“ANY PORT IN A STORM” PLACES OF REFUGE FOR SHIPS IN DISTRESS www

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tips and Resources IASC Cluster/Sector Leadership Training
Advertisements

Regional Workshop Warsaw, January 2006 STATE UNION OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO Basel Protocol on Liability and Compensation Questionnaire No. 2 Ratification.
E-navigation, and IHO’s role IHO, Monaco, October 2014 John Erik Hagen, Regional Director NCA Coordinator of the completed IMO Correspondence Group on.
© Webber Wentzel 2012 Maritime Law Association of South Africa Conference – Shelley Point – 15 September 2012 PLACES OF REFUGE FOR SHIPS IN NEED OF ASSISTANCE.
PROYECTO NEREIDAS VISIÓN EUROPEA DE LOS PROYECTOS TEN-T ALEXIO PICCO – CIRCLE Malaga 03/04/2014.
RESCUE AT SEA Esben Poulsson International Chamber of Shipping A challenge for the Shipping Industry 1.
Raymond P. Hayden “The Changing Rules on the Playground” President The Maritime Law Association of the U.S.
YORK-ANTWERP RULES AND PLACES OF REFUGE FOLLOWING THE CMI CONFERENCE 2004 By Ben Browne Shaw and Croft.
An Ocean of Opportunity: An integrated maritime policy for the EU 1 Places of refuge: General legal framework and developments within IMO and the EU Alexandros.
CMI AND PLACES OF REFUGE presented by Stuart Hetherington.
ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY IN GREECE THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK & THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL GUARANTEES/ INSURANCE PRODUCTS TO COVER OPERATORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER.
David Halldearn, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3 rd Package 11 th December 2008 Implementating the 3rd Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper.
INTERNATIONAL MARITIME LAW: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW Perspective and Participation of Non-Governmental Organizations A. William Moreira, Q.C. Past President,

Online Learning 1 Marine Facility Personnel with Security Responsibilities Canaport LNG
A PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES (NCOP) 24 OCTOBER 2007 BY MPATLISENG RAMAEMA CHIEF DIRECTOR: MARITIME TRANSPORT REGULATION DEPARTMENT.
UNECE and OSCE joint event, Almaty, May 2012
International Group of P&I Clubs Presentation to EU Transport Attachés Third Maritime Safety Package – Civil Liability of Shipowners Directive Brussels.
Prevention of pollution by harmful substances in packaged form
State of implementation of the decision III/6f regarding Ukraine (MOP 2, June, , 2008, Riga, Latvia)
The Development of Environmental Salvage and Review of the Salvage Convention 1989 Archie Bishop Holman Fenwick Willan.
INTERTANKO ATHENS TANKER EVENT THE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT Jonathan Hare Skuld Colin de la Rue Ince & Co April 2005.
The European SEA Directive Simon Marsden School of International Business, University of South Australia Module 1: Basics of SEA.
INTERTANKO LATIN AMERICAN PANEL MARITIME SECURITY: LATEST DEVELOPMENTS LATEST DEVELOPMENTS AT IMO JOSEPH J. ANGELO DIRECTOR, REGULATORY AFFAIRS AND THE.
Tripartite Meeting Tokyo, September 2007 Ship Recycling An Overview of Regulatory and Industry Developments Presented by INTERTANKO and ICS on behalf of.
THE MERCHANT SHIPPING CIVIL LIABILITY AND THE MERCHANT SHIPPING INTERNATIONAL OIL POLLUTION COMPENSATION FUND BILLS,2013 ADV A MASOMBUKA 30 JULY 2013.
RATIFICATION OF THE CAPE TOWN AGREEMEMENT OF 2012 ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE TORREMOLLINOS PROTOCOL OF 1993 RELATING TO THE INTERNATIONAL.
PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 13 OCTOBER 2015 RATIFICATION OF THE AFRICAN MARITIME TRANSPORT CHARTER 1.
The Charter of Naples and the Role of Public and Private Entities in the Mediterranean Migration Crisis Ohrid, 6 October 2015 Dr Maria Chiara Noto Dr Giorgia.
The Basel Convention and its application to hazardous and other wastes generated onboard ships Multi-country workshop on management of ship dismantling.
ISM Code 2010: Part A - Implementation Malcolm Maclachlan.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 14 – Transport policy Bilateral screening:
VICTORIAN CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
Annex 2 – Rules of the Air Annex 2 – Rules of the Air Annex 3 – Meteorological Services Annex 3 – Meteorological Services Annex 6 – Operation of aircraft.
Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision LIABILITY AND INSURANCE ISSUES Nathalie.
To Satisfaction of the Administration Seminar on the Implementation of measures to ensure that safety standards are “to the Satisfaction of the Administration.
SOLAS and SAR JIHOON WI.
RATIFICATION OF THE 1991 FAL AMENDMENTS TO THE CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION, 1948 A PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE OF.
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORT 22 SEPTEMBER 2015
LNG fueled Ships, Considerations & Perspectives
Charlotte McClain-Nhlapo Senior Operations Officer The World Bank
RATIFICATION OF THE AFRICAN MARITIME TRANSPORT CHARTER
Business sector engagement and Consumer Awareness October 3rd, 2017
International Maritime Organization
RATIFICATION OF NAIROBI INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON REMOVAL OF WRECKS ,2007 PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE OF TRANSPORT 23 SEPTEMBER 2014.
MLC Recruitment & Placement
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Portfolio Committee Presentation 7 March 2007
New York 5 May 2016   Report on Legal Framework for Civil Liability for Vessel Source Oil Spills in Polar Regions LARS ROSENBERG OVERBY.
COASTAL STATE RESPONSIBILITY (IMO) – HYDROGRAPHY
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
RATIFICATION TO THE HAZARDOUS AND NOXIOUS SUBSTANCE BY SEA CONVENTION 2010 PRESENTATION TO NCOP:SELECT COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT.
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
Bernhard Berger, Marco Paviotti DG Environment, European Commission
1996/2010 HNS Convention.
Service delivery in marine meteorology – key points for consideration
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
EU action after Deepwater Horizon accident - Gulf of Mexico – April 2010
Regulating Arctic Shipping Unilateral, Regional and Global Approaches
Service delivery in marine meteorology – key points for consideration
Handling Over and Taking Over the Navigational Watch
Overview of Article 6 procedures under the Habitats Directive
Regulatory Scoping Exercise of IMO instruments
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
European Marine Monitoring and Assessment
Expectation and activities towards the early entry into force of the Hong Kong Convention Sveinung Oftedal Specialist Director.
Presentation transcript:

“ANY PORT IN A STORM” PLACES OF REFUGE FOR SHIPS IN DISTRESS www “ANY PORT IN A STORM” PLACES OF REFUGE FOR SHIPS IN DISTRESS www.igpandi.org

“Any port in a storm” 1. What is a Place of Refuge? 2. Legal Framework 3. IMO Convention Regime 4. Obstacles to Granting a Place of Refuge 5. Challenges for States 6. Challenges for Shipping & Insurance Industries 7. Conclusions

“Any port in a storm” Prestige - Bay of Biscay, 2002

Stolt Valor - Arabian Gulf 2012 “Any port in a storm” Stolt Valor - Arabian Gulf 2012

“Any port in a storm” Stolt Valour – Arabian Gulf 2012

MSC FLAMINIA – Atlantic July 2012 “Any port in a storm” MSC FLAMINIA – Atlantic July 2012

“Any port in a storm”

“Any port in a storm” Maritime Maisie, Sea of Japan, December 2013

“Any port in a storm” Maritime Maisie

“Any port in a storm” Maritime Maisie

“Any port in a storm” MSC Napoli, Lyme Bay, January 2007

IMO Assembly Resolution A.949 (23) Dec. 2003 – preamble “Any port in a storm” IMO Assembly Resolution A.949 (23) Dec. 2003 – preamble “CONSCIOUS OF THE POSSIBILITY that ships at sea may find themselves in need of assistance relating to the safety of life and the protection of the marine environment,” “RECOGNIZING ALSO the need to balance both the prerogative of a ship in need of assistance to seek a place of refuge and the prerogative of a coastal state to protect its coastline,”

“Any port in a storm” What is a Place of Refuge - IMO Res.A.949 “Place of refuge means a place where a ship in need of assistance can take action to enable it to stabilize its condition and reduce the hazards to navigation, and to protect human life and the environment”. “The issue of places of refuge is not a purely theoretical or doctrinal debate but the solution to a practical problem” What to do when a ship finds itself in serious difficulty or in need of assistance without, however, presenting a risk to the safety of persons involved. Should the ship be brought into shelter near the coast or into a port or, conversely, should it be taken out to sea?

“Any port in a storm” IMO Guidelines Res.A.949 Para 1.18 - “Ship in need of assistance means a ship in a situation, apart from one requiring rescue of persons on board, that could give rise to loss of the vessel or an environmental or navigational hazard.” Para 3.12 - “When permission to access a place of refuge is requested, there is no obligation…to grant it”… “States should…balance risks and give shelter whenever reasonably possible” “The use of places of refuge could encounter local opposition and involve political decisions”

Legal & Procedural Framework “Any port in a storm” Legal & Procedural Framework UN Convention on the Law of the Sea Dec. 1982, Articles 192, 194, 195, 221, 225; duties to protect and preserve marine environment Salvage Convention 1989, Article 11 provides co-operation measures between interested players; no duty on State to grant a place of refuge SOLAS 1974 and SAR 1979 concerned with protecting and saving life; no duty on State to grant a place of refuge EU VTMIS Directive obliges EU States to assess risk but…no duty on EU States to grant a place of refuge /cont

“Any port in a storm” IMO Convention Regime In force Civil Liability Convention, 1992 Bunker Convention, 2001 Wreck Removal Convention, 2007 (from April 2015) LLMC, 1996 (increase in limits from June 2015) Not in force 2010 HNS Convention (consolidated 1996 Convention and 2010 Protocol)

CMI Draft Instrument “Any port in a storm” Developed early/mid 2000’s Legal obligation to grant access subject to veto IMO LEG90 May 2005 – no need for a dedicated PoR convention IMO priority to promote implementation of existing liability and compensation conventions CMI Plenary approved draft instrument October 2008 IMO LEG95 April 2009 – draft instrument not supported by States.

Article 20 VTMIS Directive “Any port in a storm” Article 20 VTMIS Directive “Member States…shall draw up, taking into account relevant guidelines by IMO, plans to accommodate, in the waters under their jurisdiction, ships in distress. Such plans shall contain the necessary arrangements and procedures taking into account operational and environmental constraints, to ensure that ships in distress may immediately go to a place of refuge subject to authorisation by the competent authority.” Experience suggests this duty is not discharged by all EU States: Prestige, Castor, Flaminia

EU Guidelines “Any port in a storm” Guidelines to complement IMO Resolution A.949 and National Plans Aimed at promoting best practice across the EC Standardise procedures and protocols for member states and industry Improve coordination and communications between all stakeholders Promoting proper risk assessment prior to decision-making Due for publication date 2015/early 2016

Potential obstacles to Granting a Place of Refuge “Any port in a storm” Potential obstacles to Granting a Place of Refuge Perceived or real public or environmental concerns Inadequate national legal or policy framework Deficient or ineffective central and/or local Government decision processes Lack of experience of maritime casualty handling Lack of guidance on maritime incident management, co-ordination and communication Inadequate equipment resources Political considerations

Potential obstacles to Granting a Place of Refuge – contd. “Any port in a storm” Potential obstacles to Granting a Place of Refuge – contd. Larger vessels means fewer potential PoRs Dangerous cargoes-risk the safety/health Delays in obtaining cargo manifest details particularly in containerised transport Concern regarding adequacy of financial security and/or guarantees Salvor/Owner/Charter preference for a specific PoR Multiple PoR requests

“Any port in a storm” Challenges for States To introduce operational procedures for central & local Government, Agencies, Port and Harbour Authorities To introduce powers for independent decision making concerning the accommodation of ships in need of assistance (e.g. UK SOSREP and Australian MERCOM); and To make technical and time-critical decisions without delay or recourse to political authority To implement effective stakeholder engagement strategy including consultation with shipowners, salvors and property and liability insurers

Challenges for Shipping & Insurance Industries “Any port in a storm” Challenges for Shipping & Insurance Industries Promoting streamlining of government/maritime authority decision processes Encouraging States implementation of relevant IMO Conventions Encouraging use of IMO PoR Guidelines Working in collaboration with Government/maritime authorities Countering negativity e.g. from pressure groups, media Responding to insurance challenges presented by major claims Promoting effective stakeholder communication and co-operation

“Any port in a storm” Conclusions No need for “panic response” e.g. a PoR Convention Managing maritime casualties is a sophisticated and complex exercise but the expertise is there Stakeholders can collaborate to minimise risk by: (i) developing and implementing effective emergency plans (ii) streamlining communication and decision-making processes (iii) Ensuring transparency (iv) Working collaboratively (v) Building mutual confidence

www.igpandi.org