TurkStat's experience with the preparation for the peer review in 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Management.
Advertisements

TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Metadata and Standards Department 1 Nezihat KERET Gülhan Eminkahyagil Metadata and Standards Department Turkish Statistical.
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
The use and convergence of quality assurance frameworks for international and supranational organisations compiling statistics The European Conference.
IWRM PLAN PREPARED AND APPROVED. CONTENT Writing an IWRM plan The content of a plan Ensuring political and public participation Timeframe Who writes the.
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
Quality assurance activities at EUROSTAT CCSA Conference Helsinki, 6-7 May 2010 Martina Hahn, Eurostat.
Marina Signore Head of Service “Audit for Quality Istat Assessing Quality through Auditing and Self-Assessment Signore M., Carbini R., D’Orazio M., Brancato.
process information Coordination of National Statistical Systems Seminar on the Implementation of Fundamental Principles Konrad Pesendorfer.
6 th Regional Statistics Seminar November 1 st, 2013 St. Kitts Marriott, Frigate Bay Beverly Harris 6 th Regional Statistics Seminar November 1 st, 2013.
Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Hungarian Experiences.
EU Code of Practice Peer Review 2006 – 8 :A Peer’s Perspective Frank Nolan Office for National Statistics UK.
23 March 2012, Luxembourg MGSC STATISTICS LITHUANIA PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PEER REVIEW Audronė Miškinienė Head.
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Too l PREPARING FOR A TADAT ASSESSMENT.
MGSC/2009/06 Eurostat Strategy for Developing Light Peer Reviews (LPR) for Candidate Countries and Adapted Global Assessments (AGA) for Potential Candidates.
Status and role of International Department (Slovak experience) MGSC Meeting Luxembourg 23 – 24 March 2012 SOSR.
Overview on the peer reviews in the Member States PGSC October 2015 Point 6 of the Agenda Claudia Junker Eurostat.
Eurostat New round of peer reviews in the enlargement countries 1 Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2015, Herceg Novi, Montenegro.
1 1 Global assessments/peer reviews – some issues seen from an assessor Jan Byfuglien Statistics Norway 5.1.
Marketing Planning Process Deirdre Makepeace Level Verifier – Professional Diploma Assignment briefing June and September 2014.
1 Recent developments in quality related matters in the ESS High level seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia countries Claudia Junker,
process and procedures for assessments
Governance, Fraud, Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
Part 2: How to ensure good project management?
National quality guidelines in Denmark
The experiences of Turkish Statistical Institute in the
Update on peer reviews Antonio Baigorri, Eurostat ESS RDG 2014 Item 9
Eurostat Quality Management (in the ESS context)
The experiences of Turkey in the
Peer review experience in the CSB of Latvia
Safety Assessment Efficiency Group 2 - Exercise 1
New round of assessments in the enlargement and EECCA countries
Hungarian Integrity Management Development
Peer review on compliance with the Code of Practice and the coordination role of the National Statistical Institute Kosovo experience Meetings of.
Management Group on Statistical Cooperation March 2015
Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2014, Antalya
4th RDG meeting Luxembourg
Updated Inventory of national practices
ESS Security and Secure exchange of information Expert Group (E4SEG) DIME/ITDG SG ESS IT Security Framework Pascal Jacques ESTAT B2 Local Security Officer.
Item 8 Cost assessment survey of production of statistics in the ESS
The Amended ESS Statistical Law - Regulation (EC) 223/2009
5.5. UN Framework for the Development of Environment Statistics (FDES)
Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager.
Management Group on Statistical Cooperation March 2013, Luxembourg
Peer review in the Republic of Macedonia
Management Group on Statistical Cooperation March 2014, Luxembourg
Cost accounting in the ESS
Peer reviews DIME/ITDG Steering Group 15 February 2019 Claudia Junker
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics
The European Statistics Code of Practice - a Basis for Eurostat’s Quality Assurance Framework Marie Bohatá Deputy Director General, Eurostat ... Strategic.
Cost assessment survey of production of statistics in the MSs and EFTA countries Daiva Norkevičienė, Directorate A ItItem 10 June 2016 ESS RDG em 10.
Overview of lessons learnt from the Peer Reviews workshop in March
The role of the international department of TurkStat
ESS Resource Directors Group Luxembourg
Daiva Norkevičienė, Directorate A ESS RDG 2015 Item 4.1
Eurostat Quality Assurance Framework and the LUCAS Peer Review Process
Sixth SPECA Project Working Group Meeting Geneva, 16 June 2011
Progress on implementing recommendations from AGA/LPR
Institutional framework for quality management in official statistics
Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2013, Skopje
External evaluation of NDPHS
‘QUALITY’ ROADMAP: Implementation
INTOSAI WORKING GROUP ON KEY NATIONAL INDICATORS
External evaluation of NDPHS
FINAL REPORTING.
"Experience with the peer reviews, successes and things to change for next reviews" Delina Ibrahimaj, Albania.
Task Force Peer reviews and quality Eurostat
Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2014, Antalya
Presentation transcript:

TurkStat's experience with the preparation for the peer review in 2015 Dr. Gürdal GEDİK International Relations Department TurkStat 16.11.2018

2. First Round Experiences 3. Early Preparations 4. Documentation 1. Background 2. First Round Experiences 3. Early Preparations 4. Documentation 5. Questionnaires 6. Peer Review Visit 7. Conclusions 16.11.2018

ESS COUNTRIES & EUROSTAT ENLARGEMENT COUNTRIES 1. BACKGROUND ESS COUNTRIES & EUROSTAT 1. Round: 2006-2008 2. Round: 2014-2015 ENLARGEMENT COUNTRIES 1. Round: 2010-2013 2. Round: 2015-... 16.11.2018

1. BACKGROUND (Cont’d) 1. ROUND PEER REVIEWS 2. ROUND PEER REVIEWS   1. ROUND PEER REVIEWS 2. ROUND PEER REVIEWS Questionnaires SAQ (for the NSI) Coordination Questionnaire (for the NSS) Light SAQ (for the stakeholders) 2. Questionnaires (Principles) 15 principles of the CoP 3. Methodology “Declaration-Based” Approach “Audit-Like” Approach 4. Visit (Principles) Principles 1-6 and 15 of the CoP 5. Improvement Actions Defined by the PR team. Defined by the NSI itself based on the recommendations of the PR team. 16.11.2018

2. FIRST ROUND EXPERIENCES 4 April 2011: Documents and self-assessment questionnaire were sent to the PR Team. 24-27 May 2011: Visit of PR Team 29 July 2011: Final report and improvement actions. June 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015: Monitoring of improvement actions by Eurostat. 16.11.2018

2. FIRST ROUND EXPERIENCES (Cont’d) Number of IAs Completed Years Number of IAs Proposed Number of IAs Completed Percentage (%) 2011 4 100,0% 2012 10 7 70,0% 2013 2014 8 5 62,5% 2015 2 2016 3 75,0% TOTAL 35 28 80,0% 16.11.2018

3. EARLY PREPARATIONS An internal team comprising of experts from International Relations Department. Official letters and information notes. Gantt chart. Informing all levels of TurkStat staff. Determination of ONAS: Central Bank and Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs. 16.11.2018

4. DOCUMENTATION List of core documents annexed to “Guide for NSIs and Other National Authorities”. Other documents to be considered as prominent for the NSS. Translation of relevant documents to English. Preparation of executive summaries. Use of translation service through a contractor translation company. 16.11.2018

5. QUESTIONNAIRES Self-Assessment Questionnaire (TurkStat). Light Self-Assessment Questionnaire (CBRT & MoFWA). Questionnaire on the Coordination Role of the NSIs (TurkStat). 16.11.2018

6. PEER REVIEW VISIT Visit of the peer reviewers for Turkey on November 3-6, 2015 in Ankara. PR team for Turkey: two experts and one representative from Eurostat. A draft list of main producers and users, non-governmental organisations, representative offices of international organisations, professional associations, etc. as well as medium-level and junior staff. 16.11.2018

7. CONCLUSIONS Opportunity to see strong aspects of the system and good practices, and areas to be developed, More burden on the NSIs, ONAs and the staff. Number of questionnaires, Audit-like approach, Principles evaluated during the visit, Formulating the improvement actions by the NSI itself. Experiencing the same methods like the ESS countries: A positive novelty for enlargement countries. 16.11.2018

7. CONCLUSIONS (Cont’d) Support of top management: indispensible for PRs. Informing not only the top management but also all levels of staff: a significant activity for the global awareness. Improvement actions with deadlines: worthwhile references to make progress in specific areas. Defining improvement actions by the NSIs themselves and SMART (Specific, Measurable, Assignable, Realistic, Time-related) approach: recent and very useful methods on defining more “to the point” actions and ensuring the NSIs to be more committed to the improvement actions. 16.11.2018

7. CONCLUSIONS (Cont’d) Time constraint is a critical aspect during the PR activities. Flow diagram Gantt chart Examination of reports and improvement actions of ESS countries to see different country practices and how to define improvement actions based on the recommendations. A small core group consisting of head of departments would be better for the questionnaire phase. Objectivity, willingness and volunteerism as the main components of an NSI before and during a PR exercise. 16.11.2018

Thank you four your attention!! Any questions? 16.11.2018