Dred Scott.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lincoln-Douglas Debates: Video (2:13)
Advertisements

 The U.S. purchased Louisiana in Congress had to decide if states being made from this territory would be free or slave.  Missouri applied to.
Dred Scott v Sanford. Who was Dred Scott? A slave born around the 1800’s Married fellow slave: Harriet Robinson 2 children: Eliza and Lizzie Died: Sept.
Dred Scott And The case for freedom By: Nate Widitor And The case for freedom By: Nate Widitor.
The Dred Scott Decision
 David Wilmot – a Pennsylvanian Democratic Congressman Born in 1814 During his political career was a Democratic, Free Soiler, and Republican. Proposed.
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). Background: The Missouri Compromise 1803: U.S. purchases Louisiana Territory from France 1820: Compromise allows slavery.
 Dred Scott v. J. A. Sanford (1857).   Who was Dred Scott?  Events Affecting Dred Scott’s fate  Timeline of Events  The Two Sides of the Issue 
A Nation Divided Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3 Pages
Historical Discussions Congress Passes the Kansas-Nebraska Act The Republican Party is Founded The Supreme Court Hands Down The Dred Scott Decision The.
Griffin Honeycutt Block 2 October 29,  Official Name- Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford  The defendant’s name was actually Sanford, but was misspelled.
By Alexander M. Barker. Born as a slave in the late 1700s Owned by the Blow family Parents are unknown Lived in Southampton County, VA Moved to Alabama;
YOU MUST WRITE EVERYTHING DOWN, UNLESS I TELL YOU OTHERWISE.
By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.
 By: Kylisha Smith and Hasan Evans.  Dred is an slave who lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back.
Dred Scott. Background Scott was the slave of an Army surgeon who took him from Missouri to posts in Illinois and modern day Minnesota. Scott was the.
Fill in your “Describing Historical Event” handout using the following PowerPoint presentation. If you need extra space use the back of your handout. Aim:
APUSH – Spiconardi.   In the 1830s, Dred Scott, a slave, accompanied his owner from Missouri to Illinois and later the territory of Wisconsin  Scott.
Lesson 18: The Union in Peril part 7
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
Deaton US History.   What Rights do you have as a citizen? Citizen Rights.
Dred Scott v. Sandford By Chloe Sturges. Overview Dred Scott, a slave in the 1800s, was taken out of Missouri, a slave state, by his owner John Emerson.
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
Compromises and Events that Led to the Civil War.
People = 3 points per 36point total. Lawyer from Illinois who debated Douglas for the Illinois Senate seat in 1858 and lost; he ran for President on the.
By Greg Munetz. He was born a slave in 1795 in Southampton County, Virginia He was industrious and intelligent, he served as a farmhand, a stevedore,
Tyler Kennedy Nick Logan.  Born a slave to the Blow family  Sold to Army Surgeon named Dr. John Anderson  Owner died then got a new owner  Lived in.
Dred Scott V. Sanford 1858 Julien Mercier and Kendal Kulp.
By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.
Back to the 1850’s… Law in the 1850’s. Rights of African Americans Still the Fugitive Slave Act Whether free or slave you could NOT be citizen Still segregation.
Dred Scott v. Sandford A Supreme Court Decision in 1857.
Dred Scott.  I can explain how the Dred Scott Court decision impacted African Americans during the time before the Civil War.
On your own and on the worksheet provided: 1) Write a definition for the word property. 2) List some examples of property.
The Dred Scott Decision 1857
Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3.
Mexican War Missouri Compromise Nullification Kansas- Nebraska Act The Compromise of 1850 Dred Scott Decision Lincoln- Douglas Debates (1858)
Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Dred Scott
Chapter 14 The Nation Divided Section 3: The Crisis Deepens
Dred Scott Decision 1857.
Ch:14 The Nation Divided
Compromise of 1850 Compromise that made California a free state. Allowed for popular sovereignty in Utah and New Mexico Territories. Also added the fugitive.
Compromises and Events that Led to the Civil War
Pre-Civil War Events Ms.Bean.
Challenges to Slavery Section Two.
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Dred Scott By :mina 5B.
Dred Scott Presentation created by Robert Martinez
Section 3 – pg 368 The Crisis Deepens
Opener – Copy into Notebook pp. 84
Chapter 14 section 3 The Crisis Deepens.
Background: Who was Dred Scott?
Dred Scott v. Sanford.
Challenges to Slavery 15-3
The Dreadful Decision Dred Scott.
Famous Abolitionists.
FOA 2/29/16 1. What did the Kansas-Nebraska Act actually do?
ROGER TANEY, CHIEF JUSTICE OF SUPREME COURT DRED SCOTT
Compromises and Events that Led to the Civil War
The Dred Scott Decision
Objective: To examine the importance of the Lincoln – Douglas debates and the Dred Scott decision. Abraham Lincoln Stephen Douglas Dred Scott.
Political Divisions Chapter 18 - Section 3.
DRED SCOTT CASE.
And The case for freedom
NOTES: Causes of the Civil War
Compromises and Events that Led to the Civil War
8X Tuesday Objective: Describe political developments in the US that led to Civil War. Agenda: Do Now: Explain the rise of the Republican Party.
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
Chapter 14: The Nation Divided
The Freed Man Shall Not Be Free
Presentation transcript:

Dred Scott

General Information Born in Virginia around 1800 Peter Blow-master In 1830-St. Louis, Missouri Two years later Peter Blow died

General Information Dr. John Emerson-master Emerson took Scott to the free state of Illinois In 1836 Emerson moved to the Wisconsin Territory.

General Information In WI married Harriet Robinson Harriet was a slave owned by a local justice of the peace Ownership of Harriet was transferred to Emerson.

In your notebooks: Scott's extended stay in Illinois, a free state, gave him the legal standing to make a claim for freedom, as did his extended stay in Wisconsin, where slavery was also prohibited. Scott never made the claim while living in the free lands…why do you think he didn’t make a claim for freedom here?

A Free Man? After two years, the army transferred Emerson to the south: first to St Louis, then to Louisiana. The Scotts’ stayed in Wisconsin for another yr Until Emerson remarried

In your notebooks: Instead of staying in the free territory of Wisconsin, or going to the free state of Illinois, the two traveled over a thousand miles, unaccompanied, down the Mississippi River to meet their master. WHY DID THEY GO DOWN SOUTH?!?

A Free Man? Emerson's died in 1843 Emerson's widow hired Scott out to an army captain Scott began to seek freedom for himself and his wife.

A Quest for Freedom Scott offered to buy his freedom from Mrs. Emerson -- then living in St. Louis -- for $300 The offer was refused Scott then sought freedom through the courts

A Quest for Freedom Scott went to trial in June of 1846 in the St Louis circuit court, but lost on a technicality Scott couldn't prove that he and Harriet were owned by Emerson's widow. In an 1850 retrial, the St Louis circuit court ruled that Scott and his family were free.

A Quest for Freedom Mrs. Emerson appeals to Missouri Supreme Court The Missouri Supreme Court decided that case should be retried.

A Quest for Freedom 1852 the Missouri Supreme Court reverses the decision of the lower court. The Scotts must return to Mrs. Emerson as her slaves

A Quest for Freedom Scott and his lawyers then brought his case to a federal court, the United States Circuit Court in Missouri. In 1854, the Circuit Court upheld the decision of the Missouri Supreme Court. There was now only one other place to go.

United States Supreme Court. To the Top! Scott appealed his case to the United States Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court of 1856 The nine justices had biases regarding slavery. Seven had been appointed by pro-slavery presidents from the South Of these, five were from slave-holding families

The Dred Scott Decision The main issues for the Supreme Court, therefore, were: whether it had jurisdiction to try the case, and whether Scott was indeed a citizen.

The Dred Scott Decision The decision of the court was read in March of 1857. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney -- a staunch supporter of slavery -- wrote the "majority opinion" for the court.

The Dred Scott Decision It stated that because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue.

The Dred Scott Decision The decision also declared the Missouri Compromise of 1820 unconstitutional. The Missouri Compromise restricted slavery in certain territories.

The Aftermath Southerns happy-Northerns outraged The decision greatly influenced the nomination of Abraham Lincoln to the Republican Party.

The Aftermath Peter Blow's sons had helped pay Scott's legal fees through the years. After the Supreme Court's decision, the former master's sons purchased Scott and his wife and set them free.

The Aftermath Dred Scott died nine months later.