Presented by: Olivier MBERA Chairperson RSC/ CGM Enviroserve Rwanda

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E-waste: Challenges and Opportunities in Africa
Advertisements

E Waste Management – Uganda’s Journey
EACO, WORKING GROUP 10 E-WASTE WORKSHOP REPORT
Kampala, Uganda, 23 June 2014 E-Waste Management in Uganda Michael Ocero, Acting Commissioner – IT Dept. Ministry of ICT ITU Regional.
E-Waste Management Policy and Strategy in Uganda
SUB-REGIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMPROVING INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE AND PROMOTING EMPLOYMENT IN THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY GALLAGHER ESTATES, JOHANNESBURG,
CONCEPT NOTE SUPPORT FOR THE DISSEMINATION OF IMPROVED RICE TECHNOLOGIES MOFA/CARD/GHANA/CONCEPT NOTE/MAY11 1 TEAM MEMBERS:  GORDON EKEKPI – MOFA/RSSP.
BRIEF ON THE WORK OF THE EACO WORKING GROUP 4 ON POSTAL SERVICES DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION By MATSIKO Gonzague – WG4 Representative.
1 Overcoming Challenges in Preparation and Implementation of NAMAs Kigali, 17 th August 2015 African Regional Workshop on NAMAs.
Financing for National Communications UNFCCC Workshop, Manila Ravi Sharma United Nations Environment Programme – Global Environment Facility.
REGIONAL INITIATIVES TO IMPROVE LAND GOVERNANCE: AFRICA Joan Kagwanja, Chief,Land Policy Initiative (LPI) ECA.
8 TH -11 TH NOVEMBER, 2010 UN Complex, Nairobi, Kenya MEETING OUTCOMES David Smith, Manager PEI Africa.
Jean-Noel Guillossou Program Manager, SSATP SSATP Strategic Priorities Annual Meeting, December 2012.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Addressing Data Discrepancies in MDG Monitoring: The Role of UN Regional Commissions.
Ministry for Women, Youth, Children and Persons with Disabilities.
Overview of Integrated Solid Waste Management (ISWM) Presentation made at the European Commission 7 th Framework Programme on Capacity Building Workshop.
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS AMONG AFRICAN SITES PRIOR TO THE WORLD BANK'S VIDEO- CONFERENCE: “OPEN STANDARDS FOR GOVERNMENT TRANSFORMATION” 17TH APRIL 2009.
MODEL POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR E-WASTE MANAGEMENT IN THE EAST AFRICAN REGION Nakiguli Helen Cynthia, Uganda Communications Commission,
INTEGRATING INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE (IK) INTO UGANDA’S POVERTY ERADICATION ACTION PLAN (PEAP) By Joyce N. Muwanga Assistant Executive Secretary Uganda National.
Eurostat/UNSD Conference on International Outreach and Coordination in National Accounts for Sustainable Development and Growth 6-8 May, Luxembourg These.
Revisions Proposed to the CIS Plan by the Global Office Misha V. Belkindas Budapest, July 3-4, 2013.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
1 FAO REGIONAL WORKSHOP ON RICE AND AQUACULTURE FOR PRODUCTIVITY INCREASE AND MARKET DEVELOPMENT IN EAST AFRICA, KAMPALA,UGANDA, APRIL 2009 AQUACULTURE.
 The East African Communications Organization (EACO) is an inter- governmental organization established by ICT regulators and operators from the East.
0 National Inter-Ministerial Dialogue on Climate Change Cape Hotel Monrovia, Liberia June 25, 2009 Assessing and Developing Policy Options for Addressing.
AU/UNIDO/Brazil High-Level Seminar on Biofuel.  Policies are required to reflect the country’s development vision for the sector  Required to establish.
Waisea Vosa Climate Change Unit Division of Political and Treaties Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.
A Sustainable Tourism Framework for the Caribbean Mercedes Silva Sustainable Tourism Specialist Caribbean Tourism Organization “Ma Pampo” World Ecotourism.
Exploring Capacity and Accountability Gaps Joan Kagwanja, Chief Land Policy Initiative World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty March 2016.
Meeting of the Committee of Experts All day event Réunion du Comité d’experts Journée entière
Theme : Information, monitoring & research NWRS Workshops October - December
Dejene Abesha, RED&FS Secretariat
Corporate Governance In Tanzania 2009
SOUTHERN AFRICA INCLUSIVE EDUCATION STRATEGY FOR LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES (SAIES) 23rd November 2016 Coastland Hotel - Durban.
Social Protection Global Technical Team Retreat,
Policy Instruments Addressing Existing Farms
Summary of the Outcomes of the 1st AfriGEOSS Steering Committee Meeting Humbulani Mudau DST, South Africa 1st AfriGEOSS Symposium 27 – 29 April 2016.
Developing reporting system for SDG and Agenda 2063, contribution of National Statistical System, issues faced and challenges CSA Ethiopia.
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
Institutional Strengthening Support
A 10 -Year Literacy/NFE Policy and Programme Framework Nepal 2006
BY MR. SENPHANOMCHONE INTHASANE, DPC, MOIC AUGUST 19TH, 2015
GEF governance reforms to enhance effectiveness and civil society engagement Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point , GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation.
ROLE AND MANDATE In terms of the National Development Agency (NDA) Act (Act No 108 of 1998 as amended), NDA was mandated to contribute towards the eradication.
Gender statistics in Information and Communication Technology for Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality Dorothy Okello, Annual.
GENDER STATISTICS IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION
Technical Cooperation Section SEDI- Executive Office
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
11/18/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE – 02 MAY 2018.
WAJIR COUNTY CLIMATE CHANGE ACT 2016
Implementation of the UN DA 10 project “The African context”
East Central and Southern Africa Health Community (ECSA HC)
NATIONAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING FRAMEWORK (NUDHF)
12/5/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Select COMMITTEE – 19 June 2018.
Breakout sessions Outcome.
Objective of the workshop
KIRIBATI IW R2R PROJECT OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION: PROGRESS
United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO)
INGONYAMA TRUST BOARD’S ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
STRENGTHENING INTERLINKAGES BETWEEN SDG7 AND OTHER SDGS
OVERVIEW OF EACO WORKING GROUP 07: E-WASTE AND COUNTERFEIT GADGETS MANAGEMENT PRESENTED TO THE 3RD AWARENESS WORKSHOP, 14TH – 16TH MAY 2018, KIGALI,
OVERVIEW OF EACO WORKING GROUP 07: E-WASTE AND COUNTERFEIT GADGETS MANAGEMENT PRESENTED TO THE 3RD AWARENESS WORKSHOP, 14TH – 16TH MAY 2018, KIGALI,
Implementing the 2030 Agenda in the Asia- Pacific region, January 2019, Shanghai Institutional arrangements to facilitate coherence in sustainable.
SUSTAINABLE TOURISM HANDBOOK FOR EASTERN AFRICA: Aims and objectives
Director-General: Mr. E Africa
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Federico Magalini – Managing Director Sofies UK
BRD The Development Bank of Rwanda Plc (BRD) is Rwanda’s only national Development Finance Institution Public limited company incorporated in 1967 and.
Synergies between NDCs & SDGs; Integration into National Planning
Presentation transcript:

Presented by: Olivier MBERA Chairperson RSC/ CGM Enviroserve Rwanda EACO REGIONAL E-WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Presented by: Olivier MBERA Chairperson RSC/ CGM Enviroserve Rwanda 3rd EACO Regional Awareness Workshop Kigali , Rwanda

1. Regional Strategy Development Steps Towards Zero Negative Impact of e-waste in EACO member States by 2030 Agenda 1. Regional Strategy Development Steps 2. Understand the Challenge 3. Review Regional and Global Best Practices 4. Outline Solutions 5. Articulate Implementation Framework

Strategy development steps Strategic Operating Plan Process Step 1 – Perform Situation Analysis Step 3 – Review Regional Best Practices Step 2 – Stakeholder Consultations Step 4 – Identify Strategic Priorities Step 5 – Define Strategic Plan Step 6 – Develop M&E Framework Step 7 – Implementation plan Strategy Operations People

Understand the Challenge “ Towards Zero negative impact of e-Waste in EACO member states by 2030” Understand the Challenge STRENGTH WEAKNESS Model regional e-waste management policy framework in place Political commitment by leaders in the member states e.g. ratification and adoption of relevant policies, laws and conventions Existence of E-waste management coordination structures at regional and national levels (EACO WG 10, National steering committee, Regional steering committees) Improved appreciation on awareness on matters of e-waste across the board (political, technical and general public) Implementation of e-waste management initiative EACO e.g. studies/ statistics Existing of some basic e-waste management infrastructure in some countries such as dismantling facilities in Kenya and Rwanda Existence of enabling environment at national level such as e-waste management policy and strategy in Uganda and draft policy in Rwanda, draft regulations and guidelines in Kenya. Lack of adequate statistics on e-waste generation in the region Limited coordination of e-waste activities at regional level Lack of comprehensive awareness on e-waste especially among end-users, decision makers. Limited expertise in e-waste management within the region Inadequate e-waste management infrastructure and facilities. Insufficient e-waste policies laws and regulations and weak enforcement of existing ones and lack of harmonization of the existing ones Unpredictable flow of resources on e-waste management Lack of easy movement of e-waste in the region ( Transboundry movement procedures complicated)

Understand the Opportunities and Treats Political Global push on e-waste management issues and initiatives by ITU, UN activities through UNFCCC, UNEP, Basel and Bamako Convention, StEP Regional integration and the EAC policy harmonization framework Global conventions, protocols, declarations. Political instability in the region Set back on political will Economic Economic opportunities arising from E-waste management Business and employment Potential for export growth Affluent societies – High consumption… Counterfeit of substandard goods Social Growing activism on environment and Green computing Increased Awareness of negative impact of e-waste – Public health Potential positive on special impact groups such as women, youth and PWDs – people with disabilities. Booming informal sector in the region Social practices and culture in handling e-waste (holding on items due to emotional attachment) Technology Availability of available technologies Best practices for Bench mark Changing of technology making the ICT equipment’s inseparable Rudimentary technology like incineration or burning. Environment Urban mining Reduced Greenhouse gases emissions Continued Poor disposal methods hence pollution to the environment Non segregation of waste Legal  

Opportunity of proper e-waste management in EACO member states Social gain: formalised recycling creates large number of green jobs at all skill levels better social status as entrepreneurs & employees rather than subsistence actors better health and lower occupational hazards through proper use of tools and technologies higher and more regular incomes for workers who have more job security Environmental gain: air, water and soil pollution avoided results in secondary raw material gained (such as gold, copper, steel, aluminium) otherwise lost in landfills or inefficient processes avoided remediation costs of contaminated sites feedstock to other industries eg. steel, aluminium, plastic and encourages green industrial development Economic gain: developed industrial recycling resulting in improves government finances through higher taxes and lower costs for municipal bodies for waste disposal attracts investment and technology

Cost of improper e-waste management in EACO member states Social cost: informal recycling as a subsistence activity creates direct social cost of low income from low quality fractions due to inefficient, sub-standard and hazardous processes indirect social cost of poor health, intermittent income, smoke, smell Environmental cost: air, water and soil pollution from emissions that degrade soil, water and air resulting in contamination in the food chain Inefficient recycling processes result in unrecoverable material losses and need for more primary resources Economic cost: under developed industrial recycling resulting in lost intrinsic value of e-waste by the formal, and thus a net loss in tax revenues for the government low investment in installing recycling infrastructure

Vision and Goal of the EACO Regional E-waste Strategy “ Towards Zero negative impact of e-Waste in EACO member states by 2030”. Goal Achieve a sustainable e-waste management system in the EACO member states”.

Outline Solutions Strategic Objectives Strengthen the policy, legal and regulatory framework for sustainable resourcing of e-waste management activities for effective protection of human health and environment within the region; Put in place the requisite e-waste management infrastructure and rationalize its distribution across EACO member states to harness unique value and enhance synergy; Establish mechanisms for comprehensive and sustainable mobilization for e-waste management resources (physical, financial and human resources); Strengthen EACO e-waste coordination structures at regional and national levels Promote research and innovation in e-waste management; Put in place a monitoring and evaluation mechanism for e-waste management; and Build capacity and create awareness for effective e-waste management in EACO member states

Five Strategic Pillars Outline Solutions Five Strategic Pillars Policy, Legal and regulatory frameworks Requisite Infrastructure for E-waste Management Resource mobilization Institutional coordination and alignment Research, Monitoring and Evaluation and Capacity building EACO Regional Strategy has identified specific Interventions to address five strategic pillars

Proposed Interventions Strategic Pillar 1 : Policy, Legal and regulatory frameworks Outcome Harmonized /Aligned legal, policy and regulatory framework for e-waste in EACO member states Transformative Intervention (To harmonize/ Align policy legal and regulatory framework for e-waste management in the EACO member states ) Review existing Policy, laws, standards and guidelines for e-waste management in EACO member states to identify gaps Develop Regional e-waste policy, guidelines, laws, regulations and standards to act as model guiding national strategies Advocate for alignments of national policies, guidelines and standards to developed regional policies, standards and guidelines Facilitate the adoption and entrenchment of regional e-waste policy, guidelines and standards. Disseminate regional e-waste management policy, guidelines and standards to cater for the uniqueness of e-waste in EACO member states $40,000 Estimated Budget $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 60,000

Proposed Interventions Strategic Pillar 2 : Infrastructure for E-waste Management Outcome A rationalized , well distributed and developed e-waste management infrastructure Transformative Intervention (To ensure rationalization of e-waste management infrastructure in the EACO member states) Conduct baseline survey on E-waste generation and volumes and develop an updated inventory to inform priority e-waste management infrastructure in the EACO member states Conduct an E-waste management infrastructure requirements analysis for the EACO member states Facilitate the development of a regional modern dismantling and recovery facility within the EACO member states Develop an e-waste management infrastructure roll out plan Put in place appropriate mechanisms for collection, transportation and disposal of e-waste such as the take-back systems with incentives for consumers, door-to-door collection etc $100,000 Estimated Budget $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 100,000

Proposed Interventions Strategic Pillar 3 : Resource mobilization Outcome A comprehensive resource mobilization mechanism implemented Transformative Intervention ( Put in place a comprehensive Resource Mobilization mechanism for e-waste management) Develop a Resource Mobilization Strategy for effective implementation of EACO e-Waste Management Strategic Plan Streamline funding mechanisms for e-waste management Engage EEE producers/retailers in strategic partnerships including financing the e-waste collection, transportation and treatment through the extended producer responsibility and advanced recycling fee. Set up an EACO e-waste fund which will collect EPR fees, ARF individual and corporate contributions etc Conduct a feasibility study for the establishment of EACO e-waste fund. $ 50,000 Estimated Budget $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 25,000 $ 40,000

Proposed Interventions Strategic Pillar 4 : Institutional coordination and alignment Outcome Strengthened capacity for coordination of e-waste management at EACO Transformative Intervention (Strengthen EACO e-waste coordination structures at regional and national levels ) Support the operations and functions of the Regional Steering Committee for effective coordination of the implementation of Regional e-Waste Strategic plan Establish collaborative frameworks with key regulatory bodies and other relevant stakeholders for the proper management of e-waste in EACO member states. Support the establishment of a Regional Producer Association as a mechanism for the implementation of EPR (Extended Producer responsibility), ARF (Advanced recycling fee), to enhance producer participation in e-waste management Establish proper mechanisms for sharing experience and knowledge on E-waste management Develop a communication and stakeholder engagement strategy on e-waste management $10,000 Estimated Budget $ 100,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 20,000

Proposed Interventions Strategic Pillar 5 : Research, Monitoring and Evaluation and Capacity building ( Cont…..) Outcome An established research, M&E system, innovation as well as developed capacity for e-waste management in EACO member states Transformative Intervention (Promote research and innovation in e-waste management) Conduct studies and baseline surveys on E-waste Organize annual e-waste management innovation contests/ awards Collaborate with research institution to promote research and innovation on e-waste management Mainstream e-waste issues in educational curriculum at various levels especially in technical school Estimated Budget $ 20,000 $ 50,000 $ 30,000 $ 15,000

Proposed Interventions Strategic Pillar 5 : Research, Monitoring and Evaluation and Capacity building Outcome An established research, M&E system, innovation as well as developed capacity for e-waste management in EACO member states Transformative Intervention (Put in place a monitoring and evaluation mechanism for e-waste management) Collaborate with stakeholders to establish and maintain a data base for e-waste generations/ volumes Develop and implement a participatory monitoring and evaluation framework Conduct midterm review and final evaluation of the regional e-waste management strategy Support monitoring and evaluation for national e-waste management initiatives in member states Estimated Budget $ 20,000 $ 50,000 $ 40,000 $ 50,000

Proposed Interventions Strategic Pillar 5 : Research, Monitoring and Evaluation and Capacity building ( Cont……) Outcome An established research, M&E system, innovation as well as developed capacity for e-waste management in EACO member states Transformative Intervention (Capacity Building and Awareness creation for e-waste management in EACO member states) Raise comprehensive awareness about e-waste and its management Build capacity amongst stakeholders and special interest groups such as informal sector, scheme operators etc. Undertake e-waste awareness campaigns in all member states targeting the general public, technical staff and local leaders Network with partner organizations through stakeholder meetings and dialogues Estimated Budget $ 50,000 $ 60,000 $ 100,000 $ 15,000

Proposed Interventions Strategic Pillar 5 : Research, Monitoring and Evaluation and Capacity building (cont... Outcome An established research, M&E system, innovation as well as developed capacity for e-waste management in EACO member states Transformative Intervention (Capacity Building and Awareness creation for e-waste management in EACO member states) Engage producers/retailers of EEE to participate in e-waste awareness campaigns Participate in regional and international fora on best practices in e-waste management Develop information, education and communication (IEC) packages for each stakeholder category Estimated Budget $ 10,000 $ 100,000 $ 25,000

Zero negative impact of e-Waste in EACO member states by 2030 Articulate Implementation Framework EACO will drive impact through clear outputs Impact Zero negative impact of e-Waste in EACO member states by 2030 Harmonized /Aligned legal, policy and regulatory framework for e-waste in EACO member states A rationalized , well distributed and developed e-waste management infrastructure A comprehensive resource mobilization mechanism implemented Outcomes Strengthened capacity for coordination of e-waste management at EACO An established research, M&E system, innovation as well as developed capacity for e- waste management in EACO member states Outputs Regional e-waste policies, guidelines and standards developed for EACO member states. E-waste regional policy, guideline and standard adopted at national level E-waste management infrastructure requirements analysis is conducted An e-waste management infrastructure roll out plan is developed Regional E-waste resource mobilization strategy developed and implemented EACO e-waste fund is established to collect EPR fees, ARF individual, corporate and donor contributions E-waste management is mainstreamed in educational curriculum at various levels especially in technical school E-waste regional steering committee operations and functions supported for effective coordination of the implementation of the regional e-waste strategic plan

Articulate Implementation Framework Existing Organization structure

Articulate Implementation Framework Partnership and coordination with different stakeholders will ease delivery RSC WG 7 Producers, Importers Implement Extended Producer Resposnibility program Finance collection and treatment Progress reporting on Regional Strategy Supervision and overall coordination with NCS Partnership EACO to create the PRO and E-waste fund EACO “achieve a sustainable e-waste management system in the EACO member states”. Enforcement of laws and regulations Regulators ( UCC, RURA, CA, TCRA,etc) Private sector Type approval , data reporting , Financial contributions Partnership in setting up required infrastructure, collection and treatment of e-waste Transboundry movement of e-waste within the region Finance the strategy Technical Assistance Capacity Building and Awareness raising Environment and Safety compliance audits Agencies in Member states ( REMA, NEMA, NEMC, etc) Development Partners

Thank You