Catherine A Gallagher Anne Douds George Mason University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mn Juvenile Justice & Mental Health Initiative Mental Health Screen Best Practices From: Blueprint for Change.
Advertisements

Rosebud Youth Wellness and Renewal Center
Reproduction of these materials only by author's explicit permission. Risk Assessment Instrument And the Development of Detention Alternatives Primary.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Increasing Alternative Sentencing in the Juvenile Justice System Through a Partnership Between Public Defenders and Social Workers National Organization.
Permanency Enhancement Project Peoria, Illinois Jennifer La Fever Elizabeth Morgan Amy Roman
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Transforming the lives of Juveniles through raising the standards of practice: Justice for Our Youth: The JOY Project The Uninterrupted & Tailor-Made Routing.
DataBrief: Did you know… DataBrief Series ● October 2012 ● No. 32 Trends in the Residential Care Industry In 2010, 25% of residential care facilities had.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
Crossover Youth: Research, Policy and Practice CYPM Overview
Fairfax County Moderate Income Definition Project George Mason University Center for Regional Analysis Presentation of Report September 22, 2006.
Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Cairssa Schively Design for Health.
Slide 1 Promoting and Supporting Status Offense System Reform Presentation to National Conference of State Legislators June 23, 2014 Allie Meyer Vera Institute.
LA County Cases: An Overview of Characteristics & Disposition Outcomes Denise C. Herz, Ph.D. California State University—Los Angeles School of Criminal.
Policy Research Shop Support for the Policy Research Shop is provided by the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education, U.S. Department of Education.
©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 Jessica Kasten and Rebecca Woodward August 14 th - 15 th 2014 Minnesota LTSS Service Access Study:
NCHS July 11, Influenza Immunization in Nursing Homes: Who Does Not Get Immunized and Whose Status is Unknown Jill A. Marsteller, PhD, MPP, Ronald.
Chapter 7.2 Examination and Treatment Prepared by Nguyen Trong Khoa.
Key Leader Orientation 3- Key Leader Orientation 3-1.
Housing Status and HIV Risk Behaviors Among Homeless and Housed Persons with HIV in the United States The findings and conclusions in this presentation.
Chris Feltham Head of Road Safety Engineering London Road Safety Unit Transport for London Road Safety Audit and Pedestrian Guardrailings.
Justice, Law & Crime Policy George Mason University Immunization Obstacles at the Local Level: How Juvenile Facilities and County Public Health Perceive.
Nursing Home Resident and Facility Characteristics Associated with Pneumococcal Vaccination, National Nursing Home Survey, Barbara Bardenheier,
Martha Herndon & Cathy waggoner
Beatriz E Builes, Cindy Weinbaum, Abigail Shefer,
Minimizing Disruption in Juvenile Education
Department of Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Justice Policy and Oversight Committee
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Personal Belief Exemptors (PBEs)
Sharon Jaques, RN, BSN,PHN CCHP
Assessment of Safety and Physical Environment factors in Governmental Primary Schools in Dammam Farhan M Al-Anezi.
Annual October Count of Children in
Epidemiology Section APHA Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2007
JUVENILE COURT 2016 Empowering Youth Strengthening Families
Mary Koslap-Petraco, MS, CPNP Michael Vallone, AAS, RN Oneek Iftikhar
Informing policy, Improving programs
D2d participating clinical sites
Juvenile Justice Policy and Oversight Committee
Transforming Hidalgo County CSCD into an Evidence Based Agency
JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER FRAMEWORK CONCEPT: AN OVERVIEW
THE YOUTH JUSTICE SYSTEM QUEENSLAND NEEDS
Hennepin/Ramsey County Juvenile Treatment Program
Jackie Eul Major: Outdoor Studies and Tourism
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
RJ Jacobs AS Meyerhoff Capitol Outcomes Research, Inc.
Online Course Design, Quality Matters Training, and Student Outcomes
FIRST PLACEMENT IS THE RIGHT PLACEMENT
Peng-jun Lu, MD, PhD1; Mei-Chun Hung, MPH, PhD1,2 ; Alissa C
LESSON OBJECTIVES Unit 4-3: Adjudication in Juvenile Court
Metro Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.
Juvenile Data Exchange (JDEX) Technology Committee Presentation
Adolescent Vaccination in Juvenile Justice Residential Facilities
Consolidated district performance report (CDPR)
Monitoring Children’s Progress
Comprehensive Youth Services
Trends and Projections
Eastern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Caroline, Cecil, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Anne’s, Somerset, Talbot, Wicomico, and Worcester.
Title I Part D Reporting
Can We Get There From Here
Southern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
Prince George’s County Juvenile Services Long Term Trends
Serving Students in High-Turnover Institutions
FIRST PLACEMENT IS THE RIGHT PLACEMENT
NoelleAngelique M. Molinari, PhD Nidhi Jain, MD CDC
SWCU Annual Report England
Title I Part D Reporting
The Texas Child Care Immunization Assessment Survey
Presentation transcript:

Catherine A Gallagher Anne Douds George Mason University Hepatitis B Vaccination Practices in Juvenile Justice Residential Facilities Catherine A Gallagher Anne Douds George Mason University

The Juvenile Justice Residential Facility Population JJRFs house young people accused of or adjudicated for criminal or delinquent offenses Often also house children in need of services High risk population, high risk time, high risk environment 3,500 JJRFs in the United States 105,000 average daily population Especially important to address gaps in health care Hepatitis B vaccinations are logistically difficult (given high turnover in population and lack of record availability) but critical

Purpose Examine the conditions under which JJRFs provide Hepatitis B vaccination Identify correlates of Hepatitis B vaccination policy and practices Highlight gaps in policy and practice measures Work towards strategic planning to increase coverage

Two data collection instruments

Size Population size All facilities Number of kids 1-25 65.5% 23,183 1-25 65.5% 23,183 26-50 6.9 19,537 51-100 10.3 23,844 101-200 4.9 11,180 200+ 2.3 21,887

Type Detention center 20.6 (715) Training school 6.5 (225) R&D 2.5 (86) Group homes 29.2 (1013) Boot camp 45 (1.3)

Ownership Private 58.8% Tribal .2 State 18.3 County 21.3 Municipality 1.4

JRFC 2004 Hepatitis B Series

23,179 young people placed in 986 facilities not providing hepatitis B vaccination

Overview 23,179 young people placed in 986 facilities NOT providing hepatitis B vaccination 25,333 young people placed in 455 facilities in which ALL young people receive hepatitis B vaccination (practice) Detention centers are less likely than other types of facilities to provide hepatitis B vaccination Facility size positively related to hepatitis B vaccination State owned and operated most likely to provide hepatitis B Many young people in residential facilities receive hepatitis B vaccinations outside the facility

Detention centers are less likely than other types of facilities to provide hep B vaccine

Two Hepatitis B Vaccination Outcomes 1. Policy 65.5% Whether ANY young person receives Hepatitis B vaccinations while assigned a bed at the facility 2. Practice 42.2% Of those suggesting a policy, whether AT LEAST ONE young person received a single dose of Hep B vaccination during a 30-day period

Summary of models Policy Practice Length of Stay 1.003 1.001 Detention -2.22 -1.75 Training 2.03 -1.11 Facility size 1.33 -1.15 2.23 1.42 2.44 1.75 2.08 2.84 3.01 3.72 17.13 14.7 Male -1.004 ------ State 1.64 2.26 City -2.37 2.68 Crowding ----- 1.82 Exams (on) 1.49 1.34 (off) -1.18 -2.00

Results of multivariate models

…a bit more balanced (removed large facility effect)

Policy Location affects Practice One or more Hep B vaccination doses given in 30-day period Inside/Outside 52.8% Inside 73.2 Outside 25.1

440 facilities indicated that “ALL young persons receive doses of hepatitis B vaccine” 55.9% reported that at least one dose had been given in the 30-day reference period This Appears to be a function of facility size but not necessarily length of stay Pre-vaccine serological screening 31.6% reported pre-vaccine serological screening for ALL young people 13.2% did not have pre-vaccine serological screening available 59.6% conducted screening at discretion of health care provider

Conclusions ¼ of JJRF daily population in facilities without provisions for Hepatitis B vaccination Policy 65.5% Practice 42.2% Larger, state-owned facilities had significantly higher odds of both Policy and Practice One interesting exception is the reversal of signs for training schools City owned facilities significantly less likely to report providing Hep B vaccination, but of those providing, City facilities significantly more likely to have evidence of Practice Practice more likely to occur when policy is to give vaccination on-site In analyses not presented, there is evidence of regional effects Additional modeling will assess state-level effects

Available Guidelines for JJRFs NCCHC Recommends vaccination for all young people This is not the reality One-size fits all may be at odds with the amount of time available to give the three-dose series The existing structure of health care in JJRFs Perhaps guidelines could be better tailored to the diverse types of facility OR guidelines based on individual young persons characteristics Some types of facilities need more direction than others