

The ECC in practice, its structure, its working process

PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO

CEPT Organisation CEPT Assembly Council Presidency ECO ECC CERP

Importance of international harmonisation

Reflection Of The NJFA In The ERC Report 25 (ECA Table) And Relation To EFIS And To The RSPP Inventory CEPT/ECC Civil/Military Meeting, November.

CEPT/ECC-ETSI Co-operation Process

Session 1 The ECC in practice, its structure, its working process

Session 1 Introduction to CEPT, its committees and ECO

Introduction to ECC PT1 February 2011.

Thomas Weilacher Chairman ECC Working Group FM

WiFi Alliance 18th October 2016 Spectrum for WiFi – ECC Actions

Frequency Regulation – Global Update for Automotive Radars

Importance of international harmonisation

Regulatory considerations

Doriana Guiducci, European Communications Office

Thomas Weilacher Chairman ECC Working Group FM

EU-US-JP ITS Steering Group Annual Meeting 2018

CEPT ECC Vice Chairman Jaime Afonso

Communications Committee Communications Office

WGSE Organisation ECC ECO External Relations STG – SEAMCAT

Didier Chauveau ETSI OCG ECN&S Chairman ETSI Board Vice Chairman

Communications Committee Communications Office

Presentation transcript:

Jukka Rakkolainen / ECO Nordic-Baltic Electronic Communications Regulators Workshop Network Neutrality and Consumer Protection Vilnius, 29 August 2012 Quality of Internet Access – a Broader View

Introduction –CEPT, ECC, ECO, WG NaN QoS requirements in Universal Service Directive –Article 22: Quality of Service NaN PT TRIS work on QoS ECO / Jukka Rakkolainen Quality of Internet Access – a Broader View Contents

The European Conference of Postal and Telecommunication Administrations (CEPT) covers the whole Europe with its 48 members –The ECO is the permanent office of CEPT located in Copenhagen The Electronic Communications Committee within in CEPT develops common policies and regulations in electronic communications and related applications for Europe The Working Group Numbering and Networks –develop policies in numbering, naming and addressing, and –advise on technical regulatory matters to encourage innovation and to support fair competition between the different market actors and in the interest of the citizens ECO / Jukka Rakkolainen Quality of Internet Access – a Broader View The CEPT – The ECC

ECO / Jukka Rakkolainen Quality of Internet Access – a Broader View Organization of the ECC Electronic Communications Committee Chairman:T. Ewers (D) Vice-Chairmen:G. Sundal (NOR) S. Himonas (CYP) European Communications Office Director:M. Thomas (G) Deputy Director: B. Espinosa (F) Steering Group WG FM Frequency Management Chairman: S. Pastukh (RUS) Vice-Chairmen: C. Reis (POR) T. Weilacher (D) WG SE Spectrum Engineering Chairman: Vice-Chairmen: A. Kholod (SUI) K. Loew (D) WG CPG Conference Preparatory Group Chairman: E. Fournier (F) Vice-Chairmen: S. Bond (G) A. Kühn (D) WG NaN Numbering and Networks Chairman: J. Vannieuwenhuyse (BEL) Vice-Chairman: S. Gemming (D) IMT-Matters Chairman: D. Chauveau (F) Vice-Chairmen: P. Toivonen (FIN) J. Afonso (POR) ECC PT1

ECO / Jukka Rakkolainen Quality of Internet Access – a Broader View Organization of the WG NaN WG NaN Numbering and Networks Chairman: Jan Vannieuwenhuyse (BEL) Vice-Chairman: Sascha Gemming (D) Future Numbering Issues Chairman: Sascha Gemming (D) PT FNI Technical Regulatory Issues Chairman: Natalija Gelvanovska (LTU) PT TRIS Number Portability Chairman: Johannes Vallesverd (NOR) PT NP Structure of the ECC Electronic Communications Committee European Communications Office Steering Group WG FM Frequency Management WG SE Spectrum Engineering WG CPG Conference Preparatory Group WG NaN Numbering and Networks IMT-Matters ECC PT1

Continuously increasing number of internet service providers (ISPs) Offers to end-users vary not only by price or technology, but also by QoS parameters, e.g. transmission speed, delay, etc So what is wrong? –Each ISP defines and measures QoS parameters in a different way –Values of different ISP are not comparable Therefore it is not possible for end-users to compare different offers and the QoS they are promising ECO / Jukka Rakkolainen Quality of Internet Access – a Broader View What is the Problem within QoS?

EU regulations provide NRAs with tools to overcome problems identified Art 22/1: The NRA shall be able to require that service providers publish comparable, adequate and up-to-date information for end-users on the quality of their services Art 22/2: The NRA may specify the QoS parameters to be measured and the content, form and manner of the information to be published However NRAs are lacking practical experience ECO / Jukka Rakkolainen Quality of Internet Access – a Broader View USD Article 22: Quality of Service

The present PT TRIS study aims to accommodate the NRAs with the practical application of the EUs regulations on QoS This, in turn, will allow the citizens to compare ISPs and make a more objective choice of an internet offer As the advanced choice of the ISP is not only based on the price but also on the performance of the connection, the information about the performance should be comparable ECO / Jukka Rakkolainen Quality of Internet Access – a Broader View How can TRIS help to solve the problem?

The draft PT TRIS reportMonitoring of Quality of Residential Internet Access Service – Pre-selected minimal set of technical parameters and measurement methods. Best Practices aims to tackle the requirements within the USD In order to identify possible discrimination in terms of the QoS it is firstly needed to establish and harmonize system of evaluation of QoS on national and international levels This will also help to stimulate the competition between ISPs not only in terms of price, but also in terms of QoS ECO / Jukka Rakkolainen Quality of Internet Access – a Broader View The Aim of PT TRIS Report

The aim is to study existing standardization, learn from experience from the field (i.e. what some countries already have done) and to formulate best practices and recommendations The Report covers –Problem statement and policy objectives –Definitions of technical QoS parameters and proposed harmonized minimum set of them –Measurement of QoS parameters –Presentation of QoS values to the end-users –Complementary QoS evaluation methods The objective of the work is to make QoS information comparable, adequate and user friendly Planned approval for public consultation in November 2012 ECO / Jukka Rakkolainen Quality of Internet Access – a Broader View The Aim of PT TRIS Report

NaN PT TRIS web-site: Jukka Rakkolainen –European Communications Office ( ECO / Jukka Rakkolainen Quality of Internet Access – a Broader View Thank you for your attention!