NATIONAL CORE INDICATORS FAMILY SURVEY RESULTS FY10-11

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Back to the Drawing Board Summary of the work of the Human Services Redesign Committee from May 2012 forward.
Advertisements

“Strategic Plan ( ) and Agency Accreditation”
What Working in the Community Means Employment and Outcomes for Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities from Across the United States Chas.
National Core Indicators Adult Family Survey Results Josh Engler, Human Services Research Institute
Developmental Disabilities Council Washington State Children’s CORE Indicators Review Panel Results October 2004.
It is the mission of Options and Advocacy to enhance and protect the lives of children and adults with disabilities. Options and Advocacy for McHenry County.
MODULE II 1 How are UCEDDs Connected?. Topics of Presentation 1. Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AIDD) 2. Association of.
State of Maine: Quality Management and National Core Indicators.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Understanding NCI Reports Sarah Taub NCI Webinar Series April 29 th, 2014 National Core Indicators (NCI)
NCI Survey Respondents Who Are Verbal and Non-Verbal: A Profile.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®
NATIONAL CORE INDICATORS ADULT CONSUMER SURVEY
N ATIONAL C ORE I NDICATORS : U SING D ATA TO M ANAGE P UBLIC S YSTEMS Valerie Bradley Human Services Research Institute Cambridge, Massachusetts People.
1 CT DDS Quality Service Review Connecticut Community Providers Association Presented by Fred Balicki, DDS Quality Management Services May 27, 2008.
The Quality Conundrum Achieving Safety, Health and Valued Outcomes.
NCI: A Growing Commitment Five Years of Performance Measurement 127 th Annual AAMR Meeting, Chicago, IL Val Bradley  Human Services Research Institute.
Profile of Caregivers AUCD Conference: November 17-20, 2013.
NCI-MAINE What is NCI?  NCI is a voluntary effort by public developmental disabilities agencies to measure and.
National Core Indicators Overview for the State of Maine Sarah Taub & Giusi Chiri Human Services Research Institute January 30, 2003.
Department of Health and Social Services Division of Developmental Disabilities Services Joint Finance Committee Hearing Fiscal Year 2014 Jane J. Gallivan.
Reinventing Quality Conference August 2004 Using NCI to Measure Performance at the Regional Center of Orange County LeeAnn Christian Regional Center of.
New Director Orientation Child Support Directors Association CSDA.
Roadmap to Change: Updating Maine’s Response to the Olmstead Decision Project Overview.
PARTICIPANT ADVISORY TEAM Raising the voice of the people.
Care Coordination for Children, Young Adults, and Their Families
State Steering Committee
Ontario Early Years Child and Family Centres Planning Guidelines
Building Our Plan Creating our Regional Action Plan
A Blueprint for Service Delivery
National Prevention Network Conference
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
Bruce Grey Child and Family Services
MAINSTREAMING OF WOMEN, CHILDREN AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES’ CONSIDERATIONS IN RELATION TO THE ENERGY SECTOR Presentation to the Joint Meeting of the.
Commit to Agency Mission and Values
Policy & Advocacy Platform April 24, 2017
The Early Childhood Family Engagement Framework: Maryland’s Vision for Engaging Families with Young Children Jeffrey Capizzano President Maryland State.
The Role of Support Coordinators on the Path to Competitive Employment
Independent Monitoring for Quality: An Evidence-Based Strategy for Building and Sustaining Effective Programs Guy Caruso and MaryJo Caruso 2011 National.
Legal Framework Common Law Health and Safety Legislation
Annual Meeting American Association of University Centers on Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Stephanie Giordano Valerie Bradley Alexandra Bonardi.
Everyday Lives: Values in Action Using IM4Q Data to Improve Statewide
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Opportunities for Growth
Impacting Public Policy: Role of the SRC
Utilizing Data for Real Quality of Life Improvement
The Arc of the District of Columbia, Inc.
Trends in Quality Assurance
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
The Role of Support Coordinators on the Path to Competitive Employment
Inland Regional Center 2018 Performance Contract Plan
Vanier Children’s Services Strategic Plan
The Office of Residential Child Care (ORCC) and Office of Provider Management (OPM) Standardization Project Presenters: LaMarva E. Ivory, ORCC Director.
Office of Developmental Programs IM4Q Annual Training Quality Management Updates July 28, /18/2018.
Val Bradley and Sarah Taub Human Services Research Institute
Nebraska’s National Core Indicators Project: A Partnership Between DHHS-DD Services and the Nebraska UCEDD NCI Annual Meeting August 1, 2018 Brad Wilson,
National Core Indicators
Data on Child and Family Outcomes: Tools for Improving State Systems
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
What Do People Tell Us About the Quality of Their Supports?
Gem Complete Health Services
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
Service Array Assessment and Planning Purposes
A Focus on Strategic vs. Tactical Action for Boards
Quality Early Childhood Care and Development:
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
Regional Center of Orange County 2011 Performance Contract
Quality Framework Overview
Presentation transcript:

NATIONAL CORE INDICATORS FAMILY SURVEY RESULTS FY10-11 Presented to the Regional Center of Orange County Board of Directors October 3, 2013 by LeeAnn Christian

The Essence of the Board’s Role To ensure that RCOC is fulfilling its mission How do you know? If RCOC is financially accountable? If RCOC is in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements? If RCOC is truly meeting the needs of the people you serve?

What is National Core Indicators? NCI is a voluntary effort by public developmental disabilities agencies to measure and track performance Collaboration began in 1997 Currently 38 states and Washington, D.C. Coordinated by HSRI and NASDDDS Human Services Research Institute National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services

What is an “Indicator”? Indicators are standard measures used across states to assess the outcomes of services provided to individuals and families Indicators address key areas of concern including employment, rights, service planning, community inclusion, choice, health, wellness and safety

Health, Welfare, & Rights NCI Framework Individual Outcomes Employment Choice & Decision-Making Relationships Community Participation Family Indicators Information & Planning Access to Supports Community Connections Choice & Control Health, Welfare, & Rights Health & Wellness Safety Respect & Rights System Performance Service Coordination Incidents & Mortality Staff Turnover

What are the Data Sources? Family Surveys Paper/pencil mail-in surveys Adult children living at home Adult children living away from home Minor children living at home Consumer Survey Face-to-face interviews Adults 18+ years

Accountability through NCI Measures strategic goal achievement Responds in ways that communicate system values Enhances transparency of the agency’s performance Involves and gives voice to individuals and families in the conversation about quality and outcomes

Family Survey Results Fiscal Year 2011 Adult Family Surveys (AFS) – at home Statewide – 4014 surveys completed RCOC – 186 surveys completed Guardian Family Surveys (GFS) – away from home Statewide – 4096 surveys completed RCOC – 256 surveys completed

Characteristics of Family Members Adult Family (at home) Family Guardian (away from home) Gender 53% male 62% male Average Age 32 41 Disability   Autism 22% 21% Cerebral Palsy 18% 15% Intellectual Disability 67% 74% Seizure Disorder 26% Race/Ethnicity Asian 6% Hispanic 29% 4% White 44% 83% Primary Language – English 64% 95%

Characteristics of Survey Respondents Adult Family (at home) Family Guardian (away from home) Age   54 and under 46% 16% 55 and over 54% 84% Relationship Parent 90% 85% Legal Guardian 58% 53% Visits with Family Member 3 or less times year n/a 14% 4 to 12 times per year More than 12 times per year 70%

INFORMATION & PLANNING Families/family members with disabilities have the information and support necessary to plan for their services and supports

ACCESS & SUPPORT DELIVERY Families/family members with disabilities get the services and supports they need

COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS Family members with disabilities use integrated community services and participate in everyday community activities

SATISFACTION & OUTCOMES Families/family members with disabilities receive adequate and satisfactory services and supports Individual and family supports make a positive difference in the lives of families

Summary of RCOC Family Surveys Generally in-line with CA averages Areas of Strength Satisfaction with services/supports received Service coordinators are knowledgeable and courteous Services are respectful of family’s culture Possible Focus Areas Consumer helping develop IPP Educating families about complaint and abuse/ neglect reporting processes

Moving Forward Further analyze NCI results and look at other data that may provide additional insight Present NCI results to various audiences, e.g., RCOC staff, Consumer Advisory Committee, Vendor Advisory Committee, at a Board meeting Form Ad Hoc Advisory Council to review Family Survey results Target areas for improvement and suggest strategies to impact change