LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF DAMPING PARAMETERS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Linear Inverse Problems
Advertisements

Generalised Inverses Modal Analysis and Modal Testing S. Ziaei Rad.
MDOF SYSTEMS WITH DAMPING General case Saeed Ziaei Rad.
Isfahan University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering May 7 th 2011 Course Instructor: Dr. S. Ziaei Rad Mode Indicator Functions.
Vibration-based Structural Health Monitoring. Vibration-based SHM Principle of Operation: Damage can be considered as a modification of physical parameters.
Multi-degree-of-freedom System Shock Response Spectrum
Nazgol Haghighat Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ir. Daniel J. Rixen
Modal Parameter Extraction Methods
Fundamentals of Linear Vibrations
Comparison of Test and Analysis Modal Analysis and Testing S. Ziaei-Rad.
Modal Testing and Analysis
1 Residual Vectors & Error Estimation in Substructure based Model Reduction - A PPLICATION TO WIND TURBINE ENGINEERING - MSc. Presentation Bas Nortier.
1 HOMEWORK 1 1.Derive equation of motion of SDOF using energy method 2.Find amplitude A and tanΦ for given x 0, v 0 3.Find natural frequency of cantilever,
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
On the Accuracy of Modal Parameters Identified from Exponentially Windowed, Noise Contaminated Impulse Responses for a System with a Large Range of Decay.
Basic structural dynamics II
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS
Formulation of a complete structural uncertainty model for robust flutter prediction Brian Danowsky Staff Engineer, Research Systems Technology, Inc.,
A Shaft Sensorless Control for PMSM Using Direct Neural Network Adaptive Observer Authors: Guo Qingding Luo Ruifu Wang Limei IEEE IECON 22 nd International.
Yeong-Jong Moon*: Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Kang-Min Choi: Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Hyun-Woo Lim: Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Jong-Heon Lee:
Identification of Eighteen Flutter Derivatives Arindam Gan Chowdhury a and Partha P. Sarkar b a Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Aerospace Engineering,
1 Final Conference, 19th – 23rd January 2015 Geneva, Switzerland RP 15 Force estimation based on proprioceptive sensors for teleoperation in radioactive.
Test Planning Modal Analysis and Testing S. Ziaei-Rad.
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 06 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Chapter 7. Free and Forced Response of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Linear Systems 7.1 Introduction Vibration: System oscillates about a certain equilibrium.
Progress in identification of damping: Energy-based method with incomplete and noisy data Marco Prandina University of Liverpool.
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 03 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
Hong-Ki Jo 1), Man-Gi Ko 2) and * In-Won Lee 3) 1) Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, KAIST 2) Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kongju.
MA402 Mathematics for Mechanical Engineering
NCAF Manchester July 2000 Graham Hesketh Information Engineering Group Rolls-Royce Strategic Research Centre.
Yeong-Jong Moon 1), Jong-Heon Lee 2) and In-Won Lee 3) 1) Graduate Student, Department of Civil Engineering, KAIST 2) Professor, Department of Civil Engineering,
, Free vibration Eigenvalue equation EIGENVALUE EQUATION
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) Jürgen Pfingstner Adaptive control scheme for the main linac of CLIC Jürgen Pfingstner 21 th of October.
Dynamics Primer Lectures Dermot O’Dwyer. Objectives Need some theory to inderstand general dynamics Need more theory understand the implementation of.
The Mechanical Simulation Engine library An Introduction and a Tutorial G. Cella.
ROBOTICS 01PEEQW Basilio Bona DAUIN – Politecnico di Torino.
Mode Superposition Module 7. Training Manual January 30, 2001 Inventory # Module 7 Mode Superposition A. Define mode superposition. B. Learn.
Computacion Inteligente Least-Square Methods for System Identification.
AAE556 Lectures 34,35 The p-k method, a modern alternative to V-g Purdue Aeroelasticity 1.
Model Reduction & Interface Modeling in Dynamic Substructuring Application to a Multi-Megawatt Wind Turbine MSc. Presentation Paul van der Valk.
Mechanical Vibrations
ECE 3301 General Electrical Engineering
A PRESENTATION ON VIBRATION
Total Least Square Identification of Parallel Robots
Introduction To Robotics
Fluid Force Identification
Dynamic Response of MDOF Structures
Chapter 2 Response to Harmonic Excitation
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Solving the Harmonic Oscillator
Manipulator Dynamics 4 Instructor: Jacob Rosen
Chapter 4 Multiple Degree of Freedom Systems
Dr-Ing Asrat Worku, AAIT
MAK4041-Mechanical Vibrations
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
University of Bridgeport
1C9 Design for seismic and climate changes
Unfolding Problem: A Machine Learning Approach
ME321 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines
LECTURE 1 – FUNDAMENTAL OF VIBRATION
중복근을 갖는 감쇠 시스템의 고유진동수와 모드의 고차 민감도 해석
Modelling and identification of damping in aero-structures ECERTA Project Liverpool 26 November 2007 Marco Prandina.
Vibration based structural damage detection for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure system.
Simplified Algebraic Method
한국지진공학회 추계학술발표회 IMPROVED SENSITIVITY METHOD FOR NATURAL FREQUENCY AND MODE SHAPE OF DAMPED SYSTEM Hong-Ki Jo1), *Man-Gi Ko2) and In-Won Lee3) 1) Graduate.
Modified Modal Methods in Asymmetric Systems
Unfolding with system identification
November 5, 2002 SE 180 Final Project.
Presentation transcript:

LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF DAMPING PARAMETERS

Contents Objectives of the research Introduction on damping identification techniques New energy-based method Numerical simulation Experimental results Conclusions Future works

Objectives of the research - Better understanding of damping in structures from an engineering point of view Defining a practical identification method Validate the method with numerical simulations Test the method on real structures

Damping in structures Damping in structures can be caused by several factors: Material damping Damping in joints Dissipation in surrounding medium

Issues in damping identification Absence of a mathematical model for all damping forces Computational time Incompleteness of data Generally small effect on dynamics

Identification techniques Techniques for identifying the viscous damping matrix Perturbation method Inversion of receptance matrix Lancaster’s formula Energy-dissipation method Prandina, M., Mottershead, J. E., and Bonisoli, E., An assessment of damping identification methods, Journal of Sound and Vibration (in press), 2009.

Theory The new method is based on the energy-dissipation method, starting from the equations of motion of a MDOF system The energy equation can be derived

Theory In the case of periodic response, the contribution of conservative forces to the total energy over a full cycle of periodic motion is zero. So if T1 = T (period of the response) And the energy equation can be reduced to

Diagonal viscous damping matrix The simplest case is a system with diagonal viscous damping matrix. In this case the energy equation becomes

Diagonal viscous damping matrix

Underdetermined system The energy system of equations is usually underdetermined since the number of DOF can be greater than the number of tests. To solve the problem there are different options: Change the parameterization of the damping matrix Increase the number of different excitations Define a criterion to select the “best” columns of matrix A

Smallest angle criterion Angle between a column ai of matrix A and the vector e Similarly, an angle between a set of columns B and the vector e can be calculated using SVD an QR algorithm

Numerical example Accelerometers (dof 7, 11 and 19) Dashpots (dof 3, 5, 13 and 17) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19

Procedure Accelerations are measured on DOF 7, 11 and 19 for a set of 8 different excitations at frequencies close to first 8 modes, random noise is added. Velocities in all DOF are obtained by expanding these 3 measurements using the undamped mode shapes Best columns of A are selected using smallest angle criterion The energy equation is solved using least squares non-negative algorithm (to assure the identified matrix is non-negative definite)

Results Case 1 N DOF of dashpots Damping coefficients (Ns/m) Angle Exact 3 5 13 17 0.01 0.5 0.1 1 N DOF of identified dashpots Identified damping coefficients (Ns/m) Angle 1 - 17 1.084 12.557 2 5 0.581 1.042 1.029 3 13 0.506 0.124 0.989 0.263 4 0.01 0.501 0.099 1.002 0.001

Results Case 2 N DOF of dashpots Damping coefficients (Ns/m) Angle Exact 3 5 13 17 0.1 N DOF of identified dashpots Identified damping coefficients (Ns/m) Angle 1 - 19 0.107 6.505 2 13 0.151 0.059 0.404 3 5 15 17 0.212 0.127 0.055 0.124 4 0.101 0.098 0.099 0.1 0.001

Results 0.1 N=1 0.107 N=2 0.151 0.059 N=3 0.212 0.127 0.055

Results Case 2 – Damping factors Mode Correct N=1 Error % N=2 N=3 1 0.014092 0.013534 3.96% 0.014096 0.03% 0.00% 2 0.001496 0.002160 44.33% 0.001495 0.11% 3 0.001024 0.000772 24.65% 0.000894 12.72% 0.001035 1.07% 4 0.000338 0.000395 16.81% 0.000305 9.74% 0.000341 0.94% 5 0.000138 0.000240 73.36% 0.000149 7.95% 0.000134 2.88% 6 0.000190 0.000162 14.71% 0.000193 1.86% 0.000181 4.69% 7 0.000114 0.000117 2.82% 0.000118 4.12% 0.000100 11.59% 8 0.000057 0.000089 54.20% 0.000049 15.05% 0.000048 15.93% 9 0.000106 0.000068 35.40% 0.000073 31.19% 0.000105 0.61% 10 0.000085 0.000044 47.89% 0.000061 27.98% 0.000087 2.50%

Nonlinear identification The method can be applied to identify any damping in the form In case of viscous damping and Coulomb friction together, for example, the energy equation can be written as

Nonlinear identification New matrix A Viscous Coulomb Friction

Experiment setup

Magnetic dashpot

Experiment procedure The structure without magnetic dashpot is excited with a set of 16 different excitations with frequencies close to those of the first 8 modes The complete set of accelerations is measured and an energy-equivalent viscous damping matrix is identified as the offset structural damping The measurement is repeated with the magnetic dashpot attached with the purpose of locating and identifying it

Experiment procedure Velocities are derived from accelerometer signals Matrix A and vector e are calculated, the energy dissipated by the offset damping is subtracted from the total energy The energy equation (In this case overdetermined, since there are 16 excitations and 10 DOFs) is solved using least square technique

Experimental results Magnetic viscous dashpot on DOF 9 Damping coefficients Expected (Ns/m) Identified (Ns/m) C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 1.515 1.320 C10 0.032

Further experiments Further experiments currently running will include more magnetic dashpots in different DOFs. They will also include nonlinear sources of damping such as Coulomb friction devices.

Coulomb friction device

Advantages of the new method Estimation of mass and stiffness matrices is not required if a complete set of measurements is available Can identify non-viscous damping in the form Robustness against noise and modal incompleteness Spatial incompleteness can be overcome using expansion techniques

Conclusions New energy-based method has been proposed Numerical simulation has validated the theory Initial experiments on real structure give reasonably good results, further experiments are currently running

Future works Coulomb friction experiment Extend the method to include material damping Try different parameterizations of the damping matrices

Acknowledgements Prof John E Mottershead Prof Ken Badcock Dr Simon James Marie Curie Actions