Biological components of sex differences in color preference

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Binocular rivalry Colin W.G. Clifford Current Biology Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages R1022-R1023 (December 2009) DOI: /j.cub Copyright ©
Advertisements

Ancient Endo-siRNA Pathways Reveal New Tricks Julie M. Claycomb Current Biology Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages R703-R715 (August 2014) DOI: /j.cub
The Circadian Timekeeping System of Drosophila Paul E. Hardin Current Biology Volume 15, Issue 17, Pages R714-R722 (September 2005) DOI: /j.cub
Volume 24, Issue 23, Pages R1109-R1111 (December 2014)
The nature of Drosophila melanogaster
Human sleep and cortical reactivity are influenced by lunar phase
Volume 23, Issue 16, Pages R673-R676 (August 2013)
Colour Vision: Understanding #TheDress
Ocean Depths: The Mesopelagic and Implications for Global Warming
Unsupervised statistical learning in newly hatched chicks
Victoria F. Ratcliffe, David Reby  Current Biology 
Animal Communication: When I’m Calling You, Will You Answer Too?
Generalizable Learning: Practice Makes Perfect — But at What?
Sensory-Motor Integration: More Variability Reduces Individuality
Whistled Turkish alters language asymmetries
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Honeybee Vision: In Good Shape for Shape Recognition
Sexual Selection: Roles Evolving
Volume 21, Issue 20, Pages R837-R838 (October 2011)
Infant cognition Current Biology
Female-led infanticide in wild chimpanzees
Behavior: Warriors Shaking Hands
Unsupervised statistical learning in newly hatched chicks
Cognition and Evolution: Learning and the Evolution of Sex Traits
Sexual Conflict: The Battle of the Sexes Reversed
Epigenetics, cellular memory and gene regulation
Joyce F. Benenson, Richard W. Wrangham  Current Biology 
Marine Battesti, Celine Moreno, Dominique Joly, Frederic Mery 
Visual Attention: Size Matters
Ecology: The Tropical Deforestation Debt
Asymmetric tail-wagging responses by dogs to different emotive stimuli
Sex Determination: Time for Meiosis? The Gonad Decides
Sex Ratios: Human Twins and Fraternal Effects
Elephant cognition Current Biology
Fiddler crabs Current Biology
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages R815-R817 (October 2015)
Sex ratios and social evolution
Neurogenetics: Short-Circuiting Sexually Dimorphic Behaviors
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages R262-R263 (March 2014)
Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages R906-R910 (November 2006)
Figs and fig wasps Current Biology
Sexual Selection and Condition-Dependent Mate Preferences
Planar Cell Polarity: Microtubules Make the Connection with Cilia
It’s all about the constraints
Daniel Hanus, Josep Call  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 13, Pages R483-R484 (July 2005)
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Evidence of episodic-like memory in cuttlefish
Noa Raz, Ella Striem, Golan Pundak, Tanya Orlov, Ehud Zohary 
Centrosome Size: Scaling Without Measuring
Volume 20, Issue 14, Pages R590-R591 (July 2010)
Attention Reorients Periodically
Dongjun He, Daniel Kersten, Fang Fang  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 17, Pages R728-R729 (September 2008)
Burying beetles Current Biology
Small RNAs: How Seeds Remember To Obey Their Mother
Cross-Modal Associative Mnemonic Signals in Crow Endbrain Neurons
Conservation Biology: The Importance of Wilderness
Rank influences human sex differences in dyadic cooperation
Horizontal Gene Transfer: Accidental Inheritance Drives Adaptation
Temporal coordination signals coalition quality
Dermatophytes Current Biology
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages R58-R60 (January 2018)
Impaired Associative Learning with Food Rewards in Obese Women
Basal bodies Current Biology
Matthew W. Hahn, Gregory C. Lanzaro  Current Biology 
Li Zhaoping, Nathalie Guyader  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Maria J.S. Guerreiro, Lisa Putzar, Brigitte Röder  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

Biological components of sex differences in color preference Anya C. Hurlbert, Yazhu Ling  Current Biology  Volume 17, Issue 16, Pages R623-R625 (August 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.022 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Mean hue preference curves. (A) British subjects. (B) Chinese subjects (±s.e.m.). Hue values are obtained from CIE-LUV coordinates, using the background color as reference white. The horizontal bar indicates only approximately the tested hues and is not an accurate reproduction of the spectrum. Current Biology 2007 17, R623-R625DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.022) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Decomposition of individual hue preference curves into two cone-contrast components, the weights on which account for differences between sexes and cultures. (A) Cone-contrast components of the eight standard colors as a function of CIE-LUV hue angle (radians), used as basis functions to extract individual hue preference weights. Left: S−(L+M) contrast. Right: L−M contrast. (B) Mean weights for S−(L+M) contrast component. (C) Mean weights for L−M contrast component. Means are for the entire population (‘All’; 98 males; 110 females) and constituent sub-populations separately (‘UK’; 79 males; 92 females) (‘China’; 19 males; 18 females). Significant differences based on independent two-sample t-tests are marked with asterisks; error bars are s.e.m. Current Biology 2007 17, R623-R625DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.022) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions