Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

Thor Seneca Thorsen, Rachel Matt, William I. Weis, Brian K. Kobilka 
A Naturally Occurring Repeat Protein with High Internal Sequence Identity Defines a New Class of TPR-like Proteins  Jacob D. Marold, Jennifer M. Kavran,
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Choel Kim, Cecilia Y. Cheng, S. Adrian Saldanha, Susan S. Taylor  Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Anna Hagmann, Moritz Hunkeler, Edward Stuttfeld, Timm Maier  Structure 
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Structure of the Cathelicidin Motif of Protegrin-3 Precursor
Raf-1 Cysteine-Rich Domain Increases the Affinity of K-Ras/Raf at the Membrane, Promoting MAPK Signaling  Shuai Li, Hyunbum Jang, Jian Zhang, Ruth Nussinov 
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
RIα Subunit of PKA Structure
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Biochemical Implications of a Three-Dimensional Model of Monomeric Actin Bound to Magnesium-Chelated ATP  Keiji Takamoto, J.K. Amisha Kamal, Mark R. Chance 
Crystal Structure of the Borna Disease Virus Nucleoprotein
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Unfolding Barriers in Bacteriorhodopsin Probed from the Cytoplasmic and the Extracellular Side by AFM  Max Kessler, Hermann E. Gaub  Structure  Volume.
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Tianjun Zhou, Liguang Sun, John Humphreys, Elizabeth J. Goldsmith 
Katharina Hipp, Clemens Grimm, Holger Jeske, Bettina Böttcher 
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Phosphorylated Histone H3 by the Survivin Subunit of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  A. Arockia Jeyaprakash,
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Crystal Structures of Human GlyRα3 Bound to Ivermectin
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Y. Zenmei Ohkubo, Emad Tajkhorshid  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Unfolding Barriers in Bacteriorhodopsin Probed from the Cytoplasmic and the Extracellular Side by AFM  Max Kessler, Hermann E. Gaub  Structure  Volume.
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages 1563-1572 (September 2015) An Isoform-Specific Myristylation Switch Targets Type II PKA Holoenzymes to Membranes  Ping Zhang, Feng Ye, Adam C. Bastidas, Alexandr P. Kornev, Jian Wu, Mark H. Ginsberg, Susan S. Taylor  Structure  Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages 1563-1572 (September 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2015.07.007 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Domain Organization and Structure of PKA myrC Subunit (A) Domain organization of myrC subunit. (B) The myristic acid (myr) is docked into a hydrophobic pocket of the myrC subunit (left) (PDB: 4DG2). The A helix at the N terminus of C subunit (right) can serve as an AKIP binding site and harbors numerous co- and post-translational modifications. The Myr motif is shown in teal. Structure 2015 23, 1563-1572DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.07.007) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Crystal Structure of RIα:myrC Showing Docked Myristic Acid (A) Side view of the RIα:myrC structure (PDB: 4X6R). The myristyl acid is shown in yellow. The N lobe of the C subunit is white; the C lobe and C tail are tan. The R subunit is cyan. (B) Electron density 2Fo-Fc map of the myristic acid and N terminus of C subunit at 1.0σ level. (C) The myristic acid binds within its previously defined hydrophobic pocket. (D) Overlay of the RIα:myrC (teal; myristic acid is shown in yellow) and myrC:SP20 (tan; myristic acid is shown in sand). These two structures display different conformations at the N terminus of the C subunit. Structure 2015 23, 1563-1572DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.07.007) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Crystal Structure of the RIIβ2:myrC2 Holoenzyme (A) The N lobe of the C subunit is shown in white; the C lobe and C tail are shown in tan. The R subunit is shown in cyan. PDB: 4X6Q. (B) 2Fo-Fc Electron density maps of the previously defined hydrophobic pocket where the myristic acid exists at the 1.0σ (top), 0.75σ (middle), and 0.5σ (bottom) level, respectively. The density of Myr motif and the myristyl density (yellow) are missing. Structure 2015 23, 1563-1572DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.07.007) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The C terminus of R Subunits (A) (Upper) Sequence alignment of four R-subunit isoforms. Helices observed in crystal structures for RIα (1RGS) and RIIβ (1CX4) are shown as red cylinders. Capping residues in αC″ are shaded. (Lower) Helical propensity for R subunits predicted by AGADIR (Lacroix et al., 1998). Sequence for RIα is shown along the x axis. (B) In the active or cAMP-bound RIα (left) and RIIβ (right) conformation, cAMP is bound to the PBC and the adenine ring is capped by a hydrophobic residue. In every CNB-B domain, this capping residue (TYP 371 in RIα, TYR 397 in RIIβ) is located in αC″. (C) In the RIα holoenzyme (left), the reorganized C-terminal helical motif is packed against the PBC and well ordered, whereas in the RIIβ holoenzyme (right), most of the C-terminal helical motif (residues 394–416), including the capping TYR397, is disordered. The flexible N-terminal Myr motif in the myrC subunit and C-terminal helical motif in RIIβ are in relatively close proximity. Structure 2015 23, 1563-1572DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.07.007) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Membrane Anchoring of RIIβ2:myrC2 Holoenzyme (A) Size-exclusion chromatography shows assembly of RIIβ2:myrC2 to nanodiscs. Peak1, peak 2, and peak 3 contain protein and lipid aggregation, RIIβ2:myrC2 holoenzyme and nanodiscs, and empty nanodiscs, respectively. SDS-PAGE of these three peaks is shown in Figure S1. (B) Characterization of RIIβ2:myrC2 holoenzyme nanodiscs. (Left) Negatively stained electron micrograph of the empty nanodiscs. (Right) Negatively stained electron micrograph of the RIIβ2:myrC2 holoenzyme nanodiscs separated from the empty one by size exclusion. Scale bar, 50 nm. Structure 2015 23, 1563-1572DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.07.007) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 PKA Has a Dynamic and Isoform-Specific Myristylation Switch (A) Potential role of Ser10 in stabilizing the N terminus of myrC subunit. (Left) The distance between the Ser10 side chain and the backbone carbonyl of residue 7 is displayed, showing that the atoms are in H-bonding distance in the myrC(K7C):SP20 (tan) (PDB: 4DFX) and wild-type myrC:SP20 structures (teal) (PDB: 4DG2). These two structures are aligned with the backbone atoms of residue 7 and side chain of Ser10, shown in stick representation. (Right) Interactions of Ser10 side chain and Cys7 and Ala6 in the myrC(K7C):RIα(K7C) structure. (B) The three myristylated structures presented here are aligned. The conformation and B-factor analysis of the myristic acid and Myr motif can be in two distinct “IN” and “OUT” modes. The myristic acid and Myr motif in SP20:myrC (PDB: 4DFX), RIα:myrC, and RIIβ2:myrC2 are shown. On the right is the scale bar for B factors. Structure 2015 23, 1563-1572DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.07.007) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Membrane-Anchoring Models of RIα2:myrC2 and RIIβ2:myrC2 Holoenzymes (Left) RIα2:myrC2 holoenzyme is not capable of contributing to its own localization though myristylation-membrane interaction, as the myristic acid is docked in the C subunit. It can be targeted to plasma membrane via binding to dual-specific or RI-specific AKAPs such as smAKAP, which can be myristylated and palmitoylated at its N terminus. (Right) The exposed myristic acid groups in the RIIβ2:myrC2 holoenzyme and AKAPs are capable of providing a mechanism for bivalent membrane anchoring. Possible position of the D/D domain and interacting AKAP helix is shown. The myristyl groups (yellow) are on the same side as the AKAP (orange)-binding surface of the D/D domain. Structure 2015 23, 1563-1572DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.07.007) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions