Travis Hansen, Marek Szczepanczyk, Michele Zanolin

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
S3/S4 BBH report Thomas Cokelaer LSC Meeting, Boston, 3-4 June 2006.
Advertisements

A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
GWDAW9 – Annecy December 15-18, 2004 A. Di Credico Syracuse University LIGO-G Z 1 Gravitational wave burst vetoes in the LIGO S2 and S3 data analyses.
AURIGA-LIGO Activity F. Salemi Italy, INFN and University of Ferrara for the LIGO-AURIGA JWG 2nd ILIAS-GW Meeting, October 24th and 25th, Palma de Mallorca,
LIGO-G Z Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates Laura Cadonati Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
G Z April 2007 APS Meeting - DAP GGR Gravitational Wave AstronomyKeith Thorne Coincidence-based LIGO GW Burst Searches and Astrophysical Interpretation.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
Adapting matched filtering searches for compact binary inspirals in LSC detector data. Chad Hanna – For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
The Role of Data Quality in S5 Burst Analyses Lindy Blackburn 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
LIGO-G M GWDAW, December LIGO Burst Search Analysis Laura Cadonati, Erik Katsavounidis LIGO-MIT.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
GRBs & VIRGO C7 run Alessandra Corsi & E. Cuoco, F. Ricci.
S.Klimenko, December 2003, GWDAW Performance of the WaveBurst algorithm on LIGO S2 playground data S.Klimenko (UF), I.Yakushin (LLO), G.Mitselmakher (UF),
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
Energy Peter Shawhan GWPAW PPT February 2011 ~10 46 Joules ~2.4x10 31 Megatons ~10 16 times the annual output of the sun.
Yousuke Itoh GWDAW8 UW Milwaukee USA December 2003 A large value of the detection statistic indicates a candidate signal at the frequency and.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
S.Klimenko, August 2003, Hannover LIGO-G Z How optimal are wavelet TF methods? S.Klimenko l Introduction l Time-Frequency analysis l Comparison.
1 Laura Cadonati, MIT For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS meeting Tampa, FL April 16, 2005 LIGO Hanford ObservatoryLIGO Livingston Observatory New.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.
Non-Parametric Distributional Tests for Gravitational Wave Transient Event Detection Yeming Shi 1, Erik Katsavounidis 1, Michele Zanolin 2 1 Massachusetts.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
LIGO-G v2 The Search For Continuous Gravitational Waves Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory on behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration The.
Searching for Binary Black Holes with Spin Aligned with Orbital Angular Momentum 1 Deborah L. Hamm – Northern Arizona University LIGO SURF 2013 Mentors:
GWDAW10, UTB, Dec , Search for inspiraling neutron star binaries using TAMA300 data Hideyuki Tagoshi on behalf of the TAMA collaboration.
LIGO-G Z Confidence Test for Waveform Consistency of LIGO Burst Candidate Events Laura Cadonati LIGO Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
S.Klimenko, December 2003, GWDAW Burst detection method in wavelet domain (WaveBurst) S.Klimenko, G.Mitselmakher University of Florida l Wavelets l Time-Frequency.
LIGO-G Z Upper Limits from LIGO and TAMA on Gravitational-Wave Bursts Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech for the LIGO and TAMA Collaborations.
LIGO-G All-Sky Burst Search in the First Year of the LSC S5 Run Laura Cadonati, UMass Amherst For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW Meeting,
LIGO-G Z Status of the LIGO-TAMA Joint Bursts Search Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
LIGO-G Z TFClusters Tuning for the LIGO-TAMA Search Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.
Status of the LIGO-AURIGA Joint Burst Analysis F. Salemi Italy, INFN and University of Ferrara on behalf of the AURIGA Collaboration and the LIGO Scientific.
Igor Yakushin, December 2004, GWDAW-9 LIGO-G Z Status of the untriggered burst search in S3 LIGO data Igor Yakushin (LIGO Livingston Observatory)
A Proposed Collaboration Between LIGO-Virgo and Swift to Improve the Chances to Detect Gravitational Waves from Core Collapse Supernovae Kiranjyot (Jasmine)
LIGO- G Z 11/13/2003LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 BlockNormal Performance Studies John McNabb & Keith Thorne, for the Penn State University.
LIGO-G Z Status of the LIGO-TAMA Joint Bursts Search Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
The first AURIGA-TAMA joint analysis proposal BAGGIO Lucio ICRR, University of Tokyo A Memorandum of Understanding between the AURIGA experiment and the.
Status of AURIGA AURIGA Sept 21 st 2005 Massimo Cerdonio INFN Section and Department of Physics University of Padova,
Steering Astronomy Toward Gravitational Wave-Supernova Science Kiranjyot (Jasmine) Gill, 1 Dr. Michele Zanolin 1 With support from Marek Szczepanczyk 1.
Abstract: We completed the tuning of the analysis procedures of the AURIGA-LIGO joint burst search and we are in the process of verifying our results.
24 th Pacific Coast Gravity Meeting, Santa Barbara LIGO DCC Number: G Z 1 Search for gravitational waves from inspiraling high-mass (non-spinning)
LIGO-G Z Results from LIGO Observations Stephen Fairhurst University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Search for gravitational waves from binary inspirals in S3 and S4 LIGO data. Thomas Cokelaer on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Search for compact binary systems in LIGO data Thomas Cokelaer On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. LIGO-G Z.
Thomas Cokelaer for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. APS April Meeting, Jacksonville, FL 16 April 2007, LIGO-G Z Search.
Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi
SC03 failed results delayed FDS: parameter space searches
Brennan Hughey MIT Kavli Institute Postdoc Symposium
Detecting a Galactic Supernova with H2 or GEO
Detecting a Galactic Supernova with H2 or GEO
All-Sky Burst Searches for Gravitational Waves at High Frequencies
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Coherent wide parameter space searches for gravitational waves from neutron stars using LIGO S2 data Xavier Siemens, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Igor Yakushin, LIGO Livingston Observatory
LIGO Scientific Collaboration meeting
GW150914: The first direct detection of gravitational waves
(Y. Itoh, M.A.Papa,B.Krishnan-AEI, X. Siemens –UWM
Coherent detection and reconstruction
Maria Principe University of Sannio, Benevento, Italy
Search for gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers:
OK Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University
Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates
A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data
Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis
Performance of the WaveBurst algorithm on LIGO S2 playground data
Distributional Tests for Supernova Searches
Presentation transcript:

Exploring Parameters For Detecting Supernovae Using A Single Interferometer Travis Hansen, Marek Szczepanczyk, Michele Zanolin Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Supernova: An Exploding Star Understand physics in extreme environments ❖ High densities ❖ High temperatures ❖ Formation of Black Holes ❖ Neutrino emissions ❖ Shock revival mechanism Galactic SN can happen anytime!

Detecting Gravitational Waves With LIGO

How We Detect These Signals Standard Method: Looking for coincidence between two different detectors. Identifying gravitational wave candidates based on excess energy.

Possible Scenarios of Detector Networks 1 2 3 H1 L1 No detection possible (no data) Single detector operational (no method developed) *<-Area of my research* 3. Two detectors operational (standard method that allowed for the first gravitational wave detection)

Noise vs. Reconstructed SN Waveforms Red: Reconstructed waveforms Blue: Noise Parameters: rho[0] - Ranking statistics, effectively SNR duration[1] - Difference between event stop and start frequency[0] - Central frequencies of the event computed from the reconstructed waveform

Noise vs. Reconstructed Based on these plots an efficient way of removing loud background events is to use: • dominant frequency: frequency[0] > 420 Hz • duration: duration[1] < 5s

Noise Distribution and Waveform Detectability Larger Reduction of Noise After selection cuts we can see that the False Alarm Rate (FAR) was reduced (left plot) while not changing and slightly improving detector efficiency (right plot)

More Waveforms To Look At

Initial studies look promising, but more work to come! Future Direction Initial studies look promising, but more work to come! ✓ * study rec vs inj SNR, the quality of reconstruction ◦ * study possibility to claim 3 sigma or 5 sigma detection confidence with single IFO ◦ * comparison with two detector network: ◦ * noise trigger distributions ◦ * reconstructed SN waveforms ✓ * minimum detectable SNR ✓ * study SNR distribution for different morphologies ◦ * comparison of noise distributions between L1L1, H1H1 and V1V1 ◦ * can we claim the detection with GEO? ◦ * comparison of the non-clean and clean data ◦ * identifying origins of the loudest noise triggers ◦ * study the impact of environmental noise on single IFO triggers ◦ * study why the data quality files do not remove loudest events ◦ * creating a special veto for single IFO ◦ * is there a possibility of tuning single detector to maximize chance of a detection? ◦ * repeat the analysis with the O3 SN set of waveforms (future)