Cheating in Online Classes: How Concerned Should We Be?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Distance Learning Environments Definition Motivating Factors Grades vs. Learning Expectations of Institutions and Faculty.
Advertisements

Why do students cheat? How do they cheat? How has cheating changed since distance education came into being? Academic integrity is of particular interest.
Missouri State Online Academic Integrity Week October 6, 2009.
Making Big Classes Small: Penn State’s Blended Learning Initiative Renata Engel John T. Harwood January 30, 2006 Copyright Penn State, This work.
Hybrid Courses: Some Random Thoughts on Expectations and Outcomes Martha Goshaw Seminole State College of Florida November 12, 2009.
Higher Education’s Role in Academic Integrity as it Relates to Technology E-LEARN CONFERENCE OCTOBER 28, 2014 NEW ORLEANS, LA TAMMIE LANG, __________ MERRYELLEN.
Learners’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Online Instruction Presented by: Dr. Karen S. Ivers Dr. JoAnn Carter-Wells Dr. Joyce Lee California State University.
Lessons in Citizenship: Collaborative Writing to Foster Academic Integrity and Civic Responsibility Ann E. Biswas University of Dayton Lilly Conference.
Academic Integrity in an Electronic World: Student Cheating and Plagiarism November 9, 2010 Brown Bag The University of Arizona
+ Adjunct at College of Charleston 101 August 18, 2015 Kendall Deas, Ph.D College of Charleston.
TIPS FOR EFFECTIVE TEACHING IN STEM HIGHER EDUCATION Benjamin C. Flores, Ph.D. Director, Computing and Electrical and Engineering Division MIE Project.
MEDICAL STUDENT TRANSITION COURSE Professionalism in the Clinical Environment ANTHONY A. MEYER, MD, PHD CHAIRMAN, DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH.
Online Classes and Cheating PRESENTED BY JEFF BARBEE.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
Academic Honor Policy Survey Results Amy Guerette, Jennifer Buchanan and Ann DelRossi On behalf of the Academic Honor Policy Committee.
Quality Online Preparation: Qualities of Faculty, Courses, and Preparation Programs By Dr. Erin O’Brien Valencia College League of Innovation Conference,
Faculty as Students: August 12, 2015 Distance Teaching & Learning Conference Kathy Keairns & Heather Tobin One Model.
Essential Learning Outcomes Civic Engagement March 22-23, 2010 North Seattle Community College Jill LaneKristin DistelhorstKaren Stuhldreher.
Problem with Multi-purpose Postsecondary Course Evaluations STANLEY VARNHAGEN JASON DANIELS BRAD ARKISON Evaluation & Research Services, Faculty of Extension.
Statistics Critical Thinking in Intro Stats Roger Woodard.
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System Ann DelRossi, Academic Affairs Administrator Office of the Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement.
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System
Essential Attributes of Faculty Professional Development: The Excellence in Online Education Initiative Carol McQuiggan, D.Ed. Senior Instructional Designer,
Perceptions of Online Education
Direct vs Indirect Assessment of Student Learning: An Introduction
1 Online, But Skeptical Results of Inside Higher Ed/Gallup 2013 Survey of Faculty Attitudes on Technology Quality Matters Conference, Nashville, Tenn.
Linda J. Demaine, JD, PhD Arizona State University College of Law
Experienced Faculty Rate Distance Education Most Effective for Achieving Many Student and Administrative Outcomes ePoster Presented Wednesday July 26,
21st Century Faculty and Students: Educational Technology Surveys 2009
Promoting Student Success With Motivation In The Online Environment
Streamlining Distance Education
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System
A nationwide US student survey
Mini-Portfolio: a brief overview
Director of Policy Analysis and Research
Jumping on the QM Bandwagon
The Other Side of Cheating: Instructor Culpability in Student Cheating
ACADEMIC HONESTY Role of Teachers 14th March, 2016 Zakir Hossain.
The Whys and Hows of Large Enrollment Online Courses at KSU
Session 1: To Blend or Not to Blend
Applying Research-Based Teaching Strategies to Higher Education
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY TASK FORCE
Moving Beyond “Don’t Do It:”
Approaches to Academic (Dis)Honesty
Leaders of Character GIVING VOICE TO VALUES
COMM 102 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com.
Promoting Student Success in Online Learning
Getting Everyone in the Game
Applying to Graduate School
2018 Student Success Summit
Parent Pride Meeting IB Diploma Programme
Fostering Academic Integrity in Online Courses
Student Accessibility Services Getting You Started
Objectives To recognize the fear is a natural response to the unknown.
Moral Education EDU 224 | Newberry College.
Maureen Capone, RDH, MS Farmingdale State College
Subfields of Psychology
Welcome to the University of Alberta
Academic Integrity.
NCAA Eligibility Center Academic requirements
Chapter 4 Values, Ethics, Academic Honesty
How to write an inquiry question
Chapter 4 Values, Ethics, Academic Honesty
Defining Deviance and Deviance Theories
Pedagogical Practice, Shift, and Professional Growth in Online Courses
The Washburn University Diversity Climate Survey Results
Session 1: To Blend or Not to Blend
Designing an Online Program Strategy
Carolyn Speer, Ph.D., CPACC
COURSE EVALUATION Spring 2019 Pilot August 27, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Cheating in Online Classes: How Concerned Should We Be? Jennifer Peterson, MS, RHIA, CTR Department of Health Sciences

Online Classes Great growth in recent years One drawback: cheating BUT – is cheating really more prevalent online? AND – how concerned should we be?

Your Experience How many of you have taught an online class? How many of you think that students cheat more online? How many of you think that students cheat more in class? Let’s see what the literature says . . .

College Student Cheating In General Studies show students admit to cheating - 60%+ Studies show faculty estimate cheating - 30-40%* Big disconnect! Volpe, Davidson, & Bell, 2008, para. 12

Why Do Student Cheat? Better Grades! Fraud triangle: Incentive/pressure Opportunity Rationalization/attitude “Everyone does it” “It isn’t hurting anyone” Grade more important than learning King, Guyette, & Piotrowski, 2009, p. 3

Differences in Perceptions of Cheating Everything on internet is public information Everyone cheats so they’re at a disadvantage if they don’t Don’t see dishonest behaviors as wrong Cheating is legitimate and necessary* Cole & Swartz, 2013, p. 744

Current Culture Normalized cheating Morals and ethics surrounding cheating have changed “Temporary social groups of universities, where culture control may result in students’ rejection of general societies norms” (Kidwell and Kent, 2008, p. S14).

Who Cheats the Most? Traditional Aged Males Members of Greek organizations Athletes Business majors Also, based on culture of college or university

Cheating in Online Courses Belief that there is more cheating Why? Harder to identify cheating Students better at using online resources to cheat Distance between student and instructor leads to more cheating Lack of face-to-face contact makes it more acceptable

Reality of Online vs. On-Campus Cheating Findings mixed Some studies find more online (one study found 41.1% compared to 20%)1 Other studies found the same (one study found 65% of students felt it was the same)2 Many studies find more in on campus setting! Panic cheating Collaborative cheating 1. Lanier, 2006, p. 249; 2. p. 253

So, Why The Focus on Online Course Cheating? Focus on online course cheating due to increase in number of online classes Questions about quality of online courses Affects perception of online courses AND perception of institution Speaks to integrity and ethics of graduates in workforce Government requires measures to insure academic integrity

Should We Just Accept Cheating? Yes: Acknowledge cheating and create other types of assessment No: Duty and responsibility to teach ethics and morals Again, government has weighed in

So, How Can We Prevent Cheating in Online Courses Proctoring exams and assignments High-tech – web cams, fingerprint analysis, IP address tracking, iris scans Middle-of-the-road: Increase students sense of community Keep online classes small and encourage interaction and lessen feelings of isolation Design classes with open book and other types of assessments (essays, projects) Timed exams, randomized question pools, assessment modifications

Challenges With These Methods Must discourage cheating Must be cost effective and acceptable to students Must not interfere with learning process No one best answer

Institution Commitment to Academic Integrity Culture in which cheating not tolerated Clear policies and procedures for violators Faculty discussing academic integrity in classes Honor codes

Conclusions True or not, belief exists that online course cheating higher Acceptance of cheating isn’t a reasonable practice Our duty to prepare ethical and moral students Must consider academic integrity in online course design

Your Feedback What methods do you use? Which have you found to be effective? Which are the most acceptable to students? Which disrupt the learning process the least?

References Cole, M. T., & Swartz, L. B. (2013). Understanding academic integrity in the online learning environment: A survey of graduate and undergraduate business students. Proceedings from ASBBS Annual Conference February 2013. King, C. G., Guyette, R. W. Jr., & Piotrowski, C. (2009). Online exams and cheating: An empirical analysis of business students’ views. The Journal of Educators Online, 6(1). Lanier, M. M. (2006). Academic integrity and distance learning. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 17(2), 244-261. DOI: 10.1080/10511250600866166. Volpe, R., Davidson, L., & Bell, M. C. (2008). Faculty attitudes and behaviors concerning student cheating. College Student Journal, 42(1), 164-175.