Uses and Guidance BLM Evaluate status of Standards for Rangeland Health Guidance provided in Washington Office Instruction Memorandum No. 2006-047 In BLM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Environment case Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009 Hellen Foster, Jarlath Molloy NATS, Imperial College London.
Advertisements

Rangeland Inventory & Monitoring. Rangeland Management is:  The use and stewardship of rangeland resources to meet goals and desires of humans.  You.
Association of Washington Public Hospital Districts The Role of the Audit Process in Sustaining Your District’s Credibility.
Bureau of Land Management NAIP Information Meeting July 19 th, 2006.
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
Opportunities for RAC Participation. Three Part discussion General presentation; Example of oil and gas decision making; and Panel Discussion of RAC involvement.
Special Recreation Permits. SRP OBJECTIVE Using the requests for SRPs in the Field, ORPs will be able to: Identify, locate and utilize current guidance.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
Conservation Planning: What’s New?. Topics for Today’s Webinar Revised NPPH Proposed NRCS Land Uses Resource Concerns Planning criteria.
Great Basin Environmental Program Update January 15, 2013 Stan Johnson, College of Agriculture, Biotechnology and Natural Resources, UNR.
Presented by MOBIL DATA COLLECTIONS ON GRAZING LAND.
Rangeland Health Assessment and Monitoring (Framework for Ecological Site-Based Assessment and Monitoring in Mongolia) 7 July 2007 Ulan Bator, Mongolia.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
1 Cumulative Impact Management: Cumulative Impact Indicators and Thresholds Presented by: Salmo Consulting Inc. and AXYS Environmental Consulting Ltd.
The Targeting Outcomes of Programs (TOP) framework.
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
An Overview of Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health: Moving From Version 3.0 to 4.0 SRM Annual Meeting Casper, Wyoming Feb. 6, 2003.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
A Comparison of 42 Local, National, and International HIA Guidelines Andrew L. Dannenberg, MD, MPH Katherine Hebert, MCRP Arthur M. Wendel, MD, MPH Sarah.
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
Riparian Proper Functioning Condition A process for assessment A defined condition A starting point A common language An interdisciplinary team approach.
Transitions in Rangeland Evaluations David A. Pyke & Jeffrey E. Herrick Jornada Experimental Range Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center.
1 Objectives 1. Why quantitative data? 2. Relationship to attributes and indicators 3. Accuracy and precision of qualitative and quantitative indicators.
MODULE 3 Composition & Roles. TAT TEAM APPROACH UPON COMPLETION OF THIS MODULE, PARTICIPANTS SHOULD UNDERSTAND: 3 – 2  Composition of the Threat Assessment.
RANGELAND INVENTORY & MONITORING. Rangeland Management is: The use and stewardship of rangeland resources to meet goals and desires of humans. You cannot.
Rangeland Inventory & Monitoring. Rangeland Management is:  The use and stewardship of rangeland resources to meet goals and desires of humans.  You.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
 Four Main Sections:  (a) Plan (Unit Level) Monitoring Program  (b) Broader Scale Monitoring Strategies  (c) Timing & Process  (d) Biennial Evaluation.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
Rangeland NRI: 2002 and Beyond Presentation given to NRCS State Conservationists NRI Exec. Committee Northwest Watershed Research Center, Boise.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
BLM Decision Making Process
Project Update SageCon, September 30, 2016
BLM Standards & Guidelines
Supervision of Insurance Market Conduct in Canada
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
PLANNING, MATERIALITY AND ASSESSING THE RISK OF MISSTATEMENT

Orientation for New Site Visitors
Project Integration Management
North American Plant Protection Organization
Safety Accountabilities
Построение культуры integrity в компании Aнар Каримов партнёр «ЭКВИТА»
د. حنان الداقيز خريف /28/2016 Software Quality Assurance ضمان جودة البرمجيات ITSE421 5 – The components of the SQA.
Tobacco control.
Modern Auditing: Assurance Services and the Integrity of Financial Reporting, 8th Edition William C. Boynton California Polytechnic State University at.
CMS HIPAA Transaction Implementation Status Checklist
Vision Facilitation Template
Refuah Community Health Collaborative (RCHC) PPS
The Wrap-up.
The Importance of Project Risk Management
Emergency Planning Steps
Landscape Approach to Resource Management
By Jeff Burklo, Director
Describing and Monitoring Rangelands:
online and interactive with OiRA The importance of prevention
Would you like an Export Certificate with your Wine?
Environmental Management Systems The ISO Approach Initial Environmental Review & Gap Analysis Presented by: NC Division of Pollution Prevention.
PROCESSES AND INDICATORS FOR MEASURING THE IMPACT OF EQUALITY BODIES
Personal Presentation
Recommendations from the SMC Bioassessment Workgroup
The Academic Alert System: Fall 2007 Report
WHY DO I WANT TO DO A RESOURCE CONCERNS CHECKLIST/INVENTORY
Internal Audit Who? What? When? How? Why? In brief . . .
Internal Audit’s Role in Preventing Fraud and Corruption
Assertive Community Treatment Webinar
Colorado’s Forest Action Plan Mike Lester, State Forester and Director
Unit 14 Emergency Planning IS 235
Presentation transcript:

Uses and Guidance BLM Evaluate status of Standards for Rangeland Health Guidance provided in Washington Office Instruction Memorandum No. 2006-047 In BLM this protocol is used primarily as one of several techniques to evaluate the Standards for Rangeland Health on uplands as required by the BLM grazing regulations. The direction for the application of the protocol are found in Instruction Memorandum 2006-047 and all BLM personnel are encouraged to review this document prior to using the protocol. This IM gives the There are several uses of the protocol within NRCS. It is one of the components of the National Resource Inventory which is used to assess the condition of the Nation’s private rangelands. A number of quantitative studies are carried out in conjunction with this inventory. The protocol also helps to support conservation planning for private livestock operators in the US. The guidance on the use of the protocol are found in the NRCS’s National Range and Pasture Handbook. Consultants and other entities interested in rangeland management can use the protocol to help develop a monitoring strategy for areas of interest or concern. The protocol also serves as an excellent communication tool for use in dispute resolution. Finally, the protocol has been translated into Spanish and is being used in Mexico (need region from Jeff) to identify areas where improved management is needed and in a program called “Ejidos” which means ?? (need help from Jeff).

Uses and Guidance NRCS Component of National Resource Inventory Conservation planning Guidance in National Range and Pasture Handbook In BLM this protocol is used primarily as one of several techniques to evaluate the Standards for Rangeland Health on uplands as required by the BLM grazing regulations. The direction for the application of the protocol are found in Instruction Memorandum 2006-047 and all BLM personnel are encouraged to review this document prior to using the protocol. This IM gives the There are several uses of the protocol within NRCS. It is one of the components of the National Resource Inventory which is used to assess the condition of the Nation’s private rangelands. A number of quantitative studies are carried out in conjunction with this inventory. The protocol also helps to support conservation planning for private livestock operators in the US. The guidance on the use of the protocol are found in the NRCS’s National Range and Pasture Handbook. Consultants and other entities interested in rangeland management can use the protocol to help develop a monitoring strategy for areas of interest or concern. The protocol also serves as an excellent communication tool for use in dispute resolution. Finally, the protocol has been translated into Spanish and is being used in Mexico (need region from Jeff) to identify areas where improved management is needed and in a program called “Ejidos” which means ?? (need help from Jeff).

Uses and Guidance Consultants and others Planning for monitoring Communication tool Consultants and other entities interested in rangeland management can use the protocol to help develop a monitoring strategy for areas of interest or concern. The protocol also serves as an excellent communication tool for use in dispute resolution. Finally, the protocol has been translated into Spanish and is being used in Mexico (need region from Jeff) to identify areas where improved management is needed and in a program called “Ejidos” which means ?? (need help from Jeff).

Uses and Guidance International Mexico Mongolia Regional Planning Management plans for ranches (ejidos) Mongolia Rangeland assessments Consultants and other entities interested in rangeland management can use the protocol to help develop a monitoring strategy for areas of interest or concern. The protocol also serves as an excellent communication tool for use in dispute resolution. Finally, the protocol has been translated into Spanish and is being used in Mexico (need region from Jeff) to identify areas where improved management is needed and in a program called “Ejidos” which means ?? (need help from Jeff).

Applications IIRH Intended Uses - Page 1 Used by knowledgeable, experienced personnel Provide a preliminary evaluation of the three attributes of rangeland health Identify areas (early warning) that are potentially at risk of crossing a threshold Assist in the process of selecting monitoring sites Communication tool We strongly recommend that only individuals familiar with the use of this protocol and the area where the evaluations will be done, conduct this type of assessment. The output from this assessment protocol is a preliminary evaluation of the status of the three rangeland health attributes, soil site stability, watershed function and biotic integrity. The addition of quantitative information to supplement this preliminary evaluation is recommended if the goal is a better certainity of the results of the assessment. This protocol can assist managers to identify areas where making management changes now could reduce the chance that an undesirable threshold would be crossed in the future. Selecting monitoring sites on areas that are potentially at risk of a threshold change would provide a sensitive indication of the effectiveness of management actions to prevent this change. Perhaps the greatest utility of this protocol is to facilitate communication among all parties interested in healthy rangelands. The use of indicators that can be seen on the ground helps to facilitate informed discussions.

Applications IIRH Not to be used to - Page 1 Identify the cause(s) of resource problems Independently make grazing or other management decisions Monitor land or determine trend Independently generate national or regional assessments of rangeland health This protocol can assist in determining if there are problems relative to soil/site stability, watershed function, and biotic integrity but it does not provide information on what is causing the problems with these three rangeland health attributes. Because this protocol relies almost exclusively on qualitative information, it is not appropriate to use this information to independently make a change in management for an area. Remember the message in the previous bullet that this protocol does not establish a cause for a problem. We purposely designed this qualitative protocol to not include numerical ratings to reduce the chances that it would be used to monitor trend of the three attributes of rangeland health. We provide quantitative measures of most of the 17 indicators and the three rangeland health attributes that are appropriate tools to use to monitor trend. There are several national efforts to report on the status and condition of US rangelands. This protocol is not recommended to be used as a stand alone tool to generate national reports. However, it can be used in conjunction with quantitative techniques to provide broad assessments of land condition over regional or national landscapes. The NRCS’s National Resource Inventory uses this approach.