Architecture for ICD 11 and SNOMED CT Harmonization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The ORCHID project Dr Ian Gaywood, NUH Dr Ira Pande, NUH Professor John Chelsom, City University London.
Advertisements

ARCHITECTURES FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS
WHO Agenda: Classifications – Terminologies - Standards
Consistent and standardized common model to support large-scale vocabulary use and adoption Robust, scalable, and common API to reduce variation in clinical.
Towards Standard International Energy Classification Vladimir Markhonko United Nations Statistics Division.
Catalina Martínez-Costa, Stefan Schulz: Ontology-based reinterpretation of the SNOMED CT context model Ontology-based reinterpretation of the SNOMED CT.
ICD 11 FC and SNOMED CT – finding as Ontologies of Clinical Situations Stefan Schulz.
United Nations Statistics Division Principles and concepts of classifications.
SNOMED CT’s Ontological Commitment Stefan Schulz University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany Ronald Cornet Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mapping from SNOMED CT to ICD-10 and ICD-10-CM Dr. Kin Wah Fung U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Biomedical Informatics Some Observations on Clinical Data Representation in EHRs Christopher G. Chute, MD DrPH, Mayo Clinic Chair, ICD11 Revision, World.
Clinical Vocabularies James J. Cimino, M.D. Columbia University.
PRD_codes_KS_ ppx. UK Renal SNOMED CT subset incorporating the new ERA-EDTA PRDs and how we can use them in Rare Disease Groups Keith Simpson.
THEORIES, MODELS, AND FRAMEWORKS
Development Principles PHIN advances the use of standard vocabularies by working with Standards Development Organizations to ensure that public health.
The IHTSDO Workbench A Terminology Management Tool John Gutai, IHTSDO May 2011 For OHT.
Chapter 6 System Engineering - Computer-based system - System engineering process - “Business process” engineering - Product engineering (Source: Pressman,
Ontology-based Convergence of Medical Terminologies: SNOMED CT and ICD-11 Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University.
Karen Gibson.  Significant investment in eHealth is underway  Clinical records: ◦ Not only a record for the author ◦ Essential to inform the next person.
Developing an OWL-DL Ontology for Research and Care of Intracranial Aneurysms – Challenges and Limitations Holger Stenzhorn, Martin Boeker, Stefan Schulz,
1 Federal Health IT Ontology Project (HITOP) Group The Vision Toward Testing Ontology Tools in High Priority Health IT Applications October 5, 2005.
SNOMED CT Denise Downs Knowledge Management & Education Lead Data Standards, Technology Office Department of Health Informatics Directorate.
A Case Study of ICD-11 Anatomy Value Set Extraction from SNOMED CT Guoqian Jiang, PhD ©2011 MFMER | slide-1 Division of Biomedical Statistics & Informatics,
SNOMED CT's Condition / Situation approach related to OGMS Stefan Schulz Medical University of Graz (Austria) ICBO 2013 Montreal OGMS Meeting.
SNOMED CT – Distributed Content Management Stefan Schulz Content Committee April 2, 2009.
1 st June 2006 St. George’s University of LondonSlide 1 Using UMLS to map from a Library to a Clinical Classification: Improving the Functionality of a.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
MEDINFO Panel II: Do we need a Common Ontology between ICD 11 and SNOMED CT to ensure seamless re-use and semantic interoperability?
IntroductionMethods & MaterialsResults Conclusions The Office of Standards and Interoperability (OFTSI) of the Foundation TicSalut, is working on the need.
Value Set Resolution: Build generalizable data normalization pipeline using LexEVS infrastructure resources Explore UIMA framework for implementing semantic.
WHO – IHTSDO: SNOMED CT – ICD-11 coordination: Conditions vs. Situations Stefan Schulz IHTSDO conference Copenhagen, Apr 24, 2012.
World Health Organization Classifications, Terminologies, Standards ICD Revision: Where Are We?
Discovering Descriptive Knowledge Lecture 18. Descriptive Knowledge in Science In an earlier lecture, we introduced the representation and use of taxonomies.
Ontological Analysis, Ontological Commitment, and Epistemic Contexts Stefan Schulz WHO – IHTSDO Joint Advisory Group First Face-to-Face Meeting Heathrow,
The ICPS: A taxonomy, a classification, an ontology or an information model? Stefan SCHULZ IMBI, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
The ICPS: A taxonomy, a classification, an ontology or an information model? Stefan SCHULZ IMBI, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Issues in Ontology-based Information integration By Zhan Cui, Dean Jones and Paul O’Brien.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 6a EHR Functional Model Standards.
Approach to building ontologies A high-level view Chris Wroe.
Enable Semantic Interoperability for Decision Support and Risk Management Presented by Dr. David Li Key Contributors: Dr. Ruixin Yang and Dr. John Qu.
SNOMED CT Vendor Introduction 27 th October :30 (CET) Implementation Special Interest Group Tom Seabury IHTSDO.
FROM ONE NOMENCLATURES TO ANOTHER… Drs. Sven Van Laere.
Presented for discussion with Implementation SIG Heather Grain.
Frequent Criticisms too ambitious recreation of a Textbook of Medicine competing with SNOMED-CT replicates the work done elsewhere: DSM, ICPC, too academic.
Assessing SNOMED CT for Large Scale eHealth Deployments in the EU Workpackage 2- Building new Evidence Daniel Karlsson, Linköping University Stefan Schulz,
LOINC – SNOMED CT Cooperation on Content
UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEMS (UMLS)
Representation of Hypersensitivity, Allergy and adverse reactions in SNOMED CT Bruce Goldberg, MD, PhD.
The “Common Ontology” between ICD 11 and SNOMED CT
NeurOn: Modeling Ontology for Neurosurgery
Scope The scope of this test is to make a preliminary assessment of the fitness of the Draft Observables and Investigation Model (Observables model)
Terminology Service Bureau Vision
Semantic Web Foundations
Can SNOMED CT be harmonized with an upper-level ontology?
Observable entities and Clinical findings
ICD 11 FC and SNOMED CT – finding as Ontologies of Clinical Situations
Federal Health IT Ontology Project (HITOP) Group
Observable entities and Clinical findings
Semantic Alignment between ICD-11 and SNOMED-CT
Functional status and activities of daily living concepts
Networking and Health Information Exchange
ICD-11 Reference Guide Robert Jakob, WHO.
Guoqian Jiang, Harold R. Solbrig, Christopher G. Chute
Harmonizing SNOMED CT with BioTopLite
Lexical ambiguity in SNOMED CT
Informatics and Terminologies Committee
Informatics and Terminology Committee
Stefan SCHULZ IMBI, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
Comprehensive Medical Assisting, 3rd Ed Unit Three: Managing the Finances in the Practice Chapter 14 - Diagnostic Coding.
Family of International Classifications: an updated definition, foundation and structure (Poster C702) This poster provides a summary of the revised Family.
Presentation transcript:

Architecture for ICD 11 and SNOMED CT Harmonization WHO - FAMILY OF INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS NETWORK ANNUAL MEETING 2014 Architecture for ICD 11 and SNOMED CT Harmonization 11-17 October 2014 Barcelona, Spain Poster Number WHO/CTS to insert Kristina Brand-Persson, James R Campbell, Christopher G Chute, Monica Harry, Sukil Kim, Vincenzo Della Mea, Alan Rector, Molly Meri Robinson Nicol, Jean Marie Rodrigues, Stefan Schulz, Harold Solbrig, Kent Spackman, Jane Millar, Bedirhan Üstün Common Ontology Working Group of the IHTSDO – WHO Joint Advisory Group (JAG) Based on agreed principles for a Common Ontology for ICD 11 and SNOMED CT an architecture has been elaborated. It is being used to help characterize what is ICD-11 and owned by WHO, what is SNOMED CT and owned by IHTSDO, and what are the Collaborative Work Products, which are jointly owned, consisting by the following building blocks: The COMMON ONTOLOGY is, mostly, a SNOMED CT subset, consisting of concepts and axioms from the “Finding / Disorder” branch. This common ontology will provide all entities of meaning that are necessary to represent the ICD content. External sources cover some special content that is temporarily or permanently outside the scope of SNOMED CT (e.g. gene names) but considered necessary for the common ontology. The ICD FOUNDATION SCAFFOLD hosts the external ontological sources and additionally provides primitives, which act chiefly as organizing headings (e.g. “Diseases of...”) to guarantee monohierarchical organization of the linearizations created out of it. The ICD CONTENT MODEL provides not only multilingual names, sets of interface terms (value sets) and definitions but also supportive knowledge about the ICD classes to be represented in the linearizations, e.g. diagnostic criteria, body sites, causal mechanisms, all of them linked to the common ontology. Furthermore, the content model provides rules that guide the building of linearization classes, such as exclusions, which ensure the disjointness of linearization classes. A QUERY LIBRARY hosts all queries that are necessary to build linearization classes. Such queries can express, e.g. simple 1:1 mappings to concepts in the common ontology, but also more complex ones, e.g. needed to account for the numerous exclusion rules in linearizations. LINEARIZATIONS are those releases of ICD-11 which address specific use cases like mortality, morbidity, primary care, reimbursement or classifications for medical specialties. They are familiar to the user, as they incorporate the classical classification principles (single hierarchy, non-overlapping classes, exhaustive partitions). They are fed by the queries of the Query Library, and by additional knowledge from the ICD-11 content model. Residuals (NEC, NOS). That linearizations are expressed by queries highlight their specific status as a special kind of terminological artefacts, which are not ontologies but whose content can be traced back to a principled ontology, viz. the Common Ontology as a subset of SNOMED CT. The hierarchical arrangement may differ in linearizations, which however reflects pragmatic preferences in the arrangement of classification codes and not incompatibilities in the ontological interpretation of the domain. Based on agreed principles for a Common Ontology for ICD 11 and SNOMED CT, an architecture has been elaborated. It is being used to help characterize what is ICD-11 and owned by WHO, what is SNOMED CT and owned by IHTSDO, and what are the Collaborative Work Products, which are jointly owned. The architecture distinguishes the components available for the end user (linearizations) from their background repository (foundation). It furthermore distinguishes the representational status of different artefacts: from context-free, pure ontological content of a SNOMED CT subset to purpose-specific monohierarchical arrangements of codes. It is finally supplemented by medical knowledge provided by the content model and by a rich collection of multilingual names, definitions and interface terms. Title INTRODUCTION SNOMED CT is a standardized terminology for health records, based on principles of formal ontology using description logics. Here, a subset is extracted, the Common Ontology, mostly consisting of concepts and axioms from the highly polyhierarchical “Finding / Disorder” branch. They denote “situations”, i.e. life periods of a patient having a given clinical condition. This common ontology will provide most of the entities of meaning that are necessary to represent the content of ICD-11. The ICD Foundation Ontology contains the ontological content, mostly SNOMED CT, apart from the external sources. It is a multi-hierarchical taxonomy and takes additional description logics axioms from SNOMED CT. Its entities of meaning describe what is universally true for the concepts covered. The ICD Content model provides multilingual names, sets of interface terms (value sets) and definitions, together with supportive knowledge about the ICD classes to be represented in the linearizations, e.g. diagnostic criteria, body sites, causal mechanisms, all of them linked to the common ontology. Furthermore the content model provides rules that guide the building of linearization classes, such as exclusions, which ensure the disjointness of linerarization classes. METHODS External sources cover content that is outside the scope of SNOMED CT but considered necessary for the common ontology, e.g. gene names or new content needed for ICD-11 but still in the submission process for SNOMED CT. A collection of Non-Descrip-tion Logics Entities con-stitutes the repository for all lineariza-tions. They are linked via queries to the Results Title concepts in the common ontology. These queries represent the numerous exclusion rules in linearizations and define non-ontological grouper s (headings). Conclusions Title Linearizations are those releases of ICD-11 which address specific use cases like mortality, morbidity, primary care, reimbursement or classifications for medical specialties. They are familiar to the user, as they incorporate the classical classification principles (single hierarchy, non-overlapping classes, exhaustive partitions). They are expressed as queries on the common ontology, and incorporate additional knowledge from the ICD-11 content model. Residuals (NEC – not elsewhere classified, NOS – not otherwise specified) are automatically generated at all hierarchical levels. That linearizations are expressed by queries highlights their status as a special kind of terminological artefacts, which are not ontologies but whose content can be traced back to a principled ontology, viz. the Foundation Ontology. The hierarchical makeup may differ between linearizations, as they reflect pragmatic preferences in the arrangement of classification codes. Linearizations can also be nested.