Status and prospects of the IceCube Neutrino Telescope

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The IceCube Neutrino Telescope Kyler Kuehn Center for Cosmology and AstroParticle Physics The Ohio State University Novel Searches for Dark Matter CCAPP.
Advertisements

Recent Results Lutz Köpke University of Mainz, Germany July 31, 2003
Sean Grullon For the IceCube Collaboration Searching for High Energy Diffuse Astrophysical Neutrinos with IceCube TeV Particle Astrophysics 2009 Stanford.
IceCube.
Recent Results Lutz Köpke University of Mainz, Germany July 31, 2003
Search for Extremely-high Energy Cosmic Neutrino with IceCube Chiba Univ. Mio Ono.
The IceCube High Energy Telesope The detector elements Expected Sensitivity Project Status Shigeru Yoshida Dept. of Physics CHIBA Univ. ICRC 2003.
Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole David Boersma UW Madison “New Views of the Universe” Chicago, 10 December 2005.
Per Olof Hulth Stockholm university1 NSF Review March 25-27, 2003 Introductory remarks Per Olof Hulth Stockholm university.
IceCube S Robbins University of Wuppertal Moriond - “Contents and Structures of the Universe” La Thuile, Italy, March 2006 Outlook for Neutrino Detection.
Frontiers in Contemporary Physics: May 23, 2005 Recent Results From AMANDA and IceCube Jessica Hodges University of Wisconsin – Madison for the IceCube.
First Results from IceCube Physics Motivation Hardware Overview Deployment First Results Conclusions & Future Plans Spencer Klein, LBNL for the IceCube.
Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole David Boersma UW Madison Lake Louise Winter Institute Chicago, 23 February 2006.
CIPANP 2006K. Filimonov, UC Berkeley From AMANDA to IceCube: Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole Kirill Filimonov University of California, Berkeley.
Kara Hoffman, the University of Maryland. the Antarctic Muon and Neutrino Array.
News from the South Pole: Recent Results from the IceCube and AMANDA Neutrino Telescopes Alexander Kappes UW-Madison PANIC ‘08 November 2008, Eilat (Israel)
Searching for Quantum Gravity with AMANDA-II and IceCube John Kelley November 11, 2008 PANIC’08, Eilat, Israel.
COSMO/CosPA 2010 Searches for the Highest Energy Neutrino with IceCube Searches for the Highest Energy Neutrino with IceCube Aya Ishihara ( Fellow) (JSPS.
B.Baret Vrije Univertsiteit Brusse l Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium The AMANDA – IceCube telescopes & Dark Matter searches B. Baret on behalf of the.
C Alexander Kappes for the IceCube Collaboration 23 rd European Cosmic-Ray Symposium Moscow, 7. July 2012 Neutrino astronomy with the IceCube Observatory.
Madison, May 20, 2009 Tom Gaisser1 IceCube Collaboration Overview & Response to 2008 SAC Report.
AMANDA. Latest Results of AMANDA Wolfgang Rhode Universität Dortmund Universität Wuppertal for the AMANDA Collaboration.
IceCube and AMANDA: Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole Brennan Hughey February 22nd, 2007.
IceCube Galactic Halo Analysis Carsten Rott Jan-Patrick Huelss CCAPP Mini Workshop Columbus OH August 6, m 2450 m August 6, 20091CCAPP DM Miniworkshop.
1 Jan Conrad (CERN) GLAST Lunch, 09. Mar. 2006, Jan Conrad (KTH) The AMANDA neutrino telescope: Results from GRB and dark matter searches Jan Conrad (KTH,
The IceCube Neutrino Observatory is a cubic kilometer detector at the geographic South Pole. We give an overview of searches for time-variable neutrino.
KEK, Feb 27, 2006Tom Gaisser1 Cosmic-ray physics with IceCube IceTop the surface component of IceCube.
XIX European Cosmic Ray Symposium Firenze (Italy) Neutrino Astronomy and Cosmic Rays at the South Pole Latest.
Science Advisory Committee March 30, 2006 Jim Yeck IceCube Project Director IceCube Construction Progress.
Status and Results Elisa Bernardini DESY Zeuthen, Germany VLVnT Workshop Amsterdam, Oct (
IceCube: Status and Results
IceCube project Shigeru Yoshida Dept. of Physics, Chiba University.
Searching for Quantum Gravity with AMANDA-II and IceCube John Kelley IceCube Collaboration University of Wisconsin, Madison, U.S.A. October 27, 2008 KICP.
Combining Gamma and Neutrino Observations Christian Spiering, DESY.
Icecube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole Kirill Filimonov, University of California, Berkeley, for the IceCube Collaboration.
1 Multi-Messenger approach in IceCube E. Resconi (Max-Planck-Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg) LAUNCH, Heidelberg, March 2007.
I Taboada, GA Tech High-energy neutrino astronomy with IceCube Ignacio Taboada Georgia Institute of Technology for the IceCube collaboration Madison, NDM.
1 Particles and Nuclei International Conference (PANIC05) Santa Fe, NM (U.S.A.) October 24 th, from Quark n.36, 02/01/04 Neutrino.
08/2006Julia Becker, Universität Dortmund TeV particle astrophysics, Madison Julia Becker for the IceCube collaboration August 2006 by the AMANDA experiment.
1 slide Brennan Hughey University of Wisconsin – Madison for the AMANDA Collaboration Recent Results From the AMANDA Experiment Rencontres du Vietnam August.
IceCube Neutrino Telescope Astroparticle Physics at the South Pole Brendan Fox Pennsylvania State University for the IceCube Collaboration VLVNT08 - Very.
Search for Ultra-High Energy Tau Neutrinos in IceCube Dawn Williams University of Alabama For the IceCube Collaboration The 12 th International Workshop.
High-energy Neutrino Astrophysics with IceCube Neutrino Observatory
Albrecht Karle University of Wisconsin - Madison for the IceCube Collaboration IceCube Current status, recent results and future prospects.
Dark Matter Searches with AMANDA and IceCube Catherine De Clercq for the IceCube Collaboration Vrije Universiteit Brussel Interuniversity Institute for.
1 IceCube Christian Spiering for the IceCube Collaboration EPSC, Cracow July 2009.
The IceCube Neutrino Observatory is a cubic kilometer detector currently under construction at the geographic South Pole. We will give an overview of searches.
Neutrino Physics with IceCube
Measuring the total neutrino cross section using the IceCube detector
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Imaging the Neutrino Universe with AMANDA and IceCube
Search for neutrinos from gamma-ray bursts with the ANTARES telescope
Julia Becker for the IceCube collaboration
Imaging the High-Energy Neutrino Universe from the South Pole
IceCube: Multiwavelength Approach to
Recent Results of Point Source Searches with the IceCube Neutrino Telescope Lake Louise Winter Institute 2009 Erik Strahler University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Performance of the AMANDA-II Detector
IC40 Physics Run Preparations
Christian Spiering, ESC DESY, Sept.2003
John Kelley for the IceCube Collaboration
GLAST Workshop April 13, 2007 Argonne National Lab
IceCube Neutrino Telescope Astroparticle Physics at the South Pole
The IceCube Neutrino Telescope
Brennan Hughey for the IceCube Collaboration
Cherenkov  April 2005 Palaiseau, France Contents: 
Rolling Search For a Cascade GRB Signal: 3 Year Results
Alexander Kappes Francis Halzen Aongus O’Murchadha
Brennan Hughey for the IceCube Collaboration
Claudio Bogazzi * - NIKHEF Amsterdam ICRC 2011 – Beijing 13/08/2011
IceCube Construction and Analysis Report
Presentation transcript:

Status and prospects of the IceCube Neutrino Telescope E. Resconi, MPIfK Heidelberg for the IceCube Collaboration VLVT08, Toulon, Var, France, 22-24 April 2008

IceTop InIce AMANDA 18 strings 13 Strings 19 Strings 2007-2008: 2006-2007: 13 Strings 2005-2006: 8 Strings 2004-2005 : 1 String IceTop Air shower detetor threshold ~ 300 TeV Total: 40 strings IC22 + AMANDA Physics Run: Ended March 2008 IC40 + AMANDA Physics Run: Started April 2008 InIce 70-80 Strings , 60 Optical Modules 17 m between Modules 125 m between Strings AMANDA 19 Strings 677 Modules See B. Fox talk

The IceCube Collaboration Bartol Research Inst, Univ of Delaware, USA Pennsylvania State University, USA University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA University of Wisconsin-River Falls, USA LBNL, Berkeley, USA UC Berkeley, USA UC Irvine, USA Clark-Atlanta University, USA Univ. of Maryland, USA University of Kansas, USA Southern Univ. and A&M College, Baton Rouge, LA, USA University of Alaska – Anchorage, USA Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ, USA Chiba University, Japan EPFL Lausanne Switzerland University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium Université de Mons-Hainaut, Belgium Universiteit Gent, Belgium Universität Mainz, Germany RWTH Aachen Universität, Germany Uppsala Universitet, Sweden Stockholms Universitet, Sweden University of Oxford, UK Universiteit Utrecht, Netherland DESY Zeuthen, Germany Universität Wuppertal, Germany Universität Dortmund, Germany Humboldt Universität, Germany MPIfK Heidelberg, Germany Amundsen-Scott Station, Antarctica

IceCube Structure Detector Components Detection Channels IceTop In-Ice Array AMANDA Detection Channels Muon Cascades Composite/Tau Physics Channels GRBs Diffuse Sources Point Sources Atmospheric Neutrinos WIMPs Supernova Cosmic Rays Exotic Particles Elisa Resconi

IceCube Structure Detector Components Detection Channels IceTop In-Ice Array AMANDA Detection Channels Muon Cascades Composite/Tau Physics Channels GRBs Diffuse Sources Point Sources Atmospheric Neutrinos WIMPs Supernova Cosmic Rays Exotic Particles Elisa Resconi

IceCube Structure Detector Components Detection Channels IceTop In-Ice Array AMANDA Detection Channels Muon Cascades Composite/Tau Physics Channels GRBs Diffuse Sources Point Sources Atmospheric Neutrinos WIMPs Supernova Cosmic Rays Exotic Particles Elisa Resconi

IceCube Structure Detector Components Detection Channels IceTop In-Ice Array AMANDA Detection Channels Muon Cascades Composite/Tau Physics Channels GRBs Diffuse Sources Point Sources Atmospheric Neutrinos WIMPs Supernova Cosmic Rays Exotic Particles Elisa Resconi

Muon Channel Observables Up-wards  AMANDA IceCube Arrival time ~ 5-7 nsec ~ 3 nsec Incoming direction 2° - 3° < 1° fov 2 fov 2 Estimated energy ± 0.5 order of magnitude Elisa Resconi

Muon Channel Atmospheric Neutrinos Ultimate Background: Systematics: reduce discrepancy among models - Extend the spectrum at low energies Signal: - Search for the prompt component - Testing alternative oscillation scenarious - Measurement of the energy IceCube Collaboration, astro-ph/0711.0353 Elisa Resconi

Muon Channel Diffuse Flux Multi-messenger argument Proton luminosity Upper bound HE  flux K. Mannheim, R.J. Protheroe, J. P. Rachen, Phys.Rev. D63 (2001) 023003 Cosmic Rays Neutrinos AMANDA-II 4 years IceCube 1 year MPR W&B Elisa Resconi

Muon Channel Diffuse Flux The IceCube Collaboration, arXiv:0705:1315. Elisa Resconi

Muon Channel Point Source & Sky-map: bin and un-binned method Source list Autocorrelation Time clusters Photons light curves Elisa Resconi

Detector Energy Window (TeV) Exposure Time (days) 24h 0h 15o 30o 45o 60o 75o -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 1997 1997-99 2000 2000-04 1997 2000 2004 AMANDA B10 AMANDA II Detector Energy Window (TeV) Exposure Time (days) Limit (TeV-1 cm-2 s-1) AMANDA-B10 (1997-99) ~1 – 1000 623 4.0·10-10 AMANDA-II (2000-04) 1.6 - 2600 Phys.Rev.D75:102001,2007 1001 5.5·10-11 (2005-06) 7.0·10-11

? Detector Energy Window (TeV) Exposure Time (days) 2007 2006 IceCube 9 strings IceCube 22 strings (+ AMANDA) Detector Energy Window (TeV) Exposure Time (days) Limit (L) Sensitivity (S) (TeV-1 cm-2 s-1) IC9 (2006) ~ 5 - 1000 137 1.2·10-10 (L) IC22 (2007) IC22 + AMANDA ~ 5 – 5000 ~ 0.5 - 10 240 ~10-11 (S) Only for specific scenarios IC80 ~ 5 - 5000 3 years 2·10-12 (S)

Muon Channel Point Source Multi-messenger argument Non-thermal activity Single source candidate Nr. Observed / Nr. expected Flux Upper Limit 10-7 GeV cm-2 s-1 32 sources pre-selected Active Galactic Nuclei Mkn 421 6 / 7.37 0.42 Mkn 501 8 / 6.39 0.85 1ES1959+650 5 / 4.77 0.78 3C273 8 / 4.72 1.00 M87 6 / 6.08 0.49 The IceCube coll., astro-ph/0611063 Elisa Resconi

X-ray Binary Systems SS433 4 / 6.14 0.27 LSI +61 303 5 / 4.81 0.74 Nr. Observed / Nr. expected Flux Upper Limit 10-7 GeV cm-2 s-1 32 sources pre-selected X-ray Binary Systems SS433 4 / 6.14 0.27 LSI +61 303 5 / 4.81 0.74 Cyg X-1 8 / 7.01 0.77 Cyg X-3 7 / 6.48 0.68 The IceCube coll., astro-ph/0611063 Elisa Resconi

Muon Channel Point Source Time Optimized Multi-messenger arguments Non-thermal activity Single source candidate Transient behavior Search for transient  Variability in astrophysics: an old problem a plethora of methods Elisa Resconi

Periodicity (multiwavelength) Active Galactic Nuclei Mkn 421 Mkn 501 1ES1959+650 X- and -rays 3C273 Radio and X-rays X-ray Binary Systems SS433 LSI +61 303 Cyg X-1 Cyg X-3 ….. Radio Periodicity (multiwavelength) Elisa Resconi

The hint: 1ES1959+650    Good X-g correlation X-ray: ASM, PCA    Good X-g correlation “orphan” flare: difficult to accommodate in leptonic models -ray: Whipple

Muon Channel WIMPs hep-ex/9804007

Muon Channel WIMPs Sun and Earth target Sun: signature for neutralino: low energy nearly horizontal tracks May – September period used for the Sun Analysis principles: - blindness: azimuth of the Sun blinded sequential reduction of atmospheric muons: muon group L2 Sample optimized for lower energies hypothesis test: Null Hp = no signal in the bin direction Sun

Muon Channel WIMPs T. Burgess, PhD thesis, Joakim et al. http://www.physto.se/~edsjo/darksusy)

IceCube Structure Detector Components Detection Channels IceTop In-Ice Array AMANDA Detection Channels Muon Cascades Composite/Tau Physics Channels GRBs Diffuse Sources Point Sources Atmospheric Neutrinos WIMPs Supernova Cosmic Rays Exotic Particles Elisa Resconi

Cascades Channel Observables AMANDA IceCube Arrival time ~ 5-7 nsec ~ 3 nsec Incoming direction ~ 30° fov 4 fov 4 Estimated energy 20 % 20 % Elisa Resconi

Cascade Channel Diffuse Flux IceCube Collaboration (O. Tarasova et al.) ICRC 2007 arXiv:0711.0353 [astro-ph] , pages 83-86. AMANDA 2000-2004 All the -track like are removed Energy Resolution: O(log(E))=0.18 Flux of atmospheric e <  preliminary All flavors upper limit: 90% = 3.9610-7(E/GeV) -2 (GeV sr s cm2)

Cascade Channel GRB Information from satellite: Multi-messenger arguments Example: Search for coincidences AMANDA-II / BATSE GRBs AMANDA 2000-2004 BATSE – AMANDA (Feb 13/2000- May 26/2000) Information from satellite: Start time of the burst Duration of the burst (T90) See A. Achterberg et al., ApJ 666:397, 2007 (astro-ph/0702265)

Cascade Channel GRB Strategy: AMANDA 2000-2004 Determine the detector stability using pre-burst and post-burst experimental data Selection criteria: - cascade hypothesis likelihood parameter - cascade hypothesis reconstructed cascade energy Search for statistical excess in the on-time experimental data (after unblinding) Likelihood parameter for cascade reconstruction Stability plot

Cascade Channel GRB Not mentioned in this talk: Sliding window (rolling) Single burst analysis All flavor GRBs limit from AMANDA-II

GRB, future effective area Preliminary

Future On-line Strategies IceCube Deep Core: low energy extension High Energy optimization Elisa Resconi

On-line Strategies Neutrino Trigger of Multi-wavelength Campaign Significant Neutrino Observation Elisa Resconi

Prototype-test already done! NToT 5. AMANDA – MAGIC Alerts sent Reaction within one day 27th September to 27th November 2006 ( E. Bernardini et al., astro-ph/0509396 ) Prototype-test already done! NToT (see E. Bernardini et al …) 5. Elisa Resconi

IceCube – ROTSE, optical follow-up for GRB and SN M. Kowalski, A. Mohr, astro-ph/0701618 IceCube Time Elisa Resconi

Towards Lower Energy (E < 1 TeV) G. Wikstrom 5 years 1- Indirect Dark Matter Search 2- Galactic Gamma-ray Sources 3- Atmospheric Neutrinos E. Akhmedov, M. Maltoni, A. Smirnov, hep-ph/0612285

Towards Lower Energy (E < 1 TeV) Olaf Schulz

Towards Lower Energy (E < 1 TeV) Preliminary design Towards Lower Energy (E < 1 TeV) Olaf Schulz

Towards Lower Energy (E < 1 TeV) Access the Southern Hemisphere    ACTIVE VETO Olaf Schulz

Towards Lower Energy (E < 1 TeV) Access the Southern Hemisphere G. Wikstrom 5 years Design study under going: Nr of strings 6 (or more) - 60 DOMs per string, position under study First strings for deep core next season Veto configuration able to reject 10^6 atmospheric muons Sensitivity for galactic sources, neutrino oscillation etc under way Olaf Schulz

Get better at the Highest Energies (E > 1 PeV) Preliminary design Olaf Schulz

Conclusions Past: AMANDA paved the way for IceCube Analysis structure, methods Best limits published since 1997 Present: Half of IceCube is in the ice Analysis running No significant hardware issues Future: get on-line, stretch the energy range Alert other instruments Access the lowest energies (IceCube Deep Core) Get better at higher energies