Eugene Research Institute/

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I Directors Conference October 23-25, 2007 Waterfront Place Morgantown, WV Reading the Fine Print Monitoring K-3 Reading Programs Presenter: Pat.
Advertisements

Administrators Meeting April 21, Key Areas of Grant-Based Monitoring Schools to be Served Instructional Assessments Instructional Strategies and.
Data Analysis Chapter 11..powerful professional development tool that can lead to school improvement.
A Quick Look at MDE’s Program Evaluation Tool. At the top of an index card, identify a hobby, sport, or activity in which you enjoy participating. Then.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Conclusion 1.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Read to Succeed Reading Coaches. “Reading coaches shall serve as job-embedded, stable resources for professional development throughout schools in order.
Jerry Ross Elementary School All students and staff will grow as learners every day.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading (IBR) Leadership Session for District Team Members, Principals, and Mentor Coaches August 25, 2004.
Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading (IBR) Leadership Session for New District Team Members Principals and Mentor Coaches August 24, 2004.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
IIT: Supporting Staff and Students at PVMS.
PLT Professional Learning Teams Weaver Elementary School January, 2013.
Creating System-Wide Support for Learning Coaches with Joellen Killion
Pennsylvania Reading First Leadership Meeting A Pathway For Success Eastern Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center Florida Center for Reading.
Instructional Coaches in Sheldon ISD
Differentiating Instruction Professional Development.
Oregon Reading First Orientation Holiday Inn Portland Airport November 12, 2002 Oregon Department of Education.
Implementation of District- Wide Middle School Student Research Projects A Three Year Plan to Build Inquiry Skills and Create Sustained Vertical Articulation.
Using Online Instruction in Positive Behavior Support Training Kansas Institute for Positive Behavior Support (KIPBS) Rachel Freeman.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
Birmingham Primary Strategy Team Subject Leader Training Literacy Co-ordinator Session Monitoring Progress - Book Trawls/Scrutinies.
Texas Regional Collaboratives for Excellence in Science and Mathematics Teaching*: An Exemplary Texas MSP Program Gina S. Day Deputy Associate Commissioner,
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
The ABCs of CSI Continuous School Improvement. If nothing ever changed, there’d be no butterflies. Unknown.
CCSS Road Map: The goal of implementing the Common Core State Standards is to ensure that instruction in our schools is changing dramatically.
Grant Writer’s Workshop Oregon Reading First Overview of Request for Proposals January 7, 2003 Holiday Inn Portland Airport The Oregon Department of Education:
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
ACADEMIC REVIEW: GOAL IS TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC SUPPORT THAT CAN BE PROVIDED TO HELP THE SCHOOL IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT.
SD Math Partnership Project An Overview Marcia Torgrude and Karen Taylor.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
1 Reading First Grant Writing Workshop: English Language Learners and Reading First Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Portland,
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Collaboration. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Collaboration refers to “ongoing participation of two or more individuals who are.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
Kim Taylor Denise Arseneau Tammy Gallant
Implementing Peer Coaching in Your School Teacher Leadership for High Student Growth Sara Overby WCPSS Coordinating Teacher for Secondary Literacy,
Leading Teachers A joint training package from the National Academy for Gifted & Talented Youth and the National Strategies.
Effective Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Where do we begin at Myers Middle School? (Adapted from Professional Learning Communities at Work Robert.
Supporting the Incredible Years® Trained Workforce
Accreditation External Review
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
“The role of mentoring from a leadership perspective “
Ed 11: Beginning Field Experience
Professional Development Update
Shelton School District
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting Leadership Session
Planning Professional Development for Teaching Staff Check In!
Lecturette 2: Mining Classroom Data
Implementing Race to the Top
Twenty Questions Competency 10.
Benefits of a Coaching culture within the School Management Team (SMT)
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Presentation transcript:

Eugene Research Institute/ Reading First Grant Writing Workshop: Knowledge & Skills of Mentor Coaches Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Portland, Oregon January 7, 2003 Material based on a presentation by Christ Doherty and Sandi Jacobs of the U.S. Department of Education, December 6, 2002.

School-Level Coaching Valuable strategy for assisting teachers in the classroom implementation of scientifically-based reading programs, instructional strategies, and reading assessments Key Implementation Issue — Ensuring coaches have sufficient knowledge and skills to provide necessary support for classroom teachers

School-Level Coaching “Who” Considerations Identifying individuals to serve as coaches Expertise in reading is not necessarily expertise in scientifically-based reading instruction Expertise in SBRR does not ensure skill in training/coaching others Few, if any, states/districts/schools have a ready-made cadre of such experts

School-Level Coaching “Who” Considerations Individuals will be trained to serve as coaches Coaches must be highly knowledgeable—not one step ahead of those they are supporting Implementation should not be delayed while coaches are trained All coaches (whether trained to be coaches or selected for existing expertise) will need ongoing training and support as implementation issues increase in complexity

School-Level Coaching “Who” Considerations Coaches should not have other responsibilities that take time from their instructional leadership roles This will require particular monitoring. Individuals without “classroom” responsibilities are frequently asked to fill other roles

School-Level Coaching “What” Considerations Clear PD Curriculum Coaches should have a clear scope and sequence for the training they are to provide No one should be wondering what comes next Clear Activities How coaching will be provided should be clearly defined: joint planning with teachers, modeling strategies and skills, study groups, classroom observation, grade-level meetings, etc. Activities will be defined through IBRs, Regional Coordinators, and school-based Reading First teams

School-Level Coaching “What” Considerations Program-Specific Support School-level coaches will be the primary providers of support on the implementation of particular instructional programs Training of coaches must include program-specific elements

School-Level Coaching “What” Considerations One More Thought About “What” — Change is hard! It will be easy for teachers to be pulled off track (or never really get on track) if they don’t feel supported Coaches must have answers to teachers’ questions and help them find solutions to their problems

School-Level Coaching “When” Considerations Time — Issues around time for school-level professional development activities must be settled before implementation begins Coach should not need to be creative in order to have time with teachers Participation cannot be optional Sequence — Coaching must ensure that teachers have the skills they need when they need them

School-Level Coaching Follow-Up Considerations New Teachers — Coaches will need to have plans to provide support to teachers who start in the middle of a school year or after the first year of implementation Teachers Who Need Additional Support — Coaches must have a clear plan to identify and assist these teachers