Impact of the New Cohesion Policy Workshop DG JRC/DG REGIO

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS AND LOGISTICS LABORATORY (TRANSLOG) © Prof. K. Zografos STEPs STEPs Scenarios for the.
Advertisements

Transport Study to support an impact assessment of the Urban Mobility Package on SUMPs CoR Meeting June 13 DG MOVE.
Smart Growth for Europes Cities and Regions: Insights from Economic Geography for An Integrated Approach Philip McCann University of Groningen Special.
Cities and Green Growth OECD Green Cities Programme
Jackson Community Comprehensive Plan – Big Picture Planning for Natural Resources Keeping it Green: Conserving Your Future Through Land Use Planning Presented.
Extrapolating the Dutch Experience Kees Schotten Wideke Boersma Camiel Heunks.
8-9 October 2009 The ESPON 2013 Programme: Prospects and Achievements Regional and Urban Statistics Working Group meeting.
Alain Bertaud Urbanist Module 1: Introduction and the Context The role of, government, urban planners and markets.
1 policy preparation policy formulation policy execution policy evaluation Indicators The Policy Cycle.
Sitges towards Sustainability : EMAS + A21 Sitges towards Sustainability : EMAS + A21 SITGES TOWARDS SUSTAINABILITY Bologna, November 27 th 2002 Departament.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH (IWW),
Role of Economics in W&W Project and in Climate Change Projects Explain how land use patterns evolve over time Forecast future land use change Determine.
ENFA Model ENFA Kick-off Meeting Hamburg, 10 May 2005.
Luci2 Urban Simulation Model John R. Ottensmann Center for Urban Policy and the Environment Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
Application of the Histocity Method to Mobility analysis and scenario definition in the city of Florence, Italy M.A. Esposito Università degli Studi di.
Investment and integrated strategies supporting towns Raivis BREMSMITS Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development of the Republic of.
When integrated models meet stakeholders and data (& vice-versa) WATER BASIN MODELS DATA STAKEHOLDERS POPULATION MODELLERS.
Smart specialisation, integrated strategies and territorial cohesion: tension or synergies 27 September Brussels ESPON 2013 Programme: The territorial.
Social economic developments in rural Europe Arie Oskam (Professor Emeritus Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy, Wageningen University) European Heritage.
“Policy Decision Support for Sustainable Adaptation of China’s Agriculture to Globalization” Land Use Change Project International Institute for Applied.
Rural-Urban Interaction in NL: Understanding & Managing Functional Regions Functional Regions Element Update Funding support provided by the Canada- Newfoundland.
IIASA M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Progress in developing the baseline scenario for CAFE.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH (IWW),
P.O. Box AL Maastricht Hedwig van Delden Garry McDonald Jasper van Vliet 1 Integrating macro-economic developments.
REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA PLEVEN DISTRICT URMA Urban-rural partnerships in metropolitan areas.
RIKSDeSurvey Module 1.2 Module 1.2 Socio economic drivers Annual meeting 2006 INEA Istituto Nazionale di Economia Agraria UC3MUniversidad Carlos III de.
HELIOS: Household Employment and Land Impact Outcomes Simulator FLORIDA STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Development & Application Stephen Lawe RSG Michael Doherty.
Phare 2003 Sector: Economic and Social Cohesion Title: Water Supply and sewerage in tourism and resort settlements.
ESPON INFO DAY 10 February 2011 in Bruxelles ESPON 2013 Programme: Progress and Prospects.
ET2050 European Territorial Scenarios modelled by SASI Klaus Spiekermann and Michael Wegener ESPON 2013 Programme Workshop Territorial Vision for Europe.
25 Years of INTERREG September 2015 in Luxembourg Building on 25 Years: Visions for your region and Europe.
August 31, 2003 ESPON action “Enlargement” Matera October 2003 Lars Olof Persson.
Defining Alternative Scenarios MTC Planning Committee and ABAG Administrative Committee May 13, 2011.
3.2 - Spatial Scenarios. Integrated Scenarios Demography - Baseline median age.
1 Metropolitan areas and regions: Trends and scenarios Lewis Dijkstra Deputy Head of the Analysis Unit DG for Regional Policy European Commission.
1 Environmental Accounts in EUROSTAT London Group Meeting-New York June 2006 Rainer Muthmann, Head of Unit E3.
Progress by the ESPON 2013 Programme in relation to the First Action Plan (Actions 4.1 and 4.2 plus) Meeting of General Directors on Territorial Cohesion.
Strategic Options for Integrating Transportation Innovations and Urban Revitalization (SOTUR) Stakeholder Scenario Building: Imagining Urban Futures Development.
Eurostat I) Context & objectives of KIP INCA project Project owner is the Environment Knowledge Community (EKC) EKC is an EU inter-services group involving.
Urban Institute Ireland/University College Dublin School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Policy, Dublin, Ireland Eda Ustaoglu.
Application of a CA Model to Simulate the Impacts of Road Infrastructures on Urban Growth Nuno Pinto and António Antunes, University of Coimbra with Josep.
Kostas Seferis, i2S Data science and e-infrastructures can help aquaculture to improve performance and sustainability!
Introduction to the EEA and the EIONET
Urban development scenarios and theme implementation
Latest work on regional statistics and analysis at OECD
Cohesion Policy and Cities
Development of a methodological framework (EEA contributions)
Workshop with the 8 PAF related Proposals & the Habitats Committee
Using RHOMOLO model to assess ESF macroeconomic impacts
Urban and Regional Economics
Regional Policy developments
A European Cities Report
Spatial data needs in EU Regional Policy
The ESPON 2013 Programme: Regional and Urban Statistics
Impact of the new Cohesion policy
Cohesion Policy, using geospatial information and statistics
GISCO Working Party October 2001
European needs for urban statistics Mireille Grubert

Assessing territorial impacts
Template and Process for Expression of Interest by Countries
Planning process in river basin management
Contact: Third stakeholder meeting on CAFE Baseline 30 April 2004 Issues related to the energy baseline Dr. L. Mantzos, M. Zeka-Paschou.
Cities and climate changes
Regional accessibility indicators: developments and perspectives
Biodiversity, Natura 2000 & Green Infrastructure in the Regional Policy Mathieu Fichter European Commission, DG Regio Team leader "sustainable.
ESPON POLICY OBJECTIVES
The GISCO Progress Report Nov – Feb By Albrecht Wirthmann
Review of JRC work on measuring ecosystem services in Europe
Presentation transcript:

Impact of the New Cohesion Policy 2014-2020 Workshop DG JRC/DG REGIO Assessment with the Land Use Modelling Platform (LUMP) State of the work Workshop DG JRC/DG REGIO 24 – June - 2013, Ispra, Italy Land Use Modelling Group INTESA Action / Sustainability Assessment Unit / Institute of Environment and Sustainability EC / DG JRC

Part I: Scenario construction AGENDA Part I: Scenario construction Introduction: the reference scenario and the policy scenario(s) The Reference Scenario. Main results achieved. Towards the Policy Scenario(s) Integration with Rhomolo. Preliminary results. The population allocation module. Designing two scenarios of urban development. Integrating the thematic investments in the simulations.

Part II: Ecosystem services and indicators AGENDA Part II: Ecosystem services and indicators Introduction: Ecosystem services Recreational potential and air quality Water quality

Reference and Policy scenarios (in a nutshell) Population projections Agriculture & Forestry Economy (GEM-E3) TEN-T Legislation Reference Scenario (RS0) No implementation of TEN-T Branch: Reference Scenario (RS1) Economy (Rhomolo) Implemen-tation of the TEN-T Implementation of the thematic priorities Policy Scenario Comparison of scenarios at European level Indicators on land use, ecosystem services and urban/rural systems Branch: “BAU urban development” (PS1) Branch: “Compact urban deve-lopment” (PS2)

State of the work: where are we? The “Reference Scenario” is ready; The specific Reference Scenario branch for DG Regio (no implementation of TEN-T) is being generated as we speak; The Policy Scenario is not ready yet, but there is progress on several preparatory steps: The integration between Rhomolo-LUMP has been worked-out; The dynamic population allocation module is working (major innovation in Land Use Modelling); Work on integrating several thematic priorities has progressed. Indicators to assess Ecosystem Services are being developed in parallel.

Coming up next… The Reference Scenario. Main results achieved.

Economic forecast (baseline) Economic forecast (Rhomolo) Integration with Rhomolo The protocol to integrate Rhomolo in LUMP was defined in the few last weeks in interaction with REMO-IPTS-Seville; It was necessary to develop this protocol because Rhomolo is not a forecasting model. Economic forecast (baseline) Real GVA Economic forecast (Rhomolo) Base run (1) (...) (2) / (1) Policy factor Rhomolo’s simulations Simulation run (2)

Economic forecast (baseline) Economic forecast (Rhomolo) Integration with Rhomolo Sectorial GVA forecasts in real terms are then ‘transformed’ into industrial and commercial land use demand using the validated ‘land use intensity approach’: Land Use Intensity approach Economic forecast (baseline) Industrial & Comm. land use demand Land allocation (EUCS100m) Land Use Intensity approach Economic forecast (Rhomolo) Industrial & Comm. land use demand

Integration with Rhomolo While the final simulations from Rhomolo are not ready, we ran some tests on currently available simulations. Baseline: Sectorial GVA growth generated by linear trend of observed growth rates (observations 1995-2008); Policy: ‘TFP’ policy alternative: The main assumption of the EU policy alternative is that the European Structural and Cohesion Funds raise the capacity of the regions for technical progress, catching up with the more advanced ones, taking into account the funding in the areas of research, technological development and innovation.

Approach “M3” (regional-specific land use intensities) Industrial and commercial land use 2006-2020 growth: 23% - 25% Difference between baseline and policy: 1,6%

Approach “M5” (regional and sector-specific land use intensities) Industrial and commercial land use 2006-2020 growth: 11% - 14% Difference between baseline and policy: 2,3%

Policy effect on ICS land use demand

The population allocation module New allocation core of LUMP for population and urban areas; Dynamically allocates inhabitants (given population projections) within each modelling region (NUTS) with a resolution of 100 m; Regional population projections Future urban land use Projected pixel population Threshold rules Indicators Allocation mechanism Potentially refined indicators

Kj,t+1 = ( Populationt+1 - Populationt ) + (Populationt * u) The population allocation module Allocation workflow Regional population projections (Qj,t+1) Regional internal migrations (u); People to allocate in t+1in NUTS2 region j (Kj,t+1): Kj,t+1 = ( Populationt+1 - Populationt ) + (Populationt * u)

The population allocation module Allocation workflow Define the local (pixel i) suitabilities to allocate people (population potential P): Pi,j,t+1 = f ( Accessibility, Neighboring Population, Distance to roads, Slope, Housing Supply ) k

Qi,t+1 = [ Kj,t+1 * ( Pi,j,t+1 / Σj Pi,j,t+1 ) ] + [Qi,t * (1-u)] The population allocation module Allocation workflow Allocate people in pixels: Qi,t+1 = [ Kj,t+1 * ( Pi,j,t+1 / Σj Pi,j,t+1 ) ] + [Qi,t * (1-u)] Pixel’s proportion of total suitability People allocated at pixel level People to allocate in each region People that do not migrate internally from t to t+1

The population allocation module Allocation workflow Iterative procedure to allocate discrete numbers of people and check for spatial restrictions (pixel caps); Force conversions to urban or abandoned urban according to thresholds. Proceed with the spatial allocation of the other land uses. Change in cell’s population density Decreases below T1 = 2 Remains between T1 and T2 Increases beyond T2 = 6 Land use is not urban Remains allocated land use Becomes urban Land use is urban Becomes urban abandoned Remains urban

The population allocation module Direct inputs / parameters Item Notes Notation Base population distribution 2006 Disaggregated from finest geometrical source zones availabe. Qi Demographic projections NUTS2 level. Source: Eurostat Qj Rate of inner regional migratons Arbitrarily defined. Flat parameter for all regions. u

The population allocation module Statistically calibrated suitability factors Item Notes Notation Potential accessibility Dynamic in time. Takes into account the major programmed changes in the network (provided by Transtools) as well as other smaller investments in road infrastructure (investments allocated through a modelling procedure that takes into account modelled traffic flows). -

The population allocation module Statistically calibrated suitability factors Item Notes Notation Neighborhood population Effect of neighboring population. - Distance to roads Based on current network, as given by TeleAtlas. Land uses Capacity of land uses to support the location of new houses / residents. Slope Effect of slope on housing construction.

The population allocation module Other allocation factors Item Notes Notation Housing supply Accounts for the inelastic supply of housing at the scale of the pixel. Housing supply is the same as of 2006, and it is updated every 10 years. Can be used for scenario configuration. S Power parameter It is optimized to fit initial population distribution (commonly ~ 1.5). Reflects the possibility that housing preferences are not linear to suitability. Ultimately can be used for scenario configuration. Strongly affects concentration / dispersal of population. k

The population allocation module Conversion rules Item Notes Notation Conversion to urban Threshold 1 >= 6 inhab T2 Conversion to abandoned urban Threshold 2 <= 2 inhab T1 Spatial restrictions to the allocation of people Item Notes Notation Moderate restriction N2K; CDDA V - VI. Population outside urban areas cannot grow over 6 inhab pixel-wise. - High restriction N2K; CDDA I - IV. Population outside urban areas t1 <= t0.

The population allocation module Policy preferences affecting population allocation (locspecs’ layers) Item Notes Notation Investment in airports Valid for both policy scenarios. Presumably increase attractiveness to residents. - Investment in urban multimodal transport Investment in culture and rural/urban regeneration

Coming up next… Policy alternatives: compact and disperse urban development. Investments in road network.