EGNOS Ionosphere Related Activities S. Schlüter, R. Prieto-Cerdeira

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GALILEO and EGNOS Fotis Karamitsos, European Commission
Advertisements

EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre EUROCONTROL Navigation Domain The Data Collection Network: EGNOS revealed GNSS 2004 – Rotterdam, The Netherlands Santiago.
Near real time assessment of the Space Weather effect on navigation based on the DGPS technique S.Lejeune, R.Warnant, A. Barré, M. Bavier Royal Observatory.
Scintillation effects on Galileo service performance
Ionosphere effects on GNSS positioning: data collection, models and analyses João Francisgo Galera Monico, Paulo De Oliveira Camargo, Haroldo Antonio Marques,
Space Weather Effects over EGNOS Performance in the North of Europe 11 th SWW, Liege, 17 th November 2014 Presenter author: Pedro Pintor Authors: R. Roldán,
SVN-49 Signal Anomaly Presented by Tom Stansell GPSW POC: Lt. Col. James Lake, Ph.D.
Report on SBAS Ionospheric Working Group Todd Walter Stanford University Todd Walter Stanford University
EGNOS Evolution Program Update D
Global Terrestrial Networks : The Hydrological Network.
CEOS Plenary Meeting Lucca, Italy November 8-9, 2011 CEOS Systems Engineering Office (SEO) Annual Report Brian Killough NASA Agenda Item #18.
Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) E. Douglas Aguilar CAPT, USAF.
Mesoscale ionospheric tomography over Finland Juha-Pekka Luntama Finnish Meteorological Institute Cathryn Mitchell, Paul Spencer University of Bath 4th.
Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS) Combined Performance
1 UNCLASSIFIED – FOUO – Not for Public Release Operational Space Environment Network Display (OpSEND) & the Scintillation Network Decision Aid Dr. Keith.
Pg 1 of 12 AGI GPS Signal Simulation & Visualization Oct 11, 2005 Curtis Hay Spirent Federal Systems.
Status of Multi-GNSS Monitoring Network Establishment Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency Satoshi Kogure APEC GIT/15 June 14, 2011.
Ionospheric Services The Australian Bureau of Meteorology, Space Weather Services setion (formerly the Ionospheric Prediction Service, IPS) provides a.
Consulting and Technology Technical Excellence. Pragmatic Solutions. Proven Delivery Dr. Frank Zimmermann November 2006 The Galileo System - Predicting.
International Civil Aviation Organization REGIONAL GNSS RELATED ACTIVITIES Secretariat ICAO APAC OFFICE GNSS IMPLEMENTATION SEMINAR 26 MARCH 2012.
GNSS Receiver - Software Radio Concept František Vejražka Czech Technical University in Prague Faculty of Electrical Engineering.
ISMR QUERY TOOL: RETRIEVAL, VISUALIZATION AND ANALYSIS OF IONOSPHERIC SCINTILLATION DATA Bruno César Vani – Milton Hirokazu Shimabukuro.
IGS Workshop 2008 The Galileo Ground Mission Segment Performances Francisco Amarillo-Fernandez, Massimo Crisci, Alexandre Ballereau John Dow, Martin Hollreiser,
European GNSS for ITS: EGNOS contribution ITS WORLD CONGRESS 2011 Orlando– 18 October 2011.
1 SBAS Implementation in the Regions of ACAC and ASECNA FP7-GALILEO / FP7-GALILEO Project with Community research funding WP2- Service.
Claudinei Rodrigues de Aguiar Federal University of Technology - Parana Paulo de Oliveira Camargo São Paulo State University.
1 J July, Ionospheric Calibration for the GFO AltimeterXiaoqing JPL Review Ionospheric Calibration for the GFO Altimeter Xiaoqing Pi Byron.
P. Wielgosz and A. Krankowski IGS AC Workshop Miami Beach, June 2-6, 2008 University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
GPS: Everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask Andria Bilich National Geodetic Survey.
GALOCAD GAlileo LOcal Component for nowcasting and forecasting Atmospheric Disturbances R. Warnant*, G. Wautelet*, S. Lejeune*, H. Brenot*, J. Spits*,
VTEC prediction using a recursive artificial neural networks approach in Brazil: initial results Engineer School - University of São Paulo Wagner Carrupt.
1 Airport mobiles surveillance and control by means of EGNOS METIS Workshop Benefits of EGNOS in Civil Aviation Istanbul 18 November 2009 Pierre GRUYER.
Present and Future of China Satellite-Based Augmentation System China Satellite Navigation Office February 2014.
VARIABILITY OF TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT AT EUROPEAN LATITUDES A. Krankowski(1), L. W. Baran(1), W. Kosek (2), I. I. Shagimuratov(3), M. Kalarus (2) (1) Institute.
Arctic Region Space Weather Customers and Space Situational Awareness Services Per Høeg, Kirsti Kauristi, Peter Wintoft, Magnus Wik, Claudia Borries.
1 Galileo / EGNOS Status GNSS Regional Plan Workshop July 12 th Casablanca Morocco Dr. Cedric Seynat Technical Department European GNSS Supervisory.
GALOCAD GAlileo LOcal Component for nowcasting and forecasting Atmospheric Disturbances R. Warnant, G. Wautelet, S. Lejeune, H. Brenot, J. Spits, S. Stankov.
EU-Africa cooperation on satellite navigation: Status of the EGNOS initiative Reference Group on Infrastructure February 2016 Addis Ababa.
MFMC GBAS – Flight Trials and Performance Studies DLR.de Chart 1 ENC 2016 – Helsinki – M. Felux, M.-S. Circiu, D. Gerbeth
EGNOS Training Course EGNOS Demonstration in China
EUROCONTROL Navigation Domain
Future SWE Missions Workshop ESA SSA/SWE State-of-Play
Space Science Data: Acquisition, Sharing and Retrieval Systems
Status of GNSS ionospheric Study in Korea
CLS (Collecte Localisation Satellites)
Agenda Item 6 GNSS Development Status and Future Work Eric Chatre, EC/ESA Rapporteur Technical WG, GNSS Panel Thank you… Good morning… I am ... and.
Real-Time Working Group
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS) Combined Performance International Committee on GNSS (ICG-4) Working Group A Saint Petersburg,
SVY207: Lecture 16 GPS Field Procedures and Computations
International Civil Aviation Organization
in the EGNOS Safety Case
Formosat3 / COSMIC The Ionosphere as Signal and Noise
EGNOS Performance and Operational Implementation status
Signal Availability in the Polar Regions
CNES Real-time Analysis center Status
European Space Weather Week – ESWW#14
R. Warnant*, G. Wautelet*, S. Lejeune*, H. Brenot*,
The Experiment on DFMC SBAS
Formosat3 / COSMIC The Ionosphere as Signal and Noise
The Status of Dual-Frequency Multi-Constellation SBAS Trial by Japan
Introduction to GNSS opportunities in different Market Segments
EGNOS Service Provision Status
Status of the Japanese QZSS Program
GRALLE Galileo-based Reliable Automatic and Low Latent EWS
2018/19 Annual Performance Plan
Experiments and Potential Applications
Agenda Background and Motivation
Augmentation Service from the Zenith
Quantifying ionospheric disturbances for user oriented applications
HG contribution to the GRC and more
Presentation transcript:

EGNOS Ionosphere Related Activities S. Schlüter, R. Prieto-Cerdeira SBAS IWG New Delhi 05-07/02/2014

Topics EGNOS V2.x.x Ionosphere Related Activities EGEP Ionosphere Related Activities: EGNOS V3 EGEP Activities for the Characterization of the Ionosphere Activities with African Countries and External Partners Status/Way forward

EGNOS V2 Release Road Map V2.2ext Qualified :June 2008 Certifiable release V2.3.1p Qualified: December 2011 Features: New RIMS (Alexandria, Athens, La Palma), NLES adaption to Inmarsat-4, Block IIF inclusion, Service coverage extension, migration to MPLS network technology, MT9/MT17 Coherency … V2.3.1i Qualified: July 2012 Features: Improved robustness to severe Iono activity ... 2.3.2 Qualified: August 2013 Features: New RIMS (Agadir, Abu Simbel), Optimisation of iono algorithms, Robustness against PRN 25 clock drift feared event (Bergen), Leap second anomaly correction (deployed in 2012) … V2.4.1M Qualified: ~July 2014 Features: Obsolescence resolution (CCF, NLES and EWAN), Qualification of ASTRA Sirius 5, New Missions (LPV-200, MOPS-D), Tuning of Iono processing … V.2.4.1P Qualified: ~ Mid 2015 (Procurement On-going) Features: Introduction of new ASTRA, 1 Step of Iono working activities, … V2.4.2 KO march 2014 Features: CPF obsolescence, RIMS A,B,C obsolescence, RIMS L2C capability, GEO ranging, 2 Step of Iono working activities

EGNOS V2 IONO Objectives Objectives of V2 Ionospheric Work Packages: General focus of all activities is to improve availability in front of severe solar max ionospheric conditions Minor changes/tuning related to some workarounds implemented in the past V2.4.2 considers also major algorithmic changes in the CPF

EGEP/EGNOS V3 Ionosphere Related Activities Main Objectives of EGEP/EGNOS V3 IONO Activities: Improving of Means/Tools to support development EGNOS V3 (and V2 releases) Improving/Consolidation of Means/Tools for the future qualification of EGNOS V3 Improving of Means/Tools to support other SBAS activities, e.g. Africa Means/Tools are: Characterization of the ionosphere (Indicators of Ionosphere Activity, Specifications, …) Reference Models for performance assessment and qualification Data (particular focus on: Africa, scintillations)

Definition of an Indicator of Ionospheric Activity Along-Arc TEC Rate (AATR) indicator as the hourly Root Mean Square (RMS) of “weighted” Along-Arc Vertical TEC Rate. Where Dt can be 30 or 60 seconds Comments: The RMS of all the AATRs (all the satellites) during 1 hour is computed for a given receiver, in order to mitigate spurious values of AATR. With the squared mapping, we mitigate the effect worst VTEC computed at low elevation. Stations used for AATR RMS computation 15 November, 2018 The European GNSS Programmes

Generation of Ionospheric Reference Scenarios CDF of AATR RMS (Different for 3 Geomagnetic Regions) Requirement 3D Iono Model AART RMS Selection of periods and data Reference Scenarios RDG

Developed Scenarios

Scintillation Performance Analysis Separate Receiver effects from System effects

Scintillation Specifications (preliminary)

Receivers & Product Data EGEP ID 66: MONITOR II Core for future EGNOS Iono related activities Launch of activity: March 2014 Users Contributing Receivers & Product Data MONITOR II IONO Repository & Products Processing EGNOS V2 & V3 Projects Testbeds GALILEO Project CNES Others.. ASECNA Project Laboratories CNES DLR ICASES I & II Others…

MONITOR II Products Examples: Bitgrabber data to replay selected scintillation events GNSS observations (Ranges and Scintillation) TEC maps Scintillation Occurrence maps AATR RMS Ad hoc generation of ionospheric reference scenarios Upgrades of Iono Modelling (GISM, NeQuick) VTEC map plot associated to VTEC-TOMION UPC external products (240 IGS stations) Latency : 1 < < 2 days

MONITOR: Ionospheric Experimental Station Network Central Archiving and Processing Facility

Activities with African Countries and External Partners ESA/CNES Activities with ASECNA Collaboration with SANSA SAGAIE network Collaboration with additional partners TBD at next IONO SBAS meeting Air Traffic Control Agency ASECNA (Agency for Aerial Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar)

SAGAIE: Two Stations Architectures Architecture 1: Dakar, Lomé FLEXPAK6 Novatel Rx, GPS GLO GAL data Collection PolarXS Septentrio Receiver, GPS, GLO, GAL data collection and scintillations parameters Archive all raw data measurements, Rinex it, and send it to Toulouse Bitgraber : 2XUSRPN200 for RF signal recording Architecture 2: Douala, Ouagadougou, Ndjamena

Data Flow between ASECNA/SAGAIE Network and MONITOR CPF CNES SAGAIE Stations ESA MONITOR ASECNA High Quality Multi-GNSS Receiver Network Stations raw Data FTP Server Data archiving CNES External data flow Rinex 3 + ISMR data High level iono Products ESA/MONITOR

DAIS Data Assimilation Techniques for Ionospheric Reference Scenarios (DAIS) Aiming to generate improved EGNOS Ionospheric Reference Scenarios by combining spaceborne and ground-based GNSS observations. Development of a method for combined reconstruction of the ionosphere (Ground & Space GNSS & Model) Filling of data gaps, in particular in African low latitudes and over oceans. Improved modelling of the Crest (profile, HmF2 and FoF2)  

Status On-going & Future Activities: On-going activities to further improve and optimize GIVD/GIVE related algorithms in EGNOS V2 releases Preparation of EGNOS V3 Phase C/D (Refinement and consolidation of tools and specifications) Further development of Models and Tools with a strong focus on scintillation effects MoU for Collaboration of ASECNA, ESA and CNES to be signed in February SANSA agreed to host 2 stations in Namibia (Implementation: Mid 2014) Increase of cooperation with external partners for data exchange and coordinated actions in support of EGNOS-V3 and SBAS-Iono group. (E.g. Boston College (LISN in South America, SCINDA and other initiatives in Africa), ASECNA (various locations in Africa), SANSA (South Africa), CHAIN (Canada), JRC-ISPRA (various locations).

Many Thanks for Your Attention!

SAGAIE MAIN FEATURES SAGAIE = STATIONS ASECNA GNSS for ANALYSE of the IONOSPHERE EQUATORIALE CNES and ASECNA have decided in 2012 to deploy a GNSS data collection network in Sub-Saharian area for ionosphere characterization Cooperation agreement signed between ASECNA and CNES in 2012 CNES in charge of: Overall management, engineering, equipment's procurement and sites deployment ASECNA in charge of: sites hosting, Telecom network, and stations operations CNES has contracted Thales for stations AIV and for sites deployment Five sites were selected: Dakar, Lomé, Douala, Ouagadougou and N’Djamena Dakar and Ouagadougou are actually operational (deployed in May/June 2013) Douala Lome and Ndjamena will be deployed in July 2013

Step 1 service area – for analysis during Phase B

Station at Ouagadougou Airport Choke Ring antenna Novatel Rx Switch Fuse Server for monitoring and control Control Tower

Correlation coefficient between the RMS of the post-fit residuals of a ionospheric model and other indices: Local Time (LT), AATR, DST, Ap and Solar Flux (SF). RECEIVER LAT (Deg) Correlation (x 100) LT AATR DST Ap SF REYK 64 18 70 -25 30 27 ONSA 57 10 78 -33 35 13 POTS 55 11 83 -29 20 CAGL 37 26 74 -13 MAS1 47 72 -7 7 9 NKLG 52 69 -24 Associated to Solar terminator High latitude receivers are more affected by geomagnetic activity The study includes six different receivers (see map) during some tens of days with high ionospheric activity (all days with DST<-100nT are included). 23

GEO Roadmap – Satellite view

Iono Scintillation, Effects on SBAS In SBAS systems ionospheric scintillations shall be considered for their effects in the following: System level: Loss-of-lock (SNR) of GNSS satellites at system (RIMS) level Increase number of cycle-slips at (RIMS) system level Increased code-phase and carrier-phase noise at (RIMS) system level User level: Loss-of-lock of GEO or MEO SBAS Data demodulation errors Cycle-slips Increased code-phase and carrier-phase noise (integrity to be protected?)