Scientific rationale for EU regulatory expectations concerning product composition in case of Class-I and Class-III medicinal products Dr Ridha BELAIBA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design of Bioequivalence Studies Alfredo García – Arieta, PhD
Advertisements

Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn
Henning H. Blume, PhD SocraTec R&D, Oberursel/Germany
6 th Annual Science and Standards Symposium January 16, 2013 Istanbul Determination of Solubility and Permeability in BCS Erika Stippler, Ph.D. Director.
Topical Bioequivalence Update Robert Lionberger, Ph.D. Office of Generic Drugs.
Modern Tools for Drug Discovery NIMBUS Biotechnology Modern Tools for Drug Discovery
Waivers of in-vivo BE studies
STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF THE XCIPIENT CROSSCARMELOSE ON METFORMIN INTESTINAL PERMEABILITY BY AN IN SITU INTESTINAL PERFUSION MODEL IN RATS Sodium chloride.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Determine impurity level in relevant batches1
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Regulatory Requirements.
Overview of Guidance Documents and Decision process: Biopharmaceutics Section Mehul Mehta, Ph.D. Director Division of Pharmceutical Evaluation I OCPB,
A Seminar on In vitro In vivo Correlation
1 Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science May 3, 2005 Factors Impacting Drug Dissolution and Absorption : Current State of Science Lawrence X. Yu,
Drug-Like Properties: Optimizing Pharmacokinetics and Safety During Drug Discovery Li Di and Edward H. Kerns ACS Short Course.
Hanoi, WORKSHOP ON PREQUALIFICATION OF ARV: BIOEQUIVALENCE Introduction to the Discussion of Bioequivalence Study Design and Conduct Presented.
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Tanzania, August, 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Guidelines and Tools available TRS 937 and BTIF (Bioequivalence Trial Information Form)
Bioequivalence of Locally Acting GI Drugs
Documentation of bioequivalence Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October 2009.
ACPS Advisory Committee Meeting October , 2002 ACPS Advisory Committee Meeting October , 2002 Scientific Considerations of Polymorphism in.
Quality by Design Application of Pharmaceutical QbD for Enhancement of the Solubility and Dissolution of a Class II BCS Drug using Polymeric Surfactants.
PHARMACEUTICS- IV (PHT 414 ) Dr. Shahid Jamil SALMAN BIN ABDUL AZIZ UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY L /9/2015 Factors Affecting Drug Absorption (Dosage.
WHO Workshop on Assessment of Bioequivalence Data BCS-Biowaivers - Template Dr. Henrike Potthast WHO Workshop on Assessment of.
Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte Pt WHO-consultant 1 WHO Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Quality, Good Manufacturing Practice &
Waiver of In Vivo Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification System Ajaz S. Hussain,
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines BCS-Biowaivers - Template Dr. Henrike Potthast Training workshop: Assessment of.
1 The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) Dr Mohammad Issa.
1 Abu Alam Ph.D. Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology July 23, 2008.
Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Gastrointestinal Drugs: An Overview
Dr. Muslim Suardi, MSi., Apt. Faculty of Pharmacy University of Andalas.
WHO Prequalification Programme June 2007 Training Workshop on Dissolution, Pharmaceutical Product Interchangeability and Biopharmaceutical Classification.
Grade Statistics without Bonus with Bonus Average = 86 Median = 87 Average = 88 Median = 89 Undergraduates Average=88 MS Average=92.
The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS)
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence General concepts and overview
Bioavailability of Dietary Supplements: Key Issues in Defining the Research Agenda Impact of Formulation on Bioavailability? Discussion Leader: Stephen.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
BIOPHARMACEUTICS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Roma Mathew.
BSC Biowaiver: Components, Requirements and Criteria
*M.Pharmaceutics (3rd Semester), Anand Pharmacy College, Anand.
In vitro - In vivo Correlation
1/20 PRESENTED BY BRAHMABHATT BANSARI K. M. PHARM DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLGY L. M. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.
Biopharmaceutics: Challenges to Pharmaceutical Industry
The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS)
Chapter 8 BIOAVAILABILITY & BIOEQUIVALENCE
Pharmacology I BMS 242 Lecture II (Continued)
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Gastrointestinal Absorption: Role of the Dosage Form
Biopharmaceutics of modified release drug products
Biopharmaceutics factors affecting Modified release products
Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn
Dissolution testing and in vitro in vivo correlation of conventional and SR preparations Formulation development and optimization is an ongoing process.
Biopharmaceutic Considerations in Drug Product Design
Y. B. Chavan College of Pharmacy,
Pharmacology I BMS 242 Lecture II (Continued)
Factors Affecting Drug Absorption (Dosage form factor)
Hanneke van der Lee, MD, PhD
BCS based waiver Harmonization
In vitro prediction matches in vivo results
The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS)
Pharmacokinetics: Drug Absorption
Basic Biopharmaceutics
Bioequivalence trials: design, evaluation, regulatory requirements
Biopharmaceutics 4th year
Biopharmaceutics 4th year
Microbial contribution to drug metabolism.
Pharmacokinetics: Drug Absorption
Formulation factors By Dr. A. S. Adebayo.
Presentation transcript:

Scientific rationale for EU regulatory expectations concerning product composition in case of Class-I and Class-III medicinal products Dr Ridha BELAIBA PharmD, PhD ANSM (French Medicines Agency) Senior Scientist: Team Leader PK-PD Evaluation Directorate-France PK-WP membre EMA (London) HRB Amman 2-3 May

BCS-Based BW Class I & Class III Composition EU Rational Concept of the BCS-Based BioWaiver (BW): Current Regulatory situation in Europe: Scientific Rational For the current requirements regarding generic drug products composition

BCS-Based BW Class I & Class III Composition EU Rational Concept of BW BW means Bioequivalence demonstration is not required Evidence of BE is always required for Generic drug products BE becomes self-evident in views of the Drug attributes and in vitro testing

BCS-Based BW Class I & Class III Composition EU Rational Concept of BW: BCS-Based BW BW for other considerations: 100 50 25

Concept of BCS-BW: Absorption Boundaries Dissolution (Drug Product) i Is not a limiting Step Is not a limiting Step (Drug Substance) Solubility Is not a limiting Step Permeability (Absorption)

BCS-Based BW Class I & Class III Composition EU Rational Concept of BCS-BW: Absorption Boundaries If a Drug Substance (DS) is Highly permeable, And If DS is soluble along the range of conditions encountered in the Gastro-intestinal truct The only limitation for absorption is the Drug Product Dissolution The Comparison of the rate dissolution could be a surrogate for the comparison of absorption profiles

Biowaiver for Generics: EMA Policy BCS Classification: Class 3 Poorly permeable Highly soluble Class 2 Highly permeable Poorly soluble Class 4 Class 1

BCS-Based BW Class I & Class III Composition EU Rational Solubility ALL is about the Drug Substance only: Maximum dissolved dose in water per Volume Unit (mg/mL). Is a physical property of the molecule (finger print) Independent from particle morphe or size: Dependent upon temperature & pH conditions Dissolution: All is about the Drug Product, Largely dependent upon the formulation, Expressed as the dissolved fraction of the drug/ Unit Time (%/min) Solubility is always the limiting factor (prerequisite) for dissolution.

BCS-Based BW Class I & Class III Composition EU Rational Solubility Dissolution: Micronization enhances considerably the solubility of the drug This Tablet is highly Soluble !!!

Biowaiver for Generics: EMA Policy The Highest Single dose is soluble: in 250 mL of aqueous Media Under pH range 1 To 6.8 At 37°C Solubility Relevant Physiological parameters for BCS: Volume: ≈ 250-300 mL pH: 1-3 Residence Time: T½ ≈ 15-30 min Permeability: Low - Volume: ≈ + 500 mL SI pH: 3-8 Residence Time: ≈ 2-4 Hours (Fasting) Capability of absorption (Permeability): High (SI 80 m² exchange surface)

Biowaiver for Generics: EMA Policy High permeability means complete absorption. Absorption is considered complete if the extent of absorption is > 85%. Only reliable investigations in human are taken into account for the classification. Permeability Relevant Physiological parameters for BCS: Volume: ≈ 250-300 mL pH: 1-3 Residence Time: T½ ≈ 15-30 min Permeability: Low - Volume: ≈ + 500 mL SI pH: 3-8 Residence Time: ≈ 2-4 Hours (Fasting) Capability of absorption (Permeability): High (SI 80 m² exchange surface)

Biowaiver for Generics: EMA Policy - Very : Very rapidly Dissolving 85% within 15 min. Rapidly dissolving: 85% within 30 min. Dissolution Relevant Physiological parameters for BCS: Volume: ≈ 250-300 mL pH: 1-3 Residence Time: T½ ≈ 15-30 min Permeability: Low - Volume: ≈ + 500 mL SI pH: 3-8 Residence Time: ≈ 2-4 Hours (Fasting) Capability of absorption (Permeability): High (SI 80 m² exchange surface)

Unlikely to be influenced by excipients Class I Drug Substance Dissolution could be a surrogate for the comparison of absorption profiles Drug Substances: Class 1 Drug Products: Very & rapidly Dissolving Valid } Unlikely to be influenced by excipients

Biowaiver for Generics: EMA Policy How excipients could influence the absorption: The drug is subject to active uptake: excipient inhibit the transporter. The drug is rapidly absorbed: excipients modulating the gastric emptying time or the intestinal transit time. BCS-Class 1

Biowaiver for Generics: EMA Policy EMA Recommendations: Using the same excipients is advisable Differences in excipients is acceptable. But The excipients that could impact: gastrointestinal motility susceptibility of interactions with the drug substance (e.g. complexation) drug permeability Interaction with membrane transporters. Must be quantitatively & qualitatively the same. BCS-Class 1

Class III Drug Substance Permeability is low: The drug is subject to transporter mediated efflux (PgP). Low passive diffusion, Site-Specific absorption (absorption window) Permeability (Absorption)

Class III Drug Substance Dissolution could be a surrogate for the comparison of absorption profiles Drug Substances: Class 3 Drug Products: Very & rapidly Dissolving Valid } Unlikely to be influenced by excipients

Biowaiver for Generics: EMA Policy How excipients could influence the absorption: Greater number of potential mechanisms. Not always predictible. BCS-Class 3

Biowaiver for Generics: EMA Policy Dissolution could be a surrogate for the comparison of absorption profiles Drug Substances: Class 3 Drug Products: Very & rapidly Dissolving Valid } If no excipients influencing the permeability

Biowaiver for Generics: EMA Policy EMA Recommendations: All the excipients must be qualitatively the same and quantitatively very similar The excipients that could impact: gastrointestinal motility susceptibility of interactions with the drug substance (e.g. complexation) drug permeability Interaction with membrane transporters. Must be quantitatively & qualitatively the same. BCS-Class 3

Biowaiver for Generics: EMA Policy EMA Recommendations: What is very similar means The difference in ratio AS/each excipient between the Test & Reference should not be > 5% BCS-Class 3

Biowaiver for Generics: EMA Policy EXAMPLE Colonne1 Mass % Lower bound % Lower Bound (g) Higher Bound (%) Higher Bound (g) AS 200 Filler 700 350% 332.5 665 367.5 735 Desitegrating Agent 90 45 4.275 85.5 4.725 105 Lubrificant 10 5 0.475 9.5 5.25 10.5 Total Mass 1000 960 1050.5

Biowaiver for Generics: EMA Policy Lyoequivalence as a surrogate for BE NO YES BIOEQUIVALENT Dissolution Tests: Over-Discriminating Dissolution Tests: Do not detect Bioinequivalence: IVIVC not known YES NO DISSOLUTION Tests

Biowaiver for Generics: EMA Policy LYOEQUIVALENCE (In vitro) As A Surrogate for BE In-Vitro data are not predictive of in vivo performances Consumer Risk (public health concern) IVIVC is seldom established. IVIVC Is product specific (generally not performed for IR formulations)

Biowaiver for Generics: EMA Policy Merci pour l’attention Thank you for your attention ridha.belaiba@ansm.sante.fr