About This Document The Cognitive Rigor (CR) Matrix (created by Karin Hess by combining Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge) is the primary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Advertisements

Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Please print the three Cognitive Rigor Matrices full page. Thanks!
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Bridging Assessment and Instruction
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
DOK and GRASPS, an Introduction for new staff
Standards Academy Grades 3 and 4 Day 1. Objectives Understand the Critical Areas of our grade levels. Examine the importance of vertical alignment across.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
Goals and Objectives.
ELA Learning Progressions
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
SLB /04/07 Thinking and Communicating “The Spiritual Life is Thinking!” (R.B. Thieme, Jr.)
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Modified from Depth of Knowledge presentation by Dr. Robin Smith at 2009 PRESA Leadership Conference… Adapted from Kentucky Department of Education, Mississippi.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Depth of Knowledge and Cognitive Demand QualityCore Professional Development Day 1, 2–1.
Teachers Helping Teachers with Rigor/Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Presented by NHCS Gifted Education Specialists.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Writing Objectives Including Bloom’s Taxanomy. Three Primary Components of an Objective Condition –What they’re given Behavior –What they do Criteria.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Depth of Knowledge and the Cognitive Rigor Matrix 1.
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Major Science Project Process A blueprint for experiment success.
Today’s Learning Target I can explain how Webb’s Depth of Knowledge compliments Bloom’s Taxonomy to build rigor in the classroom.
From Infusing Rigor & Research into Instruction and Assessment presentation USOE, Salt Lake City, UT February 25-26, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D. Center for.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
And PARCC
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
1 Cognitive Demand in Problems  Cognitive demand is a measure of what the instructional question (a question posed during class) or test item requires.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
Are your students thinking more deeply or just working harder
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Bridging Assessment and Instruction
Assessment.
Assessment.
Definitions & Examples
IB Assessments CRITERION!!!.
Outline What is Literature Review? Purpose of Literature Review
Counseling with Depth of Knowledge
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
Preparation for the American Literature Eoc
مركز تطوير التدريس والتدريب الجامعي ورقة بعنوان
مركز تطوير التدريس والتدريب الجامعي ورقة بعنوان إعداد
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Effective Questioning
Preplanning Presentation
Writing Learning Outcomes
Hess Cognitive Rigor Writing Matrix
Norman L Webb.
Arroyo Valley High School August 19, 2013
Assessment and Higher-Order Thinking
Hess Cognitive Rigor Matrix
Presentation transcript:

About This Document The Cognitive Rigor (CR) Matrix (created by Karin Hess by combining Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge) is the primary source for determining DOK levels. This document is used by PARCC and SBAC to determine standard DOK levels. Susan Richmond divided the CR Matrix into four pathways that follow developmental learning. This division was approved by Karin Hess. When planning instruction it may be beneficial to follow the pathways. Do all tasks have to encompass all pathways? NO. But if students “get stuck” in a task there may have been a gap in a previous pathway. This Task Map was created to support teachers wanting to plan instruction sequentially by DOK levels ( i.e., moving a DOK-2 to a DOK-3, etc..) and develop tasks at a higher rigor. DO NOT SKIP DOK-1 if needed. All other DOK levels need this foundational base to build upon. You can also use this document to assess what DOK level a task is. Fill in the blank for each DOK level. If you feel like you need to add more or less try a different DOK level.

A Completed DOK Matrix Showing Paths and End Target Goals Webb’s  Depth of Knowledge DOK LEVEL 1 Recall and Reproduction DOK LEVEL 2 Basic Skills and Concepts DOK LEVEL 3 Strategic Thinking and Reasoning DOK LEVEL 4 Extended Thinking Blooms  Remember (Knowledge) -Recall, locate basic facts, definitions, details and events Understand (Comprehend) -Select appropriate words for use when intended meaning is clearly evident. -Specify, explain relationships -Summarize -Identify central ideas -Explain, generalize or connect ideas using supporting evidence (quote, text, evidence). -Explain how concepts or ideas specifically relate to other content domains. Apply -Use language structure(pre/suffix) or word relationships (synonyms/antonym) to determine meaning. -Use context to identify word meanings -Obtain and interpret information using text features. -Use concepts to solve non-routine problems. -Devise an approach among many alternatives to research a novel problem. Analyze - Identify the kind of information contained in a graphic, table, visual, etc. -Compare literary elements, facts, terms and events. -Analyze format, organization and text structures. -Analyze or interpret author’s craft (e.g., literary devices, viewpoint, or potential bias) to critique a text. -Analyze multiple sources or multiple text. -Analyze complex abstract themes. Evaluate -Cite evidence and develop a logical argument for conjectures based on one text or problem. -Evaluate relevancy, accuracy and completeness of information across texts or sources Create (Synthesize) -Brainstorm ideas, concepts, problems, or perspectives related to a topic or concept. -Generate conjectures or hypotheses based on observations or prior knowledge and experience. -Develop a complex model or approach for a given situation. -Develop an alternative solution. -Synthesize information across multiple sources or texts. -Articulate a new voice, theme, knowledge or perspective. Path 1 - 1 end- 2 Path 2 - 1 Path 2 - 2 Path 2 End - 3 Path 3 - 1 Path 3 - 2 Path 3 - 3 Path 3 - 4 Path 3 - 5 Path 3 end - 6 Path 4 - 1 Path 4 - 2 Path 4 - 3 Path 4 - 4 Path 4 - 6 Path 4 - 7 Path 4 end - 8 This is the prior matrix completed. The arrow is pointing across the highest task level of each DOK path. Path 4 – 5 2009 ©Karin K Hess, Hess Cognitive Rigor Matrix – Permission to reproduce is given when authorship is fully cited. Susan Richmond

PATHWAY 1 Performance tasks demand thoughtful application of knowledge and skills, not just recall. Therefore, the DOK-1 Pathway can be thought of as pre-requisite skills and knowledge students must have to complete a performance task but in and of itself does not constitute a performance task. It is a necessary step for building background knowledge, vocabulary, definitions and descriptions around the topic in which a performance task will be based. The following DOK-1 frames are building blocks for the educator. Before completing each frame, or those you feel that are necessary to scaffold students to your final performance task, ask yourself: “What basic knowledge (e.g. vocabulary, background knowledge, definitions, descriptions, etc.…) must students have about the topic of study?”

PATHWAY 1 Pathway 1 The foundation of learning – from knowledge (remembering the name ) to understanding the purpose (e.g. definition, use of…). . What knowledge and skills, (e.g., recalled or recognized) will your students need to know in order complete the performance task? 1 2 BLOOMS: REMEMBER/KNOWLEDGE DOK 1 RECALL AND REPRODUCTION I am asking my students to recall __________. I am asking my students to locate __________. I am asking my students to read __________. 1 BLOOMS: UNDERSTAND/COMPREHENSION DOK 1 RECALL AND REPRODUCTION I am asking my students to identify _____________. I am asking my students to select ______ from clearly evident _____. I am asking my students to describe ____________. I am asking my students to explain ____________. I am asking my students to define _____________. I am asking my students to write simple ____________. 2

PATHWAY 2 On the DOK-2 Pathway students are doing the essential work of conceptualizing the knowledge and skills they have learned in order to transfer them to a new context (i.e., giving concrete meaning to knowledge and skills). A completed performance task is not accomplished at a DOK-2 level. As in DOK-1, it is a prerequisite for the higher level thinking required to complete a performance task. Students are demonstrating a true understanding of what they have learned by applying and demonstrating their knowledge in different contexts. The context is very close to the context in which they’ve learned the knowledge and skills. The following DOK-2 frames are thinking frames for educators planning a performance task. Before completing each frame, or those you feel that are necessary to scaffold students to your final performance task, ask yourself: “In what new context(s) and applications will the student use previously learned knowledge and skills to complete the performance task?”

PATHWAY 2 2 1 3 BLOOMS: APPLY DOK 1 RECALL AND REPRODUCTION 1 Preparing to conceptualize basic knowledge within a new context. “In what new context(s) and applications will the student use previously learned knowledge and skills to complete the performance task?” BLOOMS: APPLY DOK 1 RECALL AND REPRODUCTION I am asking my students to use ______ to determine ______. I am asking my students to apply rules about _______ to ________. I am asking my students to apply basic ______ for _________. 1 BLOOMS: UNDERSTAND/COMPREHEND DOK 2: SKILLS AND CONCEPTS I am asking my students to explain ________using text evidence. I am asking my students to show relationships between____and ____ using text evidence. I am asking my students to specify _____ using text evidence. I am asking my students to give examples and non-examples of _____ using text evidence. I am asking my students to summarize _______. I am asking my students to make a basic inference about _____. I am asking my students to make a logical prediction from _______. I am asking my students to identify the main idea of ________. I am asking my students to make a basic generalization about ______. I am asking my students to locate explicit __________. I am asking my students to locate implicit __________. 2

PATHWAY 2 Continued 2 1 3 Pathway 2 Preparing to conceptualize basic knowledge within a new context. BLOOMS: APPLY DOK 2: SKILLS AND CONCEPTS I am asking my students to use ______ to identify ______. I am asking my students to obtain _______ using _______. I am asking my students to interpret _______ using _______. I am asking my students to develop _____ within the limits of ______. I am asking my students to apply simple _____ in ________. 3

PATHWAY 3 The DOK-3 Pathway is truly the beginning of higher level thinking. Without the background knowledge (DOK-1) and the conceptualization of skills and knowledge (DOK-2) students can’t move forward comprehensively to DOK-3. Along the DOK-3 Pathway students bring conceptualized knowledge and/or skills (DOK-1-2) and strategically apply them to a non-routine situation for a very specific and new purpose. The specific purpose is clearly identified. The outcome of either product or performance is open-ended in response and process. The rubric or criteria supports flexible responses measuring the ability to reason. It is possible to complete a short (1-4 days or lessons) performance task at a DOK-3 level . In a DOK-4 performance task students will use a wide range of sources. The following DOK-3 frames are thinking frames for educators planning a performance task. Before completing each frame, or those you feel that are necessary to scaffold students to your final performance task ask yourself: “ What kind of strategic reasoning must my students be able to do in order to solve the non-routine problem of the performance task?”

PATHWAY 3 2 1 3 4 5 6 Pathway 3 Preparing and moving to expand on previous conceptualizations by thinking and reasoning strategically. The nature of ALL DOK-3 tasks require an explanation that demonstrates strategic reasoning and some type of statement reflecting on how the conclusion/answer was reached. “ What kind of strategic reasoning must my students be able to do in order to solve the non-routine problem of the performance task?” BLOOMS: ANALYZE DOK 1: REMEMBER/UNDERSTAND I am asking my students to identify specific ______ in ________. I am asking my students to decide which _______ is appropriate for _______. 1 BLOOMS: ANALYZE DOK 2: SKILLS AND CONCEPTS I am asking my students to categorize or compare _____________. I am asking my students to identify the use of _______. I am asking my students to analyze _______ specific _____. I am asking my students to distinguish _______ from ______. I am asking my students to identify characteristic features of ________. 2

PATHWAY 3 continued Pathway 3 Preparing and moving to expand on previous conceptualizations by thinking and reasoning strategically. BLOOMS: REMEMBER/KNOWLEDGE DOK 3: STRATEGIC THINKING/REASONING I am asking my students to make a new connection between the ideas of ______ and _____ using _________to explain their reasoning. I am asking my students to explain the reasoning behind an idea using ________. I am asking my students to use _______ in order to generalize how ________. I am asking my students to identify hidden inferences about ______ using ________ as evidence in their reasoning statement. I am asking my students to make inferences about _______ (explicit/implicit theme) by strategically using _______ . I am asking my students to describe what influence the _______may have on how a text is interpreted. I am asking my students to write a multi-paragraph composition about ______in order to analyze the writing component of _______(voice, audience, etc..). 3 BLOOMS: APPLY DOK 3: STRATEGIC THINKING/REASONING I am asking my students to apply the concept of _____ in the new context of ______. I am asking my students to apply ______ (meaning, progression of ideas, etc.…) in a final draft about _______. I am asking my students to apply _______ (internal consistency of text organization and structure) in a composing a full composition. I am asking my students to apply _______ (literary device) in their writing, to impact a reader’s interpretation of the text. 4 BLOOMS: ANALYZE DOK 3: STRATEGIC THINKING/REASONING I am asking my students to analyze ______ within _______. I am asking my students to analyze interrelationships among _____ (concepts) and _____. I am asking my students to analyze interrelationships among _____ (issues) and _____. I am asking my students to analyze interrelationships among _____ (problems) and _____. I am asking my students 5

PATHWAY 3 continued Pathway 3 Preparing and moving to expand on previous conceptualizations by thinking and reasoning strategically. BLOOMS: ANALYZE DOK 3: STRATEGIC THINKING/REASONING I am asking my students to analyze ______ within _______. I am asking my students to analyze interrelationships among _____ (concepts) and _____. I am asking my students to analyze interrelationships among _____ (issues) and _____. I am asking my students to analyze interrelationships among _____ (problems) and _____. I am asking my students to analyze an author’s use of ________ (author’s craft) to create or critique ______. I am asking my students to use reasoning, planning and evidence to support the inference of ________ in _________. 5 BLOOMS: Evaluate I am asking students to cite ______ and develop a logical argument/conjecture for ______. I am asking students to describe, compare and contrast solution methods for _________. I am asking students to verify reasonableness of the results of _________. I am asking students to justify a conclusion drawn about _______. I am asking students to critique a conclusion drawn about _______. 6

PATHWAY 4 The DOK- 4 Pathway is truly the beginning of higher level thinking. Without the background knowledge (DOK-1) and the conceptualization of skills and knowledge (DOK-2) students can’t move forward comprehensively to DOK-3. Along the DOK-3 Pathway students bring conceptualized knowledge and/or skills (DOK-1-2) and strategically apply them to a non-routine situation for a very specific and new purpose. The specific purpose is clearly identified. The outcome of either product or performance is open-ended in response and process. The rubric or criteria supports flexible responses measuring the ability to reason. It is possible to complete a short (1-4 days or lessons) performance task at a DOK-3 level . In a DOK-4 performance task students will use a wide range of sources. The following DOK-3 frames are thinking frames for educators planning a performance task. Before completing each frame, or those you feel that are necessary to scaffold students to your final performance task ask yourself: “What kind of strategic reasoning do my students need to be able to solve the non-routine problem of the performance task?”

PATHWAY 4 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 Pathway 4 BLOOMS: CREATE/SYNTHESIZE Preparing and moving to extending previously reached conclusions across content and domains. The nature of DOK-4 requires tasks to have evidence from multiple sources, examining of some type of conclusion, conjecture, hypothesis, etc.… and the proving/evaluating of the conclusion. The new conclusion (idea, concept, etc..) is then extended across new domains or concepts from which it was not originally learned. jj BLOOMS: CREATE/SYNTHESIZE DOK 1: RECALL AND REPRODUCTION I am asking my students to brainstorm ideas related to ______. I am asking my students to brainstorm concepts related to ______. I am asking my students to brainstorm problems related to ______. I am asking my students to brainstorm perspectives related to ______. 1

PATHWAY 4 continued BLOOMS: CREATE/SYNTHESIZE 2 The nature of DOK-4 requires tasks to have evidence from multiple sources, examining of some type of conclusion, conjecture, hypothesis, etc.… and the proving/evaluating of the conclusion. The new conclusion (idea, concept, etc..) is then extended across new domains or concepts from which it was not originally learned. BLOOMS: CREATE/SYNTHESIZE DOK 2: SKILLS AND CONCEPTS I am asking my students to generate ________ (conjecture or hypotheses) based on ____. 2 BLOOMS: CREATE/SYNTHESIZE DOK 3: STRATEGIC THINKING AND REASONING The nature of ALL DOK-3 tasks require an explanation that demonstrates strategic reasoning and some type of statement reflecting on how the conclusion/answer was reached. I am asking my students to synthesize _______ within the source/text of _______. I am asking my students to develop a complex model of ______ for _______. I am asking my students to develop an alternative solution for ______________. 3 BLOOMS: UNDERSTAND/COMPREHEND DOK 4: EXTENDED THINKING I am asking my students to explain how the concept or idea of ________ specifically relates to the other content domain/area of _______. I am asking my students to explain how the concept or idea of ________ specifically relates to the other concept or idea of _______. I am asking my students to develop generalizations of the results obtained about ______ and apply those generalizations to solve _________ (new problem). I am asking my students to develop generalizations of the strategies used for ______ and apply those strategies to solve _________ (new problem 4 BLOOMS: APPLY DOK 4: EXTENDED THINKING I am asking my students to illustrate how the themes of _______, _______ and _______ are interrelated. I am asking my students to select an approach from _______, ________ and _______ in order to research the novel problem of __________. I am asking my students to devise an approach from _______, ________ and _______ in order to research the novel problem of __________. 5

PATHWAY 4 continued BLOOMS: ANALYZE DOK 4: EXTENDED THINKING 6 The nature of DOK-4 requires tasks to have evidence from multiple sources, examining of some type of conclusion, conjecture, hypothesis, etc.… and the proving/evaluating of the conclusion. The new conclusion (idea, concept, etc..) is then extended across new domains or concepts from which it was not originally learned. BLOOMS: ANALYZE DOK 4: EXTENDED THINKING I am asking my students to analyze multiple sources of evidence from _____, ______ and ______ (or more) with the objective of _________. I am asking my students to analyze _______ (3 or more) works by the author _______ in order to ________. I am asking my students to analyze ________ (3 or more) works written in the same genre of ________ in order to _________. I am asking my students to analyze ________ (3 or more) time periods to reach a conclusion about _________. I am asking my students to analyze ________ (3 or more) themes about _______in order to _________. I am asking my students to analyze the complex/abstract theme of ________ based on ______ (3 or more sources). I am asking my students to analyze the complex perspective of _________ based on ________ (3 or more sources). I am asking my students to analyze the complex concept of ______ based on ______ (3 or more sources). I am asking my students to analyze the discourse style of _______ based on ______(3 or more sources). 6 BLOOMS: EVALUATE DOK 4: EXTENDED THINKING I am asking my students to evaluate the relevancy, accuracy and completeness of ________ using __________, ________ and ___________ as sources. I am asking my students to apply understanding about _________ in a novel way using the sources of ______________ (3 or more) I am asking my students to provide an argument for ______________ using the sources of __________ (3 or more). I am asking my students to provide a justification for __________ based on the sources of ____________ (3 or more). 7

PATHWAY 4 continued BLOOMS: CREATE/SYNTHESIZE 8 The nature of DOK-4 requires tasks to have evidence from multiple sources, examining of some type of conclusion, conjecture, hypothesis, etc.… and the proving/evaluating of the conclusion. The new conclusion (idea, concept, etc..) is then extended across new domains or concepts from which it was not originally learned. BLOOMS: CREATE/SYNTHESIZE DOK 4: EXTENDED THINKING I am asking my students to synthesize information across multiple sources or texts . I am asking my students to articulate a new voice about _______ using multiple sources . I am asking my students to create an alternate theme from the theme in the text/source of _______. I am asking my students to explain new knowledge or perspective using information gathered from multiple sources. 8