Panel Members Margaret Plane, City Attorney for Salt Lake City

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Public Records Act -R.C  …To be interpreted liberally to facilitate broader access  …Exceptions to be strictly interpreted in favor of disclosure.
Advertisements

Confidentiality and HIPAA
Through 2008 Season Barry Bonds 762 Home Runs Roger Clemens 354 Wins Alex Rodriguez 553 Home Runs.
Suing the Federal Government. 2 History Traditional Sovereign Immunity US Constitution "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence.
The Public Records Act The Public Records Act W.S et. seq.
© Copyright 2013 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved. Presented to the Commerce and Industry Association of New Jersey New Jersey’s Pay-to-Play Law July.
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association December 9, 2005 (revised January 4, 2006)
Newsgathering: Access to Meetings & Records. Access and the First Amendment How has the U.S. Supreme Court responded to claims that the First Amendment.
By Bob Bass Allison, Bass & Associates, LLP
Privacy Law for Network Administrators Steven Penney Faculty of Law University of New Brunswick.
Confidentiality, Consents and Disclosure Recent Legal Changes and Current Issues Presented by Pam Beach, Attorney at Law.
2010 Florida Building Code: I nterpretation P rocess O verview.
IN-CAMERA TRIALS PRESENTED BY CLLR. FELICIA V. COLEMAN CHIEF PROSECUTOR/SGBVCU MINISTRY OF JUSTICE.
OPEN MEETINGS ACT General Provisions Article, Sections through 3-501, Annotated Code of Maryland 1.
Indiana’s Public Access Laws Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Columbus Police Department August 18, 2009.
When Can You Redact Information Without Requesting an Attorney General Decision? Karen Hattaway Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division Views.
Government Data Practices and the Open Meeting Law August 2014.
Data Practices in Minnesota December Outline for this presentation Minnesota data practices laws Classification of government data Government entity.
Elected Officials and Health Department Records Indiana Public Health Foundation February 27, 2008.
Indiana’s Access to Public Records Act Heather Willis Neal Public Access Counselor Brownsburg Police Department Brownsburg Police Department February 26,
Indiana’s Public Access Laws Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Indiana Association of Cities and Towns Red Flag and Sunshine Workshop.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 11. Learning Objectives 11.1 Identify the sources of Texas law. 11.2Compare the functions of all participants in the justice.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures.
STATE BAR OF TEXAS JULY 25, 2016 Section Chairs and Treasurers.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidentiality of Records and Interagency Sharing of Educational Records.
HIPAA Training Workshop #3 Individual Rights Kaye L. Rankin Rankin Healthcare Consultants, Inc.
CHAPTER 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution
DOL Employee Benefit Plan Audits & How to Prepare
Teresa Brown Open Records Supervisor Plano Police Department
Intro to Virginia’s Judicial System
Body-Worn Cameras and the Right to Privacy
Public Utility Commission CLE June 1, 2017
New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission
Ian Marquand Montana Board of Medical Examiners
Utah’s Open Meetings Act
Mason County School District
Florida’s Sunshine Law Public Meetings
Chapter 3 Administrative Law Chapter 3: Administrative Law.
Complying with Maryland’s Open Meetings Act
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Good Governance Act
The State of the TPRA (Recent updates)
Discretionary Transfer of Cases to Tribal Court
Wyoming Statutes §§ through
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association
PUBLIC RECORDS OVERVIEW: July 29, 2017
HIPAA and 42 C.F.R. Part 2 Confidentiality
Article III of the Constitution The Courts
NAVAJO LAW SEMINAR October 14, 2016
HIPAA Pros - Disclosures
Pennsylvania Economic Development Institute November 1, 2016
Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures
Army FOIA/Privacy/Records Management Course
GRAMA Issues. GRAMA Should Not Involve “Adversarial Combat,” But What Happens When It Does?
LEGAL OVERVIEW Board Governance
Missouri Association of Rural Education
Intergovernmental Affairs
Existing Law: Sanctuary Cities Banned In South Carolina
Mini-Briefing on Recent Legislation Affecting Law Enforcement Agencies (SB 1421 and AB 748) Michele Beal Bagneris, City Attorney/City Prosecutor Javan.
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
Internal Investigations For Small Police and Fire Departments
The Office of Open Records webinar will begin soon
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
DFS Contested Case Hearing Process
Newport Flood Emergency Legal Issues
Student Data Privacy: National Trends and Wyoming’s Role
Article III of the Constitution The Courts
LEGAL OVERVIEW Board Governance
Nebraska Supreme Court rules on interpreters Additions & Amendments
Florida’s Sunshine Law and the Council & Boards
Florida Courts Scavenger Hunt
Presentation transcript:

GRAMA Should Not Involve “Adversarial Combat,” But What Happens When It Does?

Panel Members Margaret Plane, City Attorney for Salt Lake City Mark Kittrell, Senior City Attorney for Salt Lake City Mara Brown, Deputy City Attorney for Ogden City

Alternative Titles We Considered . . .

Fight Club: What You Need to Know When Litigating GRAMA

GRAMA Strategies: Picking Your Hill to Die On

GRAMA Issues

Fees

Utah Code § 63G-2-203(1) A governmental entity may charge a reasonable fee to cover the governmental entity’s actual cost of providing a record.

Total Fees Charged Total Fees Waived Assigned Department $321.55 $21.08 Attorney Total $0.00 City Council Total $1,840.66 $509.46 Community & Neighborhood Development Total Economic Development Total $85.25 $8.25 Finance Total $2,152.75 $5.50 Fire Total $46.75 $13.75 Human Resources Total $48.00 Information Management Services Total $4.50 $5.25 Justice Court Total $22.00 $44.00 Mayor's Office Total $70,882.48 $722.97 Police Total $30.25 Public Services Total $517.00 $208.45 Public Utilities Total Redevelopment Total $2.75 Site Administrator Total $3,920.18 $66.00 SLC Department of Airports Total $79,931.87 $1,643.21 Grand Total

GRAMA Requests Increasing Annually Most Governmental Entities spend an average of 260 minutes per day fulfilling records requests, That’s nearly four-and-a-half hours per day.

2017 GRAMA Requests

Pending Fee Waiver Case Salt Lake City Corporation v. Jordan River Restoration Network

Salt Lake City Corporation v. Jordan River Restoration Network

Salt Lake City Corporation v. Jordan River Restoration Network

Utah Code § 63G-2-203(4) A governmental entity may fulfill a record request without charge and is encouraged to do so if it determines that . . . releasing the record primarily benefits the public rather than a person.

Fee Waiver Procedure

Burden on the Requester: The release primarily benefits the public; and The factors weigh in favor of the waiver.

Other Determining Factors Reasonably focused? Contribution to public discussion? Impact on other City responsibilities? Received other fee waivers?

Privilege & Work Product

“records that are subject to the attorney- client privilege” Utah Code § 63G-2-305(17) “records that are subject to the attorney- client privilege”

Utah Code § 63G-2-305(18) “records prepared for or by an attorney, consultant, surety, indemnitor, insurer, employee, or agent of a governmental entity for, or in anticipation of, litigation or judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative proceeding”

Schroeder v. Utah Attorney General’s Office

Schroeder v. Utah Attorney General’s Office Allegations that mayor’s office was involved in diverting funds to an unregistered shell organization, that then gave the funds to his re- election campaign.

Public Interest Public interest in records that may document: A breach of the public trust; Solicitation of donations under false pretenses; and Misuse of donations for political purposes.

Watch the timing: request made one day after case closed.

Supreme Court rules four years later Supreme Court rules four years later . . . by that time, any interest in protecting the records had significantly diminished!

Pending Public Interest Case Utah Legal Clinic v. Salt Lake City Corporation

Utah Legal Clinic v. Salt Lake City Corporation One issue appeal: whether the district court abused its discretion when it held that the City’s interest in protecting the records from disclosure outweighed the asserted public interest in disclosure.

Utah Legal Clinic v. Salt Lake City Corporation

Police Body Cam Recordings

Police Body Cam Recordings GRAMA governs the release of body cam recordings Utah Code 77-7a-107(2)(a) Any release of recordings made by an officer while on duty or acting in the officer's official capacity as a law enforcement officer shall be subject to Title 63G, Chapter 2, Government Records Access and Management Act

Police Body Cam Recordings GRAMA makes private certain body cam recordings (Utah Code 63G- 2-302(2)(g)) private and not private: audio and video recordings created by a body-worn camera, as defined in Section 77-7a-103, that record sound or images inside a home or residence are private, except for recordings that: (i) depict the commission of an alleged crime; (ii) record any encounter between a law enforcement officer and a person that results in death or bodily injury, or includes an instance when an officer fires a weapon; (iii) record any encounter that is the subject of a complaint or a legal proceeding against a law enforcement officer or law enforcement agency; (iv) contain an officer involved critical incident as defined in Section 76-2- 408(1)(d); or (v) have been requested for reclassification as a public record by a subject or authorized agent of a subject featured in the recording

Police Body Cam Recordings Title 77, Chapter 7a contains additional requirements for the use of police body cameras 77-7a-102: Requires written policies and procedures 77-7a-103: Definitions (“Law Enforcement Encounter”) 77-7a-104: Mandates when to activate (and when not to activate) 77-7a-105: Giving notice 77-7a-106: Prohibited uses

Police Body Cam Recordings 77-7a-107: Retention and Release of Recordings (1) Any recording made by an officer while on duty or acting in the officer's official capacity as a law enforcement officer shall be retained in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local laws. (2) (a) Any release of recordings made by an officer while on duty or acting in the officer's official capacity as a law enforcement officer shall be subject to Title 63G, Chapter 2, Government Records Access and Management Act. (b) Notwithstanding any other provision in state or local law, a person who requests access to the recordings may immediately appeal to a district court, as provided in Section 63G-2-404, any denial of access to a recording based solely on Subsection 63G-2- 305(10)(b) or (c) due to a pending criminal action that has been filed in a court of competent jurisdiction.

Police Body Cam Recordings HB 265 amends subsection 107 to address concerns with third party vendors who store body cam recordings It prohibits contracts with third party providers who may withhold recordings or prevent access to such recordings

Police Body Cam Recordings Issues and Challenges Record that captures some of the most dynamic encounters with members of the public Captures members of the public in some of their most private moments Captures additional images that should not be public (juveniles, discussions about DOBs or social security numbers, nudity, etc.) Requires time-intensive redaction Critical Incidents – tug and pull with investigative agencies

Police Body Cam Recordings Need Fees to adequately address the level of resources used to produce body cam recordings Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule

Police Body Cam Recordings ACLU v. Salt Lake County District Attorney, et al.

Police Body Cam Recordings State Records Committee Decision 2017-02 (January 24, 2017) (https://archives.utah.gov/src/srcappeal-2017- 02.html) Numerous court decisions finding that any concerns about fair trial issues could be remedied through voir dire or venue change City had issued the written findings of the CRB that described footage in the body cam recordings SRC found that “even if the records had been properly classified by Respondents as protected records, the public interest favoring access to the records is greater than the interest favoring restriction to access.”  Takeaway? Only in extraordinary circumstances will the SRC uphold restrictions to access in body cam recordings of OICIs

Executive Order on Release of Body Cam Recordings in OICIs

Executive Order

Executive Order - Release Press Briefing No Q&A Factual Statements regarding the call and the facts known to officers on scene Timeline backed up by dispatch records and body cam recordings Set context before showing video No or minimal redactions Show video to family before it goes public https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqs13omgW5A

State Records Committee – Practice Tips Tip #1 – Use the Ombudsman (if it makes sense)

State Records Committee – Practice Tips Tip #2 – Use Declarations

State Records Committee – Practice Tips Tip #3 – Be brief in your presentation