Sterile Neutrino Searches with Sources and Reactors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 3+2 Neutrino Phenomenology and Studies at MiniBooNE PHENO 2007 Symposium May 7-9, 2007 U. Wisconsin, Madison Georgia Karagiorgi, Columbia University.
Advertisements

Pablo DEL AMO SANCHEZ Henri PESSARD 18/12/2012
Results from Daya Bay Xin Qian On behalf of Daya Bay Collaboration Xin Qian, BNL1.
6/6/2003Jonathan Link, Columbia U. NuFact03 Future Measurement of sin 2 2  13 at Nuclear Reactors Jonathan Link Columbia University June 6, 2003 ′03.
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
MiniBooNE: (Anti)Neutrino Appearance and Disappeareance Results SUSY11 01 Sep, 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL 1.
Source Neutrino Experiments
Prospects for 7 Be Solar Neutrino Detection with KamLAND Stanford University Department of Physics Kazumi Ishii.
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 2 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 6 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
Reactor & Accelerator Thanks to Bob McKeown for many of the slides.
8/5/2002Ulrich Heintz - Quarknet neutrino puzzles Ulrich Heintz Boston University
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
Current Status of Neutrino Physics 2012 NRF workshop on Flavor and Collider Physics Yonsei University June 8~9, 2012 Sin Kyu Kang (Seoul-Tech )
The Importance of Low-Energy Solar Neutrino Experiments Thomas Bowles Los Alamos National Laboratory Markov Symposium Institute for Nuclear Research 5/13/05.
1 The Daya Bay Reactor Electron Anti-neutrino Oscillation Experiment Jianglai Liu (for the Daya Bay Collaboration) California Institute of Technology APS.
Experimental Approaches to Sterile Neutrinos Using Low Energy Neutrinos Jonathan Link Center for Neutrino Physics Virginia Tech NOW /14/12 9/14/12.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
The Elementary Particles. e−e− e−e− γγ u u γ d d The Basic Interactions of Particles g u, d W+W+ u d Z0Z0 ν ν Z0Z0 e−e− e−e− Z0Z0 e−e− νeνe W+W+ Electromagnetic.
Neutrino oscillation physics II Alberto Gago PUCP CTEQ-FERMILAB School 2012 Lima, Perú - PUCP.
LENS-CAL I. Barabanov, V. Gurentsov, V. Kornoukhov Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow and R. S. Raghavan, Virginia Tech LONU-LENS Blacksburg, Oct 15,
1 Searching for Sterile Neutrinos with an Isotope β-decay Source: The IsoDAR Experiment Mike Shaevitz - Columbia University Aspen Winter Workshop--New.
Using Reactor Anti-Neutrinos to Measure sin 2 2θ 13 Jonathan Link Columbia University Fermilab Long Range Planning Committee, Neutrino Session November.
Neutron scattering systems for calibration of dark matter search and low-energy neutrino detectors A.Bondar, A.Buzulutskov, A.Burdakov, E.Grishnjaev, A.Dolgov,
Sterile Neutrino Oscillations and CP-Violation Implications for MiniBooNE NuFact’07 Okayama, Japan Georgia Karagiorgi, Columbia University August 10, 2007.
νeνe νeνe νeνe νeνe νeνe νeνe Distance (L/E) Probability ν e 1.0 ~1800 meters 3 MeV) Reactor Oscillation Experiment Basics Unoscillated flux observed.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
NuMI Off-Axis Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EPS2003, Aachen July 19, 2003.
Results from RENO Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “17 th Lomosonov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics” Moscow. Russia, Aug ,
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment R. D. McKeown Caltech On Behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration CIPANP 2009.
A Letter of Intent to Build a MiniBooNE Near Detector: BooNE W.C. Louis & G.B. Mills, FNAL PAC, November 13, 2009 Louis BooNE Physics Goals MiniBooNE Appearance.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
1 Neutrino Physics 2 Pedro Ochoa May 22 nd What about solar neutrinos and the solar neutrino problem? KamLAND uses the entire Japanese nuclear.
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment On behalf of the DayaBay collaboration Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Joseph ykHor YuenKeung,
Measuring  13 with Reactors Stuart Freedman HEPAP July 24, 2003 Bethesda Reactor Detector 1Detector 2 d2d2 d1d1.
1 Luca Stanco, INFN-Padova (for the OPERA collaboration) Search for sterile neutrinos at Long-BL The present scenario and the “sterile” issue at 1 eV mass.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
  Measurement with Double Chooz IDM chasing the missing mixing angle e  x.
Sterile neutrinos at the Neutrino Factory IDS-NF plenary meeting October 19-21, 2011 Arlington, VA, USA Walter Winter Universität Würzburg TexPoint fonts.
Robert Cooper. What is CENNS? Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering To probe a “large” nucleus Recoil energy small Differential energy spectrum.
Light Sterile Neutrinos: The Evidence Jonathan Link Virginia Tech Workshop on Neutrinos at the SNS Oak Ridge National Lab 5/2/12 5/2/12 5/2/2012Jonathan.
Sensitivity on sterile neutrinos with sources in Borexino A.Ianni Phys. Dept., Princeton May 9th, 2011.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE: Neutrino Oscillations and Cross Sections 15 th Lomonosov Conference, 19 Aug 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
An Alternative Design based on Inverse Beta Detection Jim Lund Sandia National Laboratories History The immediate future The 2-3 yr. time frame The beehive.
5th June 2003, NuFact03 Kengo Nakamura1 Solar neutrino results, KamLAND & prospects Solar Neutrino History Solar.
Center for Neutrino Physics Source Neutrino Experiments Jonathan Link Center for Neutrino Physics Virginia Tech NuFact 2016.
Neutrino oscillations with radioactive sources and large detectors Wladyslaw H. Trzaska on behalf of: Yu.N. Novikov, T. Enqvist, A.N. Erykalov, F. v.Feilitzsch,
51 Cr Source Experiments for Sterile Neutrinos Jonathan Link Virginia Tech Sterile Neutrinos at the Crossroads 9/27/2011.
Results on  13 Neutrino Oscillations from Reactor Experiments Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “INPC 2013, Firenze, June 2-7, 2013”
Double Chooz Experiment Status Jelena Maricic, Drexel University (for the Double Chooz Collaboration) September, 27 th, SNAC11.
NEUTRINO OSCILLATION MEASUREMENTS WITH REACTORS
Neutrino Oscillations and T2K
NESSiE and Muon Detection in magnetized Detectors
SoLid: Recent Results and Future Prospects
Search for Sterile Neutrinos
(Xin-Heng Guo, Bing-Lin Young) Beijing Normal University
Sterile Neutrinos and WDM
Simulation for DayaBay Detectors
Searches for Sterile neutrinos
Solar Neutrino Problem
Experimental Neutrino Physics
Search for sterile neutrinos with SOX: Monte Carlo studies of the experiment sensitivity Davide Basilico 1st year Workshop – 11/10/17 Tutors: Dott. Barbara.
Current Results from Reactor Neutrino Experiments
Signal and Background in LENS
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
Raju and Radioactive Neutrino Source Experiments
DUNE as the Next-Generation Solar Neutrino Experiment
PBq 144Ce-144Pr source in KamLAND
DISCUSSION Is there a right-handed (‘sterile’) neutrino in the eV range? Alain Blondel.  My views and a few others.
Presentation transcript:

Sterile Neutrino Searches with Sources and Reactors Jonathan Link Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech 3rd International Meeting for Large Neutrino Infrastructures May 31, 2016 Impact > 3rd International Meeting for Large Neutrino Jonathan Link

Sterile Neutrinos ν4 ν3 Dm22 Dm32 ν2 Dm12 ν1 ν3 Dm22 ν2 Dm12 ν1 A sterile neutrino is a lepton with no ordinary electroweak interaction except those induced by mixing. Three neutrinos allow only 2 independent Δm2 scales. ν3 ν2 ν1 Dm22 Dm12 mass2 ν4 Dm32 Atmospheric Solar Sterile ν3 Atmospheric Dm22 mass2 ν2 Solar Dm12 ν1 But the sterile Dm2 is at a completely different scales. Jonathan Link

The Evidence for Sterile Neutrinos Event Excess: 32.2 ± 9.4 ± 2.3 Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Phys.Rev.D64, 112007 (2001) LSND ( ν μ → ν 𝑒 ) Event Excess: 78.4 ± 28.5 Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 110, 161801 (2013) MiniBooNE ( ν μ → ν 𝑒 ) Giunti and Laveder, Phys.Rev.C83, 065504(2011) Gallium Anomaly ( ν 𝑒 Disappearance) Reactor Anomaly ( ν 𝑒 Disappearance) Mention et al., Phys.Rev.D83 073006 (2011) Jonathan Link

T2K Near Detector νe Disappearance Although the T2K beam is predominantly a νμ beam, the small νe component can be used in the near detector for a νe disappearance search. Phys.Rev. D91, 051102(R) (2015) T2K actually reported this as a limit, but their limit was weaker than expected and their result is completely consistent with the prevailing νe disappearance anomalies. Jonathan Link

Evidence Against the ~1 eV2 Sterile Neutrino Armbruster et al., Phys.Rev.D65 112001 (2002) KARMEN ( ν μ → ν 𝑒 ) No ν 𝑒 Excess KARMEN (90% CL) Bugey Reactor ( ν 𝑒 Disappearance) Achkar et al., Nucl.Phys.B434, 503 (1995) Effective ν μ → ν 𝑒 under certain assumptions Phys.Rev.Lett. 98, 231801 (2007) MiniBooNE (νμ → νe Appearance) νμ Disappearance (where is it?) For ν μ → ν 𝑒 to happen there must be both ν 𝑒 and ν μ disappearance Jonathan Link

Relating Appearance and Disappearance Probabilities With a single sterile neutrino we get a 4×4 PMNS mixing matrix and 3 independent Δm2s. m1 ∆ 𝑚 21 2 m3 m2 ∆ 𝑚 32 2 m4 ∆ 𝑚 43 2 Solar Ue42 Uμ42 Uτ42 Us42 + + + = 1 (PMNS Unitarty) The appearance probability (νμ→νe): Sterile Pμe = 4Ue42 Uμ42 sin22θ sin2(1.27Δm432L/E) The νe disappearance probability: Because P(mu, e) depends on both U(e,4) and U(mu,4), you can have nu_e disappearance without nu_e appearance, but you can’t have nu_e appearance without nu_mu disappearance. Pee = Pes + Peμ + Peτ Pee ≈ Pes = 4Ue42 Us42 sin2(1.27Δm432L/E) Atmospheric Pμμ ≈ 4Uμ42 Us42 sin2(1.27Δm432L/E) The νμ disappearance probability: Jonathan Link

Appearance vs. Disappearance Since any 4th mass state is predominantly sterile (Us4 ≈1), P μe ≈ 1 4 P ee × P μμ or sin2θμe = 1 4 sin2θee sin2θμμ Since Pμe depends on both Ue4 and Uμ4, you can have νe disappearance without νe appearance, but you can not have νe appearance without νμ disappearance. The absence of νμ disappearance is a huge problem for the LSND and MiniBooNE signals, while the νe disappearance anomalies are consistent with all existing data. νe Disappearance νμ→νe Appearance νμ Disappearance Global fit from Kopp et al. JHEP 1305, 050 (2013) Jonathan Link

Requirement for Disappearance Experiments “It don’t mean a thing if it ain’t got that swing” –American jazz great Duke Ellington Oscillometry: the observation and measurement of oscillations. In disappearance experiments the existence of sterile neutrinos can only be convincingly established through oscillometry. Possible oscillations in a short-baseline reactor experiment Daya Bay, Phys.Rev.Lett. 115, 111802 (2015) Jonathan Link

Bring the Source vs. Bring the Detector Reactor Experiments: the detector is brought to a pre-existing source Nuclear reactors are the most prolific terrestrial neutrino sources, producing 6×1017 ν 𝑒 per second per MWth. It is unlikely that a reactor would ever be constructed specifically for use as a neutrino source, nevertheless, neutrino experiments can use existing reactors without any impact on their normal operations. Once the detector has been delivered, neutrino statistics accumulate with minimal operational costs. Radioactive Source Experiments: the source is brought to a pre-exiting detector Leverages detectors built for other applications (e.g. solar neutrinos, dark matter). Often these detectors have existing reconstructions, well measured backgrounds and a well understood energy response. The source decays away, so to accumulate additional statistics requires a new investment on the scale of the original deployment. Jonathan Link

The GALLEX and SAGE Source Experiments The solar radiochemical detectors GALLEX and SAGE used intense EC sources (51Cr and 37Ar) to calibrate the νe detection efficiency. GALLEX Sources: 1.7 MCi of 51Cr 1.8 MCi of 51Cr SAGE Sources: 680 kCi of 51Cr 409 kCi of 37Ar Neutrinos interact in the CC process, νe+71Ga→71Ge, and are detected by the decay of 71Ge. Jonathan Link

Ideas for Short-Baseline Source Experiments There have been several ideas for short-baseline radioactive source experiments. Most use detectors designed (and funded) to do other physics. Generally these proposals benefit from detectors designed for excellent low energy sensitivity. Source Experiment Proposals Source Detector LENS-Sterile (Phys.Rev.D 75, 093006, 2007) 51Cr LENS (Solar) Zoned Radio-chemical (arXiv:1006.2103 [nucl-ex], 2010) SAGE (Solar) CeLAND (Phys.Rev.Lett. 107, 201801, 2011) 144Ce KamLAND (Reactor) Neutral Current Coherent (Phys.Rev.D 85, 013009, 2012) 37Ar or 51Cr Bolometers (DM) IsoDAR (Phys.Rev.Lett. 109, 141802, 2012) 8Li SOX (JHEP 1308, 038, 2013) 51Cr & 144Ce Borexino (Solar) Liquid Xe + Source (JHEP 1411, 261, 2014) LZ (DM) SOX (JHEP 1308, 038, 2013) Jonathan Link

Source Experiment: SOX Combines the Borexino detector with a 144Ce ν 𝑒 source and/or a 51Cr ν 𝑒 source. At the typical sterile Δm2, multiple oscillation wavelengths may be observed inside the detector. JHEP 1308, 038 (2013) Source 51Cr Source 144Ce Source sin22θee = 0.12 Δm2 = 1.5 eV2 8.25 m Evis/rec(MeV) Lrec(m) Jonathan Link

Source Experiment: SOX Combines the Borexino detector with a 144Ce ν 𝑒 source and/or a 51Cr ν 𝑒 source. At the typical sterile Δm2, multiple oscillation wavelengths may be observed inside the detector. 144Ce ν 𝑒 neutrinos have a β spectrum with a 3 MeV endpoint and are observed by inverse beta decay. JHEP 1308, 038 (2013) Source 144Ce-144Pr Decay 8.25 m Jonathan Link

Source Experiment: SOX Combines the Borexino detector with a 144Ce ν 𝑒 source and/or a 51Cr ν 𝑒 source. At the typical sterile Δm2, multiple oscillation wavelengths may be observed inside the detector. 144Ce ν 𝑒 neutrinos have a β spectrum with a 3 MeV endpoint and are observed by inverse beta decay. Mono-energetic 51Cr ν 𝑒 oscillate as a pure function of L, and are detected by electron elastic scattering. JHEP 1308, 038 (2013) Source 51Cr Decay 8.25 m Jonathan Link

Reactor Anomaly (νe Disappearance) Calculations of the reactor ν 𝑒 flux and spectrum predict a higher event rate than is observed. This results is an apparent deficit of reactor neutrinos across all experiments. Daya Bay, Phys.Rev.Lett. 116, 061801 (2016) Mention et al., Phys.Rev.D83 073006 (2011) Rate only analysis This apparent ν 𝑒 disappearance can be interpreted as evidence of high Δm2 oscillations. Jonathan Link

Jonathan Link from Antonin Vacheret

Comparison of Reactor Experiments Power (MW) Compact Core? Mass (tons) n Tag Spatial Resolution (cm) Energy Resolution (@ 1 MeV) Baseline (m) Stereo 57 Yes 1.75 Gd 11.5% 9 to 12 DANSS 3000 No 1 9.7 POSEIDON 100 1.5 25 6 Neutrino-4 90 0.4 6 to 11 NEOS (Korea) 2800 0.9 5% Prospect 85 2.9 6Li 15 4.5% 7 to 12 SoLid/CHANDLER 60 3 5 / 6 14% / 6% 5 to 12 NuLat 50 0.23 4% 4.7 Important for oscillometric coverage (L/E resolution and dynamic range) Important for background rejection and signal efficiency Jonathan Link 18

Keys to a Short-Baseline Reactor Experiment Daya Bay Far Detectors Unlike the reactor θ13 experiments, short-baseline reactor experiments are done on the surface with smaller detectors without space for massive clean shielding or gamma catchers Reducing random coincidence backgrounds is the most significant challenge. Dealing with Random Coincidence Backgrounds: Neutron and gamma shielding Unbiased spatial resolution Segmentation High neutron capture efficiency and purity Gd → 6Li Raghavan Optical Lattice Readout MicroCHANDLER Jonathan Link

Neutron Capture Options Daya Bay, RENO and Double Chooz tag neutrons with Gd capture, in conjunction with a large gamma catcher to contain the gammas. This may not work as well in the small short-baseline detectors without a gamma catcher. Neutron Capture on Gadolinium Neutron Capture on Lithium-6 n 6Li 4He 3H Contained in a few μm γ n γ γ Gd E = 4.78 MeV Electron Equivalent ~0.5 MeV E = 8 MeV γ γ Poorly contained in small detectors Jonathan Link

SoLid: Tagging with 6Li in ZnS:Ag Sheets The SoLid detector tags neutrons in thin sheets of 6Li- loaded Zinc Sulfide scintillator (ZnS:Ag) ZnS:Ag releases light with a 200 ns mean emission time which forms a very pure, high efficiency neutron tag. SoLid achieves unprecedented spatial resolution by segmenting its scintillator in cubes which are readout in two dimensions by wavelength shifting fibers. Neutron tag in the SoLid inspired CHANDLER detector, which is readout by total internal reflection. Jonathan Link

CHANDLER and SoLid The two detectors will be deployed at the BR2 reactor operating as a single experiment. BR2 50 cm 5.5 m CHANDLER SoLid Jonathan Link

SoLid and CHANDLER Sensitivity The combined sensitivity for the SoLid/CHANDLER deployment at BR2 is compared to the Gallium and Reactor Anomalies. The one-year, Phase I SoLid deployment covers most of the low Δm2 part of the Gallium Anomaly at 95% CL. Adding CHANDLER to the three- year Phase II extends the coverage to higher Δm2 and pushes the reach well into the Reactor Anomaly. These sensitivities are purely oscillometric, based on energy spectrum and baseline information alone. Oscillometric Sensitivity Only d Jonathan Link

Conclusions We have hints for a ~1 eV sterile neutrino coming from at least 5 different types of terrestrial measurements, And in two distinct channels: ν 𝜇 → ν 𝑒 appearance and ν 𝑒 disappearance. There is significant tension on the ν 𝜇 → ν 𝑒 appearance channel, making ν 𝑒 disappearance searches essential to resolving this issue. Source and reactor experiments will operate over the next several years with a good reach in the ν 𝑒 disappearance allowed space. It is important to remember that sterile neutrino mixing in the disappearance channel can only be established by an observation of the oscillation wave. Jonathan Link