High Throughput Coexistence issues – a personal comment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /108r0 Submission January 2003 Adrian Stephens, IntelSlide 1 Some proposed motions for HT SG Adrian P Stephens
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /702r0 Submission September 2003 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Report of High Throughput Usage Model Special Committee.
TGn Chair’s Status Update
VHTL6 task group work plan proposal (VHTL < 6 GHz)
Studies in WAC SG Date: Authors: September 2016
Intel Validation of TGn Simulation Scenarios
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
LB97 CID Coex Date: Authors: May 2007 May 2007
Overlapping coverage issues with n BSSs
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor
Month b Performance in Presence of g Adjacent Channel Interference Tim Wakeley - HP Tim Wakeley, Hewlett Packard.
TGn Closing Report September 2003
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Outputs of the Usage Model Special Committee
Proposed PAR and 5 Criteria for High Throughput Task Group
Beacon Response Proposal
TGn FRCC Jan 2004 Report Adrian P Stephens
Month 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 September 2004 Motion
1/24/2002 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TGg Liaison Report, January 2002 Date Submitted:
Japanese Frequency Regulations Related to TGn Functional Requirements
A Comment on Black-Box adaptation for simulation methodology
Bluetooth SIG Coexistence Working Group
Extension Coexistence with OBSS
Mesh Networks Alliance (MNA)
CID#102 - Channel Allocation
Free the APs Button Images
CSN & BSS Bridging Date: Authors: Jan 2013
Adrian P Stephens Chair, FRCC
Adrian P Stephens Chair, FRCC
TGn FRCC Jan 2004 Report Adrian P Stephens
NTT Access Network Service Systems Laboratories
Elevation Effect on MIMO Channel
Proposed Evaluation Methodology Addition
TGn FRCC Report March 2004 Adrian P Stephens Chair TGn FRCC
TGn Closing Report November 2003
TGn FRCC Jan 2004 Report Adrian P Stephens
Updates to TGn FRCC Documents
Proposed PAR and 5 Criteria for High Throughput Task Group
Thoughts on VHT Date: Authors: May 2007 April 2007
Overlapping coverage issues with n BSSs
TGn Chair’s Status Update
TGn Closing Report September 2003
Efficient Frequency Spectrum Utilization
Transmit Spectral Mask Changes
Channel Allocation March 2008 Authors: Date: Month Year
Solution for 40MHz in 2.4 GHz band
Motion to a Start High Throughput Study Group
WME+ / Fasttrack Differences
TGh Scope, Purpose and Status
IEEE Comments on aq PAR and 5C
Input on WUR PAR Scope Date: Authors: July 2016
Proposed Evaluation Methodology Addition
40MHz in 2.4 GHz band Date: Authors: Name Company Address
LB97 Coex: Duplicate DSSS
VHT - SG Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
November 2018 Opening Report
April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 July 2010
March 2019 Liaison Report Date: Authors: March 2019
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
TGg Submissions List for January 2002 Session
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
NTT Access Network Service Systems Laboratories
Month 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 November 2003
Box 5 results for Single BSS Calibration Case
TGn Closing Report Orlando , Fl, US March 2004
TGn FRCC Jan 2004 Report Adrian P Stephens
Adrian P Stephens Chair, FRCC
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
40MHz in 2.4 GHz band Date: Authors: Name Company Address
July 2018 Sub 1 GHz Interest Group
Presentation transcript:

802.11 High Throughput Coexistence issues – a personal comment May 2003 802.11 High Throughput Coexistence issues – a personal comment Adrian P Stephens (adrian.p.stephens@intel.com) Adrian Stephens, Intel

Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 May 2003 802.11 HT Coexistence Issues Want to avoid sharing a channel with legacy devices Channel selection heuristic The possibility of “cooperating” with 802.11h devices to move them Protocol is “agnostic” to frequency band Must support 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz operation “Mixed” BSS operation is rare, but must be present in the protocol. Adrian Stephens, Intel John Doe, His Company

Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 May 2003 Usage Modeling Usage Modeling HTSG special committee started with this author as the chair Likely to be ~15 use cases for which results must be presented during submission. Each use case adds significantly to the cost of preparing submissions What are the interference use cases? Who can define what types of interference are reasonable? Adrian Stephens, Intel John Doe, His Company