Innovations in Infrastructure Funding at DC Water

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Commercializing Swiss Re’s Sustainability Commitment via Innovative Financing Options.
Advertisements

1 Green Collar Jobs in the Housing Sector Green Affordable Housing Forum Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Howard Ways, AICP DC Office of.
Georgia Solar Energy Association (GSEA) Jason Bodwell Senior Program Manager GEFA March 20, 2014.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Speech by Dr. Vuong Duc Hoang Quan Director of Investment Department
CSO Strategies & Financial Management Mayor Gregory A. Ballard City of Indianapolis December 9, 2010.
03 July 2015Course Overview1 Energy Project Evaluation RES Course ESP606 Goal: To build up knowledge to so that participants will be able to assess if.
The Urban Infrastructure Challenge in Canada: Focusing on Housing Affordability and Choice Presentation by CHBA – [Name] to The Municipal Council of [Name]
Green City Bonds Coalition Building a global bond market that will finance development of low carbon and climate resilient cities Join us.
CAFR Analysis Amanda Grieco December 2,  Incorporated in 1857  Located in the northeastern part of the state  Top growth area in the state 
FINANCIAL SERVICES… Presented by: Ruchika Sharma.
Presented By: Matt Bell Partner, Viridian. Buildings and the Environment Buildings account for 36% of greenhouse gas emissions Buildings account for 72%
Funding Green Infrastructure Solutions: Stormwater Management in Pennsylvania Liz Garland American Rivers ABSTRACT Across the nation, American Rivers is.
City of Houston Long Range Financial Management Task Force City Financial Overview Part I August 29,
National Capital Region Climate Change Report OVERVIEW Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments October.
Lecture 1.  Accounting is “the language of business.”  More precisely, accounting is a system of maintaining records of a company’s operations and communicating.
MEDEF MEETING March 7, 2012 A.T. Shaukat Chief Engineer Global Infrastructure & Natural Resources.
Assessing Geopolitical Economics in Securities A panel on the impact of economic and geopolitical forces.
BIMILACI 2007 Best Practice Procurement of Engineering Services Washington, D.C. May , 2007 Gregs Thomopulos, P.E., FACEC Executive Committee Member,
Public – Private Partnership in Vietnam: A new approach Ho Chi Minh City – June 2010.
New Customer Contributions for the Water Sector: Workshop 4 August 2004.
Financial Management – Winter 2005 – 1 February to 3 March The accounting environment The rules of financial accounting:
Loan Programs.  What is the PFA?  How does PFA financing work?  What is the Capital Financing Program?  What is the State Revolving Fund Program?
Chapter 3 Learning Objectives
Chapter 15 Investing in Bonds 15-1
WASTEWATER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT by John Lisenko
Treasury of the Republic of Kazakhstan
What is OneWater? “One Water is an integrated planning and implementation approach to managing finite water resources for long-term resiliency and reliability,
Thursday, 20th May 2015 Presentation to Barry O’Dowd
Chapter 3 Learning Objectives
Rafael Gamboa González
Water Research Foundation
Chapter Outline 5.1 Insurer Insolvencies
Guaranteed Energy Savings Performance Contracting
Economic Regulation of Irish Water
ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS’ GREEN COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE
City of Somersworth, New Hampshire
Municipal Bonds BA 561 – Supply Chain Management April 30, 2012
A Accounting for Investments Principles of Accounting 12e APPENDIX
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada Leveraging Infrastructure Funds
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Utilities Department Wedgefield Water November 28, 2017.
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Texas Military Preparedness Commission
Financial Statement Analysis
WGFOA Spring Conference Egg Harbor, WI April 20, 2017
Annual General Meeting
1.22 Explain the nature of Bonds
Green Bonds for Latin America and the Caribbean
Department of Environmental Quality
Funding at Record Levels
Energy Efficiency investments European Investment Bank
Washington Metropolitan Area GFOA
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Work Session Follow UP Aug. 23, 2018.
Long-Term Liabilities: Bonds and Notes
Financial Accounting Lesson 1: The Basics
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Funding matters Problems and potential solutions to fund coastal adaptation and resilience in Australia Dr. Zsuzsa Banhalmi-Zakar Lecturer in Corporate.
[OUR CITY NAME]’S OLD SEWERS
Melanie Mills, Social Sector Engagement
Introduction to Environmental Impact Bonds
Fixing Our City’s Old Sewers
© 2015 Pearson Education, Limited.
2/3 20% 71% Half 54% Over Half 45% 14% Introduction GHG Mitigation
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AB 1600 UPDATE
Leveraging the bond market to accelerate the energy transition
CalPERS Update & Discussion
National Waterways Conference
Presentation transcript:

Innovations in Infrastructure Funding at DC Water District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority George S. Hawkins, General Manager Innovations in Infrastructure Funding at DC Water Presentation for: Chesapeake Bay Local Government Advisory Committee Financing Stormwater Programs/Pay for Success Maureen M. Holman Sustainability Chief October 6, 2017

Environmental Impact Bond (EIB) Innovations in Infrastructure Funding at DC Water Environmental Impact Bond (EIB)

Environmental Impact Bonds Program Evaluation - DC Water is conducting a rigorous, three-step program evaluation of the effectiveness of green infrastructure in managing stormwater runoff: o Step 1 - Pre-construction monitoring to measure the existing stormwater runoff without green infrastructure. o Step 2 - With results from the pre-construction monitoring and DC Water’s green infrastructure design plan for RC-A, DC Water established outcome ranges predicting the expected reduction in stormwater runoff. An independent engineering firm selected by the investors confirmed these ranges. o Step 3 - Post-construction monitoring to measure the actual stormwater runoff with green infrastructure. - By comparing the actual stormwater runoff to the existing stormwater runoff, DC Water will calculate the effectiveness of green infrastructure in Rock Creek Project A as measured by the percentage reduction in stormwater runoff and determine the associated Performance Tier, which may trigger a contingent payment on the EIB. - An independent validator will confirm the results of the analysis and Performance Tier. Performance Tier, Outcome Ranges and Contingent Payment - Depending on the effectiveness of GI, a contingent payment may be due at the mandatory tender date: Perf. Tier Outcome Ranges Contingent Payment 1 Runoff Reduction > 41.3% DC Water will make an Outcome Payment to Investors of $3.3 million. 2 18.6% <= Runoff Reduction <= 41.3% No contingent payment due. 3 Runoff Reduction < 18.6% Investors will make Risk Share Payment to DC Water of $3.3 million. - The Outcome Ranges reflect the expectation that a successful project will result in Performance Tier 2 with no contingent payment due by either party. - If green infrastructure outperforms expectations and the stormwater runoff reduction is greater than 41.3%, then DC Water will make an additional Outcome Payment to the investors for sharing its risk in the Project.

Environmental Impact Bonds Program Evaluation - DC Water is conducting a rigorous, three-step program evaluation of the effectiveness of green infrastructure in managing stormwater runoff: o Step 1 - Pre-construction monitoring to measure the existing stormwater runoff without green infrastructure. o Step 2 - With results from the pre-construction monitoring and DC Water’s green infrastructure design plan for RC-A, DC Water established outcome ranges predicting the expected reduction in stormwater runoff. An independent engineering firm selected by the investors confirmed these ranges. o Step 3 - Post-construction monitoring to measure the actual stormwater runoff with green infrastructure. - By comparing the actual stormwater runoff to the existing stormwater runoff, DC Water will calculate the effectiveness of green infrastructure in Rock Creek Project A as measured by the percentage reduction in stormwater runoff and determine the associated Performance Tier, which may trigger a contingent payment on the EIB. - An independent validator will confirm the results of the analysis and Performance Tier. Performance Tier, Outcome Ranges and Contingent Payment - Depending on the effectiveness of GI, a contingent payment may be due at the mandatory tender date: Perf. Tier Outcome Ranges Contingent Payment 1 Runoff Reduction > 41.3% DC Water will make an Outcome Payment to Investors of $3.3 million. 2 18.6% <= Runoff Reduction <= 41.3% No contingent payment due. 3 Runoff Reduction < 18.6% Investors will make Risk Share Payment to DC Water of $3.3 million. - The Outcome Ranges reflect the expectation that a successful project will result in Performance Tier 2 with no contingent payment due by either party. - If green infrastructure outperforms expectations and the stormwater runoff reduction is greater than 41.3%, then DC Water will make an additional Outcome Payment to the investors for sharing its risk in the Project.

Program Evaluation Environmental Impact Bonds DC Water is conducting a rigorous, three-step program evaluation of the effectiveness of green infrastructure in managing stormwater runoff: Step 1 - Pre-construction monitoring to measure the existing stormwater runoff without green infrastructure. Step 2 - With results from the pre-construction monitoring and DC Water’s green infrastructure design plan for RC-A, DC Water established outcome ranges predicting the expected reduction in stormwater runoff. An independent engineering firm selected by the investors confirmed these ranges. Step 3 - Post-construction monitoring to measure the actual stormwater runoff with green infrastructure. Program Evaluation - DC Water is conducting a rigorous, three-step program evaluation of the effectiveness of green infrastructure in managing stormwater runoff: o Step 1 - Pre-construction monitoring to measure the existing stormwater runoff without green infrastructure. o Step 2 - With results from the pre-construction monitoring and DC Water’s green infrastructure design plan for RC-A, DC Water established outcome ranges predicting the expected reduction in stormwater runoff. An independent engineering firm selected by the investors confirmed these ranges. o Step 3 - Post-construction monitoring to measure the actual stormwater runoff with green infrastructure. - By comparing the actual stormwater runoff to the existing stormwater runoff, DC Water will calculate the effectiveness of green infrastructure in Rock Creek Project A as measured by the percentage reduction in stormwater runoff and determine the associated Performance Tier, which may trigger a contingent payment on the EIB. - An independent validator will confirm the results of the analysis and Performance Tier. Performance Tier, Outcome Ranges and Contingent Payment - Depending on the effectiveness of GI, a contingent payment may be due at the mandatory tender date: Perf. Tier Outcome Ranges Contingent Payment 1 Runoff Reduction > 41.3% DC Water will make an Outcome Payment to Investors of $3.3 million. 2 18.6% <= Runoff Reduction <= 41.3% No contingent payment due. 3 Runoff Reduction < 18.6% Investors will make Risk Share Payment to DC Water of $3.3 million. - The Outcome Ranges reflect the expectation that a successful project will result in Performance Tier 2 with no contingent payment due by either party. - If green infrastructure outperforms expectations and the stormwater runoff reduction is greater than 41.3%, then DC Water will make an additional Outcome Payment to the investors for sharing its risk in the Project.

Environmental Impact Bonds Paying for Success By comparing the actual stormwater runoff to the existing stormwater runoff, DC Water will calculate the effectiveness of green infrastructure in Rock Creek Project A as measured by the percentage reduction in stormwater runoff and determine the associated Performance Tier, which may trigger a contingent payment on the EIB. Program Evaluation - DC Water is conducting a rigorous, three-step program evaluation of the effectiveness of green infrastructure in managing stormwater runoff: o Step 1 - Pre-construction monitoring to measure the existing stormwater runoff without green infrastructure. o Step 2 - With results from the pre-construction monitoring and DC Water’s green infrastructure design plan for RC-A, DC Water established outcome ranges predicting the expected reduction in stormwater runoff. An independent engineering firm selected by the investors confirmed these ranges. o Step 3 - Post-construction monitoring to measure the actual stormwater runoff with green infrastructure. - By comparing the actual stormwater runoff to the existing stormwater runoff, DC Water will calculate the effectiveness of green infrastructure in Rock Creek Project A as measured by the percentage reduction in stormwater runoff and determine the associated Performance Tier, which may trigger a contingent payment on the EIB. - An independent validator will confirm the results of the analysis and Performance Tier. Performance Tier, Outcome Ranges and Contingent Payment - Depending on the effectiveness of GI, a contingent payment may be due at the mandatory tender date: Perf. Tier Outcome Ranges Contingent Payment 1 Runoff Reduction > 41.3% DC Water will make an Outcome Payment to Investors of $3.3 million. 2 18.6% <= Runoff Reduction <= 41.3% No contingent payment due. 3 Runoff Reduction < 18.6% Investors will make Risk Share Payment to DC Water of $3.3 million. - The Outcome Ranges reflect the expectation that a successful project will result in Performance Tier 2 with no contingent payment due by either party. - If green infrastructure outperforms expectations and the stormwater runoff reduction is greater than 41.3%, then DC Water will make an additional Outcome Payment to the investors for sharing its risk in the Project.

Recognition within the World of Finance Environmental Impact Bonds Recognition within the World of Finance

Green Century Bonds Innovations in Infrastructure Funding at DC Water Bank of America claims its $500 million, three-year green bond, issued in November 2013, was the first U.S. corporate green bond ever. It helped fund LED streetlights in Oakland and Los Angeles. American municipal green bonds are a tad older. In June 2013, Massachusetts sold $100 million in bonds to help clean its rivers, improve wastewater management, boost clean energy and more. (Massachusetts sold another $350 million in bonds last week.) There’s little doubt that a more robust market for green bonds would make it easier for local governments and city agencies to finance infrastructure projects like these that until now have relied on conventional bonds or politically risky tax hikes. Green Century Bonds

Green Century Bonds "The responsibility of a Chief Financial Officer is to secure the funding necessary to undertake the work of the enterprise," said DC Water CFO Mark Kim.  "We also need to formulate a financing strategy that both matches the lifespan of our assets with their funding stream and that presents an equitable charge to our ratepayers.  We developed this innovative approach to achieve all these goals."    The key reasons DC Water chose to issue century bonds included:  - Asset-Liability Matching: century bonds permit the Authority to match its long-lived assets and liabilities on its balance sheet.    - Intergenerational Equity and Fairness: century bonds spread the costs of the project more affordably and fairly to those who will benefit over the next 100 years.  - Committed, Long-Term, Low-Cost Capital: century bonds allow DC Water to take advantage of historically low interest rates and to lock-in funding costs for a very long-lived asset. 

Green Century Bonds 100 years is the longest maturity we’ve seen in the green bonds market by quite some way. Typically, DC Water have issued 30-35 year municipal bonds but they thought a century bond would better match the life of the tunnel system … which is expected to last one 100 years. DC Water also noted that a 100 year bond means repayment of project costs will be spread across all the generations that benefit. They call it “intergenerational equity and fairness”. Perhaps just as importantly, the bond allows DC Water to lock in historically low interest rates.  This bond marks a big step for the US green bond market – it’s the first that has had and independent review, or “second opinion”, on the green credentials of the bond. It was done by Vigeo. A second opinion is essential to comply with the Green Bond Principles as well as the Climate Bonds Standard. The proceeds will be used to construct a tunnel to transport stormwater and sewage to a wastewater treatment plant and reduce sewage overflows to waterways. Sewage system overflows are becoming more common as climate change increases rainfall intensity in many cities with older systems – for example, 30% of the US sewage system dates back to the 19th century. We need to see a lot of these infrastructure adaptation projects.

Green Century Bonds Sustainable Accounting Standards Board.. Infrastructure Standards under development, to be released March 2016 Hello Maureen, Thank you for joining the Infrastructure Industry Working Group!  For those of you who were able to join the webinar this morning, thank you for your engagement and excellent questions. Your thoughtful input is critical to our process.    -          Electric Utilities: 100 participants -          Gas Utilities: 30 participants -          Water Utilities: 40 participants -          Waste Management: 50 participants -          Engineering & Construction Services: 70 participants -          Home Builders: 20 participants -          Real Estate, Dev. & Inv. Trusts: 110 participants -          Real Estate Services: 30 participants

National Recognition in the Press Green Century Bonds National Recognition in the Press

Financial Sustainability and Innovation DC Water has recently been upgraded to a AAA bond rating – an accomplishment that is largely due to the efforts by our CFO and Finance team to be more creative and efficient in financing our operations – such as the issuance of Green Century Bonds. In July, 2014, DC Water issued $350 million in taxable, green century bonds, marking several firsts for the Authority and the municipal sector. The 100-year final maturity represents the first municipal century bond issued by a water/wastewater utility in the United States. It also represents DC Water’s inaugural green bond issue and the first "certified" green bond in the US debt capital markets with an independent second party sustainability opinion.  The key reasons DC Water chose to issue century bonds included: - Asset-Liability Matching: century bonds permit the Authority to match its long-lived assets and liabilities on its balance sheet. - Intergenerational Equity and Fairness: century bonds spread the costs of the project more affordably and fairly to those who will benefit over the next 100 years. - Committed, Long-Term, Low-Cost Capital: century bonds allow DC Water to take advantage of historically low interest rates and to lock-in funding costs for a very long-lived asset.  

Innovations in Infrastructure Funding at DC Water Q & A for more information please contact: Maureen M. Holman, Sustainability Chief maureen.holman@dcwater.com