Academic Honor Policy Dr. Jennifer Buchanan Associate Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY STUDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES August 20, 2014 Material developed by Tim Korb, Peter Hirst, and Jeff Stefancic.
Advertisements

Academic Integrity: A Guide for Instructors Presenters: Christy D. Moran, Ph.D. Assistant Dean of Students Tine Reimers, Director CETaL.
Bell Work In the top right-hand corner of a sheet of notebook paper, write your first and last name, today’s date, the class period, and the title “Bell.
Mitigating Cheating A Cliff’s Notes version. What is cheating? The expectations change Faculty vs. Students vs. administration.
The Aggie Code of Honor and the Aggie Honor System Office
Steps you need to know to effectively bring course changes to the Curriculum Committee.
Assessment in Online Courses: Practical Examples Ms. Darla Runyon Dr. Roger Von Holzen Northwest Missouri State University.
BA 378: Accounting Information Systems Instructor: Dr. James R. Coakley.
“So You’re Taking AP?” Date: May 27 th, Advanced Placement Program (AP) courses are college-level courses offered in high school. AP courses reflect.
Dr. Jennifer Buchanan Assistant Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement Academic Honor Policy.
COURSE ADDITION CATALOG DESCRIPTION To include credit hours, type of course, term(s) offered, prerequisites and/or restrictions. (75 words maximum.) 4/1/091Course.
UNC ONLINE OVERVIEW Faculty Assembly – 3/25/2011.
Academic Integrity. What is integrity? What do you think “academic integrity” means?
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
Online Class Expectations CSP Kathryn Baker – Instructor Summer 2013.
Material developed by Tim Korb, Peter Hirst, and Jeff Stefancic
Academic Integrity at IU Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Conduct.
Academic Integrity at Brandeis Erika Lamarre Director of Academic Integrity The policies Education and Prevention Reporting an incident.
UH - Downtown. Our Journey…Our Goals  Evaluate course management systems  Raise standards and expectations  Provide consistency for both faculty and.
Academic Integrity Academic integrity means honesty and responsibility in scholarship. Students and faculty alike must obey rules of honest scholarship,
Academic Integrity and Non-Academic Student Misconduct Gabriel A. Slifka, Director Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities.
Academic Washington State University Adam Jussel Director Office of Student Standards & Accountability.
Turnitin Simon Pinter Faculty Technology Services.
The Chattahoochee Way Academic Integrity (Don’t cheat.)
Academic Integrity: Processes & Expectations at the College Level Andrea Goodwin Associate Director, Office of Student Conduct University of Maryland Diane.
Academic Integrity: Processes & Expectations at the College Level Dr. Andrea Goodwin Associate Director, Office of Student Conduct University of Maryland.
Testing Engine Saint Leo University Center for Online Learning Dr. Deborah Pendarvis Saint Leo University.
Office of Faculty Development and Advancement Janet Kistner Interim Vice President.
Undergraduate Programs Spring Enrollment Spring 2007Spring 2008 Turfgrass Mgmt.2831 Water & Soil Resources/Environmental Soil Science 2421 Environmental.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY VIOLATIONS OFFENSES, PENALTIES, AND PROCEDURES.
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System Jennifer N. Buchanan, Ph.D. Assistant Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement.
ACADEMIC HONOR POLICY AND GRADE APPEALS SYSTEM Jennifer N. Buchanan, Ph.D. Assistant Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement Jennifer N.
1 ACADEMIC SENATE POLICY ON ACADEMIC DISHONESTY History: Approved by the Academic Senate, 2/16/88 Approved.
Melissa Gunby January Quarter. Food and DrinkProfessional Behavior  Heald College has a policy of no food or drink in the classroom, other than bottled.
ICS 151 Digital Logic Design Spring 2004 Administrative Issues.
Academic Honor Policy Survey Results Amy Guerette, Jennifer Buchanan and Ann DelRossi On behalf of the Academic Honor Policy Committee.
Sources for definitions and explanations of the term plagiarism and the consequences of plagiarism: I.Class Syllabus, p. 3 “Academic Dishonesty” II. Student.
Academic Dishonesty One way to help understand just what constitutes academic dishonesty is to look at what another institution has formalized. The material.
Date: September 7, 2016 Aim #1: What is expected of me during a typical daily lesson? HW: 1)Have course outline completed and signed by parent/guardian.
Academic Integrity at IU Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Conduct.
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System Ann DelRossi, Academic Affairs Administrator Office of the Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement.
The University of Arizona
Criteria Rollout Meeting October 30, 2016
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System
Academic integrity Forum and Discussion
IE102 A Process Outlook for Industrial Engineering
Faculty of Science and Engineering
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System
An Introduction to the Graduate Writing Center (GWC) Academic Support Programs Academic Support Programs, Campus Center
Southeast Region OCTANE 2.0 Call
Introduction to Important Academic Policies-
Office of Accessibility The University of Akron
Avoiding Academic Misconduct
Cheating in Online Classes: How Concerned Should We Be?
College of Engineering
CLAS Teaching Policies and Procedures
Informatics 291s Literature Survey in Software Engineering
MA Fall 2016 Instructor: Matt Weaver Office: MATH 615
Academic Integrity Student Guide
Office of Faculty Development and Advancement
Academic integrity Collaboration
Student Learning Assessment (SLA)
Course Overview CSE5319/7319 Software Architecture and Design
Using Assessment Data to Enhance Teaching and Support Student Success
How do we Maintain Academic Integrity in Advanced classes at THS?
Course Overview CSE 8340 Advanced Software Engineering Topics: Software Engineering Economics & Processes Spring 2019 Dr. LiGuo Huang Dept. of Computer.
What Students Expect from Their Professors
Florida State University New Faculty Orientation 2019
Using AIM (for Instructors)
Academic Honesty: Plagiarism Primer
Presentation transcript:

Academic Honor Policy Dr. Jennifer Buchanan Associate Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement

Office of Faculty Development and Advancement http://fda.fsu.edu

Cases and Outcomes

Florida State University Academic Honor Policy

Gray Areas and Instructor Responsibility to Clarify Note: Instructors are responsible for reinforcing the importance of the Academic Honor Policy in their courses and for clarifying their expectations regarding collaboration and multiple submission of academic work.

Unauthorized Group Work UNAUTHORIZED GROUP WORK. Unauthorized collaborating with others. Typical Examples Include: Working with another person or persons on any activity that is intended to be individual work, where such collaboration has not been specifically authorized by the instructor. 2015 survey results identify as the behavior that students are most likely to enact and as one that isn’t viewed as cheating.

Multiple Submission MULTIPLE SUBMISSION. Submitting the same academic work (including oral presentations) for credit more than once without instructor permission. It is each instructor’s responsibility to make expectations regarding incorporation of existing academic work into new assignments clear to the student in writing by the time assignments are given. Typical Examples Include: Submitting the same paper for credit in two courses without instructor permission; making minor revisions in a credited paper or report (including oral presentations) and submitting it again as if it were new work.

Facebook Issues Recently, instructors have discovered instances of students creating course-based Facebook groups and using them to collaborate on homework and/or quizzes. If you assign individual work outside of class, please articulate your policy regarding collaboration clearly and be explicit about how it applies to study groups on Facebook and elsewhere online. For more information, see: http://fda.fsu.edu/Academics/Academic-Honor- Policy. 2015 Survey Results

Online Testing Issues 2015 Survey Results – frequency of reported cheating behaviors (from an average of 5% across all f-t-f exams to 22% collaborating with others, 25% getting unauthorized help, and 62-65% consulting unauthorized materials). Resources – Testing Center offers proctored services to students who are both on and off campus: https://distance.fsu.edu/students/distance-learning- exams. Support for online course development from ODL at: https://distance.fsu.edu/

Resources http://fda.fsu.edu/Academics/Academic-Honor- Policy http://facsenate.fsu.edu/Curriculum-Forms Ann DelRossi at: adelrossi@admin.fsu.edu or 644- 6876 Ameko Dillard (adillard@admin.fsu.edu) Melissa Crawford (mucrawford@admin.fsu.edu)