Advancing ELL Progress

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Dr. Elena Izquierdo UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) is the current state assessment program that began in spring For students in grades.
January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
SAISD Board Report Office of Research and Evaluation
LPAC overview - Fall 2004 The Language Assessment Process in Texas  LPAC, Language Assessment Proficiency Committee  ARD is the Admissions, Review and.
Annual Review Process for LPAC
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System (TELPAS) Results September 2007.
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
Texas Comprehensive SEDL Austin, Texas March 16–17, 2009 Making Consistent Decisions About Accommodations for English Language Learners – ResearchSummit.
PREPARED BY DR. HAROLD SMITH EDAD 5399 Bilingual/ESL Education.
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
Program Overview: Focus- Assessment Bilingual Module 3 Presented by Marcee Camarillo Silvia Saldaña.
SIOP Overview Humble ISD Sara Smith-Frings. ELLs in Humble I.S.D. Fall 2001 ELL 1226 Fall 2002 ELL 1438 Fall 2003 ELL 1578 Fall 2004 ELL 1750 Fall 2005.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
 ESL program is one that “provides instruction in the English language and other courses of study using teaching techniques for acquiring English, and...
ESL Education Program Report Hudson ISD ESL/Content-Based An English program that serves students identified as students of limited English proficiency.
1 English language proficiency standards (ELPS) Georgina K. Gonzalez Bilingual/ESL Director Susie Coultress Assistant Director Curriculum Division Texas.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Copyright©2007 Education Service Center Region XIII 1 English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS)
Guidebook Helping Students of Limited English Skills in the Regular Classroom Presented by Ms. Irizarry Ms. Hunter.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
AEIS Orenda Charter Schools. Changes to the AEIS 2  Assessment results include TAKS, TAKS (Accommodated), and TAKS-M for grades
TELPAS & ELPS Connection to Instruction. Purposes of TELPAS To assess progress of LEP-exempt students To indicate when LEP exemptions are no longer necessary.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
STAAR Decision Making Process for LPAC for Teachers.
The following presentation includes voice-over; please ensure speakers are available. The presentation may be paused to allow time for discussion. If.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
English Language Proficiency Standards  The English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS), as required by 19 Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 74,
Cristina G. Vázquez, Manager, Student Assessment Division, Texas Education Agency.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Bilingual/ESL Education Program Report
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K–12 Overview Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division. Joanna.
Discussion of W-APT, ACCESS Testing, Adequate Yearly Progress and Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives.
Santa Fe Public Schools Our Common Commitments Improving our lives through education.
STUDENT ASSESSMENT DIVISION TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY Assessment Provisions for Qualifying ELL Asylees and Refugees Spring 2011 Administrations © 2010, Texas.
Edgewood ISD   School District Effectiveness  Statutory Requirements  Valid Indicators of Performance  Maximum Inclusion  Individual.
Bilingual/ESL Department
Assessing LEP Students for English Language Proficiency
Meeting the needs of English Language Learners
OVERVIEW OF STATE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM June 2010
Bilingual/ESL Education Program Report
Accountability Overview 2016
Bilingual/ESL Department
Accountability Rating
TAPR Review Kohrville Elementary
Bilingual/ESL Compliance: Snapshot Preparation 101
2017 Beginning of Year DATA REFLECTION
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Accountability Update
LISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
State and Federal Accountability Overview
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
2019 Accountability Updates
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Impact of EL Students and TELPAS Performance on State Accountability
Presentation transcript:

Advancing ELL Progress 2015-2016 Laredo Independent School District Bilingual/ESL Department Cynthia S. Cruz, Director

So what do we (LISD) do to address the needs of our ELL students? LISD Demographics Identified LEP - 58% - 60% So what do we (LISD) do to address the needs of our ELL students? As per 19 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 89 Adaptations for Special Populations, Subchapter BB - Commissioner’s Rules concerning the state plan for educating English language learners we offer - Bilingual/ESL Educational Programs

So how do we measure the effectiveness of our Bilingual Program?

Accountability – State and Federal 2015 System Safeguards – provides disaggregated performance for each subject and each student group (ensures the poor performance in one area or in one student group is not masked in the performance index) Data Tables by Index – provides disaggregated results by subject/indicator and by student groups used to derive at each index outcome 2015 Accountability Summary – provides a comprehensive evaluation of the entire district or campus

PBMAS – annual evaluation of a school district’s performance and program effectiveness (BE/CTE/NCLB/Sp. Ed.) For BE data sources for PBMAS include: Student Assessment Data (STAAR, STAAR Spanish, STAAR A, STAAR Alternate 2 and TELPAS) Dropout and Graduation Data PEIMS TAPR Report– provides performance information and extensive profile information about students, staff and programs AMAOs – Provides achievement data for ELLs regarding English language acquisition using TELPAS – progress, attainment and STAAR met standard

What does an effective Bilingual Program look like as per PBMAS? ELLs are advancing academically and performing satisfactorily on state assessments. ELLs not served in BE/ESL (denials and M1s) are advancing academically and performing satisfactorily on state assessments. ELLs are graduating and not dropping out of school. ELLs graduate with a Recommended or Distinguished Achievement Program Diploma. ELLs grades 2-12 are not scoring at the beginning proficiency level for two consecutive years on TELPAS Reading. ELLs, grades 5-12, 5+years demonstrate progress on TELPAS Composite rating and are not continuing to be rated B or I.

Performance Level Assignments The PBMAS report includes specific data for each indicator which is measured with performance level assignments: Performance Level 0: Highest designation, indicating the district met the standard for the indicator. Performance Level 3: Lowest designation, indicating the district performance was farthest from the 0 – Met Standard designation. Performance – Based Monitoring Interventions Determinations Based on the performance level in each of the indicators districts are staged and supports are applied as necessary and according to state and federal law. Each intervention stage has specific requirements that must be implemented by the program/district.

10 Indicators for Bilingual/ESL

Bilingual/ESL Indicators *see booklet for more details BE STAAR 3-8 (LISD 3-5) Passing Rate (M, R, S, SS, W) ESL STAAR 3-8 (LISD 6-8) Passing Rate (M, R, S, SS, W) LEP Not Served (Denials) 3-8 Passing Rate (M, R, S, SS, W) LEP Year After Exit (M1s) STAAR 3-8 Passing Rate (M, R, S, SS, W) LEP STAAR EOC Passing Rate (M, S, SS, ELA) LEP Annual Dropout Rate (Grades 7-12) LEP RHSP/DAP Diploma Rate LEP Graduation Rate TELPAS Reading Beginning Proficiency Level TELPAS Composite Rating for Students in U.S. Schools Multiple Years

ESL STAAR 3-8 Passing Rate Indicator 1 BE STAAR 3-8 Passing Rate 2014 PBMAS Standard District Rate 2014 2014 District Performance Level 2014 Region 2014 State 2015 PBMAS Standard 2015 District Rate Mathematics 70.0 60.2 1 54.1 (2) Reading 59.6 2 60.6 (1) Science 65.0 52.2 44.8 (3) Social Studies -- 3 Writing 64.6 62.7 (1) Indicator 2 ESL STAAR 3-8 Passing Rate 2014 PBMAS Standard District Rate 2014 2014 District Performance Level 2014 Region 2014 State 2015 PBMAS Standard 2015 District Rate (Projection) Mathematics 70.0 53.9 2 1 49.4 (3) Reading 45.8 3 45.6 (3) Science 65.0 20.5 27.8 (3) Social Studies 15.2 32.7 (3) Writing 39.0 37.1 (3)

LEP STAAR EOC Passing Rate Indicator 5 LEP STAAR EOC Passing Rate 2014 PBMAS Standard District Rate 2014 2014 District Performance Level 2014 Region 2014 State 2015 PBMAS Standard 2015 District Rate Mathematics 50.0 46.6 1 60.0 63.3 (0) Science 56.0 61.9 (0) Social Studies State Rate 71.8 64.6 Report Only 60.4 (0) English Language Arts 25.7 13.1 37.6 31.1

3-5 60% Tested 3,802 Met Standard 2,297

LEP (not served in BE/ESL) STAAR LEP Year After Exit STAAR 3-8 Indicator 3 LEP (not served in BE/ESL) STAAR 3-8 Passing Rate 2014 PBMAS Standard District Rate 2014 2014 District Performance Level 2014 Region 2014 State 2015 PBMAS Standard 2015 District Rate Mathematics 70.0 55.3 2 1 43.8 (3) Reading 74.1 51.6 (2) Science 65.0 38.9 3 41.2N/A Social Studies 40.0 N/A 14.3N/A Writing 53.3 36.4N/A Indicator 4 LEP Year After Exit STAAR 3-8 Passing Rate 2014 PBMAS Standard District Rate 2014 2014 District Performance Level 2014 Region 2014 State 2015 PBMAS Standard 2015 District Rate Mathematics 70.0 83.7 72.6 (0) Reading 85.1 77.0 (0) Science 65.0 78.3 68.3 (0) Social Studies 54.2 2 1 27.6N/A Writing 87.3 65.9 (1)

2013-2014 Indicator 6 LEP Annual Dropout Rate MHS – 71 (6.9) NHS – 19 (3.8) CHS – 23 (5.5) Lara – 8 (3.6) ECHS – 0 ChMS – 1 (0.2) LMS – 0 CMS – 3 (0.8) MMS – 0 MS HS District Indicator 6 LEP Annual Dropout Rate 2014 PBMAS Standard District Rate 2014 2014 District Performance Level 2014 Region 2014 State 2015 PBMAS Standard 2015 District Rate 1.8 2.7/3.7 0(RI) 1 3.6 (1)

LEP RHSP/DAP Diploma Rate Indicator 7 LEP RHSP/DAP Diploma Rate 2014 PBMAS Standard District Rate 2014 2014 District Performance Level 2014 Region 2014 State 2015 PBMAS Standard 2015 District Rate 70.0 59.1 2 1 57.5 (2) Indicator 8 LEP Graduation Rate 2014 PBMAS Standard District Rate 2014 2014 District Performance Level 2014 Region 2014 State 2015 PBMAS Standard 2015 District Rate 75.0 49.4 2 34.1 (3)

TELPAS Reading Beginning Proficiency Level Rate Indicator 9 TELPAS Reading Beginning Proficiency Level Rate 2014 PBMAS Standard District Rate 2014 2014 District Performance Level 2014 Region 2014 State 2015 PBMAS Standard 2015 District Rate (Projection) 4.5 (9.6) 6.1/8.4 (16.5) 0(RI) at 2013 standard 7.5 12.4 (2) Indicator 10 TELPAS Composite Rating Levels for Students in U.S. Schools Multiple Years 2014 PBMAS Standard District Rate 2014 2014 District Performance Level 2014 Region 2014 State 2015 PBMAS Standard 2015 District Rate (Projection) 7.5 21.0 3 2 15.5 (3)

Establish an Instructional Focus What actions do we (LISD) need to take to better prepare our English language learners for academic success? Establish an Instructional Focus Begin with the end in mind… Plan, deliver and monitor instruction with intention: Become acquainted with your ELL students and their TELPAS/STAAR assessment data. Determine what aligned, effective instruction will “look and sound” like in your classroom. Provide linguistically accommodated instruction that explicitly targets identified student needs. Collaborate with peers to plan for instruction/assessment. Establish instructional routines that include learning scaffolds/supports for ELLs. Consistently monitor and review student progress to determine instructional effectiveness. Adjust your instruction to student needs and progress.

Every Classroom – Every Day! How do we get to where we want to go? How can we lessen the gap? How can we better meet the needs of our ELL students? Language Skills Campus Responsibility to Ensure Meaningful, Comprehensible Instruction Takes Place in Every Classroom – Every Day! Skills + Language = Comprehensible Content

Effective Instruction That is….. Effective Instruction intensive instruction to develop English language proficiency in L, S, R, W strong ESL implementation strong vocabulary development writing in every content everyday intensive instruction in all academic content areas to ensure that the students master the required essential knowledge and skills with higher order thinking consistency in the implementation of the curriculum (LEAD Documents) using effective teaching strategies to meet the needs of ELL students (Sheltered Instruction - SIOP)

Remember our Goal! **ELL students should progress at least one proficiency level per year. We must place a greater emphasis on L, S, R, W in English in every classroom, everyday in order to accomplish this. **Within four to five years of being in the Bilingual/ESL Program ELL students should be ready to EXIT the program and be successful in all English instruction.

How do we measure the success of our English language learners? STAAR Graduation Advanced High How do we measure the success of our English language learners? Advanced Intermediate Beginner TELPAS