Non-interacting electrons in a periodic potential

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 1 Periodicity and Spatial Confinement Crystal structure Translational symmetry Energy bands k·p theory and effective mass Theory of.
Advertisements

Hanjo Lim School of Electrical & Computer Engineering Lecture 3. Symmetries & Solid State Electromagnetism.
3-Dimensional Crystal Structure
PA4311 Quantum Theory of Solids Quantum Theory of Solids Mervyn Roy (S6) www2.le.ac.uk/departments/physics/people/mervynroy.
Graphene: why πα? Louis Kang & Jihoon Kim
Expression of d-dpacing in lattice parameters
Energy Bands in Solids: Part II
1 Fermi surfaces and Electron dynamics  Band structure calculations give E(k)  E(k) determines the dynamics of the electrons  It is E(k) at the Fermi.
CHAPTER 3 Introduction to the Quantum Theory of Solids
No friction. No air resistance. Perfect Spring Two normal modes. Coupled Pendulums Weak spring Time Dependent Two State Problem Copyright – Michael D.
§5.6 §5.6 Tight-binding Tight-binding is first proposed in 1929 by Bloch. The primary idea is to use a linear combination of atomic orbitals as a set of.
Nearly Free Electron Approximation Has had success in accounting for many properties of metals: Electrical conductivity Thermal conductivity Light absorption.
PHYS3004 Crystalline Solids
IV. Electronic Structure and Chemical Bonding J.K. Burdett, Chemical Bonding in Solids Experimental Aspects (a) Electrical Conductivity – (thermal or optical)
Project topics due today. Next HW due in one week
For review/introduction of Schrodinger equation: monroecc
Physics “Advanced Electronic Structure” Pseudopotentials Contents: 1. Plane Wave Representation 2. Solution for Weak Periodic Potential 3. Solution.
Computational Solid State Physics 計算物性学特論 第4回 4. Electronic structure of crystals.
1 Lecture IX dr hab. Ewa popko Electron dynamics  Band structure calculations give E(k)  E(k) determines the dynamics of the electrons.
The Bandstructure Problem A one-dimensional model (“easily generalized” to 3D!)
UNIT 1 FREE ELECTRON THEORY.
EEE 3394 Electronic Materials
Electronic Band Structures electrons in solids: in a periodic potential due to the periodic arrays of atoms electronic band structure: electron states.
Comp. Mat. Science School 2001 Lecture 21 Density Functional Theory for Electrons in Materials Richard M. Martin Bands in GaAs Prediction of Phase Diagram.
1 Lecture VIII Band theory dr hab. Ewa Popko. 2 Band Theory The calculation of the allowed electron states in a solid is referred to as band theory or.
Last Time The# of allowed k states (dots) is equal to the number of primitive cells in the crystal.
The Bandstructure Problem A One-dimensional model (“easily generalized” to 3D!)
For review of Schrodinger equation: monroecc
Nanoelectronics Chapter 5 Electrons Subjected to a Periodic Potential – Band Theory of Solids
Energy Gaps Insulators & Superconductors When does an energy or band gap lead to insulating behavior? Band gap insulators, Peierls’ insulators When does.
Solid State Physics Lecture 15 HW 8 Due March 29 Kittel Chapter 7: 3,4,6 The free electron standing wave and the traveling wave are not eigenstates.
Kronig-Penney model and Free electron (or empty lattice) band structure Outline: Last class: Bloch theorem, energy bands and band gaps – result of conduction.
Free electron Fermi gas ( Sommerfeld, 1928 ) M.C. Chang Dept of Phys counting of states Fermi energy, Fermi surface thermal property: specific heat transport.
Energy bands (Nearly-free electron model)
Metallic Solids Metallic bond: The valence electrons are loosely bound. Free valence electrons may be shared by the lattice. The common structures for.
PHY 752 Solid State Physics
Time Dependent Two State Problem
PHY 752 Solid State Physics Review: Chapters 1-6 in GGGPP
Chapter 3 Energy Band Theory.
Energy bands (<<) Nearly-free electron limit
Band Theory of Electronic Structure in Solids
Energy Bands in Crystals
Semiconductor crystals
Phonons II: Thermal properties specific heat of a crystal
5. Conductors and dielectrics
Textbook: Condensed matter physics, 2nd ed. By M. Marder
1 Crystal = Lattice + Basis a1a1 a2a2 a1a1 a2a2 1,2: Primitive unit vectors and cell 1 2 3: Not a primitive one (Conventional one)  Primitive unit cell:
Band Theory of Solids So far we have neglected the lattice of positively charged ions Moreover, we have ignored the Coulomb repulsion between the electrons.
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Condensed Matter Physics: review
Band Theory The other approach to band theory solves the Schrodinger equation using a periodic potential to represent the Coulomb attraction of the positive.
Physics 342 Lecture 28 Band Theory of Electronic Structure in Solids
Free electron Fermi gas (Sommerfeld, 1928)
Chap 8 Nearly free and tightly bound electrons
Band Theory of Solids 1.
A One-Dimensional Bandstructure Model
Bandstructure Problem: A One Dimensional Model
3-Dimensional Crystal Structure.
Even if the potential is not a well, similar gaps occur
Semiconductor crystals
More Band Structure Discussion
PHY 752 Solid State Physics
Energy Band 7 In free electron model, electrons occupy positive energy levels from E=0 to higher values of energy. They are valence electron so called.
3-Dimensional Crystal Structure
Chap 6 The free Fermi gas and single electron model
Group theory for the periodic lattice
PHY 752 Solid State Physics
Physics 1 Electric current Ing. Jaroslav Jíra, CSc.
Chapter 3 Energy Band Theory.
Presentation transcript:

Non-interacting electrons in a periodic potential Chap 7 Non-interacting electrons in a periodic potential Bloch theorem The central equation Brillouin zone Rotational symmetry M.C. Chang Dept of Phys

Bloch recalled, The main problem was to explain how the electrons could sneak by all the ions in a metal so as to avoid a mean free path of the order of atomic distances. Such a distance was much too short to explain the observed resistances, which even demanded that the mean free path become longer and longer with decreasing temperature. By straight Fourier analysis I found to my delight that the wave differed from the plane wave of free electrons only by a periodic modulation. This was so simple that I didn't think it could be much of a discovery, but when I showed it to Heisenberg he said right away: "That's it!" Hoddeson L – Out of the Crystal Maze, p.107

Translation symmetry of the lattice → Lattice Hamiltonian a U Translation operator Translation symmetry of the lattice → Simultaneous eigen-states Re-label Bloch energy, Bloch state |Ψ(x)|2 is the same in each unit cell orthogonality

Bloch theorem (1928) The electron states in a periodic potential can be written as where uk(r)= uk(r+R) is a cell-periodic function Marder’s has a factor Pf: The cell-periodic part unk(x) depends on the form of the potential. Effective Hamiltonian for u(r) (1023 times less effort than the original Schrodinger eq.)

important Allowed values of k are determined by the B.C. Periodic B.C. (3-dim case) Therefore, there are N k-points in a unit cell (of reciprocal lattice), where N = total number of primitive cells in the crystal.

Pf: important Fourier decomposition and reciprocal lattice vectors If f(r) has lattice translation symmetry, f(r)=f(r+R), for any lattice vector R [eg. f(r) can be the lattice potential], then it can be expanded as, where G is the reciprocal lattice vector. Pf: The expansion above is very general, it applies to all types of Bravais lattice (e.g. bcc, fcc, tetragonal, orthorombic...) in every dimension (1, 2, and 3) All you need to do is find out the reciprocal lattice vectors G

(x) x a A simple example: electron density (or potential, or cell-periodic function) of a 1-dim lattice a (x) x

Some useful formulas (for electrons in a lattice box) important Some useful formulas (for electrons in a lattice box) 1D 3D Restrict k to the 1st BZ, Cf. Marder, App A.4 A+M, App. D

How do we determine uk(x) from the potential U(x)? important How do we determine uk(x) from the potential U(x)? Schrodinger equation Keypoint: go to k-space to simplify the calculation Fourier transform 1. the lattice potential G=2πn/a 2. the wave function k=2πn/L Schrod. eq. in k-space aka. the central eq.

Matrix form of the central eq. (in 1D) G=ng (g=2π/a) for a particular k For a given k, there are many eigen-energies nk, with eigen-vectors Cnk. g k k C(-g)=1 C(0)=1 C(g)=1 U(x)=0 2g -2g -g 1k 2k 3k 1st BZ when U(x) ≠0, for a particular k, unk is a linear combination of plane waves, with coefficients Cnk : Also valid in higher dim

From the central eq., one can see Bloch energy n,k+G = nk Example. U(x) = 2U cos2πx/a = U exp(2πix/a)+U exp(-2πix/a) (Ug=U-g=U) Matrix form of the central eq.

A solvable model in 1-dim: The Kronig-Penny model (1930) (not a bad model for superlattice) a

K has a real solution when

1st Brillouin zone Sometimes it is convenient to extend the domain of k with the following requirement Fig from Dr. Suzukis’ note (SUNY@Albany)

First Brillouin zone for 2D reciprocal lattice Wigner-Seitz cell of the reciprocal lattice Ex: Hexagonal lattice direct lattice reciprocal lattice BZ

The first BZ of FCC lattice (its reciprocal lattice is BCC lattice) The first BZ of BCC lattice (its reciprocal lattice is FCC lattice) x y z 4/a

k Momentum and velocity of an electron in a Bloch state momentum Not a momentum eigen-state ∴ for a Bloch state with crystal momentum ħk, the actual momentum can have, with various probabilities, an infinity of values. Crystal (quasi)-momentum velocity In a perfect lattice, the motion is unhindered velocity is zero at Brillouin zone boundary εn(k) k vn(k) ~ group velocity

A filled band does not carry current (Peierls, 1929) A. Wilson (1932) … Bloch, in showing that tightly bound electrons could in fact move through the lattice, had "proved too much"—that all solids should be metals. Were insulators simply very poor conductors? However, implicit in Peierls's papers on the Hall effect lay the clue, not carried further by Peierls, that a filled band would carry no current. A filled band does not carry current (Peierls, 1929) Electric current density Inversion symmetry,εn(k)= εn(-k)  electrons with momenta ħk and -ħk have opposite velocities no net current in equilibrium a filled band carries no current even in an external field Hoddeson L – Out of the Crystal Maze, p.120

Difference between conductor and insulator (Wilson, 1931) There are N k-points in an energy band, each k-point can be occupied by two electrons (spin up and down). ∴ each energy band has 2N “seats” for electrons. conductor E If a solid has odd number of valence electron per primitive cell, then the energy band is half-filled (conductor). For example, all alkali metals are conductors k If a solid has even number of valence electron per primitive cell, then the energy band is filled (insulator). Wilson recalls Bloch's reply after hearing his arguments: "No, it's quite wrong, quite wrong, quite wrong, not possible at all." If even number of electrons per primitive cell, then there are 2 possibilities: (a) no energy overlap or (b) energy overlap. E.g., alkali earth elements can be conductor or insulator. insulator k E conductor E k

A nearly-filled band “charge” of a hole: “momentum” of a hole: ∴ unoccupied states behave as +e charge carriers “momentum” of a hole: If an electron of wavevector k0 is missing, then the sum over filled k, Σk= -k0. Alternatively speaking, a hole with wavevector kh (= -k0). is produced.

DOS for a Bloch band εnk important dk dSε Surface ε+dε =const Surface ε=const Surface ε+dε =const dk dSε

For example, DOS of 1D energy bands Van Hove singularity